battlefield 3 should take the crown now because.....

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#1 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts

that premium situation that call of duty call themselves doing, if battlefield 3 is done correctly, i beleive the momentum WILL DEFINETLY SWITCH because a person with negative IQ can see that activision going for the pockets hardcore this year. and to make it so bad, i remember when they said "we wont ever charge for our online" this is the slick way of doing it:|

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

that premium situation that call of duty call themselves doing, if battlefield 3 is done correctly, i beleive the momentum WILL DEFINETLY SWITCH because a person with negative IQ can see that activision going for the pockets hardcore this year. and to make it so bad, i remember when they said "we wont ever charge for our online" this is the slick way of doing it:|

youngmurk911
COD can't be topped. Unless EA decided to sell BF3 for $20. COD is on the level of Madden and other year released titles. Honestly the games are a ton of fun online, BF3 won't be a great substitute for COD they will end up playing alot differently. I'd imagine most games getting both.
Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts
If BF3 doesn't outscore COD i give up on FPS games.
Avatar image for GojiMaster
GojiMaster

451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 GojiMaster
Member since 2009 • 451 Posts

CoD already has the hardcore.... it is called hardcore search and destroy!

Battlefield Bad Company series has been stealing ideas from CoD. It only makes sense that CoD does the opposite

Avatar image for NiteLights
NiteLights

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 NiteLights
Member since 2010 • 1181 Posts

CoD already has the hardcore.... it is called hardcore search and destroy!

Battlefield Bad Company series has been stealing ideas from CoD. It only makes sense that CoD does the opposite

GojiMaster

Call of Duty stole Conquest from Battlefield and then just called it ' Domination. ' And Rush, it's different to Search and Destroy, last time I checked I can't blow up an objective by bringing down the structure it's located in when I play CoD, oh that's right, because CoD doesn't have destruction.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="GojiMaster"]

CoD already has the hardcore.... it is called hardcore search and destroy!

Battlefield Bad Company series has been stealing ideas from CoD. It only makes sense that CoD does the opposite

NiteLights

Call of Duty stole Conquest from Battlefield and then just called it ' Domination. ' And Rush, it's different to Search and Destroy, last time I checked I can't blow up an objective by bringing down the structure it's located in when I play CoD, oh that's right, because CoD doesn't have destruction.

No both games stole there ideas from UT, one of the first games to have these conquest type modes.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

CoD already has the hardcore.... it is called hardcore search and destroy!

Battlefield Bad Company series has been stealing ideas from CoD. It only makes sense that CoD does the opposite

GojiMaster

Bad Company stole ideas? How/Why? It was always the superior MP. This is Battlefield. The true series that got the whole thing started. They have a big task to top BF2 for how great it was at the time. CoD is nothing and is no competition to Battlefield, especially the main series. Sales? Of course, but thats because blind lemmings (Not 360) will buy any CoD. Once its announced, they'll rush to the nearest Gamestop and preorder it.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

If BF3 doesn't outscore COD i give up on FPS games. xhawk27

Why would a review dictate whether you play FPS games or not?

Obviously BF3 should outscore it, but if it doesn't, I just blame noob reviewers that buy into the hype and have probably started gaming this gen.

Avatar image for After_Math
After_Math

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 After_Math
Member since 2007 • 975 Posts
[QUOTE="youngmurk911"]

that premium situation that call of duty call themselves doing, if battlefield 3 is done correctly, i beleive the momentum WILL DEFINETLY SWITCH because a person with negative IQ can see that activision going for the pockets hardcore this year. and to make it so bad, i remember when they said "we wont ever charge for our online" this is the slick way of doing it:|

i5750at4Ghz
COD can't be topped. Unless EA decided to sell BF3 for $20. COD is on the level of Madden and other year released titles. Honestly the games are a ton of fun online, BF3 won't be a great substitute for COD they will end up playing alot differently. I'd imagine most games getting both.

Call of Duty can be topped. The other game just has to appeal enough. Halo was once the top console shooter. What topped it? Call of Duty. So why can't another game top CoD? Madden is only king because EA bought out the license, or else 2K would have taken over. Guitar Hero (another yearly released title), crashed and burn the past year/or so.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#10 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

The quality or pricepoint of COD are not their selling points.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#11 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

I'm totally getting a Gaming PC for Battlefield 3 so yeah!

Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#12 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts

The quality or pricepoint of COD are not their selling points.

KungfuKitten

i agree

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

Funny how people are calling that MW3 will suck and BF3 will be 'teh best FPS eva!!!'. Would be funny if BF3 flopped and MW3 scored better.

Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#14 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts

Funny how people are calling that MW3 will suck and BF3 will be 'teh best FPS eva!!!'. Would be funny if BF3 flopped and MW3 scored better.

DroidPhysX

i actually beleive that mw3 will get a default score of 9......and battlefield, 8.5.....im just putting that out there

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

If BF3 doesn't outscore COD i give up on FPS games. xhawk27

lol I would be shocked if it didn't but who knows. I don't really care either way, but honestly, if the MP mode is as good as I imagine, and it will because it is DICE and BF games are awesome, then the game will be a minimum of a 9.5 for me :P. Super excited for BF3.

Avatar image for slimjimbadboy
slimjimbadboy

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 slimjimbadboy
Member since 2006 • 1731 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Funny how people are calling that MW3 will suck and BF3 will be 'teh best FPS eva!!!'. Would be funny if BF3 flopped and MW3 scored better.

youngmurk911

i actually beleive that mw3 will get a default score of 9......and battlefield, 8.5.....im just putting that out there

All bf3 has to do is make bf2 with pretty maps and I'm sold. I know they are doing more but still. I agree with the scores given between the two games unless EAs media hype budget includes contribution's to reviewer sites.

On the other hand, I bet user scores on PC will be in BF3s favour.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#17 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
The moment Battlefield becomes more popular is the moment you all will turn on it.
Avatar image for Puckhog04
Puckhog04

22814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Puckhog04
Member since 2003 • 22814 Posts

[QUOTE="NiteLights"]

[QUOTE="GojiMaster"]

CoD already has the hardcore.... it is called hardcore search and destroy!

Battlefield Bad Company series has been stealing ideas from CoD. It only makes sense that CoD does the opposite

i5750at4Ghz

Call of Duty stole Conquest from Battlefield and then just called it ' Domination. ' And Rush, it's different to Search and Destroy, last time I checked I can't blow up an objective by bringing down the structure it's located in when I play CoD, oh that's right, because CoD doesn't have destruction.

No both games stole there ideas from UT, one of the first games to have these conquest type modes.

It's amazing that so few people know this. Well said.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Battlefield is never going to outsell Call of Duty. Ever. No Battlefield games is going to sell more than 20 million units. It may be the better series, but it will never sell better.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

After finally playing BF:BC 2................I'm far from excited now. Oh well, Red Orchestra 2 will be my Main FPS now when it comes out.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
I prefer Battlefield games over COD, but the gimped console versions certainly won't 'take the crown' away from COD. Especially with MW3 releasing within a few weeks of BF3.
Avatar image for Deadbeatcobra
Deadbeatcobra

1913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Deadbeatcobra
Member since 2006 • 1913 Posts

The moment Battlefield becomes more popular is the moment you all will turn on it.vashkey
LOL... so true... though not as much as CoD :P

Avatar image for OmenUK
OmenUK

1268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#23 OmenUK
Member since 2011 • 1268 Posts

that premium situation that call of duty call themselves doing, if battlefield 3 is done correctly, i beleive the momentum WILL DEFINETLY SWITCH because a person with negative IQ can see that activision going for the pockets hardcore this year. and to make it so bad, i remember when they said "we wont ever charge for our online" this is the slick way of doing it:|

youngmurk911




Up untill this point I have never played Battlefield other than a hour or so on the demo for BF: BC which I did not like so did not buy. My gaming experience has mainly consisted then of COD, but being perfectly honest after how well they (Dice) did last year with Medal Of Honor, and having seen the full 12 minute trailer for BF3, I have to say that they have not just raised the bar but have pushed it good distance ahead of the current FPS games on the market, can't wait for it's release.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#24 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Funny how people are calling that MW3 will suck and BF3 will be 'teh best FPS eva!!!'. Would be funny if BF3 flopped and MW3 scored better.

youngmurk911

i actually beleive that mw3 will get a default score of 9......and battlefield, 8.5.....im just putting that out there

I would be shocked if it scored lower than Bad Company 2(9.0).
Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts

[QUOTE="GojiMaster"]

CoD already has the hardcore.... it is called hardcore search and destroy!

Battlefield Bad Company series has been stealing ideas from CoD. It only makes sense that CoD does the opposite

NiteLights

Call of Duty stole Conquest from Battlefield and then just called it ' Domination. ' And Rush, it's different to Search and Destroy, last time I checked I can't blow up an objective by bringing down the structure it's located in when I play CoD, oh that's right, because CoD doesn't have destruction.

good. it is lame how you can camp a mile away from the objective and bomb it to death with mortar strikes and sniper UAVS, spawnkilling the entire enemy team constantly and still win. takes time, yes, but you have more than enough lives as attackers.