Black ops Review

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mamkem6
mamkem6

1457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mamkem6
Member since 2007 • 1457 Posts

Linky

The review is little strange. Lots of contradictions.

Try to read it all and judge for yourself

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
Terribly written review, loads of small stupid gripes (enemy gun sounds aren't loud enough...what?), as well as some large ones that sound like they should effect the score more than they do.
Avatar image for 3rdbass
3rdbass

3301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 3rdbass
Member since 2009 • 3301 Posts

TC that is one of the worst written reviews ever and doesn't really give any insight into the game. Felt more like an preview than a review.

Avatar image for Fried_Shrimp
Fried_Shrimp

2902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Fried_Shrimp
Member since 2009 • 2902 Posts

Black Ops isn't just a good game, it's borderline revolutionary.

Pathetic review.
Avatar image for mamkem6
mamkem6

1457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 mamkem6
Member since 2007 • 1457 Posts

TC that is one of the worst written reviews ever and doesn't really give any insight into the game. Felt more like an preview than a review.

3rdbass

I know, that is why I posted it. I think the person who did the review didn't even play the game.

Avatar image for Postal_Guy
Postal_Guy

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Postal_Guy
Member since 2006 • 2643 Posts

Reznov OMFG

epic win

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts

Black Ops isn't just a good game, it's borderline revolutionary.Fried_Shrimp

Pathetic review.

I wouldn't mind the person saying that if they had actually backed it up with the text but to say the SP is weak, the zombie mode is pretty similar to WaW and the best thing in multiplayer is the theatre mode which has been in Halo for over 3 years, then to go and say that at the end is just stupid.
Avatar image for punchacku
punchacku

278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 punchacku
Member since 2003 • 278 Posts

Reviews are like buttholes...... everyone has one....and some stink more than others. :)

Avatar image for mamkem6
mamkem6

1457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 mamkem6
Member since 2007 • 1457 Posts

Reviews are like buttholes...... everyone has one....and some stink more than others. :)

punchacku

lol to that

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts
Wth? Throughout the review he was like "good not great" Then at the end he's "its revolutionary"?
Avatar image for cj_simmons
cj_simmons

419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 cj_simmons
Member since 2005 • 419 Posts

You can tell that wasn't a professionally written review. First, the review embargo hasn't been lifted yet, and second, the review was poorly written with numerous grammar errors. Most likely a small fan site trying to gain readers by posting the first Black ops review. They say the campaign is good but not great, the levels are made for camping, and people who didn't like World At War would feel the same way about Black ops. Then they give a list of cons that is more than double the list of pros, but still call it revolutionary and give it a 9.5.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

You can tell that wasn't a professionally written review. First, the review embargo hasn't been lifted yet, and second, the review was poorly written with numerous grammar errors. Most likely a small fan site trying to gain readers by posting the first Black ops review. They say the campaign is good but not great, the levels are made for camping, and people who didn't like World At War would feel the same way about Black ops. Then they give a list of cons that is more than double the list of pros, but still call it revolutionary and give it a 9.5.

cj_simmons

This. Probably just some fansite. Very bad review.

Avatar image for SpArKs424
SpArKs424

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 SpArKs424
Member since 2010 • 2203 Posts

ill wait for more reviews this one was poorly written .

Avatar image for Da_lil_PimP
Da_lil_PimP

4241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Da_lil_PimP
Member since 2006 • 4241 Posts

The comments on that review suggest those people only go to that site for reviews.

Avatar image for muzik_mafia
muzik_mafia

1628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 muzik_mafia
Member since 2009 • 1628 Posts

Worst. Review. Ever.