This topic is locked from further discussion.
the graphics are good enough, but there is some serious room for improvement. But this game is so immersive that i don't look at the texture. no time. Lighting, animation, sound and effects DO make a difference for me. very good shooter. Best CoD game thus far.
I hear you man, it sucks that you can't jump 15 feet in the air, you don't get an over shield and where are all the plasma nades at?
Would you prefer it if your enemies required 50+ bullets to kill as opposed to three?Verge_6
my points were made with a slight touch of sarcasm ;)
I think the graphics are awesome - not just overall sharpeness, but the environments are great, with debris and bombed out building...debris, dust effects, litter......AWESOME CAKES!!!!
The only thing that I don't get is why this has crazy hype over the other Call of duties? Maybe people don't like WWII shooters, or maybe its because of the currect Iraq situation (meaning people can relate) but the other call of duties are some of the best shooters out there!!??
Its the best singleplayer shooter I've played on PC. Short yes but amazingly intense and well thought from the start to the end. Graphics are not the greatest ever but they are very good and well optimized to work even with older computers.Pessu
best quote on the thread. good job.
too many people seem to be graphics snobs. seriously, what's wrong with these graphics? maybe my eyes aren't trained well enough to spot the glaring pop up and/or lack of particle who hah that must be occuring during this game. for me, it looks and plays great.
i'm not saying that graphics aren't important - they are amongst the top things i look for in a game - but to complain about the graphics on COD4 seems to be nit-picky. maybe i just remember what it was like to play Quartet on my old Sega 8 bit.
i guess everyone wants to be a game critic.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment