Could BattleFront(PC) be GFX KING?

It manages to look better than small scale movie games, while being a huge ass game.

Full Size: https://media.starwars.ea.com/content/starwars-ea-com/en_US/starwars/battlefront/news-articles/fight-for-pod-control-in-the-action-filled-drop-zone-mode/_jcr_content/featuredImage.img.jpg

(talking about PC version)

Judging only by that small picture?

Nope.

Maybe. I doubt it though, Star Citizen looks better to me.

Open it in new tab or click the link I provided. GS auto resizes too large pictures

This shows how much you want to start a console vs PC fight it's sad.

Why not play a game , if you have any.

Not based on that picture

@-God- said:

It manages to look better than small scale movie games, while being a huge ass game.

Full Size: https://media.starwars.ea.com/content/starwars-ea-com/en_US/starwars/battlefront/news-articles/fight-for-pod-control-in-the-action-filled-drop-zone-mode/_jcr_content/featuredImage.img.jpg

(talking about PC version)

So you're talking about it having great graphics for a huge ass game...while using a picture from an article about Drop Zone, an 8v8 game mode that you're now complaining about

For you it won't be.

1. The 8v8 mode doesn't use different gfx from the 32v32 large maps.

2. The PC version on ultra will look better than any console title. I'm comparing BF to real potential gfx kings like UT, SC, or DXPC.

Why do you care so much? It's not like you can play it on your imaginary PC.

Besides, Star Citizen look better than that bullshot you posted.

How do we know what it looks like on ultra? How do we even know that image demonstrates the PC graphics? How do you know the 8v8 mode doesn't use different gfx?

I thought it was MGSV...but i could be wrong, i rarely pay attention to imaginary trophies.

For awhile. It's a stunningly beautiful game.

Also it's only 20 vs 20 in the bigger modes. They aren't doing a full 64 players.

TC, do you own anything to play Bf?

MGS V looks beautiful because of the physically based rendering, but the geometries and overall texture resolution leave a lot to be desired. You can tell it's a PS3/360 game.

Judging by his threads and posts , i think he visits PC cafes.

Or he's a generated malware that is built by troll post over the internet.

Oh i see, well in a way i'm glad since i'm going to get it on PS3, but i'm agree the game looks beautiful despite that.

Will there be dedicated servers ?

Could be they say: Well, we can do 40 players on a P2P base.

Isn't DICE doing this game? And it's EA?

I'd be more worried if the game is technical garbage and works properly before we start with the GFX KING stuff.

Sure, it could be. Maybe. It won't help the game much if it sucks though will it?

@-God-: While I understand that a picture speaks a thousand words, this isn't one of them. Like everyone said, Star Citizen looks way better then what I haven seen for Battlefront. I'm talking about gameplay footage from both Star Citizen and Battlefront.

I like and support that theory.

@-God-: Na its running on Frostbite 3, which is easily 4 years old now (i know it debuted with BF4 in 2013 but as a completed engine it must be at least 4 years old now).

Fox engine looks way better than frostbite right now. I'm waiting for BF5 before we get another big frostbite iteration which will push DICE back into the top fidelity developers, BattleFront wont be a graphical king, in fact id be surprised if it got more than a 7 on GS reviews

battlefront doesnt even look better than ps4 and xbone launch titles.

I'm far more impressed with NFS in terms of Forstbite games, honestly. That thing looks amazing. Though racing games tends to have an advantage in rendering scenarios.

Nope, doesn't compare to current gen 8 console graphics king The Order.

Yeah there are dedicated servers. It's using a matchmaking service in place of a server browser though.

Looks way better than Uncharted Bore and The Border.

Beat me to it!

@m3dude1: I'll have whatever your smoking.

If you wondered what a little too obvious trolling looks like:

@-God- said:

If you wondered what a little too obvious trolling looks like:

@m3dude1 said:

battlefront doesnt even look better than ps4 and xbone launch titles.

killzone and ryse both have better visuals

Too bad you don't have a PC to play it on.

Proof?

matchmaking only. Not looking good for PC players.

Screenshots mean nothing. Let's see it in action. And from I've seen....nope.

Matchmaking with servers hosted on dedicated hardware. DICE has never made a P2P game and they never will.

This dude really say killzone....?

right, still horrible though.

He said KZ, then Infamous, then Driveclub, The Order, and now Until Dawn were gfx kings. In that order.

Yes. hes likely just joking and a troll account.

Not really. Server browsers are very overrated. It leads to a horrible distribution of players and a lot of maps/modes going unplayed in favor of whatever the admins feel is the best.

I never really understood this undying love of server browsers. They aren't as great as people make them out to be.

LOL no. Looks about average for a current gen title but far from graphics king material son.

The current kings.

No photomode, pure gameplay shots.

ms3dude1 all of a sudden shows up out of nowhere now gpuking am I the only one who see a connection when it comes to graphic thread

And personally, I don't understand when people claim matchmaking is easier than a server browser.

Matchmaking > sometimes can take a very long time to find something (Titanfall after about a year)
Matchmaking > sometimes takes 10 minutes to put you in a server with one other person
Matchmaking > search for 5 minutes, get "Nothing came up for your search"... yeah, there are thousands of servers, why don't you connect ?

Server browers > three or four clicks and I find the gamemode I want, the amount of players I want, the ping I want, the location I want, everything. I can literally choose, limit and filter everything and I'll still find a server that matches my wants.

From my personal experience Server browser have always worked better, faster, easier, ... I see no reason to switch to or convenience in using matchmaking.

@gpuking said:

LOL no. Looks about average for a current gen title but far from graphics king material son.

The current kings.

No photomode, pure gameplay shots.

Stop lying please, there is zero gameplay to be found in those screenshots :/

Er, if you own the games you would know I can control them. Besides, the gameplay and cutscene in those two games look exactly the same.

It is quite the coincidence

What control do you have ? Walking forward ?

Standing on a roof, looking forward ?

Again, I very much doubt that is gameplay.

And, if you do consider that gameplay, I'll consider "a boy and his kite" graphics king :)