I know my answer, but the purpose of polls is to see other people's answers/ opinions, who knows, maybe Crysis really does have a better online experience...
I know my answer, but the purpose of polls is to see other people's answers/ opinions, who knows, maybe Crysis really does have a better online experience...
p2250
Fair enough, then i'll bite. Killzone 2 has the better multiplayer IMO.
Killzone 2, easily. Crysis was just boring. Crytek shouldn't have wasted those $1 million just because it would get a 9.5... Can't believe how people find Crysis fun actually
So what's the gag here? What are you trying to prove by showing that people don't like Crysis' multiplayer? The meat of Crysis' gameplay is in the single-player.
Killzone 2, easily. Crysis was just boring. Crytek shouldn't have wasted those $1 million just because it would get a 9.5... Can't believe how people find Crysis fun actuallyTheNewspaper
Riiiight :roll:
I actually like it better than KZ2 for the single player.
it'd be kind of sad if crysis was the better multiplayer with all the work and dedication killzone 2 devs put into its multiplayer compared to crytek(although they did try with crysis wars, but unfortunalty did not do as good as thought, nonetheless you can still have fun with crysis wars tho)
This comes up in pretty much every thread wherein people attempt to compare KZ2 to Crysis. After floods of Crysis screenshots destroy the KZ2 supporters, they move on to "THE GAMEPLAY IS MUCH BETTER!!!." It's been agreed upon that SP wise Crysis>KZ2 and MP wise KZ2>Crysis.
Hmm, I don't think that's a fair comparison as Crysis is much more focused on single-player. It's like comparing L4D's singleplayer to a more singleplayer focused fps.
terrible controls automatically makes Crysis the better game even though KZ2 has alot more depth.
Fizzman
KZ2 has good controls, you have to get used to them, then they'll feel perfectly fine.
getting used to an awful deadzone is something i definitely shouldnt have to do.
Whatever the problem was with the original controls has been long fixed, the controls are spot on and reward skilled players, it feels much better than even COD4, much less arcady and more heavy. I see you like Halo so you probably wouldn't understand where I'm coming from...
[QUOTE="p2250"] KZ2 has good controls, you have to get used to them, then they'll feel perfectly fine.p2250
getting used to an awful deadzone is something i definitely shouldnt have to do.
Whatever the problem was with the original controls has been long fixed, the controls are spot on and reward skilled players, it feels much better than even COD4, much less arcady and more heavy. I see you like Halo so you probably wouldn't understand where I'm coming from...
right you got me KZ2 is more rewarding shooter cause instead of actually aiming all you have to do is go full auto, and kill somoene. Moving like a tank is not more skillful, and to say KZ2 is less arcadey is just laughable at best.
Crysis wars in awesome. I dont think Killzone 2 multiplayer can rival it. Got a few friends that are into halo 3 multiplayer and were quite surprised by how good crysis wars is.
The only reason more people voted for killzone2 because they never played crysis multiplayer. crysis multiplayer takes dumps on killzone2 that's a fact.fdgdfgdfgdfg454
The only reason more people voted for killzone2 because they never played crysis multiplayer. crysis multiplayer takes dumps on killzone2 that's a fact.fdgdfgdfgdfg454
I have played Crysis wars and its a total failure. It takes about 6 shots with a pistol to kill someone. Its total fail. The game modes suck and the teamplay is horrible. The only good thing are the maps cause they are big and look nice but thats about it.
[QUOTE="fdgdfgdfgdfg454"]The only reason more people voted for killzone2 because they never played crysis multiplayer. crysis multiplayer takes dumps on killzone2 that's a fact.Warzone876
I have played Crysis wars and its a total failure. It takes about 6 shots with a pistol to kill someone. Its total fail. The game modes suck and the teamplay is horrible. The only good thing are the maps cause they are big and look nice but thats about it.
it takes only a couple of headshots. what did you expect with people full on nanosuits? and you really think deathmatch, team deathmatch and power struggle suck? you must hate every multiplayer fps then...
Everyone knows Crysis has a weak multiplayer, it's the single player that makes the game great; which is frankly all I care about because I don't play any online games.
Making a thread like this just gives me the impression someone was desperate for Killzone 2 to beat Crysis at 'something'.
Crysis, because the game takes skills and isn't a noobies fest throwing grenades in front of a door and using only rocket launchers to get kills.CuliaVakitas
:lol: even the game's creators said it was made easy for the nublets.
[QUOTE="CuliaVakitas"]Crysis, because the game takes skills and isn't a noobies fest throwing grenades in front of a door and using only rocket launchers to get kills.Espada12
:lol: even the game's creators said it was made easy for the nublets.
Sad my man,and you can't believe the amount of nooblets campers waiting for you,tats the only way to get killz they are so scare to look for people in the map.
Wait, you mean people play actually play Crysis? I thought the point of having the game was to post screenshots of it.
lolfaqs
1. You never played Crysis.
2. There was a poll here on SW sometime ago that asked which game had the best gameplay, between Crysis, Killzone 2, MGS 4, and a couple others. Crysis won that poll, which shows at least here on SW people enjoy Crysis. Anybody has the link for the thread I'm talking about?
Log in to comment