call of duty games need to go back to 30 FPS on the consoles because it looks

call of duty world at war looks so rank on consoles the textures are shockingly low rez and overall just looks so dated, after playing killzone 2 I cant even bring myself to play call of duty much anymore because killzone 2 looks and plays just so much better

it's time for both devs to realise the game looks like **** at 60FPS and needs to go back to 30 FPS to get a lot more detail in the game so it doesnt look so bad.

call of duty world at war looks so rank on consoles the textures are shockingly low rez and overall just looks so dated, after playing killzone 2 I cant even bring myself to play call of duty much anymore because killzone 2 looks and plays just so much better

it's time for both devs to realise the game looks like **** at 60FPS and needs to go back to 30 FPS to get a lot more detail in the game so it doesnt look so bad.

bigLLL

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays. 

[QUOTE="bigLLL"]

call of duty world at war looks so rank on consoles the textures are shockingly low rez and overall just looks so dated, after playing killzone 2 I cant even bring myself to play call of duty much anymore because killzone 2 looks and plays just so much better

it's time for both devs to realise the game looks like **** at 60FPS and needs to go back to 30 FPS to get a lot more detail in the game so it doesnt look so bad.

CosmicSavant

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays. 

[QUOTE="CosmicSavant"][QUOTE="bigLLL"]

call of duty world at war looks so rank on consoles the textures are shockingly low rez and overall just looks so dated, after playing killzone 2 I cant even bring myself to play call of duty much anymore because killzone 2 looks and plays just so much better

it's time for both devs to realise the game looks like **** at 60FPS and needs to go back to 30 FPS to get a lot more detail in the game so it doesnt look so bad.

Sully28

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays. 

I know all that, but if the game is running fine at 60FPS but looks like crap, it's not because it's running at 60FPS. 

[QUOTE="Sully28"][QUOTE="CosmicSavant"]

 

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays. 

CosmicSavant

I know all that, but if the game is running fine at 60FPS but looks like crap, it's not because it's running at 60FPS. 

Unless they are cutting out eye candy for extra FPS.

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays.

CosmicSavant

:lol:

this will be my new sig

i dont care what it looks like its hella fun i would play it if it looked like a PS2 gamemurat8

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays.

:lol:

this will be my new sig

would make a good sig but I didnt write it and it's coming up I did there??[QUOTE="AnimalStak"][QUOTE="bigLLL"]

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays.

bigLLL

:lol:

this will be my new sig

yea sry i fixed it

[QUOTE="bigLLL"]would make a good sig but I didnt write it and it's coming up I did there??[QUOTE="AnimalStak"]

 

:lol:

this will be my new sig

 

AnimalStak

yea sry i fixed it

[QUOTE="CosmicSavant"]

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays.

AnimalStak

:lol:

this will be my new sig

[QUOTE="murat8"]i dont care what it looks like its hella fun i would play it if it looked like a PS2 gamebigLLL

if its 60fps it means they scaled down the graphics for more frames. If there was no relationship between the two then every single game would run at 60fps.

thats why in crysis when you turn down the settings you get more frames. There are some exceptions in certain cases because of programing choices but what that guy said was very silly

Lowering the FPS does nothing for the textures because the textures rely on how much RAM you have.AIH_PSP

thats not true its more complicated than that

[QUOTE="bigLLL"][QUOTE="murat8"]i dont care what it looks like its hella fun i would play it if it looked like a PS2 gamemurat8

i dont care what it looks like its hella fun i would play it if it looked like a PS2 gamemurat8

if its 60fps it means they scaled down the graphics for more frames. If there was no relationship between the two then every single game would run at 60fps.AnimalStak

This relationship is entirely dependent on the hardware and loosely dependent on how the graphics look.  If the hardware is up to snuff, then 60FPS is no problem. Call of Duty on the PS3 looks fine and runs smooth; his argument is as ridiculous as his reasoning.

[QUOTE="murat8"][QUOTE="bigLLL"]It actually does look like a ps2 game after having played the killzone 2 beta, K2 destroys it on every level from graphics to gameplay it isnt even close, I cant even bring myself to play world at war anymore after playing K2bigLLL

[QUOTE="Sully28"][QUOTE="CosmicSavant"]

 

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays. 

CosmicSavant

I know all that, but if the game is running fine at 60FPS but looks like crap, it's not because it's running at 60FPS. 

Actually it is. Developers have to sacrafice graphical detail in order to get their game running at 60fps. At 30fps they can add more visual detail. It is also tougher to program at a higher resolution and keep the framerate that high. 

[QUOTE="bigLLL"][QUOTE="murat8"]not arguing or anything but how is KZ2's gameplay better then CoD5's? just wondering because i havent played KZ2 myself? Also control wise how do u aim down the sights? Im pretty sire its R3 but im not 100% suremurat8

[QUOTE="bigLLL"]

call of duty world at war looks so rank on consoles the textures are shockingly low rez and overall just looks so dated, after playing killzone 2 I cant even bring myself to play call of duty much anymore because killzone 2 looks and plays just so much better

it's time for both devs to realise the game looks like **** at 60FPS and needs to go back to 30 FPS to get a lot more detail in the game so it doesnt look so bad.

CosmicSavant

FPS doesn't affect how well a game looks; it just determines how fast the game plays. 

60fps > 30fps.

I think console games should HAVE to run at 60fps. 30fps is far, too slow.