battlefront pc medium vs ps4

Is pc medium settings better than ps4 graphics?

Dunno...I play it on ultra.

no. the high preset is the closest match for ps4.

No idea. Went straight to Ultra :P

With today's tech.. id say battlefront on pc low = PS4 version.

who cares. Its PvZ Garden Warfare in a new suit, not very good anyways. Just wait for fallout chaps and stop worrying about this shitty spin off

Agreed.

Also I dont see much difference between PS3 games and PS4 games in terms of graphics, so difference between Battlefront on PS4 and on PC on ultra is probably absolutely unnoticable for me (as well as for anyone else excluding mad hermits) anyway.

According to DF the PS4 version is equivalent to high. That should be the end of the thread..... Now wait for herms to say it's low/medium.

All I see is Ultra

Rember that the PS4 version is 900p

And can't maintain 60fps

PS4 ts mixed low medieum and high, on average its medium to high

in 900p

1080p with medium settings > PS4

It's high-ish settings at 900p.

After im done playing it in 4K ill let you know, ill make a mod for the game that will tell you your PS4 rating while you play on PC. Itll say, congrats, running at 15% greater then PS4, or will say, cool beans, running 45% better then PS4. My mod will also do the Joker laugh after the stat has been stated.

do you actually have a 4k monitor or are you using DSR/downsampling?

@lostrib: Dang it, exposed. I admit, i play on PS4 quality settings, my PC setup is outdated.

@mesome713: oh darn. Mine is outdated (GTX 670) as well but it still manages above PS4.

900p on medium to high with textures on ultra or high would be my guess.

Time to get some glasses.

*looks at the last sentence*

and a brain.

Whats with cows and bad eye sight?

And how can something be "probably absolutely". So you're just guessing...yet it's absolute?

900p. In general any talk of low/medium/high/ultra settings becomes much less relevant when you drop resolution and framerate. The gaming standard is (well, should be) 1080p at 60FPS. Hence why Devs recommend system requirements with that particular standard. Technically it runs mostly at the high preset though.

This. Don't let anyone else in the thread fool you OP.

Digital Foundry said this themselves, I dunno where all this butthurt hermits getting low/mid from.

900p medium/high at sub 60 fps? I'm sure it's the Cows who should be butthurt.

That's just sad.

Med-High@900p would be my guess.

To be fair, it's only an issue when PC is involved. Eagle vision activates as soon as the Xbone comes into play.

-

Anyways, doesn't matter. Average game is average, no amount of eye candy will change that.

Probably because 1080p med > 900p high 'ish.'

It's almost as if you ignored the 900p part and went straight for the high 'ish' part and tried to claim an easy victory. Like any idiot cow would.

I bet my old 6870 could pull PS4 settings. 6950s from the same series are running it at almost max 1080p, apparently.

Rofl. 2010 cards.

Linky? not that i disbelieve you but i'm genuinely curious.

Also we need to bare in mind that like all frostbite games, its CPU heavy and GPU light (ish) so that card could be running on the latest generation i7 for all i know

The difference between PS4 and PC on ultra settings in other games (i.e. Witcher III, Metal Gear Solid 5, etc. ) is absolutely unnoticable for me, therefore I presume that the difference shall be absolutely unnoticable for me in the case of SW Battlefront as well (thats regarding the word "presume").

I have excellent eyesight according to my doctor, its just that I am used to discuss difference in graphics like these:

So you cant be surprised that the pixelhunting of today's kids seems pointless to me:

Because you're looking at small snippets from a re-sized youtube, and your favorite system is the one that looks worse so of course you automatically (or subconsciously) pretend there is nothing different.

Unnoticeable for you =/= unnoticeable for everyone.

http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/witcher-3-5.jpg

http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/witcher-3-4.jpg

Get a new pair of eyes, or lose the fanboy goggles. Also, let me guess, the human eye can barely notice 30 to 60 fps?

Nope, Im looking at PC display and PS4 with those games running. On your example the PC version has depth of field off, motion blur off and bloom off, and that is why it looks crisper on screenshot, and also why it will look worse (less natural) in motion.

30 fps to 60 fps does make a difference in games like Quake 3 Arena where precision is everything, in console ports it doesnt matter too much because the games are designed for lower framerate and therefore have slower gameplay. That said any game benefits from 60 fps, no question.

Also my favourite system is PC, thats why I am so sad about what happened to PC gaming in last 15 years.

And get 10fps running it at max. Considering my 7850 can't run it at 60fps at 1080p and Ultra there's no chance a 6950 gets anywhere near that.

According to DF is between high and ultra at 900p. I would have prefered med at 1080p, though.

Basically the same as Battlefield 4.