Being in 3rd place may be better than 1st or 2nd

  • 53 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Munasha
Munasha

459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Munasha
Member since 2004 • 459 Posts
dont u guys also think Being in last place may be better than being in first in terms of sells for the CONSUMER?? Nintendo is in first and doesn't look like its trying really hard and their no sighs of a price drop because it is seating at the top. think about it MS is looking good right now with their november sells so why should MS drop the price??? Sony is in last place they cut the price, released New ps3 slim, released beater games and is really showing some effort Im just saying that when a product is doing well the company seems to not try as hard same as the Ipod when it was starting off from the white brick with a black and white screen to the Ipod Touch but lately, now that their on top of the MP3 world they have not done much to improve it unlike MS with the Zune HD their putting in more of a effort
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45671 Posts

If I said it once, I said it a dozen, okay, maybe only 12 times :P but.... This gen., third place is the new first place. :twisted:

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

This is definatly loser talk and cover up for ps3 being in last but it is kind of true. At the start of the gen sony came into the game with a cocky attitude thinking that since they owned the market last gen, the customers and devs would come to them without any sony assisted. So they put out an expensive system, with no games, and paid the ultimate price. Now they are playing catch up and really have done a great job with putting out great games, and constatly adding new features and what not. So you are kind of right, but its still loser talk.

Avatar image for boredy-Mcbored
boredy-Mcbored

1566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 boredy-Mcbored
Member since 2007 • 1566 Posts

I guess you do have a point. If an object has low sales compared to a competitor they could drop the price to attract more customers. It's economics.

Avatar image for Funconsole
Funconsole

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Funconsole
Member since 2009 • 3223 Posts
This is loser talk. You think in a sports competition someone comes out thinking "I am gonna do my best to win 3rd place". Of course not, everyone wants to be first. Sony's last means they are last aka not winning.
Avatar image for Munasha
Munasha

459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Munasha
Member since 2004 • 459 Posts
This is loser talk. You think in a sports competition someone comes out thinking "I am gonna do my best to win 3rd place". Of course not, everyone wants to be first. Sony's last means they are last aka not winning.Funconsole
u dont get it I said for the Consumer..How am I a loser am I profiting from sony's sells to care.. who trys harder a team that has 10 superbowls or a team that has none.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="Funconsole"]This is loser talk. You think in a sports competition someone comes out thinking "I am gonna do my best to win 3rd place". Of course not, everyone wants to be first. Sony's last means they are last aka not winning.Munasha
u dont get it I said for the Consumer..How am I a loser am I profiting from sony's sells to care.. who trys harder a team that has 10 superbowls or a team that has none.

the team who has the better coach and players that year
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

Think about last gen and then come back to me.

Avatar image for Munasha
Munasha

459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Munasha
Member since 2004 • 459 Posts

Think about last gen and then come back to me.

Silverbond
Nintendo was trying harder than this year, MS Got The GTA franchise on their xbox and had XBL, while PS2 just stayed the same cause it was on top and didnt bother with the online service
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]

Think about last gen and then come back to me.

Munasha

Nintendo was trying harder than this year, MS Got The GTA franchise on their xbox and had XBL, while PS2 just stayed the same cause it was on top and didnt bother with the online service

MS got the GTA franchise? You should know it was never exclusive.

Speaking of exclusives, Sony had many 1st and 3rd party exclusives last gen.

Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts

[QUOTE="Funconsole"]This is loser talk. You think in a sports competition someone comes out thinking "I am gonna do my best to win 3rd place". Of course not, everyone wants to be first. Sony's last means they are last aka not winning.Munasha
u dont get it I said for the Consumer..How am I a loser am I profiting from sony's sells to care.. who trys harder a team that has 10 superbowls or a team that has none.

yeah, it probably depends on how you look at it.

The losing team may not be working hard enough to beat the champions or need to change their strategy.

It's even worse when you can't beat a team that has now become 'complacent'.

yes. Sony has a lot more work to do if it wants to be king again.

it has to at least double-maybe triple the amount of exclusives it has,make sure they are all top notch- gameplay wise not just graphics,

appeal to many genres and target audiences,

lower their prices even more,

be more aggressive in their marketing,

do better then their knee jerk half-a** attempts like PSP Go, Six axis, Wand andHome

Make better dev tools for third parties so it makes it easier for them to cater to the PS3's strengthwhen it comes to multiplats. Because it still sounds like it is a hassle working with the Cell compared to PC and Xbox360.

Build on the functionality of the PS3's multimedia capabilities and market it, market it, market it even more-(The whole it only does everything campaign?!?!?- needs to be more specific!)

create a better online service then Itunes and Xboxlive.

The problem it looks like it wants to be the premium product with the mass sales like the Wii.

Avatar image for randomwiiplayer
randomwiiplayer

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 randomwiiplayer
Member since 2009 • 1804 Posts

Yes, I agree.

Avatar image for BattleTurtles
BattleTurtles

2406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 BattleTurtles
Member since 2009 • 2406 Posts
When Sony is in first place, it is because they are the best. When Sony is in last place, it is also because they are the best. Gotcha.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#14 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

If I said it once, I said it a dozen, okay, maybe only 12 times :P but.... This gen., third place is the new first place. :twisted:

SecretPolice
Maybe I'm living in an alternate universe, but where I live a dozen equals twelve. :lol: Anyways, I think that being in third place encourages a company to try being more competitive, and that's certainly where the consumer wins. That's why some people want to root for the underdog, because sometimes the best value comes from the person in last place.
Avatar image for xX-Incubus-Xx
xX-Incubus-Xx

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 xX-Incubus-Xx
Member since 2009 • 1120 Posts

When Sony is in first place, it is because they are the best. When Sony is in last place, it is also because they are the best. Gotcha.BattleTurtles
That's not what this topic is about. readin comprehension FTL. He's saying that as you go from first to last place, the amount of effort being put forth by each company increases exponentionally.

Nintendo is sitting well in first and doesn't have a care in the world. Software is the last thing on their minds.

Microsoft is doing alright, but Sony is closing the gap. Their software relies heavily on 1 brand...Halo. NATAL is an effort to combat both these.

Sony is in last place and is pulling all the stops, from price drops to big name exclusives.

Hopefully this puts things in a clearer perspective. The topic title is simply misleading.

Avatar image for michael582
michael582

1064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 michael582
Member since 2003 • 1064 Posts

PS2 says hi

so does the gamecube.

Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#18 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
We should just consider ourselves lucky that there are some quality, worth-while games to play on all platforms...
Avatar image for lloveLamp
lloveLamp

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 lloveLamp
Member since 2009 • 2891 Posts
gamecube was in last place and that console gave us Wind Waker, Eternal Darkness and Resident Evil REMAKE!!! so being in last place doesn't mean you won't have the best games
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45671 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

If I said it once, I said it a dozen, okay, maybe only 12 times :P but.... This gen., third place is the new first place. :twisted:

jalexbrown

Maybe I'm living in an alternate universe, but where I live a dozen equals twelve. :lol: Anyways, I think that being in third place encourages a company to try being more competitive, and that's certainly where the consumer wins. That's why some people want to root for the underdog, because sometimes the best value comes from the person in last place.

Was just a bit of....

:P

Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts
I've found that one you're on top you kinda want to stay there. And it takes alot of work to do that. I think all the companies are working equally hard.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

If I said it once, I said it a dozen, okay, maybe only 12 times :P but.... This gen., third place is the new first place. :twisted:

jalexbrown
Maybe I'm living in an alternate universe, but where I live a dozen equals twelve. :lol: Anyways, I think that being in third place encourages a company to try being more competitive, and that's certainly where the consumer wins. That's why some people want to root for the underdog, because sometimes the best value comes from the person in last place.

he may be a baker, bakers dozens are 13
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

gamecube was in last place and that console gave us Wind Waker, Eternal Darkness and Resident Evil REMAKE!!! so being in last place doesn't mean you won't have the best gameslloveLamp

The PS2 gave us GoW, DMC, MGS 2 and 3, Twisted Metal Black, Jak I,II, and III, R&C, and more.

Avatar image for Funconsole
Funconsole

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Funconsole
Member since 2009 • 3223 Posts
[QUOTE="Funconsole"]This is loser talk. You think in a sports competition someone comes out thinking "I am gonna do my best to win 3rd place". Of course not, everyone wants to be first. Sony's last means they are last aka not winning.Munasha
u dont get it I said for the Consumer..How am I a loser am I profiting from sony's sells to care.. who trys harder a team that has 10 superbowls or a team that has none.

Obviously the team with 10 superbowls is gonna try harder cause they wanna win a 11th superbowl since they will most likely have a better team and coach who work together
Avatar image for Munasha
Munasha

459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Munasha
Member since 2004 • 459 Posts
[QUOTE="Munasha"][QUOTE="Funconsole"]This is loser talk. You think in a sports competition someone comes out thinking "I am gonna do my best to win 3rd place". Of course not, everyone wants to be first. Sony's last means they are last aka not winning.Funconsole
u dont get it I said for the Consumer..How am I a loser am I profiting from sony's sells to care.. who trys harder a team that has 10 superbowls or a team that has none.

Obviously the team with 10 superbowls is gonna try harder cause they wanna win a 11th superbowl since they will most likely have a better team and coach who work together

LMAO wow...u still dont get it. so if u have a beater team u work harder???last gen nintendo was last were is it now???1st..............Last gen sony was first were is it now???last....No sony wants to get back to the top price cuts and more exclusives for sony owners..Nintendo is at the top they just give u wii fit and Mario NES in 3D
Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts
[QUOTE="Funconsole"][QUOTE="Munasha"] u dont get it I said for the Consumer..How am I a loser am I profiting from sony's sells to care.. who trys harder a team that has 10 superbowls or a team that has none. Munasha
Obviously the team with 10 superbowls is gonna try harder cause they wanna win a 11th superbowl since they will most likely have a better team and coach who work together

LMAO wow...u still dont get it. so if u have a beater team u work harder???last gen nintendo was last were is it now???1st..............Last gen sony was first were is it now???last....No sony wants to get back to the top price cuts and more exclusives for sony owners..Nintendo is at the top they just give u wii fit and Mario NES in 3D

When has nintedo ever offered a ton of games? Its what happens when you rely so heavily on your 1st party. Making games, great games, takes time. But I promise you when zelda/metroid come out they will be great.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

dont u guys also think Being in last place may be better than being in first in terms of sells for the CONSUMER?? Nintendo is in first and doesn't look like its trying really hard and their no sighs of a price drop because it is seating at the top. think about it MS is looking good right now with their november sells so why should MS drop the price??? Sony is in last place they cut the price, released New ps3 slim, released beater games and is really showing some effort Im just saying that when a product is doing well the company seems to not try as hard same as the Ipod when it was starting off from the white brick with a black and white screen to the Ipod Touch but lately, now that their on top of the MP3 world they have not done much to improve it unlike MS with the Zune HD their putting in more of a effortMunasha

I came in here expecting some lulz, but I actually agree with you.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
For Sony it is not O.K, for us gamers, aside from SW fanboys, we don't care.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

I think SW knows what this sort of talk is about, Sony going from 1st to 3rd is hardly a good thing.

For the consumer? Maybe in the short term, but the success of the PS3 will have an impact on the next generation, Playstation fans may end up having to wait longer for next gen or pay more to compensate for the previous generation losses.

Sony is burning through their cash reserve to acquire the exclusives designed to show off the PS3's capabilities, but remember what they say about the brightest flame.

Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

I don't know man, it's just how long can Sony keep on doing what they're doing and keep on trying to do their best just to find out they are last place this gen? I mean Sony did pack the launch PS3s with all kinds of goodies but they didn't see any good results, so they took out alot of stuff and downgraded their system. The only way I find being in last place a good thing is if they improve next gen.

Avatar image for cody3232
cody3232

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 cody3232
Member since 2007 • 877 Posts

[QUOTE="Funconsole"]This is loser talk. You think in a sports competition someone comes out thinking "I am gonna do my best to win 3rd place". Of course not, everyone wants to be first. Sony's last means they are last aka not winning.Munasha
u dont get it I said for the Consumer..How am I a loser am I profiting from sony's sells to care.. who trys harder a team that has 10 superbowls or a team that has none.



The team that won ten.... Like they won ten obviously they tried harder. But anyway yeah i get what you saying sony really has to push it now which they are doing which is in fact a good thing.

Avatar image for RobbRipken
RobbRipken

263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 RobbRipken
Member since 2003 • 263 Posts

I'm not the world's biggest Sony fan, however, I will say they've really earned a lot of respect from me this year. I think Sony finally gaining momentum could be a great thing for us as gamers. Obviously, Sony in last right now is causing them to step up their game. It's pushing M$ to try and put out better exclusive/PC-Xbox 360 games. Even Nintendo is being forced to make an effort now.

So yes, I agree in some ways that it can make the difference.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#33 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38071 Posts
This is loser talk. You think in a sports competition someone comes out thinking "I am gonna do my best to win 3rd place". Of course not, everyone wants to be first. Sony's last means they are last aka not winning.Funconsole
Yeah, I was just wondering if the LA Angels were spouting this stuff after the Yanks took the Phillies. Yes gamers can gain in this senario, but why are so many often crying about the Nov. NPD? P.S. sells is a verb. It is sales.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#34 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
All I know is i get to play Uncharted 2 and next year I get to play GT5 and GOW3, I'm a happy gamer no matter what Place I'm in.
Avatar image for Megaman5364
Megaman5364

2912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Megaman5364
Member since 2009 • 2912 Posts

This is definatly loser talk and cover up for ps3 being in last but it is kind of true. At the start of the gen sony came into the game with a cocky attitude thinking that since they owned the market last gen, the customers and devs would come to them without any sony assisted. So they put out an expensive system, with no games, and paid the ultimate price. Now they are playing catch up and really have done a great job with putting out great games, and constatly adding new features and what not. So you are kind of right, but its still loser talk.

Sully28
Its not loser talk, he's stating a fact, and that is that the PS3 > Xbox, get over it
Avatar image for Gundamforce
Gundamforce

1222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Gundamforce
Member since 2005 • 1222 Posts

Probably. Since their last two consoles were huge successes, Sony probably got cocky that the PS3 will succeed no matter what they did and release an expensive game with no killer apps of sorts. Unfortunately for them, Microsoft was improving as a gaming company and Nintendo started appealing to the masses. And unlike the OS industry or the handheld industry, the console industry is quite competitive. So they fall flat to last place and they got to bust their butts with a lower priced console and good game to at least profit and possibly stage a comeback. The PS3 is now much more affordable and great games are out and coming, but dethroning Nintendo or even Microsoft this gen is a long shot.

[QUOTE="Sully28"]

This is definatly loser talk and cover up for ps3 being in last but it is kind of true. At the start of the gen sony came into the game with a cocky attitude thinking that since they owned the market last gen, the customers and devs would come to them without any sony assisted. So they put out an expensive system, with no games, and paid the ultimate price. Now they are playing catch up and really have done a great job with putting out great games, and constatly adding new features and what not. So you are kind of right, but its still loser talk.

Megaman5364

Its not loser talk, he's stating a fact, and that is that the PS3 > Xbox, get over it

You do know that saying one console is better than another is an opinion, not a fact. So you get over it.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#37 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
Eh,serious damage control in here:)
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

Cows are now trying to rewrite the rules of the universe. 3rd place is now better than first. In other news, white is black, up is down, and Paulie shore is funny.

Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts

i hear what your sayin TC, and part of me kinda agrees with you.. and sony is really doing a great job fighting and scratching their way back, considering their poor launch(weaker companies woulda gave up *cough cough sega*).... but, in no way is 3rd place the new first place.. that said, i still think sony is putting out much better software and hardware

Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts

Looking at last gen PS2 was the best though they were at 1st place and when I look at this generation PS3 is becoming the best though they are in 3rd place well that means Sony is always the best at making consoles and video games but at the beginning of this generation they were more focused on winning the formats war than winning the consoles race by adding a Blu-ray drive to PS3 and making it very expensive at launch just to use it as the Trojan horse of that war.

Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

If I said it once, I said it a dozen, okay, maybe only 12 times :P but.... This gen., third place is the new first place. :twisted:

SecretPolice

Does that mean that you think cell phones are winning the handheld system war?

Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

Nintendo is sitting well in first and doesn't have a care in the world. Software is the last thing on their minds.

xX-Incubus-Xx

:roll:If that was true Nintendo wouldn't be releasing so many first party games.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="Munasha"]dont u guys also think Being in last place may be better than being in first in terms of sells for the CONSUMER?? Nintendo is in first and doesn't look like its trying really hard and their no sighs of a price drop because it is seating at the top. think about it MS is looking good right now with their november sells so why should MS drop the price??? Sony is in last place they cut the price, released New ps3 slim, released beater games and is really showing some effort Im just saying that when a product is doing well the company seems to not try as hard same as the Ipod when it was starting off from the white brick with a black and white screen to the Ipod Touch but lately, now that their on top of the MP3 world they have not done much to improve it unlike MS with the Zune HD their putting in more of a effort

where i come from last place is last place, and how am i benefiting as a consumer when the cheapest PS3 is still 50 quid more than the most expensive 360 in my country? also how am i benefiting when multiplats are still slightly better on the 360 and they make up 90% of the games i can buy for my system? SONY fanboys really can't stand the thought that the ps3 is in last place, so they change the rules to make it look like the ps3 is in first place, the ps3 is LAST in install base, that's the bottom line, and i fail to see how consumers benefit when the PS3 is still more expensive than the opther two consoles
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="BattleTurtles"]When Sony is in first place, it is because they are the best. When Sony is in last place, it is also because they are the best. Gotcha.xX-Incubus-Xx

That's not what this topic is about. readin comprehension FTL. He's saying that as you go from first to last place, the amount of effort being put forth by each company increases exponentionally.

Nintendo is sitting well in first and doesn't have a care in the world. Software is the last thing on their minds.

Microsoft is doing alright, but Sony is closing the gap. Their software relies heavily on 1 brand...Halo. NATAL is an effort to combat both these.

Sony is in last place and is pulling all the stops, from price drops to big name exclusives.

Hopefully this puts things in a clearer perspective. The topic title is simply misleading.

who has put out more highly rated games this gen then nintendo? dont forget nintendo does not only make games for the wii
Avatar image for Munasha
Munasha

459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Munasha
Member since 2004 • 459 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="Munasha"]dont u guys also think Being in last place may be better than being in first in terms of sells for the CONSUMER?? Nintendo is in first and doesn't look like its trying really hard and their no sighs of a price drop because it is seating at the top. think about it MS is looking good right now with their november sells so why should MS drop the price??? Sony is in last place they cut the price, released New ps3 slim, released beater games and is really showing some effort Im just saying that when a product is doing well the company seems to not try as hard same as the Ipod when it was starting off from the white brick with a black and white screen to the Ipod Touch but lately, now that their on top of the MP3 world they have not done much to improve it unlike MS with the Zune HD their putting in more of a effort

where i come from last place is last place, and how am i benefiting as a consumer when the cheapest PS3 is still 50 quid more than the most expensive 360 in my country? also how am i benefiting when multiplats are still slightly better on the 360 and they make up 90% of the games i can buy for my system? SONY fanboys really can't stand the thought that the ps3 is in last place, so they change the rules to make it look like the ps3 is in first place, the ps3 is LAST in install base, that's the bottom line, and i fail to see how consumers benefit when the PS3 is still more expensive than the opther two consoles

U can bet if MS was in last place it would have had a price cut already or pretty soon. I dont care about being in last I'm not last, Sony is why should i care... all i know is Next gen the PS4 will not comeout overpriced, with no games and be sold out for 6 months, like the Ps2 and ps3 beacuse they learnt from being last MS and Sony dont decide what multiplats look better on the console. xbox 1 multiplat games looked better the ps2, but ps2 was in 1st place
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

I commissioned this image a while back, but I don't think I'm fanboy enough to put it to good use :P

Anyone who likes it can do what they want with it.

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
a 3rd place is a 3rd place Sony deserved that for the mistakes they did at the beginning of the gen, it was a big cost for them, but it could be far worse.... Now it's a different story though, I still think they will en up in 3rd place, BUT it will be a VERY close race or closest race ever in the videogame history In the end, the ps3 is Awesome!
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
Sony is definitely trying harder than last gen and putting out some quality stuff because of it.
Avatar image for Racer850
Racer850

2293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 Racer850
Member since 2009 • 2293 Posts
Sony were arrogant at the start of this generation, but obviously the high price tag, and lack of games made sony loyal fans buy the 360, now Sony are pushing out AAA games, and with a lower price point are shifting more consoles, so i agree TC.
Avatar image for Shenmue_Jehuty
Shenmue_Jehuty

5211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 Shenmue_Jehuty
Member since 2007 • 5211 Posts

You make a valid point; when you are on top you get comfortable and don't try as hard, but ever since a system war has existed, it has always been measured by sales. PS1 and PS2 dominated the past 2 gens, but Nintendo has made its triumphant comeback this gen and that is it, period. It has got there because of some great games, a very competitive price, and some great extras. Bravo Nintendo.