cod4 graphics=crapppp

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/1962/a3dx0.jpg

1280x1024 x4 anti aliasing x16 anisotropic filtering cod4 demo on max everything.

Why are people hyping the graphics? Where's the freaking physics? plays like game from 1992.

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/1962/a3dx0.jpg

1280x1024 x4 anti aliasing x16 anisotropic filtering cod4 demo on max everything.

Why are people hyping the graphics? Where's the freaking physics? plays like game from 1992.

bigsmackyo4

The game plays just as well as and better than the others in the series. You don't really know what you're talking about, do you?

Furthermore, physics and graphics are not the same.

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/1962/a3dx0.jpg

1280x1024 x4 anti aliasing x16 anisotropic filtering cod4 demo on max everything.

Why are people hyping the graphics? Where's the freaking physics? plays like game from 1992.

Brmarlin

The game plays just as well as and better than the others in the series. You don't really know what you're talking about, do you?

Furthermore, physics and graphics are not the same.

umm i know this, if cod4 plays the same as all the other cod's why release it? it's nothing new been there done that, when the hell are they gonna impliment some freaking physics.

I always never understood the COD4 gfx hype...

i think people were trying to justify Killzone 2 looking awsome

R-Dot-Yung

killzone 2 looks worse texture wise.

i never thought id read someone asking where the physics in a screencap are...edeasknight

no i said the graphics suck, and why isnt there still any physics?

Downloading the demo now to see for myself, if it cant look good on my 8800GTX then..... wow.trizzle_a

he choose a bad pic on purpose, it looks great on my PC.

Boo hoo. Not all games have to have "teh grafix of teh lifetyme". If you want graphics buy a $1500 computer, buy Crysis, play that, and STFU.

[QUOTE="xTHExJUICEx"]Now that it "supposibly" looks better on the PS3 then the 360 version, COD4 in general looks like crap :roll:, right TC?bigsmackyo4

my pc looks better than xbox360/ps3 combined so yes, cod4 pc=crap console versions=watered down total crap.

If you have a PC then why did you defend the 360s version so freakin much in that other thread?

UNREAL TOURNAMENT 3 FRIDAY YEA BABY!

cod4 rehash what?

[QUOTE="xTHExJUICEx"]Now that it "supposibly" looks better on the PS3 then the 360 version, COD4 in general looks like crap :roll:, right TC?bigsmackyo4

my pc looks better than xbox360/ps3 combined so yes, cod4 pc=crap console versions=watered down total crap.

Excuse me if I have a limited knowledge about stuff lol, but I swear they said RSX graphics chip inside the ps3 was a modified 7800GTS thingy, so whats the difference?

Second, you havn't seen the ps3 version yet, which by a site claimed to say looks better than the 360 version, but even still, watch the 10 min. ign video...the graphics are so smooth...

To me, it's not about graphics, but so much as if the art style and graphics mix in such a way to appeal to me, for example, Crysis doesn't appeal to me graphics wise, does it mean it's bad?No, but at the same time, I prefer COD4 graphics over Crysis graphics.....

I agree. ITs not as good as i thought it would be.

Cant believe this got beaten by crysis in graphics.

Crysis looks like , a generation ahead.

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]

[QUOTE="xTHExJUICEx"]Now that it "supposibly" looks better on the PS3 then the 360 version, COD4 in general looks like crap :roll:, right TC?Muzzle_Flashes

my pc looks better than xbox360/ps3 combined so yes, cod4 pc=crap console versions=watered down total crap.

Excuse me if I have a limited knowledge about stuff lol, but I swear they said RSX graphics chip inside the ps3 was a modified 7800GTS thingy, so whats the difference?

Second, you havn't seen the ps3 version yet, which by a site claimed to say looks better than the 360 version, but even still, watch the 10 min. ign video...the graphics are so smooth...

To me, it's not about graphics, but so much as if the art style and graphics mix in such a way to appeal to me, for example, Crysis doesn't appeal to me graphics wise, does it mean it's bad?No, but at the same time, I prefer COD4 graphics over Crysis graphics.....

The RSX chip in ps3 is less powerful than the 7800 gtx chip.

RSX only has 6 or 4 vertex shaders vs 8 on my g70, plus only 128 bit memory interface.

less pixel fill rate.

Yes, consoles are more efficient, because of closed platform but still cant match it.

cod4 graphics are just annoying, not to mention no physics just shoot people and cant move objects the game just feels so dated.

Wow, just played demo. Great gunplay, but i'm confused as to why this won best graphics E3. CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHY? It looks like 1 generation behind crysis, and that was only on high settings.WhySoCry

the sudden shift to a modern COD probably cought everyone off guard...it looks good...but deffinetly far from the best.

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/1962/a3dx0.jpg

1280x1024 x4 anti aliasing x16 anisotropic filtering cod4 demo on max everything.

Why are people hyping the graphics? Where's the freaking physics? plays like game from 1992.

bigsmackyo4

[QUOTE="xTHExJUICEx"][QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]

[QUOTE="xTHExJUICEx"]Now that it "supposibly" looks better on the PS3 then the 360 version, COD4 in general looks like crap :roll:, right TC?bigsmackyo4

my pc looks better than xbox360/ps3 combined so yes, cod4 pc=crap console versions=watered down total crap.

If you have a PC then why did you defend the 360s version so freakin much in that other thread?

because im a pc gamer that knows xbox360 is more powerful and no reason ps3 version should look better, because even i know ps3 is inferior to xbox360.

so if the ps3 version really does look slightly better it's not because of hardware it's because of devs spent more time on ps3.

i can go into detail why it's almost impossible for ps3 to have better graphics if both pushed to limits.

BTW go look at cod4 screenshots they dont look nearly as good as my pc shot, and even my pc shot looks crap, so ps3 will be terrible and 360.

PEOPLE DO ME A FAVOR DO NOT BUY COD4 IT'S JUST A REHASHED GAME WITH NEW COAT OF PAINT, stop buying it so they stop rehashing it.

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/1962/a3dx0.jpg

1280x1024 x4 anti aliasing x16 anisotropic filtering cod4 demo on max everything.

Why are people hyping the graphics? Where's the freaking physics? plays like game from 1992.

bigsmackyo4

wow, then pc users are getting ripped cause it loooks generation better then that on the 360!

It looks amazing, and in case you didn't notice they were limiting the graphics in the demo. I couldn't go max on some things.Vandalvideo

Most likely not included in the demo to reduce the size of the download.

lol, rsx in no way can compete with a true g70 chip.bigsmackyo4

Every one of your post is full of random crap that has not 1 fact in it. I would almost say you are the same guy who thinks Painkiller looks better then MGS4.

i guess the graphics are amazing to console gamers, since they are used to crappy graphics, the lighting is terrible no real time shadows/lightsource the world textures are horrendous on highest setting, there's no physics what so ever, the games a piece of crap on top of that poorly optimized.bigsmackyo4

Yet console owners won best visuals technical last year and won it again at E3 for the very game your bashing. Go play painkiller.

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/1962/a3dx0.jpg

1280x1024 x4 anti aliasing x16 anisotropic filtering cod4 demo on max everything.

Why are people hyping the graphics? Where's the freaking physics? plays like game from 1992.

bigsmackyo4

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]i guess the graphics are amazing to console gamers, since they are used to crappy graphics, the lighting is terrible no real time shadows/lightsource the world textures are horrendous on highest setting, there's no physics what so ever, the games a piece of crap on top of that poorly optimized.Polaris_choice

Yet console owners won best visuals technical last year and won it again at E3 for the very game your bashing. Go play painkiller.

LOL atleast painkiller has physics better fire shaders/smoke/textures.

I AINT gonna lie PAINKILLER GAMEPLAY/graphics >>COD4

the game has physics and feels like you are there in the environment everything isnt static like cod4, you can move/knock around basically any objects in painkiller, you cant even push over a trashcan in cod4, the gameplay is that of doom1, only difference better graphics

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]i guess the graphics are amazing to console gamers, since they are used to crappy graphics, the lighting is terrible no real time shadows/lightsource the world textures are horrendous on highest setting, there's no physics what so ever, the games a piece of crap on top of that poorly optimized.Polaris_choice

Yet console owners won best visuals technical last year and won it again at E3 for the very game your bashing. Go play painkiller.

He must talking about the PC ver. :lol: COD4 on the 360 will own and get GOTY 8)

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]i guess the graphics are amazing to console gamers, since they are used to crappy graphics, the lighting is terrible no real time shadows/lightsource the world textures are horrendous on highest setting, there's no physics what so ever, the games a piece of crap on top of that poorly optimized.GTSaiyanjin2

Yet console owners won best visuals technical last year and won it again at E3 for the very game your bashing. Go play painkiller.

He must talking about the PC ver. :lol: COD4 on the 360 will own and get GOTY 8)

Even thought the pc version can be rendered at much higher resolutions than 720p and have all the AA and Af they want?

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]i guess the graphics are amazing to console gamers, since they are used to crappy graphics, the lighting is terrible no real time shadows/lightsource the world textures are horrendous on highest setting, there's no physics what so ever, the games a piece of crap on top of that poorly optimized.Polaris_choice

Yet console owners won best visuals technical last year and won it again at E3 for the very game your bashing. Go play painkiller.

yet the PC version of GEOW looks so much better that its the first thing GS mentions in its preview....

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]i guess the graphics are amazing to console gamers, since they are used to crappy graphics, the lighting is terrible no real time shadows/lightsource the world textures are horrendous on highest setting, there's no physics what so ever, the games a piece of crap on top of that poorly optimized.GTSaiyanjin2

Yet console owners won best visuals technical last year and won it again at E3 for the very game your bashing. Go play painkiller.

He must talking about the PC ver. :lol: COD4 on the 360 will own and get GOTY 8)

Umm, i have xbox360 and played the game on 360 beta the graphics are much worse than pc plus no physics.

cod4 has no physics the game sucks

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="bigsmackyo4"]i guess the graphics are amazing to console gamers, since they are used to crappy graphics, the lighting is terrible no real time shadows/lightsource the world textures are horrendous on highest setting, there's no physics what so ever, the games a piece of crap on top of that poorly optimized.cobrax25

Yet console owners won best visuals technical last year and won it again at E3 for the very game your bashing. Go play painkiller.

yet the PC version of GEOW looks so much better that its the first thing GS mentions in its preview....

I know the PC ver will be good, but the way he talks about makes it seem like a POS. I think he is just hating on cod but W/E