Can we all agree now that the 360 was a design disaster?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for teh_cell
teh_cell

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 teh_cell
Member since 2005 • 304 Posts

The PS3 was alwasy quieter than the 360, didn't have the ridiculous power brick, and in it's slim incarnation has both CPU and GPU at 45nm. The 360 by comparision has suffered an abnormally high failure rate, has a huge power brick and ridiculously bulky power connector. The worst hardware revisions sound like a jet taking off, and even the Jasper revision is far from being 'quiet'.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

Yes the 360's design was a disaster but what isnt is the fact that its still better than a ps3.

Avatar image for Regisland
Regisland

2390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Regisland
Member since 2009 • 2390 Posts

first 2 comments are fanboys....what a disaster

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#4 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

yep and we can also agree 360 will never have the sales like ps3 ds and wii and psp have in japan ! 360 is like selling a dead console in japan-looks at ps2 sales compared to 360 lol their similar but the difference is ps2 ia 10 yrs old and 360 is half that

and is still getting wide support !

Avatar image for teh_cell
teh_cell

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 teh_cell
Member since 2005 • 304 Posts

Better how? At failing, at not playing blu ray movies, at not allowing free online play? Or maybe better graphics. What is it you mean

Avatar image for ___gamemaster__
___gamemaster__

3422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ___gamemaster__
Member since 2009 • 3422 Posts

the thing i hate the most on my 360 is the power brick. other than that its fine.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
Only if you agree that PS3 was a total marketing disaster. Oh snap!
Avatar image for moose_knuckler
moose_knuckler

5722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 moose_knuckler
Member since 2007 • 5722 Posts
Disaster? No, if it was it would've had a redesign by now (seriously). Unless you're talking about the interior then yes that's a disaster but not how it looks.
Avatar image for boredy-Mcbored
boredy-Mcbored

1566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 boredy-Mcbored
Member since 2007 • 1566 Posts

It wasn't a disaster, just kinda faulty. A disaster would be the Virtual boy.

Avatar image for Yankees718
Yankees718

1033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Yankees718
Member since 2009 • 1033 Posts

The PS3 was alwasy quieter than the 360, didn't have the ridiculous power brick, and in it's slim incarnation has both CPU and GPU at 45nm. The 360 by comparision has suffered an abnormally high failure rate, has a huge power brick and ridiculously bulky power connector. The worst hardware revisions sound like a jet taking off, and even the Jasper revision is far from being 'quiet'.

teh_cell

The great thing about:

-120GB HDD

-Intalled like 6 of my mainly played games

All of that = i hear nothing from my fan....

And you guys WONDER why the ps3 is quiter (mandatory installs)

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

only if we can agree that the ps2 was just as bad, and seemingly the ps3 as well

Avatar image for drakecool1
drakecool1

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 drakecool1
Member since 2009 • 1145 Posts

The PS3 was alwasy quieter than the 360, didn't have the ridiculous power brick, and in it's slim incarnation has both CPU and GPU at 45nm. The 360 by comparision has suffered an abnormally high failure rate, has a huge power brick and ridiculously bulky power connector. The worst hardware revisions sound like a jet taking off, and even the Jasper revision is far from being 'quiet'.

teh_cell

whenever I here someone play a 360 I feel like im at an airport.

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts

Yes the 360's design was a disaster but what isnt is the fact that its still better than a ps3.

clyde46
Wait..........What?! The PS3 design is absolute perfection, except for the fact the GPU could of been a little better. Now as far as development, the PS3 was a disaster for dervs.
Avatar image for BloodSeeker1337
BloodSeeker1337

1278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 BloodSeeker1337
Member since 2009 • 1278 Posts
At least it's not overpriced.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Anything with 360s failure rate would be something to be ashamed of if you are the designer.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"]

Yes the 360's design was a disaster but what isnt is the fact that its still better than a ps3.

djsifer01
Wait..........What?! The PS3 design is absolute perfection, except for the fact the GPU could of been a little better. Now as far as development, the PS3 was a disaster for dervs.

Thats what I meant. On a purely design basis the PS3 beats the 360 but on the games front the 360 beats the PS3.
Avatar image for InfiniteBlak
InfiniteBlak

794

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 InfiniteBlak
Member since 2009 • 794 Posts
At least it's not overpriced. BloodSeeker1337
Tell me what makes the PS3 overpriced?
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
[QUOTE="BloodSeeker1337"]At least it's not overpriced. InfiniteBlak
Tell me what makes the PS3 overpriced?

It started off at 599, and after three years it's still more than 100 dollars more than it's competitors. So yes, it is in comparison.
Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

It started off at 599, and after three years it's still more than 100 dollars more than it's competitors. So yes, it is in comparison. HoolaHoopMan

its not over priced for what you get.

its too expensive yes, but not overpriced

Avatar image for SLIisaownsystem
SLIisaownsystem

964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 SLIisaownsystem
Member since 2009 • 964 Posts

Thats why i build my own systems.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"] It started off at 599, and after three years it's still more than 100 dollars more than it's competitors. So yes, it is in comparison. washd123

its not over priced for what you get.

its too expensive yes, but not overpriced

Only now could you say it isn't overpriced. In years past, it was easily overpriced considering the library in comparison.
Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan]

Only now could you say it isn't overpriced. In years past, it was easily overpriced considering the library in comparison.

the library is kind of irrelevant as to whether the hardware is overpriced or not.

over priced would be if the ps3 still had a standard dvd drive and no hdd and debuted at $600.

like i said it was 'too' expensive not over priced