PC gaming is too much of a hassle. Constant upgrading. Not to mention checking every game to see if your PC meets the requirements. I also think that most console games ported to the PC ends up being worse.
Console gaming > PC gaming.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
PC gaming is too much of a hassle. Constant upgrading. Not to mention checking every game to see if your PC meets the requirements. I also think that most console games ported to the PC ends up being worse.
Console gaming > PC gaming.
PC gaming is too much of a hassle. Constant upgrading. Not to mention checking every game to see if your PC meets the requirements. I also think that most console games ported to the PC ends up being worse.
Console gaming > PC gaming.
IronMaidenLives
PC gaming > Console gaming. Since pc's can do every that a console can do and more. The reason it cost more then a console is because it does over 100 times more stuff. TBH your getting your moneys worth with a computer.
PC gaming is too much of a hassle. Constant upgrading. Not to mention checking every game to see if your PC meets the requirements. I also think that most console games ported to the PC ends up being worse.
Console gaming > PC gaming.
IronMaidenLives
1: You upgrade once evey two years.
2: Oh noes reading 4 lines of system requierments(ram, cpu, gpu, HD space) is such a hassle!!!1!!
3: Console games that get ported to pc's are few and far between.
I don't think one is better than the other, just different. I prefer games on consoles like FF, MGS, Halo, but then games like Diablo 2 are in my top ten of all time, but I don't play any other PC games.
You just mix and match to what suits you best.
NickJayD
We have a winner.
PCs have some of the greatest games of all time. The graphics on PCs are better. Games like FPS and RTS work the best on PCs.
PC>consoles
[QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]PC gaming is too much of a hassle. Constant upgrading. Not to mention checking every game to see if your PC meets the requirements. I also think that most console games ported to the PC ends up being worse.
Console gaming > PC gaming.
RichieRich555
PC gaming > Console gaming. Since pc's can do every that a console can do and more. The reason it cost more then a console is because it does over 100 times more stuff. TBH your getting your moneys worth with a computer.
PCs should be used for programs like photoshop.
[QUOTE="RichieRich555"][QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"]PC gaming is too much of a hassle. Constant upgrading. Not to mention checking every game to see if your PC meets the requirements. I also think that most console games ported to the PC ends up being worse.
Console gaming > PC gaming.
turgore
PC gaming > Console gaming. Since pc's can do every that a console can do and more. The reason it cost more then a console is because it does over 100 times more stuff. TBH your getting your moneys worth with a computer.
PCs should be used for programs like photoshop.
They are, theyre also used for Gaming and Communication :P
Pc games are often buggier due to the fact that devs have to design for non-specific hardware. Also, some enres of games, like action-adventure games (DMC, Drake's, etc) are often better played with a controller. Console RPGs likewise (FF for example).
It's also less hassle to own a console. Cheaper, too.
Actually, PC games are about as stable as console games. The reason they get so many patches is because its easier to patch PC games. The mere logistics of patching console games up until now where incredibly rough. Games like Socom went ages with blatant map hacks and exploits. Not to mention over time a PC can be chaeper.Pc games are often buggier due to the fact that devs have to design for non-specific hardware. Also, some enres of games, like action-adventure games (DMC, Drake's, etc) are often better played with a controller. Console RPGs likewise (FF for example).
It's also less hassle to own a console. Cheaper, too.
osirisomeomi
Thats fine if its your opinion. Care to elaborate with reasoning?pc gaming stinks.
yea consoles are better.
tree-branch
Its preference. -SoraIn other words, you have no real tangible evidence that points to the consoles being beter in any technical capacity whatsoever? Fair enough.
[QUOTE="-Sora"]Its preference. VandalvideoIn other words, you have no real tangible evidence that points to the consoles being beter in any technical capacity whatsoever? Fair enough.
No, because PCs will always be more powerful. Better? well thats just preference, depends on which games you like more.
In other words, you have no real tangible evidence that points to the consoles being beter in any technical capacity whatsoever? Fair enough.[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="-Sora"]Its preference. -Sora
No, because PCs will always be more powerful. Better? well thats just preference, depends on which games you like more.
Exactly, you have no tangible evidence that poitns to the console being supperior in any technical capacity. We are ahead in graphics, sound, and sheer ammount of high quality titles. It is, like you said, mere preference.[QUOTE="-Sora"]In other words, you have no real tangible evidence that points to the consoles being beter in any technical capacity whatsoever? Fair enough.[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="-Sora"]Its preference. Vandalvideo
No, because PCs will always be more powerful. Better? well thats just preference, depends on which games you like more.
Exactly, you have no tangible evidence that poitns to the console being supperior in any technical capacity. We are ahead in graphics, sound, and sheer ammount of high quality titles. It is, like you said, mere preference.He didn't say that consoles were better. All he said was "it's preference." >_>Flamebait response thread to the 2 other threads on the main page.... why bother? Do you think you had a good arguement? PC Gaming requires you to learn abit, its obviously worth it or people wouldnt bother.Meu2k7
I didn't read any other threads. I just came on and made a topic
You lose with your poor, failed assumption. Nice try.
[QUOTE="-Sora"]In other words, you have no real tangible evidence that points to the consoles being beter in any technical capacity whatsoever? Fair enough.[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="-Sora"]Its preference. Vandalvideo
No, because PCs will always be more powerful. Better? well thats just preference, depends on which games you like more.
Exactly, you have no tangible evidence that poitns to the console being supperior in any technical capacity. We are ahead in graphics, sound, and sheer ammount of high quality titles. It is, like you said, mere preference.I don't remember him saying "It's preference which one is technically superior...", since that's all you're attacking him for...
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="-Sora"]In other words, you have no real tangible evidence that points to the consoles being beter in any technical capacity whatsoever? Fair enough.[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="-Sora"]Its preference. Spartan070
No, because PCs will always be more powerful. Better? well thats just preference, depends on which games you like more.
Exactly, you have no tangible evidence that poitns to the console being supperior in any technical capacity. We are ahead in graphics, sound, and sheer ammount of high quality titles. It is, like you said, mere preference.I don't remember him saying "It's preference which one is technically superior...", since that's all you're attacking him for...
Reread, I didn't attack him for his preference. I merely said, "In other words, you don't have tangible evidence that they are technically superior in any aspects".[QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="-Sora"]In other words, you have no real tangible evidence that points to the consoles being beter in any technical capacity whatsoever? Fair enough.[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="-Sora"]Its preference. Vandalvideo
No, because PCs will always be more powerful. Better? well thats just preference, depends on which games you like more.
Exactly, you have no tangible evidence that poitns to the console being supperior in any technical capacity. We are ahead in graphics, sound, and sheer ammount of high quality titles. It is, like you said, mere preference.I don't remember him saying "It's preference which one is technically superior...", since that's all you're attacking him for...
Reread, I didn't attack him for his preference. I merely said, "In other words, you don't have tangible evidence that they are technically superior in any aspects".The complexity of your response to him is overshadowed by the brilliant simplicity of his post. It simply doesn't require or ask for a retort. Whether or not said evidence was had or not is completely irrelevent to the overwhelming undeniability of "It's preference."
The complexity of your response to him is overshadowed by the brilliant simplicity of his post. It simply doesn't require or ask for a retort. Whether or not said evidence was had or not is completely irrelevent to the overwhelming undeniability of "It's preference."Spartan070I was just phishing. I didn't necessarily say that his preference was wrong, but I was trying to get him to state misconceptions.
[QUOTE="Spartan070"]The complexity of your response to him is overshadowed by the brilliant simplicity of his post. It simply doesn't require or ask for a retort. Whether or not said evidence was had or not is completely irrelevent to the overwhelming undeniability of "It's preference."VandalvideoI was just phishing. I didn't necessarily say that his preference was wrong, but I was trying to get him to state misconceptions.
Oh, aren't there already enough ignorant fanboys out there without you creating more? :lol:
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment