This topic is locked from further discussion.
I really don't know. I think this game will either do really good, or just completely suck. All of the delays and problems don't make it look so hot. Impex
exactly. I mean silicon knights had to basically start the engine over from scratch due to that whole Epic situation.. I see this game being very rushed and incomplete, it really looks very underwhelming.
Not even close to being in the same league as Lair.Heil68
what i meant was, i think its going to turn out to be really hyped a month or so before it comes out and flopping hard when it does come out. This game looked bad from day 1 and dont think im defending Lair either. I thought Lair looked like pure garbage the moment i saw it also
[QUOTE="Impex"]I really don't know. I think this game will either do really good, or just completely suck. All of the delays and problems don't make it look so hot. ChristopherM80
exactly. I mean silicon knights had to basically start the engine over from scratch due to that whole Epic situation.. I see this game being very rushed and incomplete, it really looks very underwhelming.
True. I mean, the game was supposed to come out on the Playstation, wasn't it? Now that they have the technical power to get it out in the hands of consumers, all of that crap had to happen. I'd rather them take another year and polish it up than rush it. I'll have enough to play in '08 as it is.
I think its gonna be great for a few reasons.
Developer- Silicon Knights has proven that not only can they make a great quality game(Eternal Darkness) but they are consistantly smooth(MGS twin snakes and ofcourse Eternal Darkness
Story- ITs a great blend of norse mythology from what ive heard, and oh yeah i loved the story telling in Eternal Darkness. ANd as an MGS fan, i loved the over the top cutscenes in that game.
Gameplay- a good mix of DMC and Diablo( that sounds good to me). Action gameplay with RPG elements.
Multiplayer- 4 player online coop.
I say this will be an under the radar AA game that just doesnt sell alot.
jg4xchamp
I think its gonna be great for a few reasons.
Developer- Silicon Knights has proven that not only can they make a great quality game(Eternal Darkness) but they are consistantly smooth(MGS twin snakes and ofcourse Eternal Darkness
Story- ITs a great blend of norse mythology from what ive heard, and oh yeah i loved the story telling in Eternal Darkness. ANd as an MGS fan, i loved the over the top cutscenes in that game.
Gameplay- a good mix of DMC and Diablo( that sounds good to me). Action gameplay with RPG elements.
Multiplayer- 4 player online coop.
I say this will be an under the radar AA game that just doesnt sell alot.
jg4xchamp
Yea, it wont sell well at all. I personally think online coop is highly overrated.. I want full online multiplayer like Team deathmatch and CTF type stuff, online coop makes the game way too easy. Thats why i also think Army of two looks like Garbage, its all about Coop
I played Lair it was pure flop material but didn't deserve the 4.5(More like a 6.0).
Too Human used to look like a 6.0 game but I think the delays have served it well and now it looks like a solid 8.0 title.
Lair was not a good game so please don't put down Too Human lol. I love Mythology in general so the Norse setting it's attempting
to portray looks very interesting along with the analog battle system.
this is not a 360 bashing thread. I love my 360 and think its by far the Greatest console this gen and one of the greatest consoles ever made.. ChristopherM80
You do know we can see your posting history, right?
[QUOTE="ChristopherM80"][QUOTE="Impex"]I really don't know. I think this game will either do really good, or just completely suck. All of the delays and problems don't make it look so hot. Impex
exactly. I mean silicon knights had to basically start the engine over from scratch due to that whole Epic situation.. I see this game being very rushed and incomplete, it really looks very underwhelming.
True. I mean, the game was supposed to come out on the Playstation, wasn't it? Now that they have the technical power to get it out in the hands of consumers, all of that crap had to happen. I'd rather them take another year and polish it up than rush it. I'll have enough to play in '08 as it is.
no it was supposed to be a gamecube exclusive. But when they found out about wii's hardware they jumped ship.
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]I think its gonna be great for a few reasons.
Developer- Silicon Knights has proven that not only can they make a great quality game(Eternal Darkness) but they are consistantly smooth(MGS twin snakes and ofcourse Eternal Darkness
Story- ITs a great blend of norse mythology from what ive heard, and oh yeah i loved the story telling in Eternal Darkness. ANd as an MGS fan, i loved the over the top cutscenes in that game.
Gameplay- a good mix of DMC and Diablo( that sounds good to me). Action gameplay with RPG elements.
Multiplayer- 4 player online coop.
I say this will be an under the radar AA game that just doesnt sell alot.
ChristopherM80
I think its gonna be great for a few reasons.
Developer- Silicon Knights has proven that not only can they make a great quality game(Eternal Darkness) but they are consistantly smooth(MGS twin snakes and ofcourse Eternal Darkness
Story- ITs a great blend of norse mythology from what ive heard, and oh yeah i loved the story telling in Eternal Darkness. ANd as an MGS fan, i loved the over the top cutscenes in that game.
Gameplay- a good mix of DMC and Diablo( that sounds good to me). Action gameplay with RPG elements.
Multiplayer- 4 player online coop.
I say this will be an under the radar AA game that just doesnt sell alot.
jg4xchamp
Yea, it wont sell well at all. I personally think online coop is highly overrated.. I want full online multiplayer like Team deathmatch and CTF type stuff, online coop makes the game way too easy. Thats why i also think Army of two looks like Garbage, its all about Coop
its a single player game, and not everything needs its multiplayer to be deathmatch.Well Lair had a lot of Hype and flopped.
Too Human on the other hand has flaws everyone is aware of, its more hope than hype.
Personaly, I am looking forward to Too Human even though I know it won't score well. Its story andcustomization optionsis enough for me to keep interest.
:lol:[QUOTE="EPaul"]Weren't you a Cow like a week ago? :?Spartan_024
He'll probably be a sheep next week.
lmao
Lemmings you have a infiltrator like the terminator, he's going to sabotage the system:lol:H3llstrike
No one takes him that serious. At least I hope not :shock:
All hating on too human are from cows beeing afraid of the 360 getting another awsome game.
Nothing more ,nothing less.
Silicon knights is an innovative and high quality developer. They will deliver a high quality product. Simple as that. Too human will score somewhere between 8,0 and 9,5. A lower score would be a big suprise.
Something about this game has major flop written all over it.. its wierd because when i watch gameplay vids of Too human i feel the same way i use to when i watched Gameplay vids of Lair, just something about it looks like it will be a major flop and i cant quite explain what it is.. Sure Silicon Knights are alright devs, but then again Factor 5 was also.. I really see Too Human being the Lair of 2008, I dont quite think it will score as low as lair but I easily see it scoring a 6.5 and MAYBE a 7.0 and even thats being generous.. and no this is not a 360 bashing thread. I love my 360 and think its by far the Greatest console this gen and one of the greatest consoles ever made.. Im talking strickly the game alone, Too Human looks like its going to flop hardChristopherM80
You compare a crap game like Lair to a action/RPG like Too Human ? That is a AAAA game already to me, has a host of unique armors and items like diablo, classes to choose from, eerie setting and mythology behind it
hahahahahaha, Too Human will not be anything like Lair, will probably be AAA
Aye, I don't think many have high hopes for Too Human though, so it won't have quite the sting Lair did.
The two schools of thought seem to be that it'll either be fantastic, or utterly terrible. I fall into the latter group, although I would very much like to be disproven, but all the problems with its development make me think that shan't happen.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment