Can't wait until PC and 360 merge online.

  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Chaos_Daro
Chaos_Daro

1818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 Chaos_Daro
Member since 2006 • 1818 Posts

[QUOTE="Chaos_Daro"]I guess if they gave 360 players auto aim and/or larger hitboxes it would even things out. TheCrimsonKoopa


We don't want auto aim.. That would ruin everything even more. The real solution is just keep it 360 vs. 360 and PC vs. PC.

I personally hate autoaim but I was just throwing it out there.  Larger hit boxes sounds much better as long as it's not over done.

And your solution is correct.  Controllers vs Mouse is too much of a hassle. 

Avatar image for poovine
poovine

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 poovine
Member since 2006 • 387 Posts
[QUOTE="Chaos_Daro"]I guess if they gave 360 players auto aim and/or larger hitboxes it would even things out. TheCrimsonKoopa


We don't want auto aim.. That would ruin everything even more. The real solution is just keep it 360 vs. 360 and PC vs. PC.

I agree keep them separated. Assuming that 360 and PC won't merge on every title, it shouldn't matter whether kb/m is better or controller is better. You'll be predominantly going against other people with the same control scheme so everyone is at the same level. The argument is ridiculous if you ask me. The way I see it, ikb/m is easier to use and more precise. A controller is harder to use and less precise. So if you want precision go with kb/m. If you want a harder learning curve go with a controller. Either way it shouldn't matter since you'll be predominantly playing against people with the same control scheme as you.
Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#53 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts
[QUOTE="NicktehImperial"]I have no problem with the controller. Why does everyone say that the controller is bad for FPS's? It works just as good as a K/M for me, except its more comfortable and the buttons are easier to quickly press.



Try playing Pro Evo 6 with a keyboard...its the same as an FPS with a controller.
Avatar image for bri360
bri360

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 bri360
Member since 2005 • 2755 Posts

Cuz im gonna own all you console fanboys with my PC. Especially FPS's.

Mozo336

It will be very interesting. Im better at aiming with controllers than a keyboard and mouse so well so when it happends lol.
Avatar image for Flamepheonix
Flamepheonix

384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Flamepheonix
Member since 2006 • 384 Posts

[QUOTE="TheCrimsonKoopa"][QUOTE="Chaos_Daro"]I guess if they gave 360 players auto aim and/or larger hitboxes it would even things out. Chaos_Daro



We don't want auto aim.. That would ruin everything even more. The real solution is just keep it 360 vs. 360 and PC vs. PC.

I personally hate autoaim but I was just throwing it out there. Larger hit boxes sounds much better as long as it's not over done.

And your solution is correct. Controllers vs Mouse is too much of a hassle.

I hate to tell you this the auto aim and hit boxes are already there in halo 2 and making them any bigger would be riduculous. maybe if they left the auto aim how it is in halo 2 and take them out for PC then it will be fine Proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au7KE9xUVTk oh and if its like halo CE maybe most of the PC players will be playing mods and user created maps anyways
Avatar image for cheezisgoooood
cheezisgoooood

6130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#56 cheezisgoooood
Member since 2004 • 6130 Posts
Won't it be a bit unfair?
Avatar image for Mozo336
Mozo336

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Mozo336
Member since 2006 • 251 Posts
[QUOTE="Mozo336"]

Cuz im gonna own all you console fanboys with my PC. Especially FPS's.

bri360


It will be very interesting. Im better at aiming with controllers than a keyboard and mouse so well so when it happends lol.

Ummm...   lemme think... uuuhhh....   Yeah im 120% sure you will get owned.   :P

Avatar image for marcusistheman
marcusistheman

126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 marcusistheman
Member since 2006 • 126 Posts
It will be an awesome gen when the online aspects of all consoles are merged...
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#59 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="NicktehImperial"]I have no problem with the controller. Why does everyone say that the controller is bad for FPS's? It works just as good as a K/M for me, except its more comfortable and the buttons are easier to quickly press.Chaos_Daro

It's not bad for FPS games at all.  It's just that the mouse is a lot twitchier which means you can be more accurate. 

Controllers are much more comfortable though, imo.  And  I choose comfort over precision.  It's only games where you have to "point and click" that I find unplayable with a controller, like RTS games (most of the time, anyway).

I'm not bashing PC gaming or anything, it's just my opinion :)

Of course you're not bashing PC gaming, because if you are I'd call you out if your reasoning was controller >keyboard. Simply for the fact that the PC has controllers, and can use any game console controller through the use of adaptors in the first place. Lets keep it controller v Keyboard, and not diverge into PC v Console.