http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PetolT4L7P8&hd=1
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Graphics dont look that good
dont know how they are faking these trailers so well, the very high DX9 PC version isnt this good, and no, DX11 will not make it look better, its built DX9 ground up, DX11 will do nothing but kill your framerate
Graphics dont look that good
dont know how they are faking these trailers so well, the very high DX9 PC version isnt this good, and no, DX11 will not make it look better, its built DX9 ground up, DX11 will do nothing but kill your framerate
HaloinventedFPS
Yeah it will. Very High DX9 or even full High DX9 hasn't been shown yet. We don't even know how they've put DX10 and DX11 into the game yet either.
Plus, its 360 footage. Thats pretty much how the PC beta looks but a bit worse.
They are amazing.....that is allGraphics dont look that good
dont know how they are faking these trailers so well, the very high DX9 PC version isnt this good, and no, DX11 will not make it look better, its built DX9 ground up, DX11 will do nothing but kill your framerate
HaloinventedFPS
[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]
Graphics dont look that good
dont know how they are faking these trailers so well, the very high DX9 PC version isnt this good, and no, DX11 will not make it look better, its built DX9 ground up, DX11 will do nothing but kill your framerate
ChubbyGuy40
Yeah it will. Very High DX9 or even full High DX9 hasn't been shown yet. We don't even know how they've put DX10 and DX11 into the game yet either.
Plus, its 360 footage. Thats pretty much how the PC beta looks but a bit worse.
360 version isnt that good, the beta has shown the 360 settings with the Cryengine 3 editor
and yes, we have seen very high DX9 Crysis 2, but only in the editor, the game is bugged, wont work with very high in game for some reason
and they wont just "put" DX11 in the game, it doesnt work that way
[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like crap at console spec.RavensmashI fail to see how people think this.
Some people just show how ignorrant they are...Crytek intentionally locked leak at medium settings so even when you put high all shaders will be locked on medium and 360 and PS3 settings in editor look almost exactly the same.Apart from resolution this is what the guys have been watching this past few days...
[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like crap at console spec.Mystic-GSince when have consoles looked better than that? Better than crap, or better than the footage?
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]
Graphics dont look that good
dont know how they are faking these trailers so well, the very high DX9 PC version isnt this good, and no, DX11 will not make it look better, its built DX9 ground up, DX11 will do nothing but kill your framerate
HaloinventedFPS
Yeah it will. Very High DX9 or even full High DX9 hasn't been shown yet. We don't even know how they've put DX10 and DX11 into the game yet either.
Plus, its 360 footage. Thats pretty much how the PC beta looks but a bit worse.
360 version isnt that good, the beta has shown the 360 settings with the Cryengine 3 editor
and yes, we have seen very high DX9 Crysis 2, but only in the editor, the game is bugged, wont work with very high in game for some reason
and they wont just "put" DX11 in the game, it doesnt work that way
I know it doesn't work that way. We still don't know how they've used it. They could add tessellation and more advanced lighting. We haven't seen it or had any confirmation so we still don't know.
We haven't seen Very High. The editor doesn't even show it. Theres no difference from high to very high. Many people at Facepunch confirmed this. The beta is incomplete and we're gonna have to wait till launch or the PC demo to see what its really gonna look like.
[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like crap at console spec.Mystic-GSince when have consoles looked better than that? KZ3 looks much better. Horrid aliasing, frame-rate and pop-in leave a lot to be desired.:P
The enemy AI looks bad. But it's just a trailer, so who knows.IronBassEvery video appears to feature terrible a.i.:evil:
Since when have consoles looked better than that? KZ3 looks much better. Horrid aliasing, frame-rate and pop-in leave a lot to be desired.:P Meh, I think it has it's charms :P Maybe it's the lighting that does it for me, but I really like the visuals. KZ3 does look amazing too though.[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like crap at console spec.MFDOOM1983
Since when have consoles looked better than that? KZ3 looks much better. Horrid aliasing, frame-rate and pop-in leave a lot to be desired.:P Oh you mean that extremely short-sighted shooter with tons of blur to hide the aliasing?[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like crap at console spec.MFDOOM1983
[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]KZ3 looks much better. Horrid aliasing, frame-rate and pop-in leave a lot to be desired.:P Meh, I think it has it's charms :P Maybe it's the lighting that does it for me, but I really like the visuals. KZ3 does look amazing too though. I'm sure it'll look amazing on pc with improved image quality.:)[QUOTE="Mystic-G"] Since when have consoles looked better than that? Ravensmash
It looks pretty good on an Xbox 360 - which means that the PC version will look even better!
Thanks for sharing.
Since when have consoles looked better than that? KZ3 looks much better. Horrid aliasing, frame-rate and pop-in leave a lot to be desired.:P[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like crap at console spec.MFDOOM1983
Bias is such a shame.
KZ3 looks much better. Horrid aliasing, frame-rate and pop-in leave a lot to be desired.:P[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]
[QUOTE="Mystic-G"] Since when have consoles looked better than that? AktionJakson
Bias is such a shame.
Bias about what?Crytek still insists on using the 360 version to show off the game...
Is it any wonder so many people ran to the beta?
[QUOTE="AktionJakson"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"] KZ3 looks much better. Horrid aliasing, frame-rate and pop-in leave a lot to be desired.:P
MFDOOM1983
Bias is such a shame.
Bias about what?I can accept that people prefer KZ3 looks more,I can also accept that people don't like Crysis 2 look but to say that it has horrid aliasing is biased beyond limits.Leak version showed that their AA works very well.It does not anti alias clean edges as good as MLAA but it works on everything,from trees and bushes to thin geometry and its no where near aliasing fest as you called it.
There is still plenty of time till release for them to show the PC versions. It's up to them when they show it, it's not gamers birth right to get information about a game when they feel like it, Crytek will show it off when they're ready. It's not like they're forcing you to pre-order the damn game. You don't have to make some commitment to buy the game 6 months ahead of release. If you don't like the way they're marketing it, don't buy it.Crytek still insists on using the 360 version to show off the game...
Is it any wonder so many people ran to the beta?
AnnoyedDragon
they are trying to break into the console crowd..what do you expect them to do? lawlessx
If it was just that, they would be showing the PS3 version from time to time.
Quite frankly I think Microsoft paid them off. 360 exclusive beta, 360 timed exclusive demo, 360 only promotional material...
There is still plenty of time till release for them to show the PC versions. It's up to them when they show it, it's not gamers birth right to get information about a game when they feel like it, Crytek will show it off when they're ready. It's not like they're forcing you to pre-order the damn game. You don't have to make some commitment to buy the game 6 months ahead of release. If you don't like the way they're marketing it, don't buy it. AAllxxjjnn
Why do you feel the need to jump to their defence? So much so, that you felt the need to lecture me for making what should be a simple request?
How nice of them, unadulterated 360 footage. You can see poor texture filtering, LOD, framerate drops and everything.
*HEAD NORTH ON THE FDR!*
:D
Bias about what?[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"][QUOTE="AktionJakson"]
Bias is such a shame.
Bus-A-Bus
I can accept that people prefer KZ3 looks more,I can also accept that people don't like Crysis 2 look but to say that it has horrid aliasing is biased beyond limits.Leak version showed that their AA works very well.It does not anti alias clean edges as good as MLAA but it works on everything,from trees and bushes to thin geometry and its no where near aliasing fest as you called it.
The 360 demo was quite jaggy. Maybe it was the sub-hd that did it but it certainly doesn't look as pleasing as kz3's method.Crytek still insists on using the 360 version to show off the game...
Is it any wonder so many people ran to the beta?
AnnoyedDragon
I'm mystified by this as well, console graphics are no way to show a new engine off; if anything consoles make crysis 2 look like a bad game due to the incredible aliasing and choppy frames.
I'm fully expecting DX11 to blow us away, look at Metro DX11 vs DX9, huge huge difference. To suggest DX11 looks like DX9 is similar to suggesting PC looks like console.
[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]
Crytek still insists on using the 360 version to show off the game...
Is it any wonder so many people ran to the beta?
haberman13
I'm mystified by this as well, console graphics are no way to show a new engine off; if anything consoles make crysis 2 look like a bad game due to the incredible aliasing and choppy frames.
I'm fully expecting DX11 to blow us away, to the commenter saying it does nothing it only displays your ignorance. To suggest DX11 looks like DX9 is similar to suggesting PC looks like console.
I believe that their showcasing how ce3 scales on consoles for potential sales in the middleware market.[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]
Crytek still insists on using the 360 version to show off the game...
Is it any wonder so many people ran to the beta?
haberman13
I'm mystified by this as well, console graphics are no way to show a new engine off; if anything consoles make crysis 2 look like a bad game due to the incredible aliasing and choppy frames.
I'm fully expecting DX11 to blow us away, look at Metro DX11 vs DX9, huge huge difference. To suggest DX11 looks like DX9 is similar to suggesting PC looks like console.
Because they're promoting their engine? (As MFDOOM said).[QUOTE="haberman13"][QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]
Crytek still insists on using the 360 version to show off the game...
Is it any wonder so many people ran to the beta?
Ravensmash
I'm mystified by this as well, console graphics are no way to show a new engine off; if anything consoles make crysis 2 look like a bad game due to the incredible aliasing and choppy frames.
I'm fully expecting DX11 to blow us away, look at Metro DX11 vs DX9, huge huge difference. To suggest DX11 looks like DX9 is similar to suggesting PC looks like console.
Because they're promoting their engine? (As MFDOOM said).At this point their "promotion" is just making them look bad. IMO blow people away using the PC, bullshots etc., then show people the console version AFTER they have bought it.
From what I'm reading out on the tubes, the PC version is now being lauded, and the console version is being ripped apart. The 360 demo garnered a lot of criticism from the sites I frequent.
[QUOTE="Baranga"]This gameplay video is much better. I hate how they have the call of duty "spray your entire clip with no recoil whatsoever" gun play. Killzone 3 is kind of like that now, but this is just bad.That's a bad gameplay trailer.
This is much better.
mD-
Totally agree, I hate run-n-gun games; BC2/CSS/BF2 FTW
[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]
[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"] Bias about what?MFDOOM1983
I can accept that people prefer KZ3 looks more,I can also accept that people don't like Crysis 2 look but to say that it has horrid aliasing is biased beyond limits.Leak version showed that their AA works very well.It does not anti alias clean edges as good as MLAA but it works on everything,from trees and bushes to thin geometry and its no where near aliasing fest as you called it.
The 360 demo was quite jaggy. Maybe it was the sub-hd that did it but it certainly doesn't look as pleasing as kz3's method. damn, I didn't get a chance to play this. Is it on live still cause I want to see how it looks. I played the Killzone 3 beta and it looked great. I played the single player campaign demo with a friend and it looked even better![QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]The 360 demo was quite jaggy. Maybe it was the sub-hd that did it but it certainly doesn't look as pleasing as kz3's method. damn, I didn't get a chance to play this. Is it on live still cause I want to see how it looks. I played the Killzone 3 beta and it looked great. I played the single player campaign demo with a friend and it looked even better!I see no reason why it shouldn't. Prepare for a ton a texture and object pop-in.[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]
I can accept that people prefer KZ3 looks more,I can also accept that people don't like Crysis 2 look but to say that it has horrid aliasing is biased beyond limits.Leak version showed that their AA works very well.It does not anti alias clean edges as good as MLAA but it works on everything,from trees and bushes to thin geometry and its no where near aliasing fest as you called it.
mD-
[QUOTE="mD-"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]The 360 demo was quite jaggy. Maybe it was the sub-hd that did it but it certainly doesn't look as pleasing as kz3's method.damn, I didn't get a chance to play this. Is it on live still cause I want to see how it looks. I played the Killzone 3 beta and it looked great. I played the single player campaign demo with a friend and it looked even better!I see no reason why it shouldn't. Prepare for a ton a texture and object pop-in.MFDOOM1983
Demo is not live anymore.More so,demo is made by guys who made Haze,not Crytek Frankfurt.The fact that its also confirmed to be month and a half old MP build does not help.SP will look tons better...thats why it stutters so much,MP ran smooth as butter.
EERRMM ok am I the only one who noticed he said "Prophet!?" As soon as I heard that I skipped the vid... seemed like it could be spoiler-tasticlucfonzy
No spoilers, we still have no idea how Prophet is in NYC.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment