Blu-Ray or HD-DVD

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for privateiron13
privateiron13

275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 privateiron13
Member since 2006 • 275 Posts
Although Blue-Ray is the better system I think HD-DVD will be the one that takes off biggest, It's simple, cheap and does exactly what it say's on the tin. People that know nothing about technology don't want to mess about when getting a new dvd, they want to know what they're gettin is gonna work on their system and be in HD thats it. Blu-Ray is a good idea but it doesn't always mean HD and who's gonna buy a player for £1000 that won't play any of their old dvds on it rendering them useless. Sony come up with these wild new things but they rearly work, look at mini disk, that was a brilliant bit of kit, little cd's that don't get scratched and can be recorded on to like tapes 'a master peice' but complicated and expencive. Or dare I say the whole beta max thing.
Avatar image for munsoned
munsoned

3064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 munsoned
Member since 2006 • 3064 Posts
neither right now... im not paying 2000 bucks for a tv  to watch them on.that will only last 4 to 5 years sorry...
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
wait, what do you mean "Blu-Ray doesn't always mean HD"?
Avatar image for Boba_Fett_3710
Boba_Fett_3710

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Boba_Fett_3710
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts
neither right now... im not paying 2000 bucks for a tv to watch them on.that will only last 4 to 5 years sorry...munsoned
DVDs are they way to go, they are cheap, fair quality, durable and easy to find.
Avatar image for SageJMP
SageJMP

4210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 SageJMP
Member since 2004 • 4210 Posts

Blu-Ray is a good idea but it doesn't always mean HD and who's gonna buy a player for £1000 that won't play any of their old dvds on it rendering them useless.privateiron13

this one sentence right here says you have no freaking clue what you are talking about

Avatar image for Flame1
Flame1

463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Flame1
Member since 2003 • 463 Posts
Although Blue-Ray is the better system I think HD-DVD will be the one that takes off biggest, It's simple, cheap and does exactly what it say's on the tin. People that know nothing about technology don't want to mess about when getting a new dvd, they want to know what they're gettin is gonna work on their system and be in HD thats it. Blu-Ray is a good idea but it doesn't always mean HD and who's gonna buy a player for £1000 that won't play any of their old dvds on it rendering them useless. Sony come up with these wild new things but they rearly work, look at mini disk, that was a brilliant bit of kit, little cd's that don't get scratched and can be recorded on to like tapes 'a master peice' but complicated and expencive. Or dare I say the whole beta max thing.privateiron13
blu ray players still play old dvds, just not hd-dvds, and speaking of scratching disks my scratched up dvds skip while my sratchted up blu rays play fine.
Avatar image for privateiron13
privateiron13

275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 privateiron13
Member since 2006 • 275 Posts
My mistake didn't meen to put that there. I ment it doesn't always meen people are gonna go for it although it's a good idea
Avatar image for dynastyfan
dynastyfan

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 dynastyfan
Member since 2005 • 839 Posts
Well right now i would say blu-ray because it has better support and more titles which is the most important thing in the format war
Avatar image for Nex_Ownage
Nex_Ownage

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Nex_Ownage
Member since 2004 • 4753 Posts
Neither...upscaled DVD FTW.
Avatar image for Flame1
Flame1

463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Flame1
Member since 2003 • 463 Posts
the fact alone that a scratched on a dvd can ruin the movie while one on a blu ray doesnt effect it makes the choice easy: blu ray
Avatar image for EricForeman
EricForeman

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 EricForeman
Member since 2004 • 1423 Posts

I can't wait for downloaded content to take over so both die.  I think they should be spanked for not agreeing on a universal format. 

Avatar image for ninjiijitsu
ninjiijitsu

670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 ninjiijitsu
Member since 2007 • 670 Posts
Dvd looks like crap on my hd-tv.
Avatar image for dhjohns
dhjohns

5105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 dhjohns
Member since 2003 • 5105 Posts
Although Blue-Ray is the better system I think HD-DVD will be the one that takes off biggest, It's simple, cheap and does exactly what it say's on the tin. People that know nothing about technology don't want to mess about when getting a new dvd, they want to know what they're gettin is gonna work on their system and be in HD thats it. Blu-Ray is a good idea but it doesn't always mean HD and who's gonna buy a player for £1000 that won't play any of their old dvds on it rendering them useless. Sony come up with these wild new things but they rearly work, look at mini disk, that was a brilliant bit of kit, little cd's that don't get scratched and can be recorded on to like tapes 'a master peice' but complicated and expencive. Or dare I say the whole beta max thing.privateiron13
Wrong forum /thread
Avatar image for privateiron13
privateiron13

275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 privateiron13
Member since 2006 • 275 Posts
System wars, is this not a war between 2 systems then
Avatar image for -Reggaeton-
-Reggaeton-

2392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 -Reggaeton-
Member since 2007 • 2392 Posts
Dvd looks like crap on my hd-tv.ninjiijitsu
Avatar image for alfy13
alfy13

3600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 alfy13
Member since 2004 • 3600 Posts

I can't wait for downloaded content to take over so both die.  I think they should be spanked for not agreeing on a universal format. 

EricForeman

good luck waiting
Avatar image for michaelareb0001
michaelareb0001

1366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 michaelareb0001
Member since 2005 • 1366 Posts

I personally think everyone should buy both if they are gonna dive in right now. You simply can't buy one or the other with out running a huge risk of hitching your wagon to a dead format. The great thing is, the 360 and PS3 are the cheapest options to do this right now. And regarldess of which format ulimately becomes the standard, you'll still have 2 consoles which will be garunteed winners for the next 5 years.

If I had to pick one or the other right now, I'd say Blu-Ray, now that they've got the kinks worked out, the PQ and SQ on both formats is identical. However, Blu-Ray has more studio support, and has more releases on a weekly basis than HD-DVD. It also just took the lead in overall sales. I just don't want to have to wait 3 or more years for Universal Studio and Weinstien releases, so I have no regrets buying HD-DVDs either.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts
wrong forum.