Just want to know some answers to some of my questions about the point of views of the 360 fanbase about this gen war. I like to understand my enemies.
1. Waitstation? Why the joke? PS fans are use to waiting for great games to come, but the good things is they always come. Is not true that you guys waiting for great games too(Halo 3, Mass Effect, Bioshock)?
But the PS3 launch was about as bad as the GameCubes. Resistence was the only "killer app" then, and it hasn't really gained another one since. Hence, PS3 owners are "waiting" for the next big title.
2. Do you really think a system that is $200 less is a better multi-media function? Are you saying that $200 extra we paying we getting ripped-off?
The PS3 is worth the money... if you're looking for a big multimedia hub. But for those who don't care about Blu-Ray or HD-DVD, the PS3 is a rip-off for just a gaming machine. Want a Blu-Ray player? Great. Get a PS3. Dont care about HD movies? Then why spend $200 on something that does you no good?
3. This is for the Jrpg lovers who bought a 360. Why go with the system with the least Japanese support for the genre you love? Why would you ignore the great Jrpg games that are on the PS3? You do love Jrpgs do you?
Blue Dragon and Eternal Sonata are both looking real good. They could be a change in direction on the JRPG front. Not to mention I beat Enchanted Arms about 6 months before the PS3 got it.
4. Why would you think PS3 will fail? Isn't already evident that it will not go the way of Dreamcast, Neo-Geo, or 3DO?
 It ISN'T evident that it won't go the way of other dead consoles? Lackluster sales, poor games catalog, and 3rd party exclusives leaving Sony aren't exactly touting Sony's dominance this gen. Cross that with the ever-popular $600 US price tag and a next-gen media player that probably won't be anything but a niche item (algon with HD-DVD) and they're not exactly inspiring confidence.
5. How come you can say great games like PDZ, Kameo, Dead Rising, and Call of Duty 2 are ok, but when a PS3 fan says that we have great games like Tiger Wood, Tekken DR, Virtua Fighter, R:FOM, and Motorstorm those are not ok?
Because most of those games have a counterpart on the 360. Racers and sports games are a dime a dozen. Virtual Figter will be out in a month or two, and R:FOM by is countered be Gears. The question is "Why would a person strictly interested in gaming want to spend $200 US more to play pretty much the same games? Most people in ANY country don't have the disposable income to afford BOTH the 360 and PS3.
6. How many of you actually played a PS3?
I can't speak for the others, but I have, and it's hasn't impressed me yet. The games just aren't there and graphics aren't the most important thing to me. Neither is it's multimedia package for that matter.
7. You saying blu-ray is not need. You do know you can only compress so much right?
Blu-Ray is NOT NEEDED FOR GAMING. Whether it's creating better compression or *gasp* getting off my lazy butt for 5 seconds to change a disc, Blu-Ray doesn't offer ANYTHING to a gamer (with exception to slightly better load times in most instances, but if load times were THAT important we'de either still be using carts, or the GameCube would have RULED last gen).Blu-Ray and HD-DVD are REALLY nice for movies and TV shows, but no real reason for it's use in games.
8. Lastly, You a big supporter of what Microsoft doing with the Xbox360. That means you understand the direction they want to take the Xbox franchise, right? Great 3rd party support, HD gaming, Online gameplay, and Community interactions. If follow all that then why do you dislike the PS3? Is it not doing the same thing?
"Great 3rd party support" is the only thing you mention that has a REAL draw to ALL people who play games. Most people don't have HD TVs yet. Many people don't like playing online, and if they don't dig online play, they don't care about the community.
It all boils down to games and price. GameCube had the price but few games. That's why it failied. PS2 had both, that's why it won. Wii HAS both, that's why it's doing so well, and why most people predict it's continued success.
The 360 has a full year's worth of games more than the PS3 does, and it has them at a price tag $200 US less than Sony. Not to mention a LOT of PS3 "exclusives" aren't so exclusive anymore. So the argument comes to, price and exclusives. Sony has a BIG price and lacking/losing exclusives while the 360 has a price people are getting comfortable with and gaining games daily.
My solution? Wii + DS + 360 = I've got more games than I know what to do with. And it cost me $750. 3 great systems for a little more than the price of 1 great system. But that was my coice. People need to make their own.
shungokustasu
I know all of my points are arguable to preference, but those are answers. Oh, and I'm not a lemming.Â
Log in to comment