Bungie Weekly Update 01.22.10 - Reach not Alpha

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

Just because the community loves graphics threads SO MUCH!!! here is, straight from the horses mouth, a Halo: Reach graphics thread.

__________

Right. Let's talk a little Halo: Reach.

Builds are coming in at a blistering pace as the team continues to drive hard and fast towards the ever looming Alpha branch. The process is so break neck at times that it's hard for us poor dudes over in the community pod to keep track and chronicle the goings on for you in any meaningful way. For example, the build that brought you the latest batch of media assets was already weeks old when we scrubbed it for screenshots. Pre-Thanksgiving, in fact. The nature of the development process is such that stability can often become a concern when the various disciplines are routinely plugging in their new pieces of technical and artistical hotness, so when it came time to show it off to our media friends, we decided to dust off one of the older, notably stable builds. Game tends to show better when it's in rock solid working order.

Awesome Sauce!

__________

I shall continue to update this opening post, so make sure you keep checking back. Ya hear!

Avatar image for GulliversTravel
GulliversTravel

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 GulliversTravel
Member since 2009 • 3110 Posts
They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.
Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.GulliversTravel

Bungie just put up this weeks Weekly Update today, so I figured "why the hell not?".

Avatar image for bigboss5ak
bigboss5ak

2962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 bigboss5ak
Member since 2007 • 2962 Posts
They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.GulliversTravel
The trailer begs to differ, it was all in game and the trailer was reachs latest build.
Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.GulliversTravel
The trailer would disagree with you
Avatar image for AdjacentLives
AdjacentLives

1173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AdjacentLives
Member since 2009 • 1173 Posts

They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.GulliversTravel

We won't know till we see the Beta.

Avatar image for TOAO_Cyrus1
TOAO_Cyrus1

2895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TOAO_Cyrus1
Member since 2004 • 2895 Posts
They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.GulliversTravel
The character models are awesome, exactly like the trailer in fact. If they can get the environments to look as good as the reveal then I am satisfied.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.GulliversTravel
I'm expecting the same. Look at Halo 3...the trailer "WOWed!" everyone, but the retail game didn't look as good. ;3 Though, with all their talk of how they've completely overhauled the engine...I'm hoping for more.

Avatar image for GulliversTravel
GulliversTravel

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GulliversTravel
Member since 2009 • 3110 Posts
Ive been quoted in almost every post after mine! Okay well ive always believed Halo Reach wont look that good, because of how much its trying to do in one go, so i really feel that Bungie should give us a better and more fuller look at what they are trying to achieve rather than a few shots of some muddy looking environments.
Avatar image for jakarai
jakarai

4289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 jakarai
Member since 2008 • 4289 Posts
Bungie is no different from Turn 10. They seem to always under deliver in the graphics department.
Avatar image for Arbiterisl33t69
Arbiterisl33t69

2542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 Arbiterisl33t69
Member since 2009 • 2542 Posts
In other news, the HUD everyone complained about being yellow is apparently now blue again. Hurray?
Avatar image for indigo_blur
indigo_blur

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 indigo_blur
Member since 2009 • 36 Posts

[QUOTE="GulliversTravel"]They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.AdjacentLives

We won't know till we see the Beta.

True that
Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts
Bungie is no different from Turn 10. They seem to always under deliver in the graphics department.jakarai
You seem to be confused son. Bungie has NEVER overhyped it's graphics. On the contrary, they are some of the most upfront and honest developers when it comes to graphics. Before Halo 3's reveal trailer they came out and said that it was going to be a mixture of Real-time, CGI, and some in-game footage. Only fanboys took that to mean "teh trailErs R realtime." Also, around the time Gears of War came out and before the Multiplayer beta bungie came out and said that it wasn't going to reach the graphical level of Gears. They were aiming for two different things. For Halo 3 it was TRUE HDR lighting and locked down frame rates for multiplayer. Keep in mind Halo 3 and ODST are still the ONLY console games to do true HDR lighting. Some of the scenes in ODST look REALLY good. Only fanboys bash Bungie's graphics because they don't understand what's going on.
Avatar image for Magik85
Magik85

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Magik85
Member since 2009 • 1078 Posts

Whats the most important they said: "The good news is that there's much more on the way and as soon as we can, say early next week, we'll play host to some of the freshly dropped assets in high resolution glory right here on Bungie.net."

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Ugh. Can fans get some common sense about this? Remember Halo 3? Remember the constant bantering over the visuals and using its development stages to backup the visual standard 'oh those are alpha', 'oh that was only the beta'. Just let it be, the game looks GOOD. :|
Avatar image for SpinoRaptor24
SpinoRaptor24

10316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#16 SpinoRaptor24
Member since 2008 • 10316 Posts

Bungie is no different from Turn 10. They seem to always under deliver in the graphics department.jakarai

So what? Since when has anyone played a Halo game for its graphics?

Like Skrat said, the game looks good. It's definitely not graphics king, but it's far from ugly.

Avatar image for siddhu33
siddhu33

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 siddhu33
Member since 2008 • 3264 Posts

Did anyone but me see this??

This is what makes Halo 3 Special.

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#18 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="jakarai"]Bungie is no different from Turn 10. They seem to always under deliver in the graphics department.mythrol
You seem to be confused son. Bungie has NEVER overhyped it's graphics. On the contrary, they are some of the most upfront and honest developers when it comes to graphics. Before Halo 3's reveal trailer they came out and said that it was going to be a mixture of Real-time, CGI, and some in-game footage. Only fanboys took that to mean "teh trailErs R realtime." Also, around the time Gears of War came out and before the Multiplayer beta bungie came out and said that it wasn't going to reach the graphical level of Gears. They were aiming for two different things. For Halo 3 it was TRUE HDR lighting and locked down frame rates for multiplayer. Keep in mind Halo 3 and ODST are still the ONLY console games to do true HDR lighting. Some of the scenes in ODST look REALLY good. Only fanboys bash Bungie's graphics because they don't understand what's going on.

^^^this until bungie says that the trailer was partially CGI the game will look near Identical to it, the character models are about there and they say that they have done loads of work in all departments since last november, I'd rather believe bungie's word on halo than anyone else.
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#19 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
I adored that. go sandbox! / sky box
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Yes, I heard the Bungie Reach comment multiple times here in SW.

I'm struggling on what I can say that I haven't said in those other threads...Oh I got it! :)

There has been a bunch of threads just on that comment uttered from Bungie....Well, their game is due this year so what we see isn't far off.

Also, you guys know Bungie faked that Reach Trailer, right? They aren't as honest as some claim, not that I mind (They have a game to sell, I'm not naive to that! :P ), but I can't believe the short term memory of some SW posters here. Even though Bungie increased the Frame Rate of Halo Reach and AntiAliased the Hell out of the Halo Reach trailer, it didn't look that uber with those enhancements, so don't go hype this as some sort of Graphics wonder, since that won't end well.

It's all good, REACH will be awesome, but let's not get carried away.

Remember, I didn't make the news, you guys forgot it.:P


Avatar image for Doctor-McNinja
Doctor-McNinja

1515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Doctor-McNinja
Member since 2009 • 1515 Posts

Yes, I heard the Bungie Reach comment multiple times here in SW.

There has been a bunch of threads just on that comment uttered from Bungie....Well, their game is due this year...

Also, you guys know Bungie faked that Reach Trailer, right? They aren't as honest as some claim, not that I mind, but I can't believe the short term memory of some SW posters here. Even though they increased the Frame Rate and AntiAliased the Hell out of the Halo Reach trailer, it didn't look that uber with those enhancements, so don't go hype this as some sort of Graphics wonder, since that won't end well.

It's all good, REACH will be awesome, but let's not get carried away.

Remember, I didn't make the news, you guys forgot it.:P


SolidTy

How did they 'fake' the trailer when they posted an update immediately afterwards explaining exactly how it was made? How dishonest of them! :roll:

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Yes, I heard the Bungie Reach comment multiple times here in SW.

I'm struggling on what I can say that I haven't said in those other threads...Oh I got it! :)

There has been a bunch of threads just on that comment uttered from Bungie....Well, their game is due this year so what we see isn't far off.

Also, you guys know Bungie faked that Reach Trailer, right? They aren't as honest as some claim, not that I mind (They have a game to sell, I'm not naive to that! :P ), but I can't believe the short term memory of some SW posters here. Even though Bungie increased the Frame Rate of Halo Reach and AntiAliased the Hell out of the Halo Reach trailer, it didn't look that uber with those enhancements, so don't go hype this as some sort of Graphics wonder, since that won't end well.

It's all good, REACH will be awesome, but let's not get carried away.

Remember, I didn't make the news, you guys forgot it.:P


Doctor-McNinja

How did they 'fake' the trailer when they posted an update immediately afterwards explaining exactly how it was made? How dishonest of them! :roll:

:lol: They weren't immediate in posting anything afterwards when we look at the timeline.

BUNGIE were being accused, and Bungie came forward in a timely matter after the accusations.

Ask yourself why they bothered faking a trailer, and afterwards admit the game will not look that good but close to it? Why would they do that? Why are you on my case? I didn't make the news, I didn't tell Bungie to fake the trailer, I didn't do anything of the sort. :P

Please ask them, and get back to us because I honestly can't tell you the answer. I don't know other than sales. :)

"During the Spike VGAs a new Halo Reach trailer was shown showing probably the best looking Halo graphics yet. Many sites, including even Gametrailers who assisted in hosting the Spike VGAs doubted the validity of the graphics in the Halo Reach trailer. However, Bungie issued an official response recently explaining the trailer."

As far as dishonestly goes, there are better examples, sure. But they aren't "The Most HONEST Developers out there" as some would claim. That's my point, I would think that spot for MOST HONEST would belong to those that don't pull ANY shenanigans. Again, I don't really care, it's going to be a good game, SW isn't an emotional place for me. I see news and I remember it.

Here is your :roll: emoticon back.:P

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts
Killzone 2 got nothing on the scale and size of halo reach,40 A,I at once,OPEN WORLD,weather system..and lmao at those saying that bungie isn't honest,and yet the same ones hype the fake pre rendered trailers of GT5 when is not even gameplay,its only a crappy video using game assets :lol:
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Killzone 2 got nothing on the scale and size of halo reach,40 A,I at once,OPEN WORLD,weather system..and lmao at those saying that bungie isn't honest,and yet the same ones hype the fake pre rendered trailers of GT5 when is not even gameplay,its only a crappy video using game assets :lol:Tessellation

Yes, shame on those people too.

They should realize dishonestly when they see it.But let us also laugh at those that only see honesty one way. :lol:

I'm glad I didn't hype KZ2, lol...that game surprised me by actually being a good game...just like Reach will be a good game. I can't wait to beat it on Legendary the same way I've beat ALL THE HALO's. ;)

I also don't even really talk about GT5 other than it should be fun.:lol:

Avatar image for danish-death
danish-death

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 danish-death
Member since 2004 • 5314 Posts
I don't get what's so important for a game to be *graphic king*.
Avatar image for Leejjohno
Leejjohno

13897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Leejjohno
Member since 2005 • 13897 Posts

...Because we haven't heard "pre-alpha" from a developer before... Dudes, you shouldn't expect the game to look much better than it does now, no matter what posters they shove up on the hype train.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#27 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts

[QUOTE="GulliversTravel"]They said this a few days ago. Even then, chances are its not going to look much better.AdjacentLives

We won't know till we see the Beta.

Or the "final product".
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

Yes, I heard the Bungie Reach comment multiple times here in SW.

I'm struggling on what I can say that I haven't said in those other threads...Oh I got it!

There has been a bunch of threads just on that comment uttered from Bungie....Well, their game is due this year so what we see isn't far off.

Also, you guys know Bungie faked that Reach Trailer, right? They aren't as honest as some claim, not that I mind (They have a game to sell, I'm not naive to that! ), but I can't believe the short term memory of some SW posters here. Even though Bungie increased the Frame Rate of Halo Reach and AntiAliased the Hell out of the Halo Reach trailer, it didn't look that uber with those enhancements, so don't go hype this as some sort of Graphics wonder, since that won't end well.

It's all good, REACH will be awesome, but let's not get carried away.

Remember, I didn't make the news, you guys forgot i

SolidTy

I wouldn't say they "faked" the trailer. Everyone (well,anyone who knows about game development) knows Reach wont have that level of AA, and the retail game probably wont have a consistent framerate like the one seen in the trailer. Less AA and a lower framerate wont have that big of impact on the visuals though.

Every developer adds tons of AA to the pre-released media of their games, and I'd hope that most would have caught on to it by now, but in the end the graphics usually aren't that far off.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

Talking about Reach's graphics, Bungie said:

This trailer absolutely represents our visual bar for the final game and is near identical to what you'll see next Fall. The single biggest difference between this trailer and the final game will be the extra generous amount of anti-aliasing (the smoothing of "jaggies" or edges of pixels) present in what you're watching right now but rest assured that Reach will be significantly improved in this department compared to Halo 3. (The extreme "AA" in the trailer was due to the "frame dump" mentioned above.) Bungie

Sounds good.

Avatar image for sonny2dap
sonny2dap

2215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 sonny2dap
Member since 2008 • 2215 Posts
The game is already looking nice Im guessing the only area we see significant imrpovement in is environmental textures as some of the shots already released looked like place holder stuff.
Avatar image for Doctor-McNinja
Doctor-McNinja

1515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 Doctor-McNinja
Member since 2009 • 1515 Posts

[QUOTE="Doctor-McNinja"]

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Yes, I heard the Bungie Reach comment multiple times here in SW.

I'm struggling on what I can say that I haven't said in those other threads...Oh I got it! :)

There has been a bunch of threads just on that comment uttered from Bungie....Well, their game is due this year so what we see isn't far off.

Also, you guys know Bungie faked that Reach Trailer, right? They aren't as honest as some claim, not that I mind (They have a game to sell, I'm not naive to that! :P ), but I can't believe the short term memory of some SW posters here. Even though Bungie increased the Frame Rate of Halo Reach and AntiAliased the Hell out of the Halo Reach trailer, it didn't look that uber with those enhancements, so don't go hype this as some sort of Graphics wonder, since that won't end well.

It's all good, REACH will be awesome, but let's not get carried away.

Remember, I didn't make the news, you guys forgot it.:P


SolidTy

How did they 'fake' the trailer when they posted an update immediately afterwards explaining exactly how it was made? How dishonest of them! :roll:

:lol: They weren't immediate in posting anything afterwards when we look at the timeline.

BUNGIE were being accused, and Bungie came forward in a timely matter after the accusations.

Ask yourself why they bothered faking a trailer,

I think you need to reconsider what 'faking' means, to be honest.

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#32 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

I thought those EB Games screens seemed to lack shaders compared to the VGA awards reveal.

Avatar image for siddhu33
siddhu33

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 siddhu33
Member since 2008 • 3264 Posts

I want Reach to look like this:

WIN!

Avatar image for MC3887
MC3887

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 MC3887
Member since 2009 • 1507 Posts

I want reach to look as good/better than BFBC2, I will be very satisfied with that.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="Doctor-McNinja"] How did they 'fake' the trailer when they posted an update immediately afterwards explaining exactly how it was made? How dishonest of them! :roll:

Doctor-McNinja

:lol: They weren't immediate in posting anything afterwards when we look at the timeline.

BUNGIE were being accused, and Bungie came forward in a timely matter after the accusations.

Ask yourself why they bothered faking a trailer,

I think you need to reconsider what 'faking' means, to be honest.

If it isn't 100% straight from an actual 360 or XDK, then it's not realtime-rendered...and therefore fake.

Avatar image for Doctor-McNinja
Doctor-McNinja

1515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Doctor-McNinja
Member since 2009 • 1515 Posts

[QUOTE="Doctor-McNinja"]

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

:lol: They weren't immediate in posting anything afterwards when we look at the timeline.

BUNGIE were being accused, and Bungie came forward in a timely matter after the accusations.

Ask yourself why they bothered faking a trailer,

HuusAsking

I think you need to reconsider what 'faking' means, to be honest.

If it isn't 100% straight from an actual 360 or XDK, then it's not realtime-rendered...and therefore fake.

That simply isn't true.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]

[QUOTE="Doctor-McNinja"] I think you need to reconsider what 'faking' means, to be honest.

Doctor-McNinja

If it isn't 100% straight from an actual 360 or XDK, then it's not realtime-rendered...and therefore fake.

That simply isn't true.

Prove me otherwise. How can one be certain it is a 100% realtime render or in-game demo without the game unit (or its development kit) on which to run it? That's the realtime standard and why I prefer playable demos to most anything else presented.

Avatar image for GulliversTravel
GulliversTravel

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 GulliversTravel
Member since 2009 • 3110 Posts

[QUOTE="Doctor-McNinja"]

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]If it isn't 100% straight from an actual 360 or XDK, then it's not realtime-rendered...and therefore fake.

HuusAsking

That simply isn't true.

Prove me otherwise. How can one be certain it is a 100% realtime render or in-game demo without the game unit (or its development kit) on which to run it? That's the realtime standard and why I prefer playable demos to most anything else presented.

Real-time does not mean the same thing as in-engine. In this stage of development, its unlikely they have the game running at a good framerate.
Avatar image for Vadamee
Vadamee

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Vadamee
Member since 2009 • 1195 Posts

...Because we haven't heard "pre-alpha" from a developer before... Dudes, you shouldn't expect the game to look much better than it does now, no matter what posters they shove up on the hype train.

Leejjohno
Rule #35 of SW: Every PS3 game is pre-alpha until they hit store shelves.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]

[QUOTE="Doctor-McNinja"] That simply isn't true.

GulliversTravel

Prove me otherwise. How can one be certain it is a 100% realtime render or in-game demo without the game unit (or its development kit) on which to run it? That's the realtime standard and why I prefer playable demos to most anything else presented.

Real-time does not mean the same thing as in-engine. In this stage of development, its unlikely they have the game running at a good framerate.

Realtime is stricter than in-engine since it has the additional under-the-hood stuff to deal with at the same time. And I know the results won't be the best. I'd rather see the brutal truth and know it'll only get better.
Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20500 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="Doctor-McNinja"] How did they 'fake' the trailer when they posted an update immediately afterwards explaining exactly how it was made? How dishonest of them! :roll:

Doctor-McNinja

:lol: They weren't immediate in posting anything afterwards when we look at the timeline.

BUNGIE were being accused, and Bungie came forward in a timely matter after the accusations.

Ask yourself why they bothered faking a trailer,

I think you need to reconsider what 'faking' means, to be honest.

There was enormous buzz going around by people who have seen the trailer. All saying it was in game. Where did they get that sort of confirmation from? Why didn't bungie stop these people from saying such things if it weren't true.

Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

There was enormous buzz going around by people who have seen the trailer. All saying it was in game. Where did they get that sort of confirmation from? Why didn't bungie stop these people from saying such things if it weren't true.

Zero_epyon

Bungie came out and said that the trailer would be in-engine several weeks before the actual showing, so their shouldn't be any reason for people to believe it was in-game.

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20500 Posts

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"] There was enormous buzz going around by people who have seen the trailer. All saying it was in game. Where did they get that sort of confirmation from? Why didn't bungie stop these people from saying such things if it weren't true.

opex07

Bungie came out and said that the trailer would be in-engine several weeks before the actual showing, so their shouldn't be any reason for people to believe it was in-game.

Link?
Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#44 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

[QUOTE="opex07"]

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"] There was enormous buzz going around by people who have seen the trailer. All saying it was in game. Where did they get that sort of confirmation from? Why didn't bungie stop these people from saying such things if it weren't true.

Zero_epyon

Bungie came out and said that the trailer would be in-engine several weeks before the actual showing, so their shouldn't be any reason for people to believe it was in-game.

Link?

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/105/1054772p1.html

"Though no actual gameplay was shown, the trailer did feature in-engine graphics and the first look at what is supposedly Planet Reach."

Still looking for the article by Bungie.

And another link stating the trailer is in-engine. http://www.gametrailers.com/video/halo-reach-spike-tv/59813?type=flv

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20500 Posts

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"][QUOTE="opex07"]

Bungie came out and said that the trailer would be in-engine several weeks before the actual showing, so their shouldn't be any reason for people to believe it was in-game.

Avian005

Link?

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/105/1054772p1.html

"Though no actual gameplay was shown, the trailer did feature in-engine graphics and the first look at what is supposedly Planet Reach."

Still looking for the article by Bungie.

This is a description of the trailer after the vga's, not bungie explaining what the trailer would be several weeks before. Do you have that link?
Avatar image for opex07
opex07

2236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 opex07
Member since 2007 • 2236 Posts

Link?Zero_epyon

link.(cant link to the actual tweet due to that requiring you to log in)

Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#47 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"]

Link?opex07

link.(cant link to the actual tweet due to that requiring you to log in)

Damn, I never use those search buttons.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#48 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I thought those EB Games screens seemed to lack shaders compared to the VGA awards reveal.

gamecubepad

Yep, even more proof that those were older pics.

Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts

I remember when Guerilla was saying KZ2 was in pre-alpha after the E3 2007 trailer. If you do not feel comfortable showing the game, then do not show it.

Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

Did anyone but me see this??

This is what makes Halo 3 Special.

siddhu33

Holy crud. Wish I could make that in Forge. Forge is so awesome. Im surprised not many shooters have copied it yet