Crysis 2 does not look impressive for a console game

  • 141 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

Ive run out of popcorn...damn!

Avatar image for adamlovesu
adamlovesu

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 adamlovesu
Member since 2010 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

the footage was so dissapointing in fact that it took the forums and media by storm, and is proof the xbox can handle games like killzone..... never been so dissapointed in my life ...... i think the last time i was close to being this dissapointed was when halo 3 crossed the 3 million mark.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

Looks fine. I'll be buying it on PC regardless.

Also, wha are you on about the first Crysis having "horrible gameplay"? Did you play it?

Avatar image for TheGrayEye
TheGrayEye

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TheGrayEye
Member since 2006 • 2579 Posts

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

nhh18

Horrible gameplay? Didn't it get shooter of the year on the very site you're posting on? I could have sworn it did.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

TheGrayEye

Horrible gameplay? Didn't it get shooter of the year on the very site you're posting on? I could have sworn it did.

Well halo 3 was the better shooter. Horrible gameplay is what I meant. It had one of the worst sp campaigns I've ever played.

Avatar image for designer-
designer-

1328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 designer-
Member since 2010 • 1328 Posts
Yes, completely average, nothing special, mundane. Its so completely mind numbingly normal.
Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

nhh18
Its funny, because with all of that, it still is the top of the line looking game, so stop with the ridiculous remarks. And TC is looking for people to say "thats because Crysis was on tehs PC", so dont buy into it. It just another one of those threads.
Avatar image for Tokeism
Tokeism

2365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Tokeism
Member since 2006 • 2365 Posts

Crysis 2 is a PC game, it just happens to be on360 and PS3, there is no way they can look as good compaired to a high end PC

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

gaming25

Its funny, because with all of that, it still is the top of the line looking game, so stop with the ridiculous remarks. And TC is looking for people to say "thats because Crysis was on tehs PC", so dont buy into it. It just another one of those threads.

Worse graphics than mirror edge is pretty remarkable for the best looking game of all time.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#11 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGrayEye"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

nhh18

Horrible gameplay? Didn't it get shooter of the year on the very site you're posting on? I could have sworn it did.

Well halo 3 was the better shooter. Horrible gameplay is what I meant. It had one of the worst sp campaigns I've ever played.

Good thing that´s just your opinion,just like it´s my opinion when I say that Halo 3 campaign was mediocre and gameplay wise,far worse than Crysis.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

Crysis 2 is a PC game, it just happens to be on360 and PS3, there is no way they can look as good compaired to a high end PC

Tokeism
TC probably just wants you to say that. Thats the reason why he put consoles in the topic and then put Crysis 1 in the discussion.
Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

nhh18

Its funny, because with all of that, it still is the top of the line looking game, so stop with the ridiculous remarks. And TC is looking for people to say "thats because Crysis was on tehs PC", so dont buy into it. It just another one of those threads.

Worse graphics than mirror edge is pretty remarkable for the best looking game of all time.

Oh please, pixels and textures only do so much. Mirrors edge doesnt even touch the detail and depth that Crysis 2 has on any system.
Avatar image for adamlovesu
adamlovesu

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 adamlovesu
Member since 2010 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

Its funny, because with all of that, it still is the top of the line looking game, so stop with the ridiculous remarks. And TC is looking for people to say "thats because Crysis was on tehs PC", so dont buy into it. It just another one of those threads.

Worse graphics than mirror edge is pretty remarkable for the best looking game of all time.

this is proof you havent even touched the crysis game box.
Avatar image for TheGrayEye
TheGrayEye

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 TheGrayEye
Member since 2006 • 2579 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGrayEye"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

nhh18

Horrible gameplay? Didn't it get shooter of the year on the very site you're posting on? I could have sworn it did.

Well halo 3 was the better shooter. Horrible gameplay is what I meant. It had one of the worst sp campaigns I've ever played.

How was it one of the worst you've played? The story in both Halo 3 and Crysis were medicore, so that can't be it. The gameplay in Crysis was far more advanced and open- I get the feeling lately, that a lot of console gamers can't handle that.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="TheGrayEye"]

Horrible gameplay? Didn't it get shooter of the year on the very site you're posting on? I could have sworn it did.

Arach666

Well halo 3 was the better shooter. Horrible gameplay is what I meant. It had one of the worst sp campaigns I've ever played.

Good thing that´s just your opinion,just like it´s my opinion when I say that Halo 3 campaign was mediocre and gameplay wise,far worse than Crysis.

halo 3 had an awful single player. But it wasn't hideously bad similar to crysis. There hasn't been a good fps in a while since half life 2 actually that I enjoyed playing through.

Avatar image for Tokeism
Tokeism

2365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Tokeism
Member since 2006 • 2365 Posts

[QUOTE="Tokeism"]

Crysis 2 is a PC game, it just happens to be on360 and PS3, there is no way they can look as good compaired to a high end PC

gaming25

TC probably just wants you to say that. Thats the reason why he put consoles in the topic and then put Crysis 1 in the discussion.

I never mention crysis 1, im just saying ports are mostly better on the system they are made on

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="TheGrayEye"]

Horrible gameplay? Didn't it get shooter of the year on the very site you're posting on? I could have sworn it did.

TheGrayEye

Well halo 3 was the better shooter. Horrible gameplay is what I meant. It had one of the worst sp campaigns I've ever played.

How was it one of the worst you've played? The story in both Halo 3 and Crysis were medicore, so that can't be it. The gameplay in Crysis was far more advanced and open- I get the feeling lately, that a lot of console gamers can't handle that.

It probably just wasnt fun enough to him. Its his opinion.
Avatar image for VALikimlav
VALikimlav

324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 VALikimlav
Member since 2010 • 324 Posts
Crysis 2 is a PC game. I've been thinking of getting it on consoles for multiplayer, though.
Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="TheGrayEye"]

Horrible gameplay? Didn't it get shooter of the year on the very site you're posting on? I could have sworn it did.

TheGrayEye

Well halo 3 was the better shooter. Horrible gameplay is what I meant. It had one of the worst sp campaigns I've ever played.

How was it one of the worst you've played? The story in both Halo 3 and Crysis were medicore, so that can't be it. The gameplay in Crysis was far more advanced and open- I get the feeling lately, that a lot of console gamers can't handle that.

There is level design, ai, and other elements that crysis was lacking in almost every regard. The sandbox gameplay never made up for the fact that the enemies took too many bullets, the ai was persistently a larger nuissance than challenging, and that there were huge bumps in difficulty throughout the game. Is far cry 2 a good fps because it is a sandbox. I heard many people find similar copmlaints.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

nhh18

Do trolls even try anymore?

1st one had good graphics and horrible gameplay

lol

and one for the road

lol

Avatar image for TheGrayEye
TheGrayEye

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 TheGrayEye
Member since 2006 • 2579 Posts

[QUOTE="TheGrayEye"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]Well halo 3 was the better shooter. Horrible gameplay is what I meant. It had one of the worst sp campaigns I've ever played.

nhh18

How was it one of the worst you've played? The story in both Halo 3 and Crysis were medicore, so that can't be it. The gameplay in Crysis was far more advanced and open- I get the feeling lately, that a lot of console gamers can't handle that.

There is level design, ai, and other elements that crysis was lacking in almost every regard. The sandbox gameplay never made up for the fact that the enemies took too many bullets, the ai was persistently a larger nuissance than challenging, and that there were huge bumps in difficulty throughout the game. Is far cry 2 a good fps because it is a sandbox. I heard many people find similar copmlaints.

Okay, aside from the later half of the game, the levels were great. The AI was solid, you forget that they have to respond to the player's unpredictable behavior, it's not Call of Duty. It sounds like you didn't know how to use the weapons, the enemies died one hit from a head shot. Huge bumps in difficulty? The game features enormous open-world levels, you can approach the objective from dozens of ways, so if you put your mind to it, you could have gone through some levels without fighting anybody. Crysis is pretty much a masterpiece of open-level gameplay.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

Fizzman

Do trolls even try anymore?

1st one had good graphics and horrible gameplay

lol

and one for the road

lol

I bet this now looks great graphically because it is crysis 2. This is around medium graphics on crysis 1 at best.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101144#comments_top

Screen tearing low res texturing, horrible AI, incredibly disappointing footage for a premier shooter. The first one had good graphics and horrible gameplay this looks completely average in every regard.

nhh18

Do trolls even try anymore?

1st one had good graphics and horrible gameplay

lol

and one for the road

lol

I bet this now looks great graphically because it is crysis 2.

i dont care what you think about the graphics and didnt even bother commenting on your bad graphics opinion. Crysis won shooter of the year on numerous websites, and was praised for its revolutionary gameplay in a FPS. Its painfully obvious you have no clue what you are talking about.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Looks pretty good to me... :?

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

Do trolls even try anymore?

1st one had good graphics and horrible gameplay

lol

and one for the road

lol

Fizzman

I bet this now looks great graphically because it is crysis 2.

i dont care what you think about the graphics and didnt even bother commenting on your bad graphics opinion. Crysis won shooter of the year on numerous websites, and was praised for its revolutionary gameplay in a FPS. Its painfully obvious you have no clue what you are talking about.

Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

nhh18

Having an opinion that it sucks is fine. You said it had bad gameplay as a resolute in your OP, meaning it wasn't opinionated. That is wrong.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]I bet this now looks great graphically because it is crysis 2.

nhh18

i dont care what you think about the graphics and didnt even bother commenting on your bad graphics opinion. Crysis won shooter of the year on numerous websites, and was praised for its revolutionary gameplay in a FPS. Its painfully obvious you have no clue what you are talking about.

Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

We are talking about people in general, not just the trolls and haters that clog up forums. And in general and according to user scores, KZ2 and Crysis had amazing gameplay.
Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

i dont care what you think about the graphics and didnt even bother commenting on your bad graphics opinion. Crysis won shooter of the year on numerous websites, and was praised for its revolutionary gameplay in a FPS. Its painfully obvious you have no clue what you are talking about.

gaming25

Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

We are talking about people in general, not just the trolls and haters that clog up forums. And in general and according to user scores, KZ2 and Crysis had amazing gameplay.

Killzone 2 had horrific level design with a near impossible final level, broken controls, and a hideously poor single player campaign. Only thing that it had that was utterly amazing was level design for its multiplayer maps were probably the best besides halo combat evolved in terms of memorable.

Avatar image for TheGrayEye
TheGrayEye

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 TheGrayEye
Member since 2006 • 2579 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]I bet this now looks great graphically because it is crysis 2.

nhh18

i dont care what you think about the graphics and didnt even bother commenting on your bad graphics opinion. Crysis won shooter of the year on numerous websites, and was praised for its revolutionary gameplay in a FPS. Its painfully obvious you have no clue what you are talking about.

Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

It seems apparent you just missed the point of the gameplay. You haven't really given solid reasons for why it has "horrible gameplay"

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]I bet this now looks great graphically because it is crysis 2.

nhh18

i dont care what you think about the graphics and didnt even bother commenting on your bad graphics opinion. Crysis won shooter of the year on numerous websites, and was praised for its revolutionary gameplay in a FPS. Its painfully obvious you have no clue what you are talking about.

Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

You think it sucks, i think its good. You aren't cool and edgy because you dislike a popular game. Who am i to believe some random forum poster who bashes Crysis on elements of the game that are touted as its best features by almost every publication out there. Im gonna stick with myopinion of the game and the majority of the gaming community. You are certaintly entitled to your opinion even if it lacks any actual reasoning as to why you dislike Crysis. You see though im not making threads saying how glorious Crysis is, but you on the other hand are compelled to make forum posts to bash Crysis. Im very secure with my opinion, but you clearly are not.

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="gaming25"][QUOTE="nhh18"]Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

nhh18

We are talking about people in general, not just the trolls and haters that clog up forums. And in general and according to user scores, KZ2 and Crysis had amazing gameplay.

Killzone 2 had horrific level design with a near impossible final level, broken controls, and a hideously poor single player campaign. Only thing that it had that was utterly amazing was level design for its multiplayer maps were probably the best besides halo combat evolved in terms of memorable.

But that is in YOUR opinion. So it isnt fact. And it is a FACT that it did NOT have broken controls since the devs intentionally made them that way. I thought the controls were amazing and revolutionary and I thought the SP was amazing imo too. And the last level wasnt too hard on normal.
Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

i dont care what you think about the graphics and didnt even bother commenting on your bad graphics opinion. Crysis won shooter of the year on numerous websites, and was praised for its revolutionary gameplay in a FPS. Its painfully obvious you have no clue what you are talking about.

Fizzman

Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

You think it sucks, i think its good. You aren't cool and edgy because you dislike a popular game. Who am i to believe some random forum poster who bashes Crysis on elements of the game that are touted as its best features by almost every publication out there. Im gonna stick with myopinion of the game and the majority of the gaming community. You are certaintly entitled to your opinion even if it lacks any actual reasoning as to why you dislike Crysis. You see though im not making threads saying how glorious Crysis is, but you on the other hand are compelled to make forum posts to bash Crysis. Im very secure with my opinion, but you clearly are not.

those are controls. Nothing to do with gameplay. Gameplay is the level design, pacing, ai, combat, and other stuff. Which all sucked

Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
Yeh, some of the textures look pretty wack, and the lighting is a little cold, maybe it's meant to be that way though. Anyways, hope it looks far better on PC, cause this looks like Crysis 1 on medium with a little bit better lighting.
Avatar image for enterawesome
enterawesome

9477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#35 enterawesome
Member since 2009 • 9477 Posts
Wow, I must be weird, because I thought that looked great.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Good thing that´s just your opinion,just like it´s my opinion when I say that Halo 3 campaign was mediocre and gameplay wise,far worse than Crysis.

Arach666

QFT.

Crysis won FPS of the year during a FPS releasing spree. Beating none the less than CoD4, UT3, Halo 3, BioShock, Episode 2, Portal and Team Fortress 2.

I find it hard to believe anyone has the guts to say a open-level FPS with so huge levels and so many possibilities to get through your objective is "average". Maybe it's just that you are not creative enough to understand how to do it.

Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

those are controls. Nothing to do with gameplay. Gameplay is the level design, pacing, ai, combat, and other stuff. Which all sucked

nhh18

Did you just say controls have nothing to do with gameplay? :lol:

Avatar image for successful19
successful19

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 successful19
Member since 2009 • 307 Posts

graphics look good but not better than the games thats out now, just some regular graphics (compared to ps3 games) gameplay looks really boring..but mabey they saving the good gameplay footage for e3

Avatar image for gaming25
gaming25

6181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 gaming25
Member since 2010 • 6181 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

nhh18

You think it sucks, i think its good. You aren't cool and edgy because you dislike a popular game. Who am i to believe some random forum poster who bashes Crysis on elements of the game that are touted as its best features by almost every publication out there. Im gonna stick with myopinion of the game and the majority of the gaming community. You are certaintly entitled to your opinion even if it lacks any actual reasoning as to why you dislike Crysis. You see though im not making threads saying how glorious Crysis is, but you on the other hand are compelled to make forum posts to bash Crysis. Im very secure with my opinion, but you clearly are not.

those are controls. Nothing to do with gameplay. Gameplay is the level design, pacing, ai, combat, and other stuff. Which all sucked

The AI was praised as one of the best of all time. The level design was amazing. And like I keep saying to you, that is only YOUR opinion.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#40 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]Why should I honestly care what someone else thinks about the game when I played it as well and thought it sucked. Is it shocking that someone has a negative opinion on a game? I already knew that crysis 1 even with its 91 metacritic score has the largest and most obnoxious defense force that thinks that the game is the greatest game since half life 2 and any complaints about this game iws impossible. I don't understand how it is that much different than it is killzone 2 which got the same exact scores and people accept that the game sucks besides multiplayer maps are very well done. Oh I forgot this is crysis we are talking about.

nhh18

You think it sucks, i think its good. You aren't cool and edgy because you dislike a popular game. Who am i to believe some random forum poster who bashes Crysis on elements of the game that are touted as its best features by almost every publication out there. Im gonna stick with myopinion of the game and the majority of the gaming community. You are certaintly entitled to your opinion even if it lacks any actual reasoning as to why you dislike Crysis. You see though im not making threads saying how glorious Crysis is, but you on the other hand are compelled to make forum posts to bash Crysis. Im very secure with my opinion, but you clearly are not.

those are controls. Nothing to do with gameplay. Gameplay is the level design, pacing, ai, combat, and other stuff. Which all sucked

Thats very nice, but no one is going to view your opinion as accurate. I could

Just a few quotes from the Gamespot review. I could get dozens more from various other websites whichwholeheartedly disagrees with your assessment, but its really not necessary.

Crysis is visually stunning, packed with intelligent, thrilling gameplay, and easily one of the greatest shooters ever made.

  • Dynamic, emergent shooter gameplay
  • Unparalleled visuals with destructible environments
  • High level of replayability
  • Power struggle makes for huge multiplayer battles
  • An amazing accomplishment overall.

What are you talking about those are controls? I did not mention anything about the controls. The pacing was excellent it started off with slowly infiltrating the island and eventually building up to a new enemy which completely changes the game and is very refreshing. The AI was regarded as excellent and the NKA soldiers did a good job of fighting a special forces operative with a nano suit. Crytek made the enemies respond very well for the most part.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

those are controls. Nothing to do with gameplay. Gameplay is the level design, pacing, ai, combat, and other stuff. Which all sucked

Snagal123

Did you just say controls have nothing to do with gameplay? :lol:

He also said AI and level design sucked. That's even worse than saying controls have nothing to do with gameplay.

Well, not really worse. It's just ridiculous. I find myself forced to use a combo :|:o:shock::):D:lol:

Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts
Crysis 2 is a PC game. I've been thinking of getting it on consoles for multiplayer, though.VALikimlav
It is also a CONSOLE GAME!
Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts
People need to understand that it isn't a finished product. Besides., this game does a lot of technical things besides graphics, unlike other shoots, it isn't AS LINEAR and a lot is happening on screen, you need to take that into account. for what it is doing the graphics SO far are impressive, IMO. Wait and see.
Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

those are controls. Nothing to do with gameplay. Gameplay is the level design, pacing, ai, combat, and other stuff. Which all sucked

N30F3N1X

Did you just say controls have nothing to do with gameplay? :lol:

He also said AI and level design sucked. That's even worse than saying controls have nothing to do with gameplay.

Well, not really worse. It's just ridiculous. I find myself forced to use a combo :|:o:shock::):D:lol:

Well gameplay mechanics are controls and are an aspect of gameplay. It is the most important since it creates the learning curve however, I am saying that gameplay sucked because of the other aspects. Actually I am being a hypocrit right now. Gameplay aspects and contorls were two different aspects on gamespot old school sheet. Which I will say than that they are two different aspects. Since sound, graphics, among other aspects are also gameplay.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

You think it sucks, i think its good. You aren't cool and edgy because you dislike a popular game. Who am i to believe some random forum poster who bashes Crysis on elements of the game that are touted as its best features by almost every publication out there. Im gonna stick with myopinion of the game and the majority of the gaming community. You are certaintly entitled to your opinion even if it lacks any actual reasoning as to why you dislike Crysis. You see though im not making threads saying how glorious Crysis is, but you on the other hand are compelled to make forum posts to bash Crysis. Im very secure with my opinion, but you clearly are not.

gaming25

those are controls. Nothing to do with gameplay. Gameplay is the level design, pacing, ai, combat, and other stuff. Which all sucked

The AI was praised as one of the best of all time. The level design was amazing. And like I keep saying to you, that is only YOUR opinion.

AI is average at best. It is no where near the quality of killzone 2 or halo 3.

Avatar image for HAZE-Unit
HAZE-Unit

10564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 HAZE-Unit
Member since 2007 • 10564 Posts

One question TC, are you going to buy the game or not?

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

Well gameplay mechanics are controls and are an aspect of gameplay. It is the most important since it creates the learning curve however, I am saying that gameplay sucked because of the other aspects.

Snagal123

Thats a nice 180.

Eh noticed I am a hypocrit so I am pulling back my statement. My original statement is true. THey are 2 different aspects at gamespot reviews. So I will leave it at that.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

One question TC, are you going to buy the game or not?

HAZE-Unit

No interest.

Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

those are controls. Nothing to do with gameplay. Gameplay is the level design, pacing, ai, combat, and other stuff. Which all sucked

nhh18

Well gameplay mechanics are controls and are an aspect of gameplay. It is the most important since it creates the learning curve however, I am saying that gameplay sucked because of the other aspects. Actually I am being a hypocrit right now. Gameplay aspects and contorls were two different aspects on gamespot old school sheet. Which I will say than that they are two different aspects. Since sound, graphics, among other aspects are also gameplay.

nhh18

Thats a nice 180 you just made.