Crysis 2's 3D tech is unbelievable!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

Gentleman,hype train keeps rolling on... :P

"Somehow, through technical sorcery by the hands of Crytek's super-nerds, Crysis 2 is not only possibly the most amazing-looking console game ever, but it even does so without creating a reality-sucking singularity inside your PS3 or 360. It looks even better on PC, but whether it will stutter like Colin Firth depends on your machine's muscle. We've played all three versions of the game, but it's hard to say how the average PC will handle it since we played on a mysteriously-specced mega-machine, but wow was it crisp and luscious. So Cryisis 2, any way you play it, looks stunning in 2D. But hold your nanosuit-clad horses, because Crytek's "how the heck did they do that" CryEngine 3 also pulls off 3D so near-flawlessly we still can't believe it works the way it does."



"How do we know this for sure? We have played through roughly 90% of the game in 3D on the 360. Our review won't be up until Tuesday, but for now we just wanted to share how this may just be the best 3D tech we've seen on any game. Yes, the 3D requires a compatible TV, but surprisingly it doesn't require those expensive active-shutter glasses. We wore crummy-old plastic polarized glasses, and after a comparison assessment, we think Crysis 2's 3D is miles ahead of Killzone 3's – even with Killzone using those fancy-pants active-shutter glasses. With Killzone we noticed some significant jaggies that don't seem to synch well with the 3D, as well as some not-insignificant ghostly double images around much of the environment. It also hurt our eyes something fierce after only a couple of minutes."

"With Crysis 2, while the 3D isn't utterly free of flicker or a slightly darkened screen, the effect is much, much cleaner. We were able to play the game continuously for hours with only slight eye discomfort (of course this will vary from person to person). The shocking thing is that the game seems to suffer next to zero image or framerate degradation. If it's there, we couldn't detect it. So you can see why we're in disbelief: Crysis 2, running on a 360, with a smooth framerate, in 3D, with the same (as far as we could see) graphical fidelity as 2D. It's astonishing. During the brief parts of the campaign that we played in 2D, we found ourselves jonesing to put it back in 3D like some heroin addict that needs to inject Horse straight into his eyeballs. "

LINK

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
Now I want a 3D Monitor =(
Avatar image for hip-fire
hip-fire

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 hip-fire
Member since 2011 • 206 Posts
3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can afford
Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts

Lovin the PR talk :D

Avatar image for ravenguard90
ravenguard90

3064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ravenguard90
Member since 2005 • 3064 Posts

I for one am really excited for this, especially the fact that it doesn't require active-shutter glasses. That in itself would shave significant costs for a 3D setup.

I really hope this type of 3D can be transferred down to other games. Definitely a step in the right direction for the industry.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

That's not true stereoscopy though. Digital Foundry has a piece on it. It has some major flaws but considering that it doesn't cut the performance or level of detail in half, some people will love it,

Avatar image for Truth_Hurts_U
Truth_Hurts_U

9703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#7 Truth_Hurts_U
Member since 2006 • 9703 Posts

Glad I picked up a 2011 Panasonic this month. I love 3D and don't understand the hate it gets.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

Glad I picked up a 2011 Panasonic this month. I love 3D and don't understand the hate it gets.

Truth_Hurts_U
Don't think anyone hates it. It's just really expensive. Your TV was $500+ no doubt. With gas at $4.00 a gallon I can't drop $500 down at once on anything. I'm spending an extra $200-250 on gas each month.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

Glad I picked up a 2011 Panasonic this month. I love 3D and don't understand the hate it gets.

Truth_Hurts_U
It's expensive and it gives me a headache. That's enough for me to hate it. I just find the whole 3d effect stupid in general.
Avatar image for Truth_Hurts_U
Truth_Hurts_U

9703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 Truth_Hurts_U
Member since 2006 • 9703 Posts

It's expensive and it gives me a headache. That's enough for me to hate it. I just find the whole 3d effect stupid in general. millerlight89

It's not that expensive. You can pick up 2010 models that are around $800 now. Grab 2 pair of 3D glasses and your around $1,040 ish. That's not bad at all... Considering in 2006 I paid $1,400 for a 32 inch LCD.

I can see if your not into PQ and 3D $1,000 ish dollars is alot.

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]It's expensive and it gives me a headache. That's enough for me to hate it. I just find the whole 3d effect stupid in general. Truth_Hurts_U

It's not that expensive. You can pick up 2010 models that are around $800 now. Grab 2 pair of 3D glasses and your around $1,040 ish. That's not bad at all... Considering in 2006 I paid $1,400 for a 32 inch LCD.

I can see if your not into PQ and 3D $1,000 ish dollars is alot.

$1000 is alot regardless of what you're buying. Thats enough to feed me for a year.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]It's expensive and it gives me a headache. That's enough for me to hate it. I just find the whole 3d effect stupid in general. Truth_Hurts_U

It's not that expensive. You can pick up 2010 models that are around $800 now. Grab 2 pair of 3D glasses and your around $1,040 ish. That's not bad at all... Considering in 2006 I paid $1,400 for a 32 inch LCD.

I can see if your not into PQ and 3D $1,000 ish dollars is alot.

Well that is a lot of money for me to spend on a TV. However, I have no problem spending that type of money on my PC. I guess it just depends what you like. I think we can both agree that $1000 is a lot of money no matter what you are spending it on. People probablly think you are silly for spending that much on a TV ( I don't personally, as I have no room to talk :P), as I am more than certain many think it is silly for me to spend hundreds on my PC.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts
3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can affordhip-fire
No one can afford? Do you like in Africa or something because 3D is not expensive if you want it. you can buy 3D TVs for under $1K
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-fire"]3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can affordMozelleple112
No one can afford? Do you like in Africa or something because 3D is not expensive if you want it. you can buy 3D TVs for under $1K

Do you pay for you bills, gas, food, etc.? If so, you wouldn't be saying they are expensive.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-fire"]3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can affordMozelleple112
No one can afford? Do you like in Africa or something because 3D is not expensive if you want it. you can buy 3D TVs for under $1K

What 3D TV?
Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="hip-fire"]3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can affordKHAndAnime
No one can afford? Do you like in Africa or something because 3D is not expensive if you want it. you can buy 3D TVs for under $1K

What 3D TV?

I'd like to jump in this conversation as well. Most 3DTVs are actually over 1K.

So...

Avatar image for DireOwl
DireOwl

3352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 DireOwl
Member since 2007 • 3352 Posts

[QUOTE="hip-fire"]3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can affordMozelleple112
No one can afford? Do you like in Africa or something because 3D is not expensive if you want it. you can buy 3D TVs for under $1K

I'm sorry but $1000 dollars is allot of money unless you make 6+ figures a year.

Avatar image for hip-fire
hip-fire

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 hip-fire
Member since 2011 • 206 Posts

[QUOTE="hip-fire"]3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can affordMozelleple112
No one can afford? Do you like in Africa or something because 3D is not expensive if you want it. you can buy 3D TVs for under $1K

Do i like in Africa? and I got bills 2 pay, college student, i aint got 2k for a 3D tv

Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

That's good news for 3D in general. Sounds like it can be a big step forward. I'll wait until next gen when the tech will be even better.

Avatar image for RpgGamer23q
RpgGamer23q

296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -3

User Lists: 0

#20 RpgGamer23q
Member since 2006 • 296 Posts

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="hip-fire"]3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can affordhip-fire

No one can afford? Do you like in Africa or something because 3D is not expensive if you want it. you can buy 3D TVs for under $1K

Do i like in Africa? and I got bills 2 pay, college student, i aint got 2k for a 3D tv

I'm pretty sure you can get em for a lot cheaper then 2k...I bought my 47" Sony 3d tv for 1.5k couple of months ago, if anything price would have dropped a bit more now.
Avatar image for hip-fire
hip-fire

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 hip-fire
Member since 2011 • 206 Posts

[QUOTE="hip-fire"]

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"] No one can afford? Do you like in Africa or something because 3D is not expensive if you want it. you can buy 3D TVs for under $1KRpgGamer23q

Do i like in Africa? and I got bills 2 pay, college student, i aint got 2k for a 3D tv

I'm pretty sure you can get em for a lot cheaper then 2k...I bought my 47" Sony 3d tv for 1.5k couple of months ago, if anything price would have dropped a bit more now.

1.5k? where, whats the name? seriously i should start saving

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Crytek's 3D works off the back buffer and affects maybe 1-3% performance wise. Thats why its possible on consoles also. The downside is that the 3D effect isn't as great as normal sterescopic effects but the performance hit isn't anywhere near as bad. Not that incredible tbh

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

They fake their 3D. You can see it pretty clearly in places where there's steep parallax.

Also whoever wrote that has a serious problem with hyperbole, and doesn't understand how 3D TV's or 3D games work.

Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts

3D = Old News, no one cares cause no one can affordhip-fire

I got my 60" 1080p 3d t.v for only $680 last november.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

They fake their 3D. You can see it pretty clearly in places where there's steep parallax.

Also whoever wrote that has a serious problem with hyperbole, and doesn't understand how 3D TV's or 3D games work.

Teufelhuhn

Do game journalists typically have a good understanding of game technology anyways?