Cod4 on PC is graphically better than MW2

MW2 can only fit 18 people max. Cod4 has 64 Player maximum. Thanks to the dedicated server Cod4 is able to handle 64 smoke grenades at the same time. MW2 has the same engine like cod4 but can only handle 18 smokegrenades.

3 special grenades dont work with smokegrenades because its a too powerful graphics effect. That means that cod4 on PC isgraphically better than his successor.

It's really a shame the Moves that ACTIVISION have been making lately, I really feel for the COD fans on PC.

You do realise that your thread title and subsequent statement contradict each other right? What you said there would prove either MW2 was less optimized or more graphically intensive than MW 1.

It's really a shame the Moves that ACTIVISION have been making lately, I really feel for the COD fans on PC.

SolidTy

Well you know why they decided to give this one platform the total shaft...

What?

The engine could still do 64 smoke grenades on screen if it wanted to, MW2 does look better than CoD4, not by much though.

At the end of the day it is a highly modifed Quake 3 Engine, id never play it for its graphics anyway.

MW2 has larger environments, better lighting, better shadows, etc.

the mod should be handing out bans to those ignoring the sticky. why do people think it doesn't apply to them. its been their nearly a week now

You do realise that your thread title and subsequent statement contradict each other right? What you said there would prove either MW2 was less optimized or more graphically intensive than MW 1.

Espada12

both ways and mw2 is meant for all systems. No deticated servers is a sign of demotion and laziness.

have u seen MW2 in 1080p it looks alot better

MW2 can only fit 18 people max. Cod4 has 64 Player maximum. Thanks to the dedicated server Cod4 is able to handle 64 smoke grenades at the same time. MW2 has the same engine like cod4 but can only handle 18 smokegrenades.

3 special grenades dont work with smokegrenades because its a too powerful graphics effect. That means that cod4 on PC isgraphically better than his successor.

SLIisaownsystem

Also why do we keep on improving graphics engines? I mean, all we need to do to make a game look better according to SLIisaownsystem is throw some more smoke grenades in there!brandontwb

dude only people who cant afford MW2 on the PC would say this.

edit: by say I meant talk about it

have u seen MW2 in 1080p it looks alot better

kemar7856

:lol:

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

You do realise that your thread title and subsequent statement contradict each other right? What you said there would prove either MW2 was less optimized or more graphically intensive than MW 1.

both ways and mw2 is meant for all systems. No deticated servers is a sign of demotion and laziness.

Also why do we keep on improving graphics engines? I mean, all we need to do to make a game look better according to SLIisaownsystem is throw some more smoke grenades in there!brandontwb

awww poor hermits i know how you feel

With CoD maps, 64 players makes it more of cluster spunk than it already is with 18. Some games just aren't designed for that amount of players. CoD maps are much too small. More players doesn't equal better online experience. For example, KZ2 with 32 players on Tharsis depot just sucks but it works well for a larger map like Pryhus Rise or Saluman Market. It all depends on map design.

[QUOTE="kemar7856"]

have u seen MW2 in 1080p it looks alot better

treedoor

:lol:

graphically better? i really don't think so

better?

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

It's really a shame the Moves that ACTIVISION have been making lately, I really feel for the COD fans on PC.

EvanTheGamer

Well you know why they decided to give this one platform the total shaft...

That logic is just so flawed.

64 players in shipment throwing smoke grenades.....i think swomeones computer would crash