Cows --- Do you really believe some games can't be done on Xbox 360?

I'm not talking about games Sony owns the rights to. I'm talking about cows saying that the graphics for a game are so great on the PS3 that it is impossible for it to be done on 360. You actually believe this? :lol: This when 360 has been proven over and over to have the best looking multiplats (for the most part...there are a couple of exceptions). "But, but, but teh Uncharted!" Yes, cows...I'm certain even that beauty of a game could be done on 360.

Just face it cows...even though PS3 released a year after 360, graphical superiority has not been proven with PS3. Excluding Wii and PS3, all other consoles in history that have released a year or more after the competition have ALWAYS produced better graphics (no, I'm not counting silly add-ons like SegaCD, 32x...I mean actual consoles). But not with teh PS3. :lol: I'm really not even counting Wii, because Nintendo didn't try to have a graphical powerhouse. Sony did...

Too many lemmings jealous over great looking ps3 games , tis very sad.

Too many lemmings jealous over great looking ps3 games , tis very sad.

Nike_Air

Too many cows thinking it is jealousy when it is actually just lemmings scratching their head wondering why cows think the PS3 outshines 360 graphically...

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

Too many lemmings jealous over great looking ps3 games , tis very sad.

AvIdGaMeR444

Too many cows thinking it is jealousy when it is actually just lemmings scratching their head wondering why cows think the PS3 outshines 360 graphically...

There is the exact same thread on the freaking front page covering the exact same thing...

And Ps3 is outshining 360 graphically lately.

I'm not talking about games Sony owns the rights to. I'm talking about cows saying that the graphics for a game are so great on the PS3 that it is impossible for it to be done on 360. You actually believe this? :lol: This when 360 has been proven over and over to have the best looking multiplats (for the most part...there are a couple of exceptions). "But, but, but teh Uncharted!" Yes, cows...I'm certain even that beauty of a game could be done on 360.

Just face it cows...even though PS3 released a year after 360, graphical superiority has not been proven with PS3. Excluding Wii and PS3, all other consoles in history that have released a year or more after the competition have ALWAYS produced better graphics (no, I'm not counting silly add-ons like SegaCD, 32x...I mean actual consoles). But not with teh PS3. :lol: I'm really not even counting Wii, because Nintendo didn't try to have a graphical powerhouse. Sony did...

AvIdGaMeR444

And graphical superiority has not been proven for the 360 either.

Isnt this the same lemming that posted a thread here saying MGS4 will not get a ten? :lol: REBEL2100x

I did say that. And I promise I was the only one who believed teh MGS4 wouldn't score a 10. No really...I was the only one who said that. :roll: I also admitted I was owned about that.

Too many lemmings jealous over great looking ps3 games , tis very sad.

Nike_Air

So after posts like that are you going to continue to adopt the myth that you're unbiased?

[QUOTE="REBEL2100x"]Isnt this the same lemming that posted a thread here saying MGS4 will not get a ten? :lol: AvIdGaMeR444

I did say that. And I promise I was the only one who believed teh MGS4 wouldn't score a 10. No really...I was the only one who said that. :roll: I also admitted I was owned about that.

Not really ;. More like the whole lemming army got owned.

crysis can be done on consoles too. JPOBS

I have Crysis, and trust me, no it cant.

I really havent seen a game that looks better than Killzone 2 on the 360. So eya, I believe there are some games the 360 cant do that are on the ps3. But then of course im not a dev.

They probably just say that so hardcore lemmings get their feelings hurt and turn DEFENSE mode on and start making threads like these full of laughing emoticons so they can feel superior.

Welcome to SW.

I really havent seen a game that looks better than Killzone 2 on the 360. So eya, I believe there are some games the 360 cant do that are on the ps3. But then of course im not a dev.

kool-aids

why would that mean it can not be done on another platform?

Not a Cow but Lair in its original state before the patch could not and can not be done on the 360 :P

Graphically both console are pretty much equal but it doesn't matter if the 360 CAN do it the fact is that it isn't doing it ; PS3 has been releasing more good looking exclusive than the 360 IMO. However gameplay>graphics so just buy the games you like.

Is it not obvious at this stage that the differences between the two are minimal? The gap between the PS3 and 360 is much smaller than that of the xbox and PS2, and were there any games there which were released on one but impossible on the other?

Other than maybe Doom 3 i really dont think so.

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]crysis can be done on consoles too. Ninja-Hippo

I have Crysis, and trust me, no it cant.

Cows 2005: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2006: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2007: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2008: PS3 gonna blow....awww forget it.

Cows 2005: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2006: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2007: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2008: PS3 gonna blow....awww forget it.

Riverwolf007

You forgot to add laughing emoticons, i recommend you use them if you are going for the troll look.

Cows 2005: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2006: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2007: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2008: PS3 gonna blow....awww forget it.

Riverwolf007

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

Cows 2005: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2006: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2007: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2008: PS3 gonna blow....awww forget it.

Koalakommander

You forgot to add laughing emoticons, i recommend you use them if you are going for the troll look.

I can't resist a request.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]crysis can be done on consoles too. JPOBS

I have Crysis, and trust me, no it cant.

If they strip out the inards of the PS3 and 360 and replace them with more powerful hardware, then sure Crysis can be done on consoles. If not, then no it cant. And it doesnt take a developer to know that. Just play the game. Crysis looks better than Far Cry 2 is looking right now, or at the very least on par, yet Far Cry 2 can only run on consoles at medium PC settings.

So how could crysis be done on consoles? It could be if it were watered down, but then you're not really playing "crysis" at all, but a stripped down version of what once was crysis.

[QUOTE="Koalakommander"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

Cows 2005: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2006: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2007: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2008: PS3 gonna blow....awww forget it.

Riverwolf007

You forgot to add laughing emoticons, i recommend you use them if you are going for the troll look.

I can't resist a request.

That was worst then the first attempt 0_o.

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]crysis can be done on consoles too. JPOBS

I have Crysis, and trust me, no it cant.

No just stop. Lets not get started.

At the moment there is not a single game shown on the 360 that looks better than Heavy Rain most definetly. I don't care what type of game it is, because you guys compared different genres graphics to eachother all the time, so this does in fact count.Cedmln

Heavy Rain was originally in development for both platforms until sony paid for exclusivity, so id say its possible on the 360 and they are equal in power, there is no hidden potential!!!

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

Too many lemmings jealous over great looking ps3 games , tis very sad.

Ninja-Hippo

So after posts like that are you going to continue to adopt the myth that you're unbiased?

I know he does that a lot. If he was truly objective, he would have recognised the cows responses to the 360 getting Gears of War and at the time it's superiority. Although, you lemmings have a few like him on your side. I'd probably get moderated if I named names.

In my opinion, and this is coming from a hermit (with a slight favourtism for the 360 although only slight because I seem to be bashing it more and more these days) this gen is far far closer than last gen. Some of the screenshots you consolites argue over amaze me in all honesty. The character shots in heavy rain are no more detailed than some of the EA sports games. Similar in the size of the small environments and use of system resources to focus on character detail. Nothing more imho!

I'm sure cows think that X game isn't capable on another platform as much as lemmings think their exclusives can only be played on the 360.

It's always best on games you know aren't going to a rival console though, that way you can't be proved wrong!

although im not a cow, my hermitness inclines me and my graphic whore alter ego to post on this. i have only two words for the topic:

Heavy Rain

In truth, I would say that some graphical PS3 games are possible on the Xbox 360. The RSX is only slightly technically better that the Xbox 360's Xenos when you look at the specifications.

When you look at the PS3, however, you also get the Cell.

Compared to the Xbox 360's Triple cores (called Xenon) clocked at 3.2 GHz, the PS3's cell has one main core (the PPE) clocked at 3.2 GHz, along with 7(1 core is reserved for the OS, while 6 are available to developers) other sub cores (the SPE's) also clocked at 3.2 GHz.

How the whole cell works (I think) is like this:

The PPE core sends out information to any of the 6 SPE cores it has available. The SPE then processes the information, and sends it back to the PPE core.

Because of this, it is sort of like the PS3 has 7 cores for physics in video games. The cell is quite powerful for in terms of physics processing. This is sort of how the cell alone can emulate PS1 games.

The reason cows probably say this is in terms of physics, rather. While I would say that MGS4 graphics could be done on the Xbox 360, there are physics elements that the Xbox 360's Xenon might have problems with.

Take Shadow Moses for example. While the textures and details could most likely be recreated on the Xenos, the Xenon might have difficulty processing the blizzard effect, the snow on Snake's body, enemy AI, and occasionally explosions... at the same time.

In short, I would say that games could be done on both PS3 and Xbox 360 graphically, but in terms of physics, the PS3 has a better chance.

If the cell could also process graphics, however, that would be a different story...

I'll bet this post is riddled with mistakes. If you do find some, please tell me, but don't turn it into a flame.

The 360 was outdated back in 05!:roll:FirstDiscovery

Yer okay:roll: thats why multiplat games look the same

At the moment there is not a single game shown on the 360 that looks better than Heavy Rain most definetly. I don't care what type of game it is, because you guys compared different genres graphics to eachother all the time, so this does in fact count.Cedmln

some sports games look as good as heavy rain ...the player models at least .

Also Killzone 2 pales in comparison of Far Cry 2 . The only thing KZ2 has against it is weapon models and blur .

I know he does that a lot. If he was truly objective, he would have recognised the cows responses to the 360 getting Gears of War and at the time it's superiority. DAZZER7

There is nothing superior about Gears of War. Its reliance on artstyle over polygons, the very thing that made it so visually appealing, is also what made them so basic and choppy.

In truth, I would say that some graphical PS3 games are possible on the Xbox 360. The RSX is only slightly technically better that the Xbox 360's Xenos when you look at the specifications.

When you look at the PS3, however, you also get the Cell.

Compared to the Xbox 360's Triple cores (called Xenon) clocked at 3.2 GHz, the PS3's cell has one main core (the PPE) clocked at 3.2 GHz, along with 7(1 core is reserved for the OS, while 6 are available to developers) other sub cores (the SPE's) also clocked at 3.2 GHz.

How the whole cell works (I think) is like this:

The PPE core sends out information to any of the 6 SPE cores it has available. The SPE then processes the information, and sends it back to the PPE core.

Because of this, it is sort of like the PS3 has 7 cores for physics in video games. The cell is quite powerful for in terms of physics processing. This is sort of how the cell alone can emulate PS1 games.

The reason cows probably say this is in terms of physics, rather. While I would say that MGS4 graphics could be done on the Xbox 360, there are physics elements that the Xbox 360's Xenon might have problems with.

Take Shadow Moses for example. While the textures and details could most likely be recreated on the Xenos, the Xenon might have difficulty processing the blizzard effect, the snow on Snake's body, enemy AI, and occasionally explosions... at the same time.

In short, I would say that games could be done on both PS3 and Xbox 360 graphically, but in terms of physics, the PS3 has a better chance.

If the cell could also process graphics, however, that would be a different story...

I'll bet this post is riddled with mistakes. If you do find some, please tell me, but don't turn it into a flame.

qman101

All this techno babble is so 2005. Both consoles are out. We've seen the games. They look the same.

[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]crysis can be done on consoles too. gatorteen

I have Crysis, and trust me, no it cant.

No just stop. Lets not get started.

its that time of day where the hermits own consolites

Cows 2005: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2006: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2007: PS3 gonna blow 360 outta the water. Look at KZ2!!!

Cows 2008: PS3 gonna blow....awww forget it.

Riverwolf007

My Nintendo 64 has better graphics than the Xbox 360, only a blind fanboy would say otherwise.WiiBalla

Are you series :lol:

Of course, i'm always serious. Are you a blind fanboy I was referring to ?

My Nintendo 64 has better graphics than the Xbox 360, only a blind fanboy would say otherwise.WiiBalla

*Facepalm*

[QUOTE="qman101"]

In truth, I would say that some graphical PS3 games are possible on the Xbox 360. The RSX is only slightly technically better that the Xbox 360's Xenos when you look at the specifications.

When you look at the PS3, however, you also get the Cell.

Compared to the Xbox 360's Triple cores (called Xenon) clocked at 3.2 GHz, the PS3's cell has one main core (the PPE) clocked at 3.2 GHz, along with 7(1 core is reserved for the OS, while 6 are available to developers) other sub cores (the SPE's) also clocked at 3.2 GHz.

How the whole cell works (I think) is like this:

The PPE core sends out information to any of the 6 SPE cores it has available. The SPE then processes the information, and sends it back to the PPE core.

Because of this, it is sort of like the PS3 has 7 cores for physics in video games. The cell is quite powerful for in terms of physics processing. This is sort of how the cell alone can emulate PS1 games.

The reason cows probably say this is in terms of physics, rather. While I would say that MGS4 graphics could be done on the Xbox 360, there are physics elements that the Xbox 360's Xenon might have problems with.

Take Shadow Moses for example. While the textures and details could most likely be recreated on the Xenos, the Xenon might have difficulty processing the blizzard effect, the snow on Snake's body, enemy AI, and occasionally explosions... at the same time.

In short, I would say that games could be done on both PS3 and Xbox 360 graphically, but in terms of physics, the PS3 has a better chance.

If the cell could also process graphics, however, that would be a different story...

I'll bet this post is riddled with mistakes. If you do find some, please tell me, but don't turn it into a flame.

Gamer556

All this techno babble is so 2005. Both consoles are out. We've seen the games. They look the same.

I stated up there that the graphical power between a PS3 and Xbox 360 isn't big. O_O

The PS3 has the cell, which, if done right, can be honed to make great games. However, very few games have actually used completely the PS3's cell, and the only game I believe that does is MGS4.

It's like I said, the cell is for physics processing, and not graphics processing. Cows, however, use this as an alibi for saying that the PS3 is better than the Xbox 360.

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

Too many lemmings jealous over great looking ps3 games , tis very sad.

Ninja-Hippo

So after posts like that are you going to continue to adopt the myth that you're unbiased?

So Unbiased people can't have an Opinion?