What's your opinion? I don't care and think it's 2 years late and will most likely be the weakest version of it. While Wii owners get to play COD4, other systems get MW2. It will probably still be a decent game for only Wii owners but it is a little too late
COD4 coming out for Wii.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Gimped version ported to the Wii two years later by Treyarch. No thanks. 
anybody who doesnt pick option 2 is dead wrong, an extreme fanboy, and in complete denialkidcool189
Nice bait.
[QUOTE="-Sluggo-"][QUOTE="hanslacher54"]
I had to put option 2 and 3 because of the sheep,:P
Wii_Gamer_277
Sheep are irrelevant. They hype anything to hell and back that is "exclusive" to the Wii.
Like tigr woods PGA golf right ? and CoDW@W ?Tiger Woods is irrelevant when most sheep are playing Wii Sports. It is the highest selling game ever, is it not?
CoD WaW got 8.5s all around because it is a sub-par game developed by a sub-par dev. Go play some excite bots or 7.5 World.
[QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"]
Hey guys, come November COD4 will turn out to be the same game on Wii as 360, just with worse graphics and in 480p
same online modes, same voice chat (just using wii speak), same DLC, same weapons, all the maps (maybe)
-Sluggo-
You are going to play a massively gimped two-year-old port, ported over the the worst system by an inferior developer while everyone else is playing the sequel. GG Sheep.
So?? yea its a port but with the best FPS controls on home consoles (no PC)
it won't be massively gimped, only the graphics will get toned down, worst system is your opinion, and Trey isn't inferior. they've made plenty of good games, IW is the douche's charging you for two map packs on release date, go ahead keep eating what scraps they throw you while you pay $20 to activate map packs already on the disc
yes it is a port, that will lose good graphics and gain more accurate controls than analog while keeping everything else
[QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"]
[QUOTE="-Sluggo-"]
You are going to play a massively gimped two-year-old port, ported over the the worst system by an inferior developer while everyone else is playing the sequel. GG Sheep.
-Sluggo-
So?? yea its a port but with the best FPS controls on home consoles (no PC)
it won't be massively gimped, only the graphics will get toned down, worst system is your opinion, and Trey isn't inferior. they've made plenty of good games, IW is the douche's charging you for two map packs on release date, go ahead keep eating what scraps they throw you while you pay $20 to activate map packs already on the disc
yes it is a port, that will lose good graphics and gain more accurate controls than analog while keeping everything else
Best controls? Maybe to a baby or the elderly. :lol:
It will be massively gimped. Everyone but Wii fanboys know this. Treyarch cashed in on Infinity Wards success of CoD 4 by taking it and adding a coat of World War II paint.
More accurate controls? Have you played to Conduit? GTFO kid. Let the tears flow and don't let the door hit you on the way to Game Stop to pick up Imagine Puppies.
GTFO kid? Thanks for openly insulting me. Uh, yea I've played a lot of conduit online, Medal of Honor Heroes 2, World at War Wii and i find its controls better than on 360/PS3 and i own a 360/PS3 too
but hey I JUST ACTUALLY PLAYED THOSE and formed an opinion. oh, and something about critics saying Metroid Prime 3, Conduit and others have the best FPS controls on home consoles (not pc) makes me think it will control fine too, hey its not like people like IGN and others have said the controls were superb???!!
huh?
Can you stop, that gif is really scary, I'm afraid :(You are going to play a massively gimped two-year-old port, ported over the the worst system by an inferior developer while everyone else is playing the sequel. GG Sheep.
-Sluggo-
It is NOT, I repeat, NOT going to have better graphics. The IR tech in the Wiimote is less accurate than analog sticks. You only think that it's better because you're a Wii fanboy and cannot fathom that just because you are physically pointing at something, it might not be the most accurate.
Wii
-Sluggo-
The Wii mote is more realistic, doesn't mean it's more accurate than a analog stick. Analog is more precise and accurate so FPS controls for PS3 and 360 are better than Wii.
[QUOTE="-Sluggo-"]
It is NOT, I repeat, NOT going to have better graphics. The IR tech in the Wiimote is less accurate than analog sticks. You only think that it's better because you're a Wii fanboy and cannot fathom that just because you are physically pointing at something, it might not be the most accurate.
Wii
hanslacher54
The Wii mote is more realistic, doesn't mean it's more accurate than a analog stick. Analog is more precise and accurate so FPS controls for PS3 and 360 are better than Wii.
I meant to say better precision aiming. I don't know what you're trying to say or if you're trying to agree with me. I think so... :?[QUOTE="hanslacher54"]
[QUOTE="-Sluggo-"]
It is NOT, I repeat, NOT going to have better graphics. The IR tech in the Wiimote is less accurate than analog sticks. You only think that it's better because you're a Wii fanboy and cannot fathom that just because you are physically pointing at something, it might not be the most accurate.
Wii
-Sluggo-
The Wii mote is more realistic, doesn't mean it's more accurate than a analog stick. Analog is more precise and accurate so FPS controls for PS3 and 360 are better than Wii.
I meant to say better precision aiming. I don't know what you're trying to say or if you're trying to agree with me. I think so... :?Yeah I agree with you. I was just adding on to what you said.
Log in to comment