vote and post reason
This topic is locked from further discussion.
only managed to play BF:BDwhile i played COD3, COD4 & COD:Waw... so its not really fair for me to vote.. but the 1 i played most was COD4 followed by BF:BD..
battlefield.. but this is coming from a pc gamer's perspective.. since most console gamers would say CoD since its gotten more console friendly(not talking down on consoles)and not had a proper taste of BF(bad company isnt even close) i say BF cause of the scale.. more players online at once.. more intense battles.. but thats just MY OPINION :)
p.s
these games are completely different.. so not fair to compare
Wow. This is a close one.
I love Call of Duty because of it's fluent and intense gameplay.
I love battlefield because of its open and tactics-oriented gameplay
....i like open and free more than closed and intense.Battlefield gets my vote.
Wow. This is a close one.
I love Call of Duty because of it's fluent and intense gameplay.
I love battlefield because of its open and tactics-oriented gameplay
....i like open and free more than closed and intense.Battlefield gets my vote.
metalmaggot46
so which one is better?
(for anyone from the UK)...there is only one way to find out....
FIGHHHT!!! LOL
Both offer different things, Battlefield 2 has better multiplayer maps but COD4 has more addictive gameplay.
Battlefield has the better series but Call of Duty 4 is probably the best game. I voted for Battlefield series.
Battlefield has vehicles. When CoD gets those it is better.clembo1990
ahem... CoD3 has Tanks, Jeeps and Sidecar Motercycles in Multiplayer.
Battlefield has vehicles. When CoD gets those it is better.clembo1990It did years ago. Call of Duty United Offensive. Its design is both a combination of COD1 with elements of Day of Defeat and Battlefield added. Probably one of the best COD MP modes to date. Oh COD3 had vehicles too, pity they sucked.
[QUOTE="clembo1990"]Battlefield has vehicles. When CoD gets those it is better.metalmaggot46
ahem... CoD3 has Tanks, Jeeps and Sidecar Motercycles in Multiplayer.
Yep, but I'd like to see more :) For example, some small maps with little of no vehicles and some massive maps that'd work brilliantly with a chopper or a tank convoy.My criticism with both Call of Duty anything and Battlfield 2 is that on the surface they appear relistic, but in the core its arcadey and casual. These games just feel... weak to me. But I vote for Battleliefd 2 over Call of Duty 4 because of the Project Reality mod.
PC Battlefield > PC Call of Duty > Console Call of Duty > Console Battlefield I'd say that's about right. inertkI can get behind that, BF:BC wasnt that good IMO and all the previous BF on console were complete trash IMO a good game of BF2 or BF2142 is up there with the best game experiences
PC Battlefield > PC Call of Duty > Console Call of Duty > Console Battlefield I'd say that's about right. inertk
Agree with you here, call of duty started to become stale after two, but CoD4 Modern warefare brought it back, World at War was okay but so tired of WW2 shooters.
battlefield.. but this is coming from a pc gamer's perspective.. since most console gamers would say CoD since its gotten more console friendly(not talking down on consoles)and not had a proper taste of BF(bad company isnt even close) i say BF cause of the scale.. more players online at once.. more intense battles.. but thats just MY OPINION :)
p.s
these games are completely different.. so not fair to compare
devious742
Console player here.
If you want chaos, go all out. COD doesn't do it properly. It's just a nade fest with super accurate guns with no recoil. I loved BF2 because you have actual people flying choppers, not some assist which could find and kill people in places where the player didn't even know where they were at. A bunch of tanks, sniping took skill so you rarely ever saw someone sniping, because you couldn't just pick up a sniper and go 20-0 like you can in COD4/WaW (I refer to these because most people never played previous ones, they started with 4 and claimed COD to be the best series ever)
BF takes a huge dump on COD, it's not even close. Ask someone who has played BF and COD from the beginning, not people who think COD4 is the greatest and that BF: Bad Company is actually Battlefield. BC is nothing like Battlefield yet people on here think it is.
is this even a real question?battlefield, which is a series that pretty much changes the way you game online for PC vs a series that recycles their games every year and released cod5, which is basically a MOD of cod 4. and sold it for $60. battlefield 2 is better than any cod game by miles. SF_KiLLaMaNI'd put the first CoD over BF2 (modless) any day. BF2 had so many balancing and technical issues (the engine it runs on is one of the worst I've seen) that I cannot bring myself to enjoy it without total conversion mods like Forgotten Hope 2. It felt nothing like BF1942.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment