Bad Company 2 vs Modern Warfare 2!

BadCompany2

VS

ModernWarfare2

i think both look great. but i'll probably only be getting bad company 2 though(i like battlefield more :-P, but that's just me :-) )

what are your thoughts?

MW2 over BC2 but BC2 will definately be a good game. I hope there's more game modes online.hoosier7

[QUOTE="hoosier7"]MW2 over BC2 but BC2 will definately be a good game. I hope there's more game modes online.Next-Gen-Tec

I think they have snow mobiles online in BC2, i'm gonna enjoy making car bombs out of those!hoosier7

BC2. Screw Activision. Plus I think BC is just more fun to play than any COD game.

BC2 for me. Vehicles, larger maps, destructive environments, awesome sound, and more immersive atmosphere.

mw2... its confiremed that mw2 has more levels types apart from snow but bad company 2 is snowy so far, and i dont like the snow.

battlefield 3 will be better that mw2 but bc2 will not be as good as mw2

BC2 for me. Vehicles, larger maps, destructive environments, awesome sound, and more immersive atmosphere.

Verge_6

The destructable able environments look really cool in BF: BC 2. And, they fixed the one problem that I had with that game: not carrying a side arm except for recon. I hated that, you would run into a battle with a SAW and some guy would tear you apart with a shotgun. Now this gives you a chance...

BC2. Screw Activision. Plus I think BC is just more fun to play than any COD game.

rogerjak

At least multiplayer wise im sure Bad Company 2 will be a lot better. Just like BC1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CoD4 imo

Still MW2 will probably have a better singleplayer.

I just got done playing CoD 2 online for the first time on the PC and I can honestly ask "Where did the CoD series go wrong?!"

Seriously, CoD 4 has very cramped levels with tons of spawning problems. No room for tactics or real teamwork. CoD 2 had very large levels, not BF2 sized but much larger than CoD 4. They are well thought out levels too with plenty of cover, room to move, and ability to use tactics. Why did the series get so arcady? Why does it want to be Unreal Tournament yet fails at being a basic shooter.

I guess all people want to do is hop in a game, shoot 50 people that are within 2 feet from them, throw nades over walls to get tons of kills, then go do something else. Nobody actually wants to experiance the joys of teamwork and cooperation.

So to be relevant to the thread, BF BC 2 is going to be the much better gaming experiance, no matter what the reviews say. Reviewers love the ADD style of gameplay in the new CoD games. They just go nuts for it. MW2 is going to be grossly overrated and going to hit easily 2+ million sales on each platform with DLC being released every three months for $15.

I just got done playing CoD 2 online for the first time on the PC and I can honestly ask "Where did the CoD series go wrong?!"

Seriously, CoD 4 has very cramped levels with tons of spawning problems. No room for tactics or real teamwork. CoD 2 had very large levels, not BF2 sized but much larger than CoD 4. They are well thought out levels too with plenty of cover, room to move, and ability to use tactics. Why did the series get so arcady? Why does it want to be Unreal Tournament yet fails at being a basic shooter.

I guess all people want to do is hop in a game, shoot 50 people that are within 2 feet from them, throw nades over walls to get tons of kills, then go do something else. Nobody actually wants to experiance the joys of teamwork and cooperation.

So to be relevant to the thread, BF BC 2 is going to be the much better gaming experiance, no matter what the reviews say. Reviewers love the ADD style of gameplay in the new CoD games. They just go nuts for it. MW2 is going to be grossly overrated and going to hit easily 2+ million sales on each platform with DLC being released every three months for $15.

Wasdie

I just got done playing CoD 2 online for the first time on the PC and I can honestly ask "Where did the CoD series go wrong?!"

Seriously, CoD 4 has very cramped levels with tons of spawning problems. No room for tactics or real teamwork. CoD 2 had very large levels, not BF2 sized but much larger than CoD 4. They are well thought out levels too with plenty of cover, room to move, and ability to use tactics. Why did the series get so arcady? Why does it want to be Unreal Tournament yet fails at being a basic shooter.

I guess all people want to do is hop in a game, shoot 50 people that are within 2 feet from them, throw nades over walls to get tons of kills, then go do something else. Nobody actually wants to experiance the joys of teamwork and cooperation.

So to be relevant to the thread, BF BC 2 is going to be the much better gaming experiance, no matter what the reviews say. Reviewers love the ADD style of gameplay in the new CoD games. They just go nuts for it. MW2 is going to be grossly overrated and going to hit easily 2+ million sales on each platform with DLC being released every three months for $15.

easy one, both

bf is my fav though

Eh, BC is the game with spawning problems. I can't see it being better than MW2.Next-Gen-Tec

[QUOTE="Next-Gen-Tec"]Eh, BC is the game with spawning problems. I can't see it being better than MW2.kweeni

[QUOTE="kweeni"][QUOTE="Next-Gen-Tec"]Eh, BC is the game with spawning problems. I can't see it being better than MW2.Next-Gen-Tec

BC2 for sure. MW2 can take it's day one map packs and £55 price tag and jump off a cliff.

[QUOTE="kweeni"][QUOTE="Next-Gen-Tec"]Eh, BC is the game with spawning problems. I can't see it being better than MW2.Next-Gen-Tec

mw2

[QUOTE="Next-Gen-Tec"][QUOTE="kweeni"] BC doesn't have spawn problemkweeni

edit: ah, WTF happened to my post, it's missing a big chunk above...