Bungie - Halo-like Shooter For PS3?

Is there a good chance Bungie will do something like Halo for the PS3/Xbox 360? What would Activision want them to work on? The only thing the PS3 is missing is a space jumping Halo shooter. Thats what I was hoping Red Faction Guerrilla would be but it FAILED.

Is there a good chance Bungie will do something like Halo for the PS3/Xbox 360? What would Activision want them to work on? The only thing the PS3 is missing is a space jumping Halo shooter. Thats what I was hoping Red Faction Guerrilla would be but it FAILED.

erglesmergle

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Is there a good chance Bungie will do something like Halo for the PS3/Xbox 360? What would Activision want them to work on? The only thing the PS3 is missing is a space jumping Halo shooter. Thats what I was hoping Red Faction Guerrilla would be but it FAILED.

siddhu33

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

Yeah I don't see another space FPS from Bungie sorry for PS3 only owners=/. I think Bungie is going to want to break out of the mold and try something.

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Is there a good chance Bungie will do something like Halo for the PS3/Xbox 360? What would Activision want them to work on? The only thing the PS3 is missing is a space jumping Halo shooter. Thats what I was hoping Red Faction Guerrilla would be but it FAILED.

siddhu33

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

Youre saying Bungie can create ANY IP they want and Activision has no say at all? I dont believe that.

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Is there a good chance Bungie will do something like Halo for the PS3/Xbox 360? What would Activision want them to work on? The only thing the PS3 is missing is a space jumping Halo shooter. Thats what I was hoping Red Faction Guerrilla would be but it FAILED.

siddhu33

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Is there a good chance Bungie will do something like Halo for the PS3/Xbox 360? What would Activision want them to work on? The only thing the PS3 is missing is a space jumping Halo shooter. Thats what I was hoping Red Faction Guerrilla would be but it FAILED.

erglesmergle

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

Youre saying Bungie can create ANY IP they want and Activision has no say at all? I dont believe that.

Nearly any IP they want.

It is an action game, that we know.

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Is there a good chance Bungie will do something like Halo for the PS3/Xbox 360? What would Activision want them to work on? The only thing the PS3 is missing is a space jumping Halo shooter. Thats what I was hoping Red Faction Guerrilla would be but it FAILED.

erglesmergle

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

Youre saying Bungie can create ANY IP they want and Activision has no say at all? I dont believe that.

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

SaltyMeatballs

Youre saying Bungie can create ANY IP they want and Activision has no say at all? I dont believe that.

Its not that hard to believe but, lets say Bungie wants to make a Rock Band game. Then what?

Don't care. Anything coming out of Activision is immediately off my radar due to their suckage.

Its not that hard to believe but, lets say Bungie wants to make a Rock Band game. Then what?

erglesmergle

Anyway, bungie don't get to do any IP they want. They've already started working on the project; the only ones who know what it is are Bungie and Activision. Their partnership with Activision is for that one new IP that they're currently working on, whatever it may be. Activision get to publish it, but Bungie have absolute control over making it.

I'm not sure if Bungie is capable of making a game that isn't a floating space marine shooter. I'll be curious to see what they come up with, but I'm not expecting much.

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Is there a good chance Bungie will do something like Halo for the PS3/Xbox 360? What would Activision want them to work on? The only thing the PS3 is missing is a space jumping Halo shooter. Thats what I was hoping Red Faction Guerrilla would be but it FAILED.

erglesmergle

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

Youre saying Bungie can create ANY IP they want and Activision has no say at all? I dont believe that.

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Its not that hard to believe but, lets say Bungie wants to make a Rock Band game. Then what?

Ninja-Hippo

Anyway, bungie don't get to do any IP they want. They've already started working on the project; the only ones who know what it is are Bungie and Activision. Their partnership with Activision is for that one new IP that they're currently working on, whatever it may be. Activision get to publish it, but Bungie have absolute control over making it.

I meant a game like Rock Band.

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

Activision can't make them work on anything.

All they do is get to advertise the game, and give bungie some money.

Bungie own the ip that acti is publishing, they own their staff, they own nearly everything.

It's just that activision get to advertise the game.

Anyway, I think that Bungie will do something really far away from Halo.

ujjval16

Youre saying Bungie can create ANY IP they want and Activision has no say at all? I dont believe that.

Haha. That made me smile.

[QUOTE="ujjval16"][QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

Youre saying Bungie can create ANY IP they want and Activision has no say at all? I dont believe that.

erglesmergle

Haha. That made me smile.

I'm sure that's what every dev house wants, doesn't mean that's what they got. It would make no sense to take all risk, provide all funds, run all advertising and not maintain control over anything. Activision is not known for it's artistic vision or respect for developer talent.

Seeing as Bungie are crap FPS devs, they better make something else.

Kan0nF0dder

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

Seeing as Bungie are crap FPS devs, they better make something else.

smokingsbad

Don't care. Anything coming out of Activision is immediately off my radar due to their suckage.

Pug-Nasty

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

Seeing as Bungie are crap FPS devs, they better make something else.

smokingsbad

I thought MS got first dibs on whatever Bungie made.

[QUOTE="smokingsbad"][QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

Seeing as Bungie are crap FPS devs, they better make something else.

Kan0nF0dder

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"] So straight AAA's = crap? You learn something new everyday I guess.-The-G-Man-

Is this a matter of fact, or are you just attempting to be humerous?

What is a matter of fact though is the sheer amounthours, kills and deaths 11 million people have recorded in singleplayer.

Is this a matter of fact, or are you just attempting to be humerous?What is a matter of fact though is the sheer amounthours, kills and deaths 11 million people have recorded in singleplayer.-Snooze-

I thought MS got first dibs on whatever Bungie made.

Silverbond

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]Is this a matter of fact, or are you just attempting to be humerous?What is a matter of fact though is the sheer amounthours, kills and deaths 11 million people have recorded in singleplayer.-The-G-Man-

I think bungie will stay far from halo like game.

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]Is this a matter of fact, or are you just attempting to be humerous?What is a matter of fact though is the sheer amounthours, kills and deaths 11 million people have recorded in singleplayer.-The-G-Man-

The facts you just threw at me blew my mind!!!

The facts you just threw at me blew my mind!!!-Snooze-

it's a little hard to use facts in an argument that's about pure opinion-The-G-Man-

So it's your opinion that "Most the worlds population think the latter two Halo games had poor singleplayer"

Why make such a claim then call it your opinion? If you dislike the single player just say so, don't then try to make out everyone else did "in your opinion"

The fact are however that in ONE day

Brute Infantry

KIA Today: 785,942

Keep in mind that's just one type of enemy. Can you think of a game that beats that?

[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"]

it's a little hard to use facts in an argument that's about pure opinion-Snooze-

So it's your opinion that "Most the worlds population think the latter two Halo games had poor singleplayer"

Why make such a claim then call it your opinion? If you dislike the single player just say so, don't then try to make out everyone else did "in your opinion"

The fact are however that in ONE day

Brute Infantry

KIA Today: 785,942

Keep in mind that's just one type of enemy. Can you think of a game that beats that?

Wasn't it hinted that their next game will be more of an RPG?:?

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"]

it's a little hard to use facts in an argument that's about pure opinion-The-G-Man-

So it's your opinion that "Most the worlds population think the latter two Halo games had poor singleplayer"

Why make such a claim then call it your opinion? If you dislike the single player just say so, don't then try to make out everyone else did "in your opinion"

The fact are however that in ONE day

Brute Infantry

KIA Today: 785,942

Keep in mind that's just one type of enemy. Can you think of a game that beats that?

I'm not going to bother asking how you came to this conclusion, 'cause im sure it was a well thought out, indepth study.

I am, however, going to have to ask you how the first having the best campaign, equates to people thinking Halo 2 and 3 were all about multiplayer.

Would it not just mean Halo 1 had the best singleplayer? I won't mention nostalgia as a factor, or even the fact that Halo 1 was limited to LAN, and thus limiting the appeal of its MP.

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"]

it's a little hard to use facts in an argument that's about pure opinion-The-G-Man-

So it's your opinion that "Most the worlds population think the latter two Halo games had poor singleplayer"

Why make such a claim then call it your opinion? If you dislike the single player just say so, don't then try to make out everyone else did "in your opinion"

The fact are however that in ONE day

Brute Infantry

KIA Today: 785,942

Keep in mind that's just one type of enemy. Can you think of a game that beats that?

most people also think the halo series is crap and completely overrated in reviews.

I'm not going to bother asking how you came to this conclusion, 'cause im sure it was a well thought out, indepth study.I am, however, going to have to ask you how the first having the best campaign, equates to people thinking Halo 2 and 3 were all about multiplayer.Would it not just mean Halo 1 had the best singleplayer? I won't mention nostalgia as a factor, or even the fact that Halo 1 was limited to LAN, and thus limiting the appeal of its MP.-Snooze-

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]I'm not going to bother asking how you came to this conclusion, 'cause im sure it was a well thought out, indepth study.I am, however, going to have to ask you how the first having the best campaign, equates to people thinking Halo 2 and 3 were all about multiplayer.Would it not just mean Halo 1 had the best singleplayer? I won't mention nostalgia as a factor, or even the fact that Halo 1 was limited to LAN, and thus limiting the appeal of its MP.-The-G-Man-

Forum posts are not proof of anything, and reviews are proof of one random guys opinion. Which isn't proof at all now is it?

Just head over to Bungie.Net for figures instead of making assumptions based on forums posts.

FYI - I think Halo sucks, both single and multiplayer.

Forum posts are not proof of anything, and reviews are proof of one random guys opinion. Which isn't proof at all now is it?Just head over to Bungie.Net for figures instead of making assumptions based on forums posts.FYI - I think Halo sucks, both single and multiplayer.-Snooze-

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]Forum posts are not proof of anything, and reviews are proof of one random guys opinion. Which isn't proof at all now is it?Just head over to Bungie.Net for figures instead of making assumptions based on forums posts.FYI - I think Halo sucks, both single and multiplayer.-The-G-Man-

No ... Not really. The entire world could claim France didn't exists ... it wouldnt make it so.

No in my opinion they are done with anything to do with Halo, unless MS comes to them with an absorbance amount of money to do another one, which is never going to happen because they have 343 doing their Halo now. The bottom line is Bungie left MS to do their own thing, they didn't jump ship to just go to another publisher to help them finance another Halo type game.

[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="-Snooze-"]Forum posts are not proof of anything, and reviews are proof of one random guys opinion. Which isn't proof at all now is it?Just head over to Bungie.Net for figures instead of making assumptions based on forums posts.FYI - I think Halo sucks, both single and multiplayer.-Snooze-

No ... Not really. The entire world could claim France didn't exists ... it wouldnt make it so.