This Carmack guy need to give it a rest, and what's worst is that lems are taking his words like facts, but fail to realize that there are PLENTY of games and dev out there that actually has been or have worked on the ps3 that heavily contest his claim. The proof is in the pudding guys, the ps3 do have games that (visually) contest (or in some cases, beat out) the 360's best looking game to date.
KZ2, critics said that visually, this game isn't anywhere near short of amazing
Uncharted, 3 reviewers have stated that this game was the console graphics king during it's reign
MGS4, nearly every reviewer stated that this game is not only one of (if not) the best looking game on consoles to date visually, but they also said technically as well.
Yet, since this guy Carmack, created a genre that was a success, and knows computer hardware inside and out, all of a sudden, he knows what hes talking about. Quality dev like Activision and Ubisoft said that the ps3 was easy to develop for in which both companies produced quality games on the ps3 (COD4 and Assasins Creed) (something that Carmack has yet to do), but since Carmack is what he is, all of these credible statements just went out the window huh? Do mind yall lems, that the only game that looks to have surpass gears on the 360 and ran efficiently is gears2 after 2 years of exclusives:lol:, while games on the ps3 gets better and better in visuals. When "Carmack" makes a game that gets good praises like the games i gave above on the ps3, then his words IMHO can hold weight, but until then, his words means NOTHING!!!!!!!!!
by the way, didn't the people at Crytek (the ones that assisted in Crysis, which happens to be the generation's graphics king as of now) stated that the ps3 is more powerful? but since Cramack created a new genre and was successful at it, he can give pointers on how and what this gen is all about, but all in all, he hasn't made a single game on the ps3 or a game that looks better than Crysis? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Log in to comment