Are you serious? this game looks amazing...Mikerules868
From what I have seen in the demo it does lack a lot in visual quality when compared to the PC at its maximum potential. It looks like the game is running on my old PC which still looks great none the less.
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"] Based upon the review it looks like the controls are pretty solid. Kudos to the Xbox 360 for being able to pull this off.Bansheesdie
Thats what got me, because OXM said that the controllers were the worst thing.
Â
Thats what IGN said to, at least in their prievew....they said it made single player very frustrating.Â
That sounds ilke ascore that game really deserves on the PC. The fact that a brand spankin new franchise like Supreme Commander scored lower than that regurgitated crap astounds me.
That sounds ilke ascore that game really deserves on the PC. The fact that a brand spankin new franchise like Supreme Commander scored lower than that regurgitated crap astounds me.Vandalvideo
Â
Yeah, no joke. Supreme Commander mops the floor with this. Maybe Gamespot really likes live action cutscenes. Â
[QUOTE="Mikerules868"]Are you serious? this game looks amazing...smokeydabear076
From what I have seen in the demo it does lack a lot in visual quality when compared to the PC at its maximum potential. It looks like the game is running on my old PC which still looks great none the less.
But compared to other 360 games, namely RTS's namely that Lord of the Rings on to be specific. This game looks wayyy better than that. And if im not mastaken it also has more characters on screen.
Another thing didnt the Godfather get a 6 in the graphics? you cant say this games graphics is only one point better than the godfather's.
It's not about the capabilities of the 360 its about how it was ported. With your logic, I guess Spiderman 3 is all the PS3 can push in the graphics department.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]That sounds ilke ascore that game really deserves on the PC. The fact that a brand spankin new franchise like Supreme Commander scored lower than that regurgitated crap astounds me.TekkenMaster606
I liked SC more too. C+C was just too old school and didn't really require any tactics...Â
Â
Yeah, no joke. Supreme Commander mops the floor with this. Maybe Gamespot really likes live action cutscenes.
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"] Based upon the review it looks like the controls are pretty solid. Kudos to the Xbox 360 for being able to pull this off.cobrax75
Thats what got me, because OXM said that the controllers were the worst thing.
Â
Thats what IGN said to, at least in their prievew....they said it made single player very frustrating.
i also found that pretty strange because i had zero problems with the controls. i guess whoever at IGN that reviewed the 360 version played the pc version abit to much and expected too much from console version.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]That sounds ilke ascore that game really deserves on the PC. The fact that a brand spankin new franchise like Supreme Commander scored lower than that regurgitated crap astounds me.TekkenMaster606
Â
Yeah, no joke. Supreme Commander mops the floor with this. Maybe Gamespot really likes live action cutscenes.
Â
I really didnt understand that either.....Supcom was a lot better.
Â
IMO COH also deserved a higher score, GS gave it a lower review then almost any other site.Â
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]That sounds ilke ascore that game really deserves on the PC. The fact that a brand spankin new franchise like Supreme Commander scored lower than that regurgitated crap astounds me.TekkenMaster606
Â
Yeah, no joke. Supreme Commander mops the floor with this. Maybe Gamespot really likes live action cutscenes.
yea. SC = my favorite RTS to date. i too dont understand how GS gave SC a lower score
After playing Supreme Command and the Dungeon Siege game on PSP, I've come to the conclusion that Gas Powered Games is going to be a serious powerhouse in the industry.
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Mikerules868"]Are you serious? this game looks amazing...Mikerules868
From what I have seen in the demo it does lack a lot in visual quality when compared to the PC at its maximum potential. It looks like the game is running on my old PC which still looks great none the less.
But compared to other 360 games, namely RTS's namely that Lord of the Rings on to be specific. This game looks wayyy better than that. And if im not mastaken it also has more characters on screen.
Another thing didnt the Godfather get a 6 in the graphics? you cant say this games graphics is only one point better than the godfather's.
Well he did mention framerate issues, I do not know if that is factored into the graphics or the gameplay part.
That sounds ilke ascore that game really deserves on the PC. The fact that a brand spankin new franchise like Supreme Commander scored lower than that regurgitated crap astounds me.Vandalvideo
I agree. It's kind of dumb how SupCom got knocked down for "high system requirements". I'll take SupCom over C&C3 any day. But hey, that's just me.Â
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]That sounds ilke ascore that game really deserves on the PC. The fact that a brand spankin new franchise like Supreme Commander scored lower than that regurgitated crap astounds me.cobrax75
Â
Yeah, no joke. Supreme Commander mops the floor with this. Maybe Gamespot really likes live action cutscenes.
Â
I really didnt understand that either.....Supcom was a lot better.
Â
IMO COH also deserved a higher score, GS gave it a lower review then almost any other site.
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]7 in graphics compared to PCs 9. :lol:Jewish_GameBoy
Â
Â
And? Care to add something worthwhile to this conversation? "Oh look at that hermit, he must be a nerd so I better find an immature and childish image to show my 'leet humor skills"
Â
:|
Â
Xbox 360 got pwnd in the graphics department here. Â
I really dont understand how Supcom got a lower score then C&C3 either.
smokeydabear076
Because the single player is atrocious.
I could honestly care less about SP in an most RTS's. SupCom is basically a purely MP game, it wasn't designed at all for SP really. I'll take a good MP RTS over a good SP RTS anyday. There's just so much freedom and strategies that can be used in SupCom than their are in most other RTS's. It's just awesome the things you can do with that game. It has a lot of depth.Â
7 in graphics compared to PCs 9. :lol:TekkenMaster606
A console is not a PC and half of the people playing on the PC wouldn't get 9 graphics unless they have a top of the line video card, cpu and memory. I still i find it really dumb that people actually come here to compare consoles to a PC.
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]7 in graphics compared to PCs 9. :lol:skbmassive
A console is not a PC and half of the people playing on the PC wouldn't get 9 graphics unless they have a top of the line video card. Still i find it really dumb that people compare consoles to a PC.
Â
Why? They're all machines capable of playing games, and a lot of the time, the same games. The only people trying to seperate the PC from the rest of the consoles are fanboys tired of fighting for second place. Â
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]7 in graphics compared to PCs 9. :lol:skbmassive
A console is not a PC and half of the people playing on the PC wouldn't get 9 graphics unless they have a top of the line video card. Still i find it really dumb that people compare consoles to a PC.
C&C3 can be ran on max or near max on hardware that's much less powerful than the 360's hardware...
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]7 in graphics compared to PCs 9. :lol:skbmassive
A console is not a PC and half of the people playing on the PC wouldn't get 9 graphics unless they have a top of the line video card. Still i find it really dumb that people compare consoles to a PC.
I remember a certain review stating, "Comand and Conquer 3 for the PC scales beautifully even with old machines".
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]7 in graphics compared to PCs 9. :lol:TekkenMaster606
A console is not a PC and half of the people playing on the PC wouldn't get 9 graphics unless they have a top of the line video card. Still i find it really dumb that people compare consoles to a PC.
Â
Why? They're all machines capable of playing games, and a lot of the time, the same games. The only people trying to seperate the PC from the rest of the consoles are fanboys tired of fighting for second place.
Log in to comment