Battlefield 2(PC)>>>>Call of Duty 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Painballz
Painballz

1058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Painballz
Member since 2008 • 1058 Posts

Battlefield is way batter than Call of Generic

Battlefield has....

Vehicles

64 Player Combat

Battlefield actually REQUIRES TEAMWORK unlike COD 4.

COD 4 is highly overrated, it sounds and plays the same as COD 2.

PC gamers don't get care much for it anymore, I've asked many people and they all say its repetitive

Battlefield 2 destorys COD 4 in every possible way.

Battlefield 3 will destroy any COD now or in the future

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts
BF2 is much better than COD4....I will agree with you their.
Avatar image for Painballz
Painballz

1058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Painballz
Member since 2008 • 1058 Posts

BF2 is much better than COD4....I will agree with you their.cobrax25

yea, BF2 is still incredibly fun, and its been out since 05

Avatar image for Relys
Relys

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Relys
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts

It has to many technicle issues. Seriously, why can't EA fix the memory leaks?

I would still chose BF2 if we're talking about just gameplay. I just played it with a friend last week and it's far better than anything else out!

Avatar image for Relys
Relys

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Relys
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts

Battlefield 3 will destroy any COD now or in the future

Painballz

Not if there's in-game advertising it won't...

I pray it won't!

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I highly dislike BF2 and have to agree. It's sad that the a game from July 2005 is superior to one from October 2007... a whole development cycle after.
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

I highly dislike BF2 and have to agree. It's sad that the a game from July 2005 is superior to one from October 2007... a whole development cycle after.foxhound_fox

typo?

Avatar image for Painballz
Painballz

1058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Painballz
Member since 2008 • 1058 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]I highly dislike BF2 and have to agree. It's sad that the a game from July 2005 is superior to one from October 2007... a whole development cycle after.cobrax25

typo?

prolly

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts
what they need in BF2, is a way to actually force people to join squads....you shouldnt be able to spawn unless your in a squad.
Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts

You should list how many patches it has too ;)

:P

Anyway, agreed.

Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
Despite your stupid threads, I completely agree. BF2 is still the best MP shooter.
Avatar image for stephant_6
stephant_6

1758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#12 stephant_6
Member since 2005 • 1758 Posts
Battlefield 2 is among the best online shooters,but is there a reason you are so agressive in your posts? You take gaming a bit too seriously IMO.
Avatar image for Holden1985
Holden1985

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Holden1985
Member since 2007 • 530 Posts
Yeah still a great game even today.
Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts
Agreed! They should give console guys a version like it not that stupid bad company.
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts
CoD is a better shooter. Battlefield has MMO elements and like you mentioned vehicles, flying jets etc etc. If you want pure shooter. CoD is superior anyday. Battlefield is just less repetitive. I personally prefer Battlefield games. On PC platform however. I will never even touch Bad Company.
Avatar image for Kirlok
Kirlok

2061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Kirlok
Member since 2008 • 2061 Posts
cod 4 online is overrated
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts

Battlefield 2 is among the best online shooters,but is there a reason you are so agressive in your posts? You take gaming a bit too seriously IMO.stephant_6

He is agressive? I don't see any exclamation signs. Stop being paranoid :P

Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts

cod 4 online is overratedKirlok

Ye perhaps slightly. It requires pretty much no tactic. Like I said. Its a pure mindless shooter. Not everyone enjoys playing quake territory/battlefield style.

Avatar image for ninjaxams
ninjaxams

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 ninjaxams
Member since 2004 • 7500 Posts
I highly dislike BF2 and have to agree. It's sad that the a game from July 2005 is superior to one from October 2007... a whole development cycle after.foxhound_fox
try november. and your wrong BTW...
Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#20 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts
This is an apples to oranges comparison - large-scale combat (BF2) vs small scale combat (COD4). Lets face it, COD4 is a bit like Socom but with more respawn game modes than non-respawn modes. A more accurate comparison would be BF2 vs something like Warhawk (I know, BF2 hands down). Anyway, I agree that BF2 is without equal for the large-scale modern combat, but for the smaller scale stuff its hard to beat COD4. I also like the COD4 ranking, unlock and perk system better than BF2. To be fair, BF2142 built on BF2's upgrade/rank system, and has a more versatile system similar to COD4.
Avatar image for smack_masta
smack_masta

2748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 smack_masta
Member since 2006 • 2748 Posts
I still prefer CS. But I agree with you.
Avatar image for Impex
Impex

5532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 Impex
Member since 2005 • 5532 Posts
Can't say I agree. I'd say 1942 with DC patch > CoD4 > BF2
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Battlefield is god. Not including those crap console versions, of course.