This topic is locked from further discussion.
Na. Im pretty sure Quake 3 Arena and UT 2004 came out way after it. But its definately the top dog when it comes down to skill.
I hear ya man :) Awesome Game.Well, I would say UT3 does because really, what's changed since UT04? Which is whypeople give it crap but I like it.
Kiyobear
[QUOTE="Kiyobear"]
Well, I would say UT3 does because really, what's changed since UT04? Which is whypeople give it crap but I like it.
Kusimekaa
Movement is much simpler, it there for takes less skill to master.
I have never once thought to myself it's easier to move in UT3, that sounds odd to me.
Edit: now that I think about it that sounds like BS to me. Easier to move? what the hell? It's the same thing.
[QUOTE="Kiyobear"]I hear ya man :) Awesome Game.Well, I would say UT3 does because really, what's changed since UT04? Which is whypeople give it crap but I like it.
mgs_freak91
The twenty or thirty of us that love UT3 should all get together for a drink some day.
[QUOTE="Kusimekaa"]
[QUOTE="Kiyobear"]
Well, I would say UT3 does because really, what's changed since UT04? Which is whypeople give it crap but I like it.
Kiyobear
Movement is much simpler, it there for takes less skill to master.
I have never once thought to myself it's easier to move in UT3, that sounds odd to me.
Edit: now that I think about it that sounds like BS to me. Easier to move? what the hell? It's the same thing.
If you seriously believe that the movement in UT3 is not easier then you must not of played much UT2004. UT2004 is a LOT faster, with dodge jumps which UT3 doesn't contain. Faster movement = Harder to aim = more skill needed. Seriously go play some UT2004 and join a clan server or something, and you're see what i mean when you struggle to get even one kill. I never had that problem in UT3 (then again it's not like it has much clans, the game's almost dead)
[QUOTE="Kiyobear"]
[QUOTE="Kusimekaa"]
Movement is much simpler, it there for takes less skill to master.
Kusimekaa
I have never once thought to myself it's easier to move in UT3, that sounds odd to me.
Edit: now that I think about it that sounds like BS to me. Easier to move? what the hell? It's the same thing.
If you seriously believe that the movement in UT3 is not easier then you must not of played much UT2004. UT2004 is a LOT faster, with dodge jumps which UT3 doesn't contain. Faster movement = Harder to aim = more skill needed. Seriously go play some UT2004 and join a clan server or something, and you're see what i mean when you struggle to get even one kill. I never had that problem in UT3 (then again it's not like it has much clans, the game's almost dead)
First off, I will never struggle to get one kill in a UT game. No, I have not played UT04 in years, though. Felt the same to me. Easier to aim? Whatever. It plays like UT and I think *cough* sometimes fans of an older game will be down on a newer game because of little, tiny changes.Which is what I think the case is here. I still double jump off walls and crap in UT3.
UT3 is dead, though. However, I enjoy UT3 (for the most part) more. Same game slicker visuals.
[QUOTE="Kusimekaa"]
[QUOTE="Kiyobear"]
I have never once thought to myself it's easier to move in UT3, that sounds odd to me.
Edit: now that I think about it that sounds like BS to me. Easier to move? what the hell? It's the same thing.
Kiyobear
If you seriously believe that the movement in UT3 is not easier then you must not of played much UT2004. UT2004 is a LOT faster, with dodge jumps which UT3 doesn't contain. Faster movement = Harder to aim = more skill needed. Seriously go play some UT2004 and join a clan server or something, and you're see what i mean when you struggle to get even one kill. I never had that problem in UT3 (then again it's not like it has much clans, the game's almost dead)
First off, I will never struggle to get one kill in a UT game. No, I have not played UT04 in years, though. Felt the same to me. Easier to aim? Whatever. It plays like UT and I think *cough* sometimes fans of an older game will be down on a newer game because of little, tiny changes.Which is what I think the case is here. I still double jump off walls and crap in UT3.
UT3 is dead, though. However, I enjoy UT3 (for the most part) more. Same game slicker visuals.
No do not misunderstand me i do not look down on newer game's just cause there different, the reason i wasn't too fond of UT3 was cause it really lacked some serious polish and the game felt like a step backwards rather than a step forwards. I was really hyped for UT3.
As you said, you havn't played Ut04 in years, if you compare them side by side you will realise Ut04 is a lot faster, meaning it takes more skill to aim, that's pretty common knowledge. Faster target = Harder to shoot.
I also enjoyed UT3, but it lacked some new guns, and some new gamemodes to make it exciting and fresh. The graphics were amazing, however due to it lacking my favourite game mode (last man standing) i just couldn't really get into the game. I'm really hoping for a step forwards and seeing some new things in UT4 or whatever.
socom whether you like it or not as a game took skill. like with what you said, burst or single shot for far and pray and spray didnt get you farriver_rat3117Not a FPS, but I definitely agree. SOCOM is the only game since CS to give me that tense feel. The community is also amazing. Most fun I've ever had with such a crappy game.
[QUOTE="river_rat3117"]socom whether you like it or not as a game took skill. like with what you said, burst or single shot for far and pray and spray didnt get you farwstfldNot a FPS, but I definitely agree. SOCOM is the only game since CS to give me that tense feel. The community is also amazing. Most fun I've ever had with such a crappy game. agreed and i got CS and took it back the next day it wasnt hard at all but it was boring and ugly
Stop acting like COD4 doesn't take skill, I bet you would die in 2 seconds, yes noob tube abusers make the game less enjoyable but that doesn't take the skill out of the game...
While I think CS takes a lot of skill, Tribes and Tribes 2 take the most most skill out of any FPS I have played.
Red Orchestra is somewhere in there too.
Difficulty order 1) is hardest 5) is easiest
1) Tribes (You had to manually ski.. which was a pain)
2) Tribes 2
3) Red Orchestra (No real hud/crosshair, 1 shot kills, no arrows or team indicators.. hardcore game)
4) CS 1.6 (You can't spray as much as you can in Source)
5) CS:Source
Say, I've never played Counter Strike and I got a question. It sounds alot like Call of Duty being that you die in so few bullets so why does everyone say CS takes soo much skill yet refer to COD as an easy game for noobs?FerdMertz
Exactly, casual duty takes alot of dedication to become good at. I mean look, it has triple health when dying 3 times. Oh and perks, they really enhance and balance the gameplay of an FPS.
While I think CS takes a lot of skill, Tribes and Tribes 2 take the most most skill out of any FPS I have played.
Red Orchestra is somewhere in there too.Difficulty order 1) is hardest 5) is easiest
1) Tribes (You had to manually ski.. which was a pain)
2) Tribes 2
3) Red Orchestra (No real hud/crosshair, 1 shot kills, no arrows or team indicators.. hardcore game)
4) CS 1.6 (You can't spray as much as you can in Source)
5) CS:Sourcezero_snake99
I miss tribes, I wish they would re-make it =
Like other have said there is stuff like Quake 3 and UT2K4. Anyway some of us like stuff like Swat 4, Arma, Ghost Recon, so that bunny hopping, quick dashing, multi jumping stuff becomes irelevant to proper skill based shooters that focus on reticule simulation mostly.
Stop acting like COD4 doesn't take skill, I bet you would die in 2 seconds, yes noob tube abusers make the game less enjoyable but that doesn't take the skill out of the game...
ps3wizard45
When us real FPS/TPS fans talk about games requiring skill, we mean it as Joe Random can't decide one day "I want to play Counter Strike or SOCOM" and go insanely positive with most kills on his team.
In COD, Joe Random can say "hey I heard COD was fun, I'm going to go play it" and he'll go 30-10 easily. Unless you're blind there is no reason why you shouldn't dominate in a game that simplified. It's beyond casualized and if you look at the hitboxes you can see that.
If COD4 takes skill why is the Pro Mod for it basically CS For Nubs?
[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]
While I think CS takes a lot of skill, Tribes and Tribes 2 take the most most skill out of any FPS I have played.
Red Orchestra is somewhere in there too.Difficulty order 1) is hardest 5) is easiest
1) Tribes (You had to manually ski.. which was a pain)
2) Tribes 2
3) Red Orchestra (No real hud/crosshair, 1 shot kills, no arrows or team indicators.. hardcore game)
4) CS 1.6 (You can't spray as much as you can in Source)
5) CS:SourceUptown
I miss tribes, I wish they would re-make it =
I'm pretty sure there is a browser based version, if not freeware version. There is a new version of T2. www.tribesnext.com (if that doesn't work, google it). It's completely free since they dropped server support. It's amazing.What skill? It's as simple as holding aim and lining up your sights with your target before holding down the "FIRE!" button. That or spamming grenades. And the melee combat is literally as simple as pressing the melee button which gives you a huge one shot kill arc. When you play bayonets in Red Orchestra you have to charge the strike and release to thrust it forward and it only hits a single point on your screen. You have to stab people in vital areas to kill them, limbs and groin/stomach do not instantly kill. When you have a gunbutt battle it uses the same mechanics, except it can take 5 blows to kill someone.Stop acting like COD4 doesn't take skill, I bet you would die in 2 seconds, yes noob tube abusers make the game less enjoyable but that doesn't take the skill out of the game...
ps3wizard45
You actually had to aim in Counterstrike, with single shots or burst shots from a far, and to spray you needed to pull your mouse a ceratin way to accuratley straighten the bullets. You could also shoot through walls if you could hear footsteps, and the hitbox would actually be the same as if the enemy was really behind the wall. The damage would just be a little weaker, but if you headshot through a wall, it's going to hit the head. Was this the last skill-based FPS? I know Halo is more stradegy, and vehicles, spraying and stuff, but Counterstrike had a uniqueness in each weapon. The guns actually recoil that you had to master in order to control your shots without retreatingcubemovies
Iv been playing CS 1.6 all day and i reckon that Halo 3 is more skill based, but only just.
Stop acting like COD4 doesn't take skill, I bet you would die in 2 seconds, yes noob tube abusers make the game less enjoyable but that doesn't take the skill out of the game...
What skill? It's as simple as holding aim and lining up your sights with your target before holding down the "FIRE!" button. That or spamming grenades. And the melee combat is literally as simple as pressing the melee button which gives you a huge one shot kill arc. When you play bayonets in Red Orchestra you have to charge the strike and release to thrust it forward and it only hits a single point on your screen. You have to stab people in vital areas to kill them, limbs and groin/stomach do not instantly kill. When you have a gunbutt battle it uses the same mechanics, except it can take 5 blows to kill someone. I agree COD 4 takes no skillI am pretty sure Killzone 2 takes skill. Why? Becuase even rocket luancher noobs do not do much. I could use an assault rifle and kill a rocket launcher player easily. The game pretty much takes skill than most shooters this generation. :D
[QUOTE="Uptown"]
[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]
While I think CS takes a lot of skill, Tribes and Tribes 2 take the most most skill out of any FPS I have played.
Red Orchestra is somewhere in there too.Difficulty order 1) is hardest 5) is easiest
1) Tribes (You had to manually ski.. which was a pain)
2) Tribes 2
3) Red Orchestra (No real hud/crosshair, 1 shot kills, no arrows or team indicators.. hardcore game)
4) CS 1.6 (You can't spray as much as you can in Source)
5) CS:Sourcezero_snake99
I miss tribes, I wish they would re-make it =
I'm pretty sure there is a browser based version, if not freeware version. There is a new version of T2. www.tribesnext.com (if that doesn't work, google it). It's completely free since they dropped server support. It's amazing. Yeah. The original Tribes is available as a free download.I'm pretty sure there is a browser based version, if not freeware version. There is a new version of T2. www.tribesnext.com (if that doesn't work, google it). It's completely free since they dropped server support. It's amazing. Yeah. The original Tribes is available as a free download. IIRC they shut down the original master servers though, so it should take a bit of work to get things going. I seriously miss Tribes though, yeah. Manual skiing is all I know, and it was awesome.[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]
[QUOTE="Uptown"]
I miss tribes, I wish they would re-make it =
PannicAtack
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Yeah. The original Tribes is available as a free download. IIRC they shut down the original master servers though, so it should take a bit of work to get things going. I seriously miss Tribes though, yeah. Manual skiing is all I know, and it was awesome.I remember I downloaded it a couple years ago. Impossible to find a game that wasn't an RPG mod or something.[QUOTE="zero_snake99"] I'm pretty sure there is a browser based version, if not freeware version. There is a new version of T2. www.tribesnext.com (if that doesn't work, google it). It's completely free since they dropped server support. It's amazing.
Makari
Need more skill to walk in Quake Live than playing CS...agff9Truthfully. I've been playing since q3 arena and there are stil some dudes that roll me up.
Stop acting like COD4 doesn't take skill, I bet you would die in 2 seconds, yes noob tube abusers make the game less enjoyable but that doesn't take the skill out of the game...
ps3wizard45
CoD 4 takes skill? Hmm... the hitboxes are big. The aim is sticky. The game design is extremely forgiving. Yes, I'd say it takes little to no skill. The game is geared towards a massive, mainstream audience. It's not even trying to be a skill based shooter. Stop trying to make CoD out to be something it wasn't ever trying to be.
[QUOTE="ps3wizard45"]
Stop acting like COD4 doesn't take skill, I bet you would die in 2 seconds, yes noob tube abusers make the game less enjoyable but that doesn't take the skill out of the game...
CoD 4 takes skill? Hmm... the hitboxes are big. The aim is sticky. The game design is extremely forgiving. Yes, I'd say it takes little to no skill. The game is geared towards a massive, mainstream audience. It's not even trying to be a skill based shooter. Stop trying to make CoD out to be something it wasn't ever trying to be.
What I found is that a lot of lower-skilled players tend to defend COD 4 because it is their peak of achievment. Not trying to insult anyone just an observation i've made.[QUOTE="ps3wizard45"]
Stop acting like COD4 doesn't take skill, I bet you would die in 2 seconds, yes noob tube abusers make the game less enjoyable but that doesn't take the skill out of the game...
ThePRAssassin
When us real FPS/TPS fans talk about games requiring skill, we mean it as Joe Random can't decide one day "I want to play Counter Strike or SOCOM" and go insanely positive with most kills on his team.
In COD, Joe Random can say "hey I heard COD was fun, I'm going to go play it" and he'll go 30-10 easily. Unless you're blind there is no reason why you shouldn't dominate in a game that simplified. It's beyond casualized and if you look at the hitboxes you can see that.
If COD4 takes skill why is the Pro Mod for it basically CS For Nubs?
this has to be trolling, you can't be serious. If you have any Joe Randoms (such as yourself) who would like to play me in CoD 4 or Halo 3, please tell them to PM me and I'll give you my gamertag, I'll never turn down a perfect 28- 0 game using only pistols and no choppers, or a nice little 26 - 0 Indestructable. Of course, it will all be by casual luckiness and not skill, but still. :roll:[QUOTE="ThePRAssassin"]
[QUOTE="ps3wizard45"]
Stop acting like COD4 doesn't take skill, I bet you would die in 2 seconds, yes noob tube abusers make the game less enjoyable but that doesn't take the skill out of the game...
When us real FPS/TPS fans talk about games requiring skill, we mean it as Joe Random can't decide one day "I want to play Counter Strike or SOCOM" and go insanely positive with most kills on his team.
In COD, Joe Random can say "hey I heard COD was fun, I'm going to go play it" and he'll go 30-10 easily. Unless you're blind there is no reason why you shouldn't dominate in a game that simplified. It's beyond casualized and if you look at the hitboxes you can see that.
If COD4 takes skill why is the Pro Mod for it basically CS For Nubs?
this has to be trolling, you can't be serious. If you have any Joe Randoms (such as yourself) who would like to play me in CoD 4 or Halo 3, please tell them to PM me and I'll give you my gamertag, I'll never turn down a perfect 28- 0 game using only pistols and no choppers, or a nice little 26 - 0 Indestructable. Of course, it will all be by casual luckiness and not skill, but still. :roll: But the game will be aiming for you.[QUOTE="ThePRAssassin"]
When us real FPS/TPS fans talk about games requiring skill, we mean it as Joe Random can't decide one day "I want to play Counter Strike or SOCOM" and go insanely positive with most kills on his team.
In COD, Joe Random can say "hey I heard COD was fun, I'm going to go play it" and he'll go 30-10 easily. Unless you're blind there is no reason why you shouldn't dominate in a game that simplified. It's beyond casualized and if you look at the hitboxes you can see that.
If COD4 takes skill why is the Pro Mod for it basically CS For Nubs?
this has to be trolling, you can't be serious. If you have any Joe Randoms (such as yourself) who would like to play me in CoD 4 or Halo 3, please tell them to PM me and I'll give you my gamertag, I'll never turn down a perfect 28- 0 game using only pistols and no choppers, or a nice little 26 - 0 Indestructable. Of course, it will all be by casual luckiness and not skill, but still. :roll: But the game will be aiming for you. If I had CoD4 for the 360, I would definitely take him up on the offer. The chances of you being able to perfect a random cage match is very slim, and I say chances because that is ultimately what success in CoD4 hinges on: chance. Now I'll be fair: good CoD4 players are slightly distinguished than bad players. Okay, now I'll be truthful: any good player will tell you that he has a bad game every two or three games. If the game is truly based on skill, there are no such thing as "bad games." In a skill game, it is either you are good, or you are bad.I agree also. I'm sick of all these run-n-gun takes on "tactical" multiplayer games. I'm sick of the spray and pray games where luck is more of a factor than skill in determining who wins (and no, from my experience, Halo is not a spray-n-pray game). Team Fortress 2 was a nice little beacon by Valve saying "Yes, we still understand that the video game market still encompasses an audience other than ADD-addled 16 year olds who will give up on a game the minute they don't 'win'." It is hardcore, yet very pub-friendly at the same time and I like that.Call me crazy but in my experience Team Fortress 2 requires some skill. And there are 9 unique ways you can learn to play.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment