Why is everyone pitching a fit about the game? if battlefield came out with a spin off version of 3 with graphics thats decent enough for a portable....there would be no complaints and people would be all over it.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why is everyone pitching a fit about the game? if battlefield came out with a spin off version of 3 with graphics thats decent enough for a portable....there would be no complaints and people would be all over it.
with what the vita can do its pretty bad, I don't even blame the vita like most people do, I blame activision for passing this to a crappy third party developer. Killzone vita is being done in-house and it looks gorgeous and almost like its ps3 counterpart. But graphics aren't everything, it could be fun but given their track record I doubt it.
Why is everyone pitching a fit about the game? if battlefield came out with a spin off version of 3 with graphics thats decent enough for a portable....there would be no complaints and people would be all over it.
youngmurk911
dude..everyone on the internet hates call of duty.... thats why they are dissing it...has nothing to do with the vita...
if you want something positive then go to a CoD fanboy site.
It's clearly running on the same engine as burning skies. There's no way you could look at the short clips of killzone mercenary gameplay and not realize that this game looks like a half assed project compared to that
Edit: This is coming from a guy who buys call of duty each year because I enjoy them.
It would look great, if it were a PSP game. But it's a Vita game and we know that the system can do far more than what Declassified is doing(ie, Killzone: Mercenary). Not to mention that it's being made a developer who hasn't made a single quality product since 2000.
Well, when you compare it to how Killzone looks on it...who'd want to play CoD?ispeakfact
This is the truth. Killzone Merc looks amazing graphically on Vita. The detail in the enviroments (not actual textures but the amount of stuff they packed in each enviroment) is outstanding from the little snippit. It's got great lighting and the art style looks fantastic. I can image the MP being great too,
Why is everyone pitching a fit about the game? if battlefield came out with a spin off version of 3 with graphics thats decent enough for a portable....there would be no complaints and people would be all over it.
youngmurk911
Oh yes they would. An even crappier single-player bundled together with 8-16 player only? That wouldn't fly with anyone.
lol because its call of duty and since when has this said game ever been good on handhelds! to the general audience its aimed at?
it surely was not "on par quality to its console counterparts on the ds nor the psp ,
and with the lack of any where internet pretty much secures my theory on this bad boy , , ---best kept on the console , ! why because its multiplayer focused and for that kind of game its best kept on the console see mariokart is a whole different ball game it can be played as well on the smaller screen as it could the bigger one
the shooting games really suffer in trasnmission to handhelds, take even goldeneye for example controls are solid but the overall expeirence just omg cant expliain it ,
well it doesnt look good either... i mean we've seen Killzone and also Uncharted so clearly devs could have done a much better job with COD... It looks like a rushed game and Sony just wants a COD title for PSV hoping it will push sales..
I hope Sony realises they should focus on their 1st party devs and let them handle exclusives for PSV, or else give proper support to 3rd party devs when dealing with PSV..
mmmmmmmmm graphicy goodness /sarcasm
it looks like resident evil 3DS which is kinda sad consider the RE3DS looks the way it does with 3D on! if it was built for 2D only it would probably look even better. We all know Vita is more capable that the 3DS so this is pretty sad.
mmmmmmmmm graphicy goodness /sarcasm
it looks like resident evil 3DS which is kinda sad consider the RE3DS looks the way it does with 3D on! if it was built for 2D only it would probably look even better. We all know Vita is more capable that the 3DS so this is pretty sad.
painguy1
Maybe a compromise had to be made for it to run at constant 60fps? That and probably inexperience. How did Burning Skies look on Vita?
[QUOTE="painguy1"]
mmmmmmmmm graphicy goodness /sarcasm
it looks like resident evil 3DS which is kinda sad consider the RE3DS looks the way it does with 3D on! if it was built for 2D only it would probably look even better. We all know Vita is more capable that the 3DS so this is pretty sad.
OB-47
Maybe a compromise had to be made for it to run at constant 60fps? That and probably inexperience. How did Burning Skies look on Vita?
Nope, it runs at a steady 30 fps lol.[QUOTE="painguy1"]
mmmmmmmmm graphicy goodness /sarcasm
it looks like resident evil 3DS which is kinda sad consider the RE3DS looks the way it does with 3D on! if it was built for 2D only it would probably look even better. We all know Vita is more capable that the 3DS so this is pretty sad.
OB-47
Maybe a compromise had to be made for it to run at constant 60fps? That and probably inexperience. How did Burning Skies look on Vita?
It runs at 30 FPS, this is what **** me the most, there is NOTHING redeeming about this game. If it ran at 60FPS and looks like this MAYBE we could give it a pass but it doesn't even do that..Sony can get stuffed if they think we will buy this crap.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment