These are captured from the E3 trailer if anyone paid close attention. Looks pretty good ey? Cant wait to see the full demo from EA on playstation 3.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Blurry textures and probably no AA, just like BC2. The first pic reminds me of Crysis 2 which is far from awesome looking on ps3.silversix_Ps3 version has 4xmlaa
Looks like the consoles have a new contender for console graphics king.ferret-gamer
What? The new Rayman SO looks better than that!
would like to see more... Is the PS3 version going to be at E3 ? And I cant really tell much from those screen.
would like to see more... Is the PS3 version going to be at E3 ? And I cant really tell much from those screen.
GTSaiyanjin2
Supposed to be demo-ed tomorrow at the arcades/showroom.
[QUOTE="silversix_"]Blurry textures and probably no AA, just like BC2. The first pic reminds me of Crysis 2 which is far from awesome looking on ps3.SandvichmanPs3 version has 4xmlaa It has 4xmLaa? How does that work out?
''PS3 will be getting extra 4x MLAA and SPU-Deferred Shading so it should have more photo realistic/less jagged graphics and better lighting. Because of DICE's ground breaking optimizations in this area, the game may continue to run smoother on the PS3 due to less stress put on the main GPU''
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="silversix_"]Blurry textures and probably no AA, just like BC2. The first pic reminds me of Crysis 2 which is far from awesome looking on ps3.ferret-gamerPs3 version has 4xmlaa It has 4xmLaa? How does that work out?
I'm gonna assume it means MLAA to the equivilant of MSAAx4 instead of MSAAx8. I know with AMD drivers you get to set how much MLAA is applied and it had 2 different selections on its slider.
''PS3 will be getting extra 4x MLAA and SPU-Deferred Shading so it should have more photo realistic/less jagged graphics and better lighting. Because of DICE's ground breaking optimizations in this area, the game may continue to run smoother on the PS3 due to less stress put on the main GPU''
Sandvichman
Got a link? Not bashing, just curious.
So PC>PS3>360 I take.''PS3 will be getting extra 4x MLAA and SPU-Deferred Shading so it should have more photo realistic/less jagged graphics and better lighting. Because of DICE's ground breaking optimizations in this area, the game may continue to run smoother on the PS3 due to less stress put on the main GPU''
Sandvichman
that looks really sad,i bet the 360 version is gonna do a better job with the texture filtering,let alone the superior PC version.TessellationIt doesn't look really sad. I actually looks pretty decent.
[QUOTE="Tessellation"]that looks really sad,i bet the 360 version is gonna do a better job with the texture filtering,let alone the superior PC version.caseystrykerIt doesn't look really sad. I actually looks pretty decent.
It actually, from those shots, looks better than KZ3. KZ3 only looks good cause of blur otherwise it'd look like a generic PC title.
I thought the latest Radeon cards did.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]
There's no such thing as "4xMLAA". MLAA doesn't have subsamples like MSAA does.
Teufelhuhn
Looks like the consoles have a new contender for console graphics king.ferret-gamer
I agree. It looks very nice, even with the lower rez textures, the engine does a nice job with the lighting, and overall the image is still very impressive.
Looks god anyone one know what resolution it's being displayed at? Looks like Crytek is going to eat the **** they spouted out.
Slighty worse actually....well thats what they have been saying..Looks like BC2 bascially thats fine by me, guessing the 360 will just be slightly better.
razgriz_101
[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]Slighty worse actually....well thats what they have been saying..Looks like BC2 bascially thats fine by me, guessing the 360 will just be slightly better.
ShadowDeathX
was thinkin the 360 might handle AA better but who knows.
Great. Post youtube screen caps and give the LEMs more ammo ;P
Personally I'm betting the PS3 will be better then the 360 version becase they are actually utilizing the cell and not just giving a gimped port of the 360 version.
Ha! I guessed right :lol: Cutscenes were the PS3 footage :P
ChubbyGuy40
Thank god. I remember watching them and thought they actually looked kind of poor and I was a little disappointed. Now it makes sense.
I thought the latest Radeon cards did.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]
There's no such thing as "4xMLAA". MLAA doesn't have subsamples like MSAA does.
Teufelhuhn
There's 2-8x of it...
Still not impressive considering it's still stripped down. Also, there is a huge lack of facts regarding console versions. I am very cautious with BF3 on consoles
Xbox 360 is far superior to the PS3, no matter what you fanboys want to believe.Sainterz
In theory they are about even. But the battlefield games are VERY CPU dependant and the PS3 has a stronger one. So maybe DICE found some ways to offload stuff onto it to make it run smoother. Graphics mean nothing with a choppy framerate
[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]
[QUOTE="mitu123"] I thought the latest Radeon cards did.
mitu123
There's 2-8x of it...
No there isn't. The slider bar just controls the normal AA methods, turning on MLAA overrides these. And plus, MLAA doesn't have samples, it's a post process.Looking good for a console game and Sony has made a deal with EA to provide exclusive bonus content to the PS3 version of BF3, among other EA titles. The PS3 version of BF3 will come with Battlefield 1943 as a bonus at no additional charge. Not bad if you don't have a PC to play the best version on. Heck I may even get it in addition to the PC versiob just for the extra goodies.Heil68
Yeah sony were getting a lot of deals like this. Bioshock infinite comes with the first bioshock along with move support. Sony struck a lot of deals. But 1943 is a great addition
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment