Condemned 2 ps3 vs xbox 360

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for zxsavy
zxsavy

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 zxsavy
Member since 2007 • 48 Posts
I need a little help. I have an Xbox-360 and a PS3 and was debating which version of the game to get. I'm not an achievement whore so those really won't sway me at all and I won't really play the online. So i was just wondering on what your opinions are on it.
Avatar image for ninjapirate2000
ninjapirate2000

3347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ninjapirate2000
Member since 2008 • 3347 Posts
Their probably exactly the same it'll come down to which controller you prefer.
Avatar image for Candy-Star
Candy-Star

4378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Candy-Star
Member since 2004 • 4378 Posts
I think they are the same.. I don't have either so I'm just basing this on the review.. if you don't care about online or anything or that sort just consider which one is cheaper.. and which controller you prefer to play on.
Avatar image for SmashBrosLegend
SmashBrosLegend

11344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 SmashBrosLegend
Member since 2006 • 11344 Posts

I've only played the 360 version, but the PS3 version has a higher Gamerankings and Metacritic score.

I don't think you can go wrong either way. Just go with the system that has a controller you're more comfortable with.

Avatar image for fenwickhotmail
fenwickhotmail

7308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 fenwickhotmail
Member since 2004 • 7308 Posts

I would say 360 for the online, achievements, rumble and controller.

But if you're not playing online i suppose there's not much difference

Avatar image for Arsenal325
Arsenal325

4899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Arsenal325
Member since 2005 • 4899 Posts

I thought the demo was alright.. im VERY glad they were smart and made the attack buttons R1 and L1 for ps3.. i lvoe the controls.. i hate the attack buttons being R2 and L2 in other games.. those suck.. controls are great thogh for this game.. I thought the demo was alright. I dont really like how dark it is with those slime monster dudes.. i just like fighting plain people that actually put up a fight.. Ill rent it soon

I went through the options and im also glad to see rumble is in this game. :)

Avatar image for Thebettertwin
Thebettertwin

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Thebettertwin
Member since 2005 • 1051 Posts

From the vids and screens released it looked like the 360 was the better version dont know if this was true of the final version however.

Avatar image for zxsavy
zxsavy

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 zxsavy
Member since 2007 • 48 Posts
I guess what it's going to come down to is the controls. Thanks for the quick replies.
Avatar image for cosmostein77
cosmostein77

7043

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 102

User Lists: 0

#9 cosmostein77
Member since 2004 • 7043 Posts

Their probably exactly the same it'll come down to which controller you prefer. ninjapirate2000

I agree,

I played the original on 360, so chances are the 360 is where I will get the second one. Although if you like the PS3 controller better then my all means.

Avatar image for BobHipJames
BobHipJames

3126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 BobHipJames
Member since 2007 • 3126 Posts

I would say 360 for the online, achievements, rumble and controller.

But if you're not playing online i suppose there's not much difference

fenwickhotmail

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that the Xbox 360 online is superior and a legitimate reason to count the 360 as better than the Playstation 3 without a fight?

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that achievements a legit reason to consider a 360 version superior?

Since WHEN has rumble been considered a reason that the 360 is superior and since WHEN did you honestly forget that the Dualshock 3 is on its way to stores and has found its way to some people in America's homes already?

Since WHEN did you forget that controller preference is almost entirely subjective?

But, forget all that. Do you enjoy paying $50 annually for Live? Do you enjoy paying for a wireless adapter? Do you enjoy using batteries to power your 360 controller? Do you ACTUALLY enjoy matchmaking and prefer it to server lists? Do you like the RROD hanging over your head? Do you enjoy not having an HDMI connection (assuming you bought yours before mid-2007) and not having 7.1 built into your console?

And on and on and on and on.

I am so tired of generalities and exaggerations in system wars.

Avatar image for BobHipJames
BobHipJames

3126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 BobHipJames
Member since 2007 • 3126 Posts

From the vids and screens released it looked like the 360 was the better version dont know if this was true of the final version however.

Thebettertwin

Show me the vids and screens. I sincerely doubt that they've actually gotten any legit comparison up on any games website, but if they do, I'd love to see them.

Avatar image for Thebettertwin
Thebettertwin

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Thebettertwin
Member since 2005 • 1051 Posts
[QUOTE="Thebettertwin"]

From the vids and screens released it looked like the 360 was the better version dont know if this was true of the final version however.

BobHipJames

Show me the vids and screens. I sincerely doubt that they've actually gotten any legit comparison up on any games website, but if they do, I'd love to see them.

i didn't say there were any comparison vids but in the run up to release sega release screens of both versions and they looked better on the 360

heres some pics

http://gamersyde.com/news_6109_en.html

i dont expect you to believe me anyway as you are a die hard PS3 fan

Avatar image for fenwickhotmail
fenwickhotmail

7308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13 fenwickhotmail
Member since 2004 • 7308 Posts
[QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"]

I would say 360 for the online, achievements, rumble and controller.

But if you're not playing online i suppose there's not much difference

BobHipJames

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that the Xbox 360 online is superior and a legitimate reason to count the 360 as better than the Playstation 3 without a fight?

Read the review

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that achievements a legit reason to consider a 360 version superior?

Adds more gameplay

Since WHEN has rumble been considered a reason that the 360 is superior and since WHEN did you honestly forget that the Dualshock 3 is on its way to stores and has found its way to some people in America's homes already?

Enhances gameplay

Since WHEN did you forget that controller preference is almost entirely subjective?

I didn't. From my experience it is mch preferred

But, forget all that. Do you enjoy paying $50 annually for Live? Do you enjoy paying for a wireless adapter? Do you enjoy using batteries to power your 360 controller? Do you ACTUALLY enjoy matchmaking and prefer it to server lists? Do you like the RROD hanging over your head? Do you enjoy not having an HDMI connection (assuming you bought yours before mid-2007) and not having 7.1 built into your console?

I have a PS3

And on and on and on and on.

I am so tired of generalities and exaggerations in system wars.

Because you add lots to system wars

Avatar image for BobHipJames
BobHipJames

3126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 BobHipJames
Member since 2007 • 3126 Posts

LOL @ "achievements adds more gameplay"

LOL @ "Rumble enhances gameplay"

LOL @ not acknowledging DS3

LOL @ conceding controller preference is subjective

LOL @ conceding everything else

360 online is superior.....according to a review. Now I've seen it all. Now only if that review could convince me of the things that I KNOW to be true, not being true, and maybe I'll consider that a valid point.

Avatar image for fenwickhotmail
fenwickhotmail

7308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#15 fenwickhotmail
Member since 2004 • 7308 Posts

LOL @ "achievements adds more gameplay"

LOL @ "Rumble enhances gameplay"

LOL @ not acknowledging DS3

LOL @ conceding controller preference is subjective

LOL @ conceding everything else

360 online is superior.....according to a review. Now I've seen it all. Now only if that review could convince me of the things that I KNOW to be true, not being true, and maybe I'll consider that a valid point.

BobHipJames

Lol at your post?

See it works both ways

Avatar image for bigevil_rashek
bigevil_rashek

882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 bigevil_rashek
Member since 2006 • 882 Posts
[QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"]

I would say 360 for the online, achievements, rumble and controller.

But if you're not playing online i suppose there's not much difference

BobHipJames

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that the Xbox 360 online is superior and a legitimate reason to count the 360 as better than the Playstation 3 without a fight?

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that achievements a legit reason to consider a 360 version superior?

Since WHEN has rumble been considered a reason that the 360 is superior and since WHEN did you honestly forget that the Dualshock 3 is on its way to stores and has found its way to some people in America's homes already?

Since WHEN did you forget that controller preference is almost entirely subjective?

But, forget all that. Do you enjoy paying $50 annually for Live? Do you enjoy paying for a wireless adapter? Do you enjoy using batteries to power your 360 controller? Do you ACTUALLY enjoy matchmaking and prefer it to server lists? Do you like the RROD hanging over your head? Do you enjoy not having an HDMI connection (assuming you bought yours before mid-2007) and not having 7.1 built into your console?

And on and on and on and on.

I am so tired of generalities and exaggerations in system wars.

Come down dude no body insulted you.....unless you take an insult to the PS3 personally.

Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16743 Posts

Gotta Love GameSpot People, read this quote from the Review: "You should note that a week after release, not many people are playing online, and if you're playing on the PlayStation 3, then you may have particular trouble finding a match".

It was the exact same with Warhawk when it was released and it's full of players since... I can't even recall how long ago.

reminds me of the "Downside" for Ps3 owners with DMC4 "A 20 min mandatory install" JESUS CHRIST 20 MIN !!!!! :roll:, not even the 5gb required for that one are worth complaining for a better version.

Avatar image for Thebettertwin
Thebettertwin

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Thebettertwin
Member since 2005 • 1051 Posts
[QUOTE="BobHipJames"][QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"]

I would say 360 for the online, achievements, rumble and controller.

But if you're not playing online i suppose there's not much difference

bigevil_rashek

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that the Xbox 360 online is superior and a legitimate reason to count the 360 as better than the Playstation 3 without a fight?

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that achievements a legit reason to consider a 360 version superior?

Since WHEN has rumble been considered a reason that the 360 is superior and since WHEN did you honestly forget that the Dualshock 3 is on its way to stores and has found its way to some people in America's homes already?

Since WHEN did you forget that controller preference is almost entirely subjective?

But, forget all that. Do you enjoy paying $50 annually for Live? Do you enjoy paying for a wireless adapter? Do you enjoy using batteries to power your 360 controller? Do you ACTUALLY enjoy matchmaking and prefer it to server lists? Do you like the RROD hanging over your head? Do you enjoy not having an HDMI connection (assuming you bought yours before mid-2007) and not having 7.1 built into your console?

And on and on and on and on.

I am so tired of generalities and exaggerations in system wars.

Come down dude no body insulted you.....unless you take an insult to the PS3 personally.

Haven't you read his other posts he does. anyone would think that he gave birth to the machine

Avatar image for fenwickhotmail
fenwickhotmail

7308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#19 fenwickhotmail
Member since 2004 • 7308 Posts
[QUOTE="bigevil_rashek"][QUOTE="BobHipJames"][QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"]

I would say 360 for the online, achievements, rumble and controller.

But if you're not playing online i suppose there's not much difference

Thebettertwin

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that the Xbox 360 online is superior and a legitimate reason to count the 360 as better than the Playstation 3 without a fight?

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that achievements a legit reason to consider a 360 version superior?

Since WHEN has rumble been considered a reason that the 360 is superior and since WHEN did you honestly forget that the Dualshock 3 is on its way to stores and has found its way to some people in America's homes already?

Since WHEN did you forget that controller preference is almost entirely subjective?

But, forget all that. Do you enjoy paying $50 annually for Live? Do you enjoy paying for a wireless adapter? Do you enjoy using batteries to power your 360 controller? Do you ACTUALLY enjoy matchmaking and prefer it to server lists? Do you like the RROD hanging over your head? Do you enjoy not having an HDMI connection (assuming you bought yours before mid-2007) and not having 7.1 built into your console?

And on and on and on and on.

I am so tired of generalities and exaggerations in system wars.

Come down dude no body insulted you.....unless you take an insult to the PS3 personally.

Haven't you read his other posts he does. anyone would think that he gave birth to the machine

Haha. What we have here is a common case of fanboy-ism

Avatar image for lespaul00
lespaul00

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 lespaul00
Member since 2006 • 242 Posts

Gotta Love GameSpot People, read this quote from the Review: "You should note that a week after release, not many people are playing online, and if you're playing on the PlayStation 3, then you may have particular trouble finding a match".

It was the exact same with Warhawk when it was released and it's full of players since... I can't even recall how long ago.

reminds me of the "Downside" for Ps3 owners with DMC4 "A 20 min mandatory install" JESUS CHRIST 20 MIN !!!!! :roll:, not even the 5gb required for that one are worth complaining for a better version.

AgentA-Mi6

I think the install argument was a counter to the disc swapping argument. Disc swapping takes less time overall than the install. In reality, though, they are both silly arguments.

Avatar image for Thebettertwin
Thebettertwin

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Thebettertwin
Member since 2005 • 1051 Posts

Gotta Love GameSpot People, read this quote from the Review: "You should note that a week after release, not many people are playing online, and if you're playing on the PlayStation 3, then you may have particular trouble finding a match".

It was the exact same with Warhawk when it was released and it's full of players since... I can't even recall how long ago.

reminds me of the "Downside" for Ps3 owners with DMC4 "A 20 min mandatory install" JESUS CHRIST 20 MIN !!!!! :roll:, not even the 5gb required for that one are worth complaining for a better version.

AgentA-Mi6

Tbh i would rather not have a 20 min install its a console not a pc i would rather just put the game in and play it. that gies for updates as well though i buy the game and put it in to be confronted by an update wtf lol

Avatar image for lespaul00
lespaul00

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 lespaul00
Member since 2006 • 242 Posts
[QUOTE="fenwickhotmail"]

I would say 360 for the online, achievements, rumble and controller.

But if you're not playing online i suppose there's not much difference

BobHipJames

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that the Xbox 360 online is superior and a legitimate reason to count the 360 as better than the Playstation 3 without a fight?

Since WHEN has system wars concluded that achievements a legit reason to consider a 360 version superior?

Since WHEN has rumble been considered a reason that the 360 is superior and since WHEN did you honestly forget that the Dualshock 3 is on its way to stores and has found its way to some people in America's homes already?

Since WHEN did you forget that controller preference is almost entirely subjective?

But, forget all that. Do you enjoy paying $50 annually for Live? Do you enjoy paying for a wireless adapter? Do you enjoy using batteries to power your 360 controller? Do you ACTUALLY enjoy matchmaking and prefer it to server lists? Do you like the RROD hanging over your head? Do you enjoy not having an HDMI connection (assuming you bought yours before mid-2007) and not having 7.1 built into your console?

And on and on and on and on.

I am so tired of generalities and exaggerations in system wars.

Your post sounds as if it should be in a different topic, one that is geared to whether or not XBOX Live is worth the cost or not. Or why you feel the 360 is not worth the money. The poster said he has both systems. We have to assume he has Live as he did not state otherwise. With that being said, comparison is between the game for each system, not which system is better.

Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16743 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

Gotta Love GameSpot People, read this quote from the Review: "You should note that a week after release, not many people are playing online, and if you're playing on the PlayStation 3, then you may have particular trouble finding a match".

It was the exact same with Warhawk when it was released and it's full of players since... I can't even recall how long ago.

reminds me of the "Downside" for Ps3 owners with DMC4 "A 20 min mandatory install" JESUS CHRIST 20 MIN !!!!! :roll:, not even the 5gb required for that one are worth complaining for a better version.

lespaul00

I think the install argument was a counter to the disc swapping argument. Disc swapping takes less time overall than the install. In reality, though, they are both silly arguments.

Both Fanboy Arguments, I never thought switching discs was a Problem with the Ps1 (MGS1,FF7,FF8) so why would it be now? Only biased fanboys have that double standard.
Avatar image for otto1967
otto1967

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 otto1967
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
PS people are so funny. "Since WHEN did you forget that controller preference is almost entirely subjective"?? That's an easy way of saying "I'm fiercely loyal to Sony (for whatever reason), and I REFUSE to admit anything crappy about the PS3." This is not subjective. The PS3 has an archaic, anachronistic controller that for all intents and purposes has not changed in 15 years. Failing to improve it was plain lazy and moronic by Sony, qualties they obviously excel at. Which is why they're taking 1 of the all-time colossal baths on the PS3. Its layout sucks, and I find it actually ergonomically painful. Yes the 360 has obvious crap hardware issues, and MS will nickle-and-dime you to death. But it is still a superior system at this point, and no question it is more user friendly than the PS3, which isn't at all. And the 360 still has better games right now. I own both, and I only own the PS3 for the blu-ray really. And $400 for a machine that isn't backward compatible at all is a disgrace. If the hardware weren't so crap on the 360, for me it would be no contest. And why do PS owners take this all so personally? Why don't you marry it if you love it so much?
Avatar image for kayn83
kayn83

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#27 kayn83
Member since 2004 • 2214 Posts

Well its predecessor is a 360 exclusive (there's a PC port but nevermind that as Condemned 2 is not on the PC) so therefore I would go with the 360 version just because you can own both games on the same console.

I own both titles and I own them both for the 360.

Avatar image for Blinblingthing
Blinblingthing

6943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Blinblingthing
Member since 2005 • 6943 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

Gotta Love GameSpot People, read this quote from the Review: "You should note that a week after release, not many people are playing online, and if you're playing on the PlayStation 3, then you may have particular trouble finding a match".

It was the exact same with Warhawk when it was released and it's full of players since... I can't even recall how long ago.

reminds me of the "Downside" for Ps3 owners with DMC4 "A 20 min mandatory install" JESUS CHRIST 20 MIN !!!!! :roll:, not even the 5gb required for that one are worth complaining for a better version.

Thebettertwin

Tbh i would rather not have a 20 min install its a console not a pc i would rather just put the game in and play it. that gies for updates as well though i buy the game and put it in to be confronted by an update wtf lol

What about the wear and tear it saves your disc reader from constantly accessing the disc, Less loading times????

So I guess you rather Endure 15% longer loading scenes and a potential 2 - 4 weeks of repair time sending in a console to MS

Come guys there are pros and cons to everytime

Sorta like rushing a console to the market with a design flaw making it prone to the RROD

Sure you get it to the market early with out competition, but now its costing you 1 billion in warranty costs

A 20 Min install isn't only a 20 Min install. It's shorter load scenes and less work on your machine which in the end adding to better gameplay experience

Avatar image for bam706
bam706

1053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 bam706
Member since 2005 • 1053 Posts

I dont find anything wrong with installing games, It was a great idea for metal gear solid 4, everyone needs to take a break every now and then...