What do you think CoD World at War is best on? Are the graphics better on the PS3, is the online better on the 360, or does the Wii-mote make it the best on the Wii?
I don't care about the Wii version, but the general consensus is that the 360 and PS3 versions have extremely minor advantages over the other. So it's not really best on either.
i really want to say the PC version but the multiplayer side 7/10 games have hackers and cheats of some sort. I prefer the single player above the rest though
i really want to say the PC version but the multiplayer side 7/10 games have hackers and cheats of some sort. I prefer the single player above the rest thoughCrystal-Rush
Try 1/1000 and if there is a hacker, usually admins or even punkbuster kicks/bans them.
[QUOTE="Crystal-Rush"]i really want to say the PC version but the multiplayer side 7/10 games have hackers and cheats of some sort. I prefer the single player above the rest thoughbladeeagle
Try 1/1000 and if there is a hacker, usually admins or even punkbuster kicks/bans them.
maybe im unlucky then but i have noticed them in alot of matches
[QUOTE="Crystal-Rush"]i really want to say the PC version but the multiplayer side 7/10 games have hackers and cheats of some sort. I prefer the single player above the rest thoughCrystal-Rush
Try 1/1000 and if there is a hacker, usually admins or even punkbuster kicks/bans them.
maybe im unlucky then but i have noticed them in alot of matches
Not everyone who gets amazing scores and kills hack.
[QUOTE="Crystal-Rush"]i really want to say the PC version but the multiplayer side 7/10 games have hackers and cheats of some sort. I prefer the single player above the rest thoughCrystal-Rush
Try 1/1000 and if there is a hacker, usually admins or even punkbuster kicks/bans them.
maybe im unlucky then but i have noticed them in alot of matches
Yeah you must be preety unlucky like the other person said normally cheaters are dealt with quite quicky via punkbuster or admins on the server
i really want to say the PC version but the multiplayer side 7/10 games have hackers and cheats of some sort. I prefer the single player above the rest thoughCrystal-Rush
If thats so, then i will say 7/10 you will find someone who is just better than you. People complaining about hackers most of the time is people whinning about someone being better.
i really want to say the PC version but the multiplayer side 7/10 games have hackers and cheats of some sort. I prefer the single player above the rest thoughCrystal-Rush
Play on better servers then. I never encounter hackers online and if I do THey get banned pretty fast.
I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't.
[QUOTE="organic_machine"]The PC. Why was it not included? DeathScape666
I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't.
And yet I can still play with my friends on co-op singleplayer and zombie mode.
PS3 & 360 version are basically the same but PSN is free so it has the edge.. Thinking about it though, people will be playing the 360 version for longer, a bit like COD4 on there, they didn't get any decent games out for over 6 months so most 360 owners stuck to COD4 while the PS3 owners were moving onto other games.
[QUOTE="organic_machine"]The PC. Why was it not included? DeathScape666
I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't. Cept split-screen is not important to any PC gamers so they woulden't care:| Heck Websites from 2006 have said Split-Screen is pretty much dead.
[QUOTE="organic_machine"]The PC. Why was it not included? DeathScape666
I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't.
65 players for pc, better graphics, user made mods and levels. Are you unaware of those advantages the pc version has?
[QUOTE="DeathScape666"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]The PC. Why was it not included? kozzy1234
I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't.
65 players for pc, better graphics, user made mods and levels. Are you unaware of those advantages the pc version has?
No, I'm fully aware of them. But it doesn't have split-screen multiplayer, therefore the console versions are better, in my opinion. Why can't people just accept my opinion? I understand if you think the PC version is better, but I think the console version is better.
[QUOTE="DeathScape666"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]The PC. Why was it not included? JangoWuzHere
I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't. Cept split-screen is not important to any PC gamers so they woulden't care:| Heck Websites from 2006 have said Split-Screen is pretty much dead. How is not important?
Good thing I listen to myself and not what a bunch of websites think. :| No, that's ridiculous. I should believe what they say, despite me playing Motorstorm: Pacific Rift SPLIT-SCREEN MULTIPLAYER ten minutes ago with my little brother.
[QUOTE="DeathScape666"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]The PC. Why was it not included? bladeeagle
I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't.
And yet I can still play with my friends on co-op singleplayer and zombie mode.
[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="DeathScape666"] I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't.DeathScape666
And yet I can still play with my friends on co-op singleplayer and zombie mode.
I don't understand what your point is.
What is the point of splitscreen? To play the same game on the same console with other people.
I may not be able to do that with my PC but I can still play on the same game with my friends. Sure it may not be on the same screen, but I'm still playing with friends.
And yet I can still play with my friends on co-op singleplayer and zombie mode.
bladeeagle
I don't understand what your point is.
What is the point of splitscreen? To play the same game on the same console with other people.
I may not be able to do that with my PC but I can still play on the same game with my friends. Sure it may not be on the same screen, but I'm still playing with friends.
Some preffer spitscreen, some preffer thousands of user made mods, keybaord and mouse, better graphics, better sound and 64 player limit instead of under 20 like on consoles. I respect your opinion that you like the console version better, just like i expect you to respect the fact that i own both the pc and 360 version and that i enjoy the pc version alot better.
Splitscreen is a PITA, if its not a party game (Rock band, GHWT) then SS is worthless, for games like CoD W@W just play online, playing splitscreen with 4 little quads is annoying.
Splitscreen AFAIK is dead, and many console users would agree with me on this one, Online>>>>>>>>>Splitscreen.
And yet I can still play with my friends on co-op singleplayer and zombie mode.
I don't understand what your point is.
What is the point of splitscreen? To play the same game on the same console with other people.
I may not be able to do that with my PC but I can still play on the same game with my friends. Sure it may not be on the same screen, but I'm still playing with friends.
Here's the difference: You need four PCs and four copies of the game in order to play with all your friends. We'll say that a gaming PC that can run Call of Duty: World at War costs 500 dollars. One copy each is 50 dollars. So that's 2200 dollars to play Call of Duty: World at War with my three friends on PC. In order to play Call of Duty: World at War on a console, you need to have one console, four controllers, and one copy of the game. We'll say an XBox 360 capable of running Call of Duty: World at War costs 300 dollars. A game costs 60 dollars. A controller costs 50 dollars. So that's 560 dolars to play Call of Duty: World at War with my friends on XBox 360. On top of that, those four controllers can be used for any other game on the console. Listen, before Christmas 2008, my friends always played Call of Duty 4. I didn't own a system capable of running Call of Duty 4, but luckily, I could always play with my friends. They had the game, the system, the controllers, so I didn't need anything. It was available for any future partcipants that wanted to play. Now I own a PS3 that can run the newest craze, World at War, but I still don't want to buy it. Never fear, I can still play it because my friends own the game and four controllers. Even if one my friends that own a PS3 doesn't have enough controllers, I can at least bring some over! Of course, most of my friends have 360's, but my point still stands. Plus, the console, controllers, and game are always there at someone's house. You don't need to plan to bring PC's over to play LAN. Do you see how it benefits me in my situation now? Whenever I bring this up, Hermits can never see why I like the console versions better. I understand why you like the PC version for your own personal reasons, but you have to see mine, and say, "I understand. That makes sense."
Splitscreen is a PITA, if its not a party game (Rock band, GHWT) then SS is worthless, for games like CoD W@W just play online, playing splitscreen with 4 little quads is annoying.
Splitscreen AFAIK is dead, and many console users would agree with me on this one, Online>>>>>>>>>Splitscreen.
I made a poll and asked people if they liked Offline or Online multiplayer better. The winner was Offline. I can't find it, but search my name and something along the lines of, "What do you like better: Online multiplayer or Offline multiplayer?" And you'll see the poll results. It was here in System Wars. Plus, games like Super Smash Brothers Brawl and Little Big Planet (My favorite multiplayer games of all time.) have you all share one screen, anyway, so it's awesome. Split-screen multiplayer isn't dead. If it was, then why do games keep including it? I admit that it isn't as strong as it used to be, but obviously developers find some use to it if they keep including it, at least some of them.
dude on pc now...even call of duty 2 has 64 player games actually full of players ...im pretty sure there's games as large in cod5 for pc .
but cod5 is best on pc
call of duty started on pc...i still remember playing call of duty 1's demo from pc gamer i think came with the mag...but it used the quake 3 engine i thought it sucked though i was playing unreal/quake at the time well still do lol.
got COD5 on PS3 but i would assume that the version runs/looks identically on the 360.. however i believe the PC version is the best after playing it on my friend's PC... not so sure about the Wii version though, havent seen it running or played it but considering the inferior hardware / online service i dont think its on par with other systems..
[QUOTE="DeathScape666"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]The PC. Why was it not included? JangoWuzHere
I'd put the other three versions over the PC version because the latter lacks split-screen multiplayer. If we are speaking solely single player, then yes, the PC version is the best. But if you include multiplayer, then it isn't. Cept split-screen is not important to any PC gamers so they woulden't care:| Heck Websites from 2006 have said Split-Screen is pretty much dead.
I have to agree I actually despise split screen multi-player in shooters. It doesn't help that I despise shooters on consoles in general (except for the N64).
Log in to comment