Bad Company 2 Mutiplayer or Modern Warfare 2 Multiplayer (Poll)

  • 55 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Cubs360
Cubs360

3771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Cubs360
Member since 2006 • 3771 Posts

I've played both these extensively. Of course I've only played the demo of Bad Company 2, but I have played about 10 hrs. I think I like Bad Company 2 better than MW 2. I think its more balenced and has more variety. What I do think MW2 does do better is gun play, The responsiveness of the weapons and satisfaction seems to be better. BC2 has much better immersion, and sound effects. Graphics are about the same. BC2 does seem a little more clunky on the control side, and I hate the fact that you cannot lay down like you can in MW 2. What do you guys think?

Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

i think both are great

Avatar image for Deadly02
Deadly02

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Deadly02
Member since 2009 • 51 Posts

MW2 for me. From what i saw in the gameplay videos, BF:BC 2 doesn't look so awesome

Avatar image for emorainbo
emorainbo

3067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 emorainbo
Member since 2008 • 3067 Posts

MW2 is twitchier and has better controls. BC2 has better gun physics, has bigger maps and vehicles. I think BC2 is way better, I can actually see people working together in this rather than lone wolfing it just to get a higher K/D.

Avatar image for Regisland
Regisland

2390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Regisland
Member since 2009 • 2390 Posts

I prefer playing a game where I cant die with only 3 shots.

Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

I've played both these extensively. Of course I've only played the demo of Bad Company 2, but I have played about 10 hrs. I think I like Bad Company 2 better than MW 2. I think its more balenced and has more variety.

What I do think MW2 does do better is gun play, The responsiveness of the weapons and satisfaction seems to be better. MW2 gunplay is just noobish, Too easy to get kills. BC2 does a better job with guns. However, the gun models in MW2 look better because the guns arent really "dirty". They seem new :P.

BC2 has much better immersion, and sound effects.Agree.

Graphics are about the same. Are you joking? MW2 graphics are ugly compared to BC2. Plus BC2 has destructive environments.

. BC2 does seem a little more clunky on the control side, It isnt as arcady, guns have somewhat of a feel to them.

and I hate the fact that you cannot lay down like you can in MW 2. Have to fully agree on this one, its a battlefield war type of game, they need it so you can go prone.

What do you guys think?

Badcompany is wayy better, even the demo i thought was better than MW2.

Cubs360

Just my opinion on what youve said..

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
I prefer larger open maps, destructibility and vehicles to MW 2's style, so BC 2. MW 2 was too claustrophobic with too many silly perks and people running around with no particular purpose- it didn't keep me occupied for long.
Avatar image for tirralirra
tirralirra

2261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 tirralirra
Member since 2009 • 2261 Posts

BC2 easily. MW2 looks better, but BC2 is only a demo at the moment, so no real comparisons can be made. Gameplay-wise, i can see who you think it'd clunky. Feels more like KZ2 but not as exagerrated, which is a good thing, much better than CODs twitchy gunplay. Good amount of recoil, spray and pray is impossible unless at close range. Definitely more balance, one thing I hate about COD is how overpowered the Snipers can, even at massively long range. BC2 requires you to get a headshot (usually need to aim about a cm above their head - gravity) or shoot again. Also, you have gravity on the bullets too and there's more than enough weapons and attachments. Vehicles feel great too. Just waiting for a BF3 now.

Edit: Dirt is not part of a gun model... :roll:

I'll stress again, BC2 does not look as good as MW2. Much larger maps, vehicles, more activity and destructable environments makes this difficult. And lack of prone is a good thing. No campers. The camo in BC2 is better done making courched people hard enough to see anyway. Also, BF series is much more like a sim compared to COD. In COD, where some places you can't prone, they're are many areas where proning would be difficult/unfeasible. BC2 avoids this grey area but simply disabling it. Too many times I can avoid getting killed in COD by going straight into prone.

Finally, you can kill and get killed in a 1v1 gun fight which isn't possible in COD.

Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

Well BC2 isn't out yet... So idk, but I hated MW2's online. The glitchiest Most camper/noob friendly game Ive ever played

Avatar image for Combii
Combii

755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 Combii
Member since 2009 • 755 Posts

It's not the same games.

Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#11 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

I really like both, but I'd say Bad Company 2 as there isn't near as many problems online as MW2 (camping, killstreaks, heartbeat sensors, akimbo shotguns, glitches, etc.) But I really like bother, but BC2 seems more well done to me.

Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts

BC2, i just like class based shooters better

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#13 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

I prefer Bad Company 2 by far. MW2 has a nice single player but i dont like MW2´s fast paced mp

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#14 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts
There's only one right answer. And by the looks of it, people know what the right answer is. :P
Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#15 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

Bad Company 2 is the superior game IMO. From the betas I have played (Arica Harbor and Port Valdez) I have had much more fun with Battlefield.

Avatar image for AndyAlfredo
AndyAlfredo

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 AndyAlfredo
Member since 2009 • 1402 Posts

I even liked the beta more than MW2, and the new demo blows the beta out of the water.

And bullet drop rules. Long range headshots ftw.

Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#17 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
BFBC2 without a doubt.
Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts
I like both, and they both need to take note from each other.
Avatar image for me_rock
me_rock

2462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 me_rock
Member since 2004 • 2462 Posts

Well MW2 is broken beyond repair, and BC2 demo is awesome, so I'm going with BC2.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
BC2 looks like it's going to take a major hit in MW2 numbers
Avatar image for DaViD_99
DaViD_99

2496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 DaViD_99
Member since 2007 • 2496 Posts

After playing the demo, Bad Company 2 for sure.

Avatar image for anotherone10
anotherone10

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 anotherone10
Member since 2008 • 1559 Posts

MW2 for me. From what i saw in the gameplay videos, BF:BC 2 doesn't look so awesome

Deadly02

Most people judge a game after they have actually played it :roll:

Avatar image for good_sk8er7
good_sk8er7

4327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#23 good_sk8er7
Member since 2009 • 4327 Posts

Wow the results of this poll just suck for MW2 lol.

I choose BC2 :)

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#24 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

It really depends, MW2 is quicker, closer and faster paced. The aiming and speed are all tuned to hone your twitch shooting, and the small maps make speed and independence major factors. BC2 is less personal, with less customization and options for expressing yourself, but its larger and more team based. The vehicles take the place of killstreaks allowing anyone access, while it encourages working together and doing objectives over getting kills and speeding through.

Overall, you can't really compare. Both are great, but different enough you can't pick a definitive better game.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#25 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Its all about Battlefield Bad Company 2

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#26 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

It really depends, MW2 is quicker, closer and faster paced. The aiming and speed are all tuned to hone your twitch shooting, and the small maps make speed and independence major factors. BC2 is less personal, with less customization and options for expressing yourself, but its larger and more team based. The vehicles take the place of killstreaks allowing anyone access, while it encourages working together and doing objectives over getting kills and speeding through.

Overall, you can't really compare. Both are great, but different enough you can't pick a definitive better game.

SPYDER0416

Of course they are completely comparable. BFBC 2 has a class system, some light perks, and leveling system but it is not as noob friendly with broken builds and whatnot.

BFBC2 also has bullets that travel, destructable enviroments, and much more team based objectives. If you don't fight as a team, you lose as a team.

Overall MW2 imay be the most dumbed down competitive shooter ever made. It was made so ALL players have a fair chance at winning. Deathstreaks, killstreaks, heavy emphasis on perks, and the insane level system (that completely takes away from any team play), all are attempts at making it so everybody is exactly equal no matter how good you are.

In BF BC2, it isn't twitched based. If your fingers aren't as fast as mine that is no problem. Get points by healing other, fixing things, resupplying ammo, or flank the enemy and easily kill them. MW2 forces head first engagements with its small maps with very little team tactics. A noob there is only balanced by perks and streaks. In BF BC2, a noob can find easy ways to adapt with its much more open sytle of maps.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

Why on Earth isn't MAG in that poll. MAG for the win most definitly. MAG gives an action packed experience, like MW2 while doing it on huge maps like bc2 provides. One game is to noobish (mw2) and the other game is a ghost town (bc2) while MAG, is more hardcore (hate saying that) and provides plenty of targets to engage, giving a non stop thrill ride of full blown action.

Move over boy and girls theirs a new kid on the block and that is MAG!!!

Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts

Why on Earth isn't MAG in that poll. MAG for the win most definitly. MAG gives an action packed experience, like MW2 while doing it on huge maps like bc2 provides. One game is to noobish (mw2) and the other game is a ghost town (bc2) while MAG, is more hardcore (hate saying that) and provides plenty of targets to engage, giving a non stop thrill ride of full blown action.

Move over boy and girls theirs a new kid on the block and that is MAG!!!

GreyFoXX4

Have you eaven played the darn game? Altough i only played the MAG beta, i got bored to tears in minutes. I dont know if they fixed it, but there i had about as much fun as watching paint dry.

BF:BC2 ghost town? 12 v 12 in BFBC2 will make more noise, more destruction, more killing, more mindless panic, more *OMGWTF THAT WAS SO FRIGGIN AWSOME* moments in a minute then all 256 players in MAG in one spot would do in a hundred years

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

BC2 by a landslide. It is infinitely more tactical and squad-based.

Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts

Bad Company 2 all the way. Judging by the demo, it's a far superior experience to MW2 in evey way, imo. I can see most who voted agree. :D

Avatar image for TheOwnerOner
TheOwnerOner

2921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 TheOwnerOner
Member since 2007 • 2921 Posts
BF is a bit more refreshing, but overall I'd have to give it to MW both are great
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

Why on Earth isn't MAG in that poll. MAG for the win most definitly. MAG gives an action packed experience, like MW2 while doing it on huge maps like bc2 provides. One game is to noobish (mw2) and the other game is a ghost town (bc2) while MAG, is more hardcore (hate saying that) and provides plenty of targets to engage, giving a non stop thrill ride of full blown action.

Move over boy and girls theirs a new kid on the block and that is MAG!!!

chaplainDMK

Have you eaven played the darn game? Altough i only played the MAG beta, i got bored to tears in minutes. I dont know if they fixed it, but there i had about as much fun as watching paint dry.

BF:BC2 ghost town? 12 v 12 in BFBC2 will make more noise, more destruction, more killing, more mindless panic, more *OMGWTF THAT WAS SO FRIGGIN AWSOME* moments in a minute then all 256 players in MAG in one spot would do in a hundred years

Yes I have played THE DARN GAME, the actuall GAME actually, while I also played the beta for MAG, the beta that didn't have 256 players. And as you stated it didn't grab me aswell. But I have to say once I hit level 8 in the game and got to battle in the 256 player games, it was on from there. After having those battles and getting the full feel of the fight between factions I fully enjoy the smaller matches now. The community and the hatred amoung factions is just awesome now lol :)

Dude I'll just say this MAG has truely been a pleasant surprise to me. LAG free gameplay, smooth frame rates, team work has been awesome, action is non stop, great community that I promise will continue to grow. The game is definitly addictive, and it makes you want to jump on and just help your faction out if not just playing sabotage for 15 or 20 mins., you really tend to start to feel like you are part of something. Like right now we on Valor have earned contracts on Sabo that gives +5 exp points and on Requistion that gives a -5% cool down time on artillary. And those are earned through wins and losses by a faction. MAG is truely a thrill ride.

P.S. And the heathens that are SVER have earned contracts on Domination. If your a SVER, I promise I have a cross hair on you :)

Avatar image for Nerd_Man
Nerd_Man

13819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Nerd_Man
Member since 2007 • 13819 Posts
Bad Company 2's multiplayer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Warfare 2's multiplayer
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

I've only played the BFBC2 demo on the PS3 and so far I dont like the game at all. The graphics the gun play nothing feels right. When I shoot at someone it takes for ever for them to die. I'm buying the game on the PC so I'm hoping I will like that version Better. So far I like COD4 better than both MW2 and BC2. So in my opinion COD4>>>MW2>>>BC2. I hate MW2 because I suck at, but I still play the game because I want to get better at it. I played BC2 demo and I hope I will find the good in the game, because so far I dont like the game at all.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
BFBC2. Game is just awesome. I played the PS3 beta for quite a long time and I really can't wait to get my hands on the PC version. It's going to be awesome. Everything just feels better than MW2.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

Oh yea MAG has prone position :P

Avatar image for Hanass
Hanass

2204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#37 Hanass
Member since 2008 • 2204 Posts

I've only played the BFBC2 demo on the PS3 and so far I dont like the game at all. The graphics the gun play nothing feels right. When I shoot at someone it takes for ever for them to die. I'm buying the game on the PC so I'm hoping I will like that version Better. So far I like COD4 better than both MW2 and BC2. So in my opinion COD4>>>MW2>>>BC2. I hate MW2 because I suck at, but I still play the game because I want to get better at it. I played BC2 demo and I hope I will find the good in the game, because so far I dont like the game at all.

GTSaiyanjin2

You got used to the insta-kill noobfest in MW2, that's why you think it takes "forever" to kill someone in BFBC2. In reality, the amount of bullets it takes to kill someone in BFBC2 is perfectly normal, just like any other shooter (Halo, Counter-Strike Source, Team Fortress 2...); MW2 is the problem, not this game.

Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#38 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

BF:BC2 is a lot better than MW2. For one thing, it's fun, and for another thing, it's challenging. I laugh at all those people who say it takes an entire clip of ammo to kill someone. Shooting in bursts help a lot. The teamwork is a lot better, and it actually feels like I'm fighting in a battle most of the time.

Avatar image for Renzokucant
Renzokucant

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 Renzokucant
Member since 2009 • 3157 Posts
ouch lol. MW2 owned
Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts
LMFAO @ Poll results! Bad Company 2 is my choice. The scale is extensive. The amount of weapons, equipment and actual CONTROLLABLE vehicles is a mega plus as well. Also one of the most strategic shooters this gen alongside MAG and Killzone 2 (even though some may think they all pale in comparison to BF2). No prone is a downside.
Avatar image for Dystopian-X
Dystopian-X

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Dystopian-X
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts
[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]LMFAO @ Poll results!

Yeah you could say this places loves it's BC2 lol. -Votes-
Avatar image for Slywolf10
Slywolf10

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Slywolf10
Member since 2009 • 530 Posts

Imo MW2=played for like a month nonstop, bfbc2=i will still play at after like a year.

Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts
I honestly think KZ2 should be compared to BFBC2 more than MW2. THAT would be an epic showdown of two tactical squad based shooters. Team work and proper use of classes are required in these games. Plus Killzone 2 already knocked Modern Borefare Poo from the throne IMO :D. Killzone 2 and Bad Company 2 are by far the best multiplayer games I've played this gen (so far). And thanks to the AMAZING DICE we will get another spectacular MP from them later this year with Medal of Honor!
Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

I honestly think KZ2 should be compared to BFBC2 more than MW2. THAT would be an epic showdown of two tactical squad based shooters. Team work and proper use of classes are required in these games. Plus Killzone 2 already knocked Modern Borefare Poo from the throne IMO :D. Killzone 2 and Bad Company 2 are by far the best multiplayer games I've played this gen (so far). And thanks to the AMAZING DICE we will get another spectacular MP from them later this year with Medal of Honor!TREAL_Since

its just too bad that the noobs dont know how to shoot in KZ2 (or cry because of a little bit of weight to the guns). noobs: gametrailers.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts
I honestly think KZ2 should be compared to BFBC2 more than MW2. THAT would be an epic showdown of two tactical squad based shooters. Team work and proper use of classes are required in these games. Plus Killzone 2 already knocked Modern Borefare Poo from the throne IMO :D. Killzone 2 and Bad Company 2 are by far the best multiplayer games I've played this gen (so far). And thanks to the AMAZING DICE we will get another spectacular MP from them later this year with Medal of Honor!TREAL_Since
I just wish GG's would have made more maps like pyris rise, KZ2 shines on the big maps and very comparable to BF2, and seeing how everyone works together on those. Smaller maps is teamplay aswell, but boy is it a blood bath lol.
Avatar image for mD-
mD-

4314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 mD-
Member since 2005 • 4314 Posts

You guys I'm actually really annoyed. I haven't played Killzone 2 yet, but if it's anything as enjoyable as the Bad Company 2 demo, then I'll feel like an idiot..

This video has convinced me to seriously consider buying Bad Company 2:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SKH1eHep7c

THAT IS THE SINGLE PLAYER CAMPAIGN AND IT LOOKS ****ING INCREDIBLE... I'm at a loss for words almost because I had no idea it would be looking that good. If this game releases with not a lot of bugs, DICE has really outdone themselves. I'm just praying that they didn't rush this games release and they polished/tested the **** out of this game.


Again if you haven't, watch this video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SKH1eHep7c

What really gets me is the explosive AND diverse sound quality. The graphics are also one of the best. The gameplay looks fun and one that takes effort to master with all the various types of vehicles and guns with different recoil (unlike other games that have guns with barely any recoil. *cough MW2*).

Btw, this is coming from a past CS:S player who has almost mastered all the guns in the series as they have be treated differently in terms of controlling recoil. I think I'll wait for reviews, but if they game is like what I see in this video, then it's going to be.


FFXIII, GoW3, And Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (I'll get Mass Effect 2 and MAYBE Killzone 2 later)

Avatar image for aznfool07
aznfool07

3552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 aznfool07
Member since 2005 • 3552 Posts
Battlefield for the epic intense battles and mw2 for the short fun games.
Avatar image for movin_target
movin_target

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#48 movin_target
Member since 2005 • 3412 Posts

I'd say I prefer BC2 over MW2, that isn't saying much though.

I hate to bring a third game in, but I say MAG trumps the two overall in my opinion.

Avatar image for tirralirra
tirralirra

2261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 tirralirra
Member since 2009 • 2261 Posts

You guys I'm actually really annoyed. I haven't played Killzone 2 yet, but if it's anything as enjoyable as the Bad Company 2 demo, then I'll feel like an idiot..

This video has convinced me to seriously consider buying Bad Company 2:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SKH1eHep7c

THAT IS THE SINGLE PLAYER CAMPAIGN AND IT LOOKS ****ING INCREDIBLE... I'm at a loss for words almost because I had no idea it would be looking that good. If this game releases with not a lot of bugs, DICE has really outdone themselves. I'm just praying that they didn't rush this games release and they polished/tested the **** out of this game.


Again if you haven't, watch this video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SKH1eHep7c

What really gets me is the explosive AND diverse sound quality. The graphics are also one of the best. The gameplay looks fun and one that takes effort to master with all the various types of vehicles and guns with different recoil (unlike other games that have guns with barely any recoil. *cough MW2*).

Btw, this is coming from a past CS:S player who has almost mastered all the guns in the series as they have be treated differently in terms of controlling recoil. I think I'll wait for reviews, but if they game is like what I see in this video, then it's going to be.


FFXIII, GoW3, And Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (I'll get Mass Effect 2 and MAYBE Killzone 2 later)

mD-

On the sound, the best thing about it, is when it changes tone and pitch for say, when you've been shot. Having 5.1 dolby digital makes this a wonder! And yes, the gun play is comparable with KZ2, as are the maps and team work (although KZ2 is some more congested maps). I just wish KZ2 MP had all the vehicles and heavy artillery it had in the SP.

BC2 is great, but somehow, i feel the overall gameplay is off from BF2. Gunplay is better, land vehicles about the same, but air vehicles feel a bit sketchy sometimes.

Gunplay (the most important aspect of any FPS) is amazing, beats KZ2 and topped that as best gunplay this gen.

Avatar image for powerman91
powerman91

692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 powerman91
Member since 2008 • 692 Posts

I've only played the BFBC2 demo on the PS3 and so far I dont like the game at all. The graphics the gun play nothing feels right. When I shoot at someone it takes for ever for them to die. I'm buying the game on the PC so I'm hoping I will like that version Better. So far I like COD4 better than both MW2 and BC2. So in my opinion COD4>>>MW2>>>BC2. I hate MW2 because I suck at, but I still play the game because I want to get better at it. I played BC2 demo and I hope I will find the good in the game, because so far I dont like the game at all.

GTSaiyanjin2
If you use burst fire on enemies at a distance you'll kill them faster because its more accurate and Im pretty sure the graphics for the demo arent as good as the actual game will be. Just get rid of the CoD4 and MW2 mindset and you'll probably enjoy the game.