BF3 or MW3? Which one?

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

Which game is better? I vote Bf3.

Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

Why not bump up the thread that is STILL on the first page...

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Are we back to this? :?

Anyway, BF3 all day everyday. It's the best online FPS to come in years.

Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
At least MW3 is fun. Still wouldn't give them any money though.
Avatar image for bigbeebis
bigbeebis

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 bigbeebis
Member since 2007 • 705 Posts
Not a fan of either. But in terms of accesibilty and quick fun I'd say MW.
Avatar image for Mozuckint
Mozuckint

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 Mozuckint
Member since 2012 • 831 Posts

BF3. Those Online MP battles with vehicles and destruction physics never get old :D

Avatar image for YoshiYogurt
YoshiYogurt

6008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 YoshiYogurt
Member since 2010 • 6008 Posts
Not a fan of either. BF3 is boring as hell. MW3 sucks.
Avatar image for BibiMaghoo
BibiMaghoo

4018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 BibiMaghoo
Member since 2009 • 4018 Posts
Bad Company 2 is better than both of them. Play that instead.
Avatar image for JohnnyCageMK
JohnnyCageMK

4365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 JohnnyCageMK
Member since 2012 • 4365 Posts
Halo Reach and Black Ops.
Avatar image for Nozizaki
Nozizaki

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#10 Nozizaki
Member since 2007 • 1471 Posts
Although the updates can be turn off, BF3 has much better physics, sounds and more realistic things like recoil on the guns. You get randomly killed by choppers as much in both though.
Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

MW3, but it's cool to hate CoD so I voted BF3

Avatar image for achilles614
achilles614

5310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 achilles614
Member since 2005 • 5310 Posts
I have 36 hours in the online for MW3 and 33 hours for BF3 (that's probably nothing for some people). I am bored to tears with COD it's an absolute joke the only reason it held my attention for so long is because before MW3 my last COD was COD4. BF3 on the other hand is pretty damn good and the DLC adds a ton of new content. If I wanna play 64 man large scale infantry combat I can do that for a game...or play primarily vehicles for one match. The game play has so much variation which is why I keep coming back. This was my first battlefield game since 1942 so my impressions may be different than someone who has been keeping up with the series. CSS>>>BF3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MW3
Avatar image for YoshiYogurt
YoshiYogurt

6008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 YoshiYogurt
Member since 2010 • 6008 Posts
Halo Reach and Black Ops.JohnnyCageMK
Halo is honestly the only good console shooter left. Let's hope halo 4 is done well.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
mw3 becaue it doesnt have the garbage delay in hit detection that the bf seires are known for...and it has a factor of pesonal achievement, whereas bf is all about teamwork and vehicles rather frags.
Avatar image for True_Chaos_UK
True_Chaos_UK

2570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 True_Chaos_UK
Member since 2010 • 2570 Posts

BF3 bar far for me apart from the campaign, but I stopped playing after this premium bollocks.

Avatar image for achilles614
achilles614

5310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 achilles614
Member since 2005 • 5310 Posts
.and it has a factor of pesonal achievement, whereas bf is all about teamwork and vehicles rather frags.dakan45
Not when you take down a loaded heli with an RPG :D or hold off an assault on a control point by yourself. My personal favorite is capturing a CP while doing donuts in the jeep.
Avatar image for rockydog1111
rockydog1111

2079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#17 rockydog1111
Member since 2006 • 2079 Posts

Not sure about on consoles, but on PC BF3>MW3.

Avatar image for CTR360
CTR360

9217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#18 CTR360
Member since 2007 • 9217 Posts
MW3
Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.

Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts

nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.

rasengan2552
MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better.
Avatar image for onewiththegame
onewiththegame

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 onewiththegame
Member since 2004 • 4415 Posts
Haven't played mw3 but BF3 is great
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Not sure about on consoles, but on PC BF3>MW3.

rockydog1111
well, depends how you see it.l Mw3 on pc is miles better than the consoles, far far better graphics and unlike bf3 it has lan, modes and server browser :) I guess its what matters to you.
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.

Loegi
MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better.

Agreed with everything, typical gunfight in bf3, shoot, shoot, shoot, then the game decides to finally register the bullets and flash the damn crosshair, the other guy dies and i take damage from someone who is dead. Also bf3 might be shinny but the enviroments are empty and bland.
Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts
Both are terrible garbage.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

MW3, but it's cool to hate CoD so I voted BF3

Harisemo
and that's what CoD kids say when they can't come up with a real argument.^
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
Both are terrible garbage.famicommander
Avatar image for mrmoeone
mrmoeone

524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 mrmoeone
Member since 2006 • 524 Posts

Imo BF3...the big maps vehicle and air combat, and the destructability is awesome and pretty immersive:D

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.

rasengan2552

Do you have proof of this?people would admit MW3 was better if it was, they wouldn't have a reason to hide it lol

I like CoD for it's gung ho maps and gameplay sometimes but it has no lasting effect for me, it's good to blow off steam but when I want to play with friends and really get into a tactical round of gameplay I choose BF3.One thing CoD has over BF3 is hit detection, but there is a lot more going on in BF3 to warrant some hiccups. Still annoys the Sh!t out of me though.

Bottom line is both games are good for different reasons

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Imo BF3...the big maps vehicle and air combat, and the destructability is awesome and pretty immersive:D

mrmoeone

I agree. Even if you just join a 64 player Caspian CQ server and stand there and just listen to the audio alone it's pretty freaking epic. The sense of immersion is incredible.

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#29 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

Don't like either, but Battlefield 3 looks like it has actualy effort put into it, so it gets my vote.

Avatar image for Xeogua
Xeogua

1542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Xeogua
Member since 2010 • 1542 Posts

Out of those it's BF3. BF3 is boring as hell now though, and the updates are too big. I don't have room on my hard drive for all of them.

Avatar image for rockydog1111
rockydog1111

2079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#31 rockydog1111
Member since 2006 • 2079 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="rockydog1111"] well, depends how you see it.l Mw3 on pc is miles better than the consoles, far far better graphics and unlike bf3 it has lan, modes and server browser :) I guess its what matters to you.
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.

Loegi
MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better.

Agreed with everything, typical gunfight in bf3, shoot, shoot, shoot, then the game decides to finally register the bullets and flash the damn crosshair, the other guy dies and i take damage from someone who is dead. Also bf3 might be shinny but the enviroments are empty and bland.

That is true, I love the vehicles in BF3 though. Unlike what haters would have you believe, neither are bad games.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#32 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

I don't own either game, however I have more WAY more fun with COD than I ever do with BF, so the answer is COD.

Plus COD has a fun (but sometimes short) campaign, BF just has a crappy and forgettable short campaign.

Online COD has action and many features, BF only has a few modes and it's boring because maps are too big and you just walk around trying to find people to kill but rarely do. Only good thing about it is the realism and the destructable environments, everything else is just boring IMO.

COD is the better series, hands down. Though Killzone destroys both.

Avatar image for quebec946
quebec946

1607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 quebec946
Member since 2007 • 1607 Posts

they both get really old after a while.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

I don't own either game, however I have more WAY more fun with COD than I ever do with BF, so the answer is COD.

Plus COD has a fun (but sometimes short) campaign, BF just has a crappy and forgettable short campaign.

Online COD has action and many features, BF only has a few modes and it's boring because maps are too big and you just walk around trying to find people to kill but rarely do. Only good thing about it is the realism and the destructable environments, everything else is just boring IMO.

COD is the better series, hands down. Though Killzone destroys both.

ShadowMoses900
WTF are you on about? Everything you've said is subjective and only a matter of an opinion. You say COD is more fun and then pass it off that COD is the better series. I bet you're one of those people who are fanboys of COD, decided to try out BF3 and was owned because the game has a learning curve.
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.

Loegi
MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better.

Better map sizes? How would fying a jet or even a heli work on a tiny Cod map? Whether its fun to play is subjective.
Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#36 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts
I'm surprised you didn't make a sh***** video about this.
Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
[QUOTE="Loegi"][QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

nobody here will ever admit that MW3 is just better, the game gets supported by the devs 10x more than BF3 does.

Cranler
MW3 has better hit detection (the most important part in my opinion), better map sizes, less annoying graphics (lensflares everywhere), and is generally more fun to play, so I do think MW3 is better.

Better map sizes? How would fying a jet or even a heli work on a tiny Cod map? Whether its fun to play is subjective.

I'm playing a shooter, not a jet simulator or something. So, yes, CoD has better map sizes. And yes the fun part is subjective, but CoD has more action in a shorter amount of time generally, and the constant unlocks give a faster rate of satisfaction too.
Avatar image for Frieza99
Frieza99

228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Frieza99
Member since 2012 • 228 Posts

MW3

Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#39 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

BF3 all day

Avatar image for WTA2k5
WTA2k5

3999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 120

User Lists: 0

#40 WTA2k5
Member since 2005 • 3999 Posts

I'd actually say MW3. The only thing Battlefield does much better is map design and 64-player Conquest. Other than that, BF3 has a much worse campaign and co-op, and most of its modes beyond Large Conquest aren't all that interesting. Modern Warfare 3 isn't anything spectacular either, but each part of the whole package is a bit better.

Avatar image for RoccoHout
RoccoHout

1086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 RoccoHout
Member since 2011 • 1086 Posts

I prefer BF3 more big time. The game makes you feel more like your in an actual war, not in just some experiment where you and your team got dropped into an isolated part of the city.

Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

Bad Company 2 is better than both of them. Play that instead. BibiMaghoo
+5

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#43 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

If there was a prize for making the billionth BF3 vs MW3 thread, TC might have won.

Anyways, co-op and single player - MW3

Multiplayer - BF3

BF3's co-op isn't terrible but its not as mode and variety filled as MW3's, and I think MW3's multiplayer is fun but super unbalanced and lacking in the depth and scale of BF3 (especially on PC with 64 players).

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts
BF3. It's not even close. MW3 is casual trash designed for children
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
BF3. It's not even close. MW3 is casual trash designed for childrenBPoole96
BF3 isn't?
Avatar image for RoccoHout
RoccoHout

1086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 RoccoHout
Member since 2011 • 1086 Posts

BF3 has more than twice the votes, yet MW3 has more than twice the sales :(

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#47 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

MW3 all the way, it is far more superior in everyway from fun and enjoyable modes like infected mode ( like tower defence ), domination, One in the Chamber to the newly released Face Off, MW3 offers an online fun that no other game provides ( imo ), its quick and very easy to get in and talk to people. join your friends, can easily even find people and not worry about running for 5 hours in a huge map like in BF3 to find one person and heck if you get killed in BF3 after you been running for 5 hours to find someone guess what? you'll have to go back and run all the way again just to find someone. i dislike big games like BF3 but BF3 was still fun to play just not as fun as MW3 or CoD in general.. CoD provide more fun and value for me.

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#48 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

BF3 has more than twice the votes, yet MW3 has more than twice the sales :(

RoccoHout

Because this is SW, the place where everyone here hate on anything CoD cuz probably they suck at it or something.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]BF3. It's not even close. MW3 is casual trash designed for childrenJebus213
BF3 isn't?

Not nearly to the extent that MW3 is. Not saying BF3 is some super hardcore game like CSS but it at least incorporates things like recoil, suppression effects, skill to use vehicles effectively, and bullet drop whereas MW3 is a complete noobfest where people just point their ARs down narrow corridors and use kill streaks.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="RoccoHout"]

BF3 has more than twice the votes, yet MW3 has more than twice the sales :(

finalstar2007

Because this is SW, the place where everyone here hate on anything CoD cuz probably they suck at it or something.

It's not really possible to suck at a CoD game. Anyone with any idea how to operate a dual analog controller can do well at it. People hate on it because it is basically has only changed for the worse since CoD4