Which game is better? I vote Bf3.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Halo Reach and Black Ops.JohnnyCageMKHalo is honestly the only good console shooter left. Let's hope halo 4 is done well.
.and it has a factor of pesonal achievement, whereas bf is all about teamwork and vehicles rather frags.dakan45Not when you take down a loaded heli with an RPG :D or hold off an assault on a control point by yourself. My personal favorite is capturing a CP while doing donuts in the jeep.
nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.
MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better.nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.
rasengan2552
well, depends how you see it.l Mw3 on pc is miles better than the consoles, far far better graphics and unlike bf3 it has lan, modes and server browser :) I guess its what matters to you.Not sure about on consoles, but on PC BF3>MW3.
rockydog1111
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better. Agreed with everything, typical gunfight in bf3, shoot, shoot, shoot, then the game decides to finally register the bullets and flash the damn crosshair, the other guy dies and i take damage from someone who is dead. Also bf3 might be shinny but the enviroments are empty and bland.nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.
Loegi
nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.
rasengan2552
Do you have proof of this?people would admit MW3 was better if it was, they wouldn't have a reason to hide it lol
I like CoD for it's gung ho maps and gameplay sometimes but it has no lasting effect for me, it's good to blow off steam but when I want to play with friends and really get into a tactical round of gameplay I choose BF3.One thing CoD has over BF3 is hit detection, but there is a lot more going on in BF3 to warrant some hiccups. Still annoys the Sh!t out of me though.
Bottom line is both games are good for different reasons
Imo BF3...the big maps vehicle and air combat, and the destructability is awesome and pretty immersive:D
mrmoeone
I agree. Even if you just join a 64 player Caspian CQ server and stand there and just listen to the audio alone it's pretty freaking epic. The sense of immersion is incredible.
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better. Agreed with everything, typical gunfight in bf3, shoot, shoot, shoot, then the game decides to finally register the bullets and flash the damn crosshair, the other guy dies and i take damage from someone who is dead. Also bf3 might be shinny but the enviroments are empty and bland. That is true, I love the vehicles in BF3 though. Unlike what haters would have you believe, neither are bad games.nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.
Loegi
I don't own either game, however I have more WAY more fun with COD than I ever do with BF, so the answer is COD.
Plus COD has a fun (but sometimes short) campaign, BF just has a crappy and forgettable short campaign.
Online COD has action and many features, BF only has a few modes and it's boring because maps are too big and you just walk around trying to find people to kill but rarely do. Only good thing about it is the realism and the destructable environments, everything else is just boring IMO.
COD is the better series, hands down. Though Killzone destroys both.
WTF are you on about? Everything you've said is subjective and only a matter of an opinion. You say COD is more fun and then pass it off that COD is the better series. I bet you're one of those people who are fanboys of COD, decided to try out BF3 and was owned because the game has a learning curve.I don't own either game, however I have more WAY more fun with COD than I ever do with BF, so the answer is COD.
Plus COD has a fun (but sometimes short) campaign, BF just has a crappy and forgettable short campaign.
Online COD has action and many features, BF only has a few modes and it's boring because maps are too big and you just walk around trying to find people to kill but rarely do. Only good thing about it is the realism and the destructable environments, everything else is just boring IMO.
COD is the better series, hands down. Though Killzone destroys both.
ShadowMoses900
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better. Better map sizes? How would fying a jet or even a heli work on a tiny Cod map? Whether its fun to play is subjective.nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.
Loegi
[QUOTE="Loegi"][QUOTE="rasengan2552"]MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better. Better map sizes? How would fying a jet or even a heli work on a tiny Cod map? Whether its fun to play is subjective. I'm playing a shooter, not a jet simulator or something. So, yes, CoD has better map sizes. And yes the fun part is subjective, but CoD has more action in a shorter amount of time generally, and the constant unlocks give a faster rate of satisfaction too.nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.
Cranler
I'd actually say MW3. The only thing Battlefield does much better is map design and 64-player Conquest. Other than that, BF3 has a much worse campaign and co-op, and most of its modes beyond Large Conquest aren't all that interesting. Modern Warfare 3 isn't anything spectacular either, but each part of the whole package is a bit better.
If there was a prize for making the billionth BF3 vs MW3 thread, TC might have won.
Anyways, co-op and single player - MW3
Multiplayer - BF3
BF3's co-op isn't terrible but its not as mode and variety filled as MW3's, and I think MW3's multiplayer is fun but super unbalanced and lacking in the depth and scale of BF3 (especially on PC with 64 players).
MW3 all the way, it is far more superior in everyway from fun and enjoyable modes like infected mode ( like tower defence ), domination, One in the Chamber to the newly released Face Off, MW3 offers an online fun that no other game provides ( imo ), its quick and very easy to get in and talk to people. join your friends, can easily even find people and not worry about running for 5 hours in a huge map like in BF3 to find one person and heck if you get killed in BF3 after you been running for 5 hours to find someone guess what? you'll have to go back and run all the way again just to find someone. i dislike big games like BF3 but BF3 was still fun to play just not as fun as MW3 or CoD in general.. CoD provide more fun and value for me.
BF3 has more than twice the votes, yet MW3 has more than twice the sales :(
RoccoHout
Because this is SW, the place where everyone here hate on anything CoD cuz probably they suck at it or something.
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]BF3. It's not even close. MW3 is casual trash designed for childrenJebus213BF3 isn't? Not nearly to the extent that MW3 is. Not saying BF3 is some super hardcore game like CSS but it at least incorporates things like recoil, suppression effects, skill to use vehicles effectively, and bullet drop whereas MW3 is a complete noobfest where people just point their ARs down narrow corridors and use kill streaks.
[QUOTE="RoccoHout"]
BF3 has more than twice the votes, yet MW3 has more than twice the sales :(
finalstar2007
Because this is SW, the place where everyone here hate on anything CoD cuz probably they suck at it or something.
It's not really possible to suck at a CoD game. Anyone with any idea how to operate a dual analog controller can do well at it. People hate on it because it is basically has only changed for the worse since CoD4Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment