CoD4 or WaW

Which is better?

Im gonna go with CoD 4. Because you dont die in two shots like Cod WaW.

Technically WAW is better and has all COD4 offered + a little bit more... Both are practically the same game, only set in defferent era/conflicts.. One being the WWII and the other a ficticious conflict..

However i prefare COD4 maybe cause its not set in the WWII era, and after so much time spent with modern day weapons, using the ones in WAW feels so meehh... look forward to COD:MW2...

Technically WAW is better and has all COD4 offered + a little bit more... Both are practically the same game, only set in defferent era/conflicts.. One being the WWII and the other a ficticious conflict..

However i prefare COD4 maybe cause its not set in the WWII era, and after so much time spent with modern day weapons, using the ones in WAW feels so unsatisfying... look forward to COD:MW2...

COD4 hands down.

4 had better campaign.

WAW had better multiplayer

Call of Duty 4, hands down.

Taking someone down with a Barrett M82A1 or M4 Carbine is far more fun to me than killing Nazis with a Thompson. WaW is fun, but it just proves my theory that Treyarch in general is a hack of a developer. They essentially copy and pasted everything good about Call of Duty 4 and sent it back in time. Even the new additions like vehicle combat and the like just felt weak.

Which is better?

Im gonna go with CoD 4. Because you dont die in two shots like Cod WaW.

Zeppy007

Technically WAW is better and has all COD4 offered + a little bit more... Both are practically the same game, only set in defferent era/conflicts.. One being the WWII and the other a ficticious conflict..

However i prefare COD4 maybe cause its not set in the WWII era, and after so much time spent with modern day weapons, using the ones in WAW feels so meehh... look forward to COD:MW2...

Malta_1980

Like....?

All Treyarch did was some reskins and added different guns that suited the setting and added a mediocre single player campaign.

It just really show how untalented, unoriginal, and uncreative Treyarch is. They are what you call... a bad developing team.

The only reason WaW is remotely fun is because of the setup that they copied and pasted from Call of Duty 4 from the work that Infinity Ward did (they are what you call... a good developing team)

**** Activision for being so greedy and wanting to milk Call of Duty for all its worth by trying to release one every year, and ruining a wonderful franchise that Infinity Ward created.

Call of Duty 4 is better. Anyone that says WaW is better is just pissing over the hard work that Infinity Ward tries to do.

[QUOTE="Zeppy007"]

Which is better?

Im gonna go with CoD 4. Because you dont die in two shots like Cod WaW.

scottiescott238

4 had better campaign.

WAW had better multiplayer

n00bproof

COD:WAW is technically better but 4 has the better guns and maps. so COD4 is the winnerDBhova23

Well, since they are both incredibly similar, it just depends on what era you prefer. Modern or WWII?

I already have CoD4 and I'm picking up WaW tomorrow, so my advice: get both. Why? If you feel like Modern fighting, CoD4, but if you feel like taking a trip into the past, WaW.

WAW. Bigger maps, more balanced guns and perks, actually feels like a war and it has better graphics imo. It's better in everyway rather than that campfest known has cod 4.Espada12