[QUOTE="Telekill"]It's all a matter of opinion. My opinion is that PS1 was better than N64 and Saturn and Virtual Boy. PS2 is better than Gamecube and Xbox. And lastly, that PS3 is better than Wii and 360. That's simply my opinion, and a lame attempt at an insult or throwing shame where it doesn't belong isn't going to change it.Buff-McBlumpkin
I can understand the PS1 and PS2 thing (Hell, I enjoyed the PS2 the most out of the systems last generation as well and I owned all three, the amount of killer games on it was/is crazy,) but the PS3 "Is Better than the Wii and the 360?" I understand that's your opinion, but I'd like to hear what that opinion is based on. I can understand "The PS3 will/might be better than the Wii and 360 (based on the outstanding quality of games on the previous Sony systems,") but "Is?"Â Based on what? Brand name alone? Fanboy love?
I, for one, base a system's worth on the quality of the games in its current library, and as of right now the PS3 is sorely, sorely lacking in that department. Hell, it has been four months and its highest rated game is an 8.6. It has set the record on Gamespot for the longest a system has every gone post-launch without a 9.0+ game. I guess that's what makes me a minority in this forum, I don't give a damn about brand names - only the quality of games.
Fanboys, hahaha.
i compeletely agree with u there
ps3 will/can be greater then the 360/wii but at its current state its still lagging behind...
and honestly ps2 and ps1 had the most AAA tittles and AA tittles for any console during their generation... those facts alone dont lie(100million plus user base doensnt lie either i say 100 million cause im factoring in that about 20 million crapped out)
Log in to comment