David Jaffe Predicts Next Console Generation Will Be the Last

  • 69 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Blazerdt47
Blazerdt47

5671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Blazerdt47
Member since 2004 • 5671 Posts

David Jaffe Predicts Next Console Generation Will Be the Last

TheGod of WarandTwisted Metalcreator thinks that the $60 game model is broken, and won't last much longer.

It's not justAngry Birdsdeveloper, Rovio Mobile, thatforesees dark timesahead for console gaming, Eat Sleep Play boss David Jaffe thinks that outlook is pretty bleak as well. Jaffe believes that we're coming to the end of console gaming, and that while there will be a PlayStation 4, therewon'tbe a PlayStation 5.

image

Jaffe felt that pre-owned sales and piracy were two of the biggest threats to the industry, because they were both taking revenue away from the publishers and developers. He suggested a PS3 game that sold 300,000 copies might sell 850,000 were it not for pre-owned sales. He said that that was not a model that was sustainable forever, and that it was would only be a few more years before the industry started to shy away from trying to make blockbuster games, and instead turned smaller, cheaper alternatives that they didn't require such huge levels of investment.

Jaffe thought that the retail business model, where a game costs $60 or so, was broken for the majority of games, especially when it came to value for money. He said that the game that contained hundreds of hours of gameplay was just as much of a problem as the one that contained just a handful of hours. He felt that there would always be a market for the really big games, likeGears of WarandUncharted, but he was less clear on what people would be playing them on. He said that it might be a streaming service like OnLive or Gaikai that filled that role, or a digital platform like Steam, but he was convinced that after the next console generation, the industry would move on to something else.

The problem here is that Jaffe is saying a lot of different things, which don't go together quite as well he seems to think. He's very likely correct that $60 games won't be around forever, but it doesn't automatically follow that a new business model will kill off consoles. It's not dissimilar to the situation with PC gaming, which has apparently been on its deathbed for years, and yet somehow keeps surviving, adapting and evolving.

Avatar image for Swift_Boss_A
Swift_Boss_A

14579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Swift_Boss_A
Member since 2007 • 14579 Posts

We can change !

Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts
So long as we continue to get big Entertainment titles rather than little mobile games in some way or another. I really don't care/
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

As long as I get to play big budget titles (and small) I am happy. I want Uncharted, Zelda, Diablo, Battlefield and all that.

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#5 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts

Meh. I think he's forgetting the evolution process that gaming will go through.

And as long as there is split screen, console gaming will never die.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#6 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38071 Posts
Interesting. I am definately far from another console gen, personally. I have many Xbox and 360 games yet to play; a BC PS3 with a backlog of PS2 and some PS3 ones to play; anf if I get another Wii, there are some Wii, GC and VC games to play. A lot of gaming with out buying any new releases for me.
Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

Console gaming is dying! (I think I've read something like this before ;) ).

Anyways, if this is true, which i don't think it will be because like he says there will always be a market for those big AAA titles, then people will just move to the PC where there will always be high quality hardcore games.

Avatar image for lettuceman44
lettuceman44

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#8 lettuceman44
Member since 2005 • 7971 Posts

And what will replace console gaming? Onlive? Ha, yea ok.

Almost as silly as saying PC Gaming is dying.

Avatar image for Mrmccormo
Mrmccormo

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Mrmccormo
Member since 2011 • 870 Posts
For all the forecasting, predicting, and analysis, it won't matter. The game industry will continue on, and so will consoles. People forget history so easily. Consoles were "dead" after the Atari. Literally. There were a LOT of consoles in the Atari era, but they all crashed. PC gaming took over completely. When the NES was launched, it was laughed at. It was a stupid 8-bit Japanese toy trying to tango with the 16-bit PC big boys. It was guaranteed to fail. No one was going to buy it. And then? The new console era was born. The same thing has happened with the Wii, because the Wii EXPANDED the market. As long as consoles continue to expand their market, they won't fail. If a console is too expensive, it'll get slapped into its place (like the PS brand went from #1 to #3 overnight).
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
This doom and gloom will get us nowhere. If various reports are to be believed, then PC gaming is dying, console gaming is dying, traditional handheld gaming is dying, and mobile gaming is only a short lived fad. In other words, gaming, as a whole, is dying. These are panic scenarios, knee jerk reactions, and we really shouldn't be entertaining any of those. The gaming industry, in its various forms, has continued to evolve and survive over two decades. I don't see why any form of gaming should die or kill each other off- all four of them can co-exist, and will probably continue to thrive in an (admittedly uneasy) symbiosis for the foreseeable future.
Avatar image for Blazerdt47
Blazerdt47

5671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Blazerdt47
Member since 2004 • 5671 Posts

For all the forecasting, predicting, and analysis, it won't matter. The game industry will continue on, and so will consoles. People forget history so easily. Consoles were "dead" after the Atari. Literally. There were a LOT of consoles in the Atari era, but they all crashed. PC gaming took over completely. When the NES was launched, it was laughed at. It was a stupid 8-bit Japanese toy trying to tango with the 16-bit PC big boys. It was guaranteed to fail. No one was going to buy it. And then? The new console era was born. The same thing has happened with the Wii, because the Wii EXPANDED the market. As long as consoles continue to expand their market, they won't fail. If a console is too expensive, it'll get slapped into its place (like the PS brand went from #1 to #3 overnight).Mrmccormo

Yea the game industry will continue.....Zynga here we come! :P

Farmville HD confirmed PS4 launch title.

Avatar image for PatchMaster
PatchMaster

6013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 PatchMaster
Member since 2003 • 6013 Posts

This doom and gloom will get us nowhere. If various reports are to be believed, then PC gaming is dying, console gaming is dying, traditional handheld gaming is dying, and mobile gaming is only a short lived fad. In other words, gaming, as a whole, is dying. These are panic scenarios, knee jerk reactions, and we really shouldn't be entertaining any of those. The gaming industry, in its various forms, has continued to evolve and survive over two decades. I don't see why any form of gaming should die or kill each other off- all four of them can co-exist, and will probably continue to thrive in an (admittedly uneasy) symbiosis for the foreseeable future.charizard1605

Well put, good sir

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#13 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45460 Posts
I think the pre-owned game sales are what's really hurting the industry, game retailers that sell used games have stopped carrying new copies of older games once they drop from full retail price, and instead only carry used copies of older titles, that's why publishers these days only seem interested in making titles that sell huge at launch, and when publishers don't get the revenues they start canning talented studios that make the games we love, I'd be fine if they eventually moved to a digital distribution model for consoles, as long as companies like Sony and Microsoft offered cheap HDD storage and better managed digital rights. Even offer tangible retail games but change to a licensing model that doesn't allow for the resale of media.
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

Dear god... its not going to end, I really do not see how these developers do not realize that. Tons of people have ZERO interest in PC gaming...

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Hahah I love how the shoe is on the other foot with a couple devs saying console gaming is dying!! Bu bu bu now they are all wrong right? :lol:

Avatar image for mtron32
mtron32

4450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 mtron32
Member since 2006 • 4450 Posts
I have to agree about the worth of these games. Homefront is a prime example because for a gamer like me that doesnt do multiplayer, why am I going to pay 60+ dollars for your game that may not even be good? if homefront were 30-35 then i would be all over it. Maybe they need to start making shooters into two different products: a 30 dollar disc with single player, and the full version with single and multi for 60. This way I could enjoy the game and ignore the online features as I always do.
Avatar image for mike_on_mic
mike_on_mic

886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#17 mike_on_mic
Member since 2004 • 886 Posts
I believe that it will move into a mix of digital distrubution and traditional media. Offer Digital Distro at a cheaper price point and you might find more people take that up, as broadband gets faster and HDD capacity gets larger, it will means it is easier to download any game you have.
Avatar image for mtron32
mtron32

4450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 mtron32
Member since 2006 • 4450 Posts
^digital distribution, that's what I'd like to see. I wouldn't styep one foot into gamestop if I could help it. But they have to price the games right. Knock at least 15 off the price.
Avatar image for djohnstonXCII
djohnstonXCII

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 djohnstonXCII
Member since 2009 • 177 Posts

This guy has been in the business a long time. He was developing games on the PS1 before most of you were probably born so when this guy talks, it would be best to listen. Read the entire interview, this man knows EXACTLY what he is talking about.

Avatar image for Mrmccormo
Mrmccormo

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Mrmccormo
Member since 2011 • 870 Posts
This doom and gloom will get us nowhere. If various reports are to be believed, then PC gaming is dying, console gaming is dying, traditional handheld gaming is dying, and mobile gaming is only a short lived fad. In other words, gaming, as a whole, is dying. These are panic scenarios, knee jerk reactions, and we really shouldn't be entertaining any of those. The gaming industry, in its various forms, has continued to evolve and survive over two decades. I don't see why any form of gaming should die or kill each other off- all four of them can co-exist, and will probably continue to thrive in an (admittedly uneasy) symbiosis for the foreseeable future.charizard1605
It could be argued that the game industry is declining (maybe not outright dying). Where are all the gamers from the last generation? The PS2 sold 150 million (and still counting). The Wii didn't eat them up (they expanded the market) and this has been proven by several studies over the years. At most, only half of the Wii's numbers come from last gen gamers. Even if you add the 360 and PS3, the numbers still don't add up. Of course, we're not even counting the 45 million gamers between the Xbox and Gamecube (these gamers likely did upgrade to this gen).
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#21 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
The current business model is messed up. Development Budgets are skyhigh and games have to sell a tremendous amount to even break even. Developers should focus on smaller, less expensive titles at a more reasonable price. Great examples would be Warhawk or SOCOM or Wipeout on PSN.
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

oh how the tables have turned

now everyone is saying Console gaming is dying

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

:roll: And when portable games start costing 60 dollars?

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

If they are so concerned about lost revenue due to pre owned sales, than why not just lower the price of new games? If games were $40-50, people would probably buy more. younger kids who have either no job or a minimum wage job can't shell out $60 1-2 times a month and by the time they do have the moeny, the used games are much cheaper. When retailers like Gamestop have 8 month old games for full retail price, don't expect every consumer to willing fork over $60 for it.

Avatar image for gangster480
gangster480

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#25 gangster480
Member since 2006 • 856 Posts

I personally think that if anything is to replace console it would be a service similar to onlive. I know onlive isnt the best right now but if the technology gets better andwe can get a quality and lag free experience, console will be overtaken. That won't happen anytime soon but another 2 generations of console and that is very very possible, especially if the price is decent.

Avatar image for Mrmccormo
Mrmccormo

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Mrmccormo
Member since 2011 • 870 Posts

If they are so concerned about lost revenue due to pre owned sales, than why not just lower the price of new games? If games were $40-50, people would probably buy more. younger kids who have either no job or a minimum wage job can't shell out $60 1-2 times a month and by the time they do have the moeny, the used games are much cheaper. When retailers like Gamestop have 8 month old games for full retail price, don't expect every consumer to willing fork over $60 for it.

BPoole96
Games are cheaper than they used to be. Games have been $50 for a while, but if you take inflation into account, it ends up being a bit more than $60. Never mind that plenty of SNES games like FF3 (6) were $70 or more. The problem is that games aren't WORTH what they cost. People would happily fork over $60 if they knew the game would be worth keeping for more than a month, but most games are throwaways to the general public. There's a reason why there's a huge used gaming market.
Avatar image for felipebo
felipebo

4170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 felipebo
Member since 2009 • 4170 Posts

Since when have pre-owned games been such a problem? They've been around as long as the first boring video game and no consoles died because of it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

*Sigh* here we go again...

It always baffels me when Devs or other people in the industry has this odd idea that The gaming platforms are as static as such.

PC gaming does not die, It evolves, Console gaming does not die, it evolves. It is pretty much common sense, every time things need to happen the platforms evolve, heck They Pretty much evolve with each generation.

Consoles have a fair bit of options (and likelyhood) such as, DD, binding a game to an account, and Streaming, the two first we allready see in PC gaming, and it is no surprise that it would happen sooner or later on consoles, the third one is pretty much Onlive which I would still argue is a console, so Consoles "as we know it" would go away, but consoles as a whole sure won't as long as there is a market, there are money to be had, and people to supply.

Avatar image for Warhawk_
Warhawk_

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Warhawk_
Member since 2006 • 1497 Posts

I like David but I don't know what the hell he is talking about. I'm sick of this "consoles are dying" crap, it's just as old as "pc gaming is dying" and "handhelds are dying" nonsense. They are all doing great. And why do some companies and developers even care about used games? Hasn't there always been people buying and selling used games since the Atari times? I mean this was never a problem in the entire gaming history.So why worry now?

Avatar image for spookykid143
spookykid143

10393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 spookykid143
Member since 2009 • 10393 Posts

The entire interview is a good read and quite amusing.

Avatar image for Zero5000X
Zero5000X

8314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Zero5000X
Member since 2004 • 8314 Posts
Perhaps Microsoft and Sony would go that route but I doubt Nintendo will ever change. There will always be a Nintendo console/handheld as long as the company is around.
Avatar image for hypoty
hypoty

2825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 hypoty
Member since 2009 • 2825 Posts

Game designer American McGee thinks similarly. Honestly, I think within a decade we will be seeing the majority of console games take advantage of smaller price tags and be available primarily through console DD services. Three clicks and the game is yours. Like always, PC is has reached this stage first and it has been the saving grace for the platform. Consoles won't die but the shift towards DD will radically shift the console gaming market, most likely for the better (or worse, depends on how much meddling MS and Sony will be doing with their services).

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

If they are so concerned about lost revenue due to pre owned sales, than why not just lower the price of new games? If games were $40-50, people would probably buy more. younger kids who have either no job or a minimum wage job can't shell out $60 1-2 times a month and by the time they do have the moeny, the used games are much cheaper. When retailers like Gamestop have 8 month old games for full retail price, don't expect every consumer to willing fork over $60 for it.

Mrmccormo

Games are cheaper than they used to be. Games have been $50 for a while, but if you take inflation into account, it ends up being a bit more than $60. Never mind that plenty of SNES games like FF3 (6) were $70 or more. The problem is that games aren't WORTH what they cost. People would happily fork over $60 if they knew the game would be worth keeping for more than a month, but most games are throwaways to the general public. There's a reason why there's a huge used gaming market.

I do remember some SNES/N64 games being very expensive. I remember buying LoZ: Majora's Mask for like $75. From my understanding, this was mainly due to cartridges costing so much. Even for game prices right now, why is it that PS3/360 games cost $60 new while PC/Wii games cost $50?

Publishers really need to evaluate how much they should charge for a game. A new IP with hardly any marketing is not going to sell exceptionally well compared to a game with an established name. In order for more people to give the game a shot, they should make it cost less new, which could also increase revenue.

If 10 people buy the game and 5 buy it new while 5 buy it used, only $300 was accumulated (I'm aware that not all the money goes to the publisher, but this is just an example)

If those same 10 people all bought the game new for $40, then $400 could be accumulated

There have been plenty of games this gen that I have wanted to get but realize that they are probably 8-10 hour experiences and then anything else is just repeated gameplay. In some cases I will spend the $60 and get it new (Like God of War 3), but other times I can easily dismiss it for the time being and just wait until its $30 used on Amazon a month later.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

So the world will end before the ps5

:cry:

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Why doesn't everyone raise the price then if selling 300,000 is too little:-? 10 more because 360 and PS3 games look ten dollars much better than Wii games:roll. Wii games get rented too. Uh oh. $120 and $100 Wii games. !!

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22682 Posts
I've never bought a pre-owned game in my life...
Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#37 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
I can see generations seriously stretched out from here on out. We're coming close to maxing out the capabilities of even 1080p TVs with today's tech visually, so all that is left is stuff under the hood, which evolves at a much slower pace.
Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
Well it's just not this guy, it's a bunch of experts that predict it so... I also believe console gaming will die after next generation.
Avatar image for kate_jones
kate_jones

3221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 kate_jones
Member since 2007 • 3221 Posts

This guy has been in the business a long time. He was developing games on the PS1 before most of you were probably born so when this guy talks, it would be best to listen. Read the entire interview, this man knows EXACTLY what he is talking about.

djohnstonXCII

I was born the same year as Jaffe, been gaming as long as he has, he makes some points, offers no answers and is just wrong on many things.

Avatar image for Superzone
Superzone

3733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#40 Superzone
Member since 2004 • 3733 Posts
Console gaming isn't dying and it's not going to. That's ludicrous. There are plenty of people like myself that are absolutely fine with consoles, controllers, and discs. I don't want that to change, and neither to millions of other people. As long as there is a large enough audience for console gaming, it won't be going anywhere.
Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#41 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

No form of gaming is dying for ****'s sake.

Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts
I won't be surprised if Sony or Microsoft come out with a rival to Steam for consoles, and distribute titles through that instead of physical media. It worked for Steam. Digital distribution is the future, like it or not.
Avatar image for TheAcountantMan
TheAcountantMan

1281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 TheAcountantMan
Member since 2011 • 1281 Posts
It would be great if Sony had its version of steam for PC....and maybe brought some 1st party games to PC.
Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#44 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts
[QUOTE="charizard1605"]This doom and gloom will get us nowhere. If various reports are to be believed, then PC gaming is dying, console gaming is dying, traditional handheld gaming is dying, and mobile gaming is only a short lived fad. In other words, gaming, as a whole, is dying. These are panic scenarios, knee jerk reactions, and we really shouldn't be entertaining any of those. The gaming industry, in its various forms, has continued to evolve and survive over two decades. I don't see why any form of gaming should die or kill each other off- all four of them can co-exist, and will probably continue to thrive in an (admittedly uneasy) symbiosis for the foreseeable future.Mrmccormo
It could be argued that the game industry is declining (maybe not outright dying). Where are all the gamers from the last generation? The PS2 sold 150 million (and still counting). The Wii didn't eat them up (they expanded the market) and this has been proven by several studies over the years. At most, only half of the Wii's numbers come from last gen gamers. Even if you add the 360 and PS3, the numbers still don't add up. Of course, we're not even counting the 45 million gamers between the Xbox and Gamecube (these gamers likely did upgrade to this gen).

consoles aren't $100 - $150 yet. A lot of those people from last gen didn't buy their console at launch and waited til the price was cheaper. The price of entry for a console today is the price it was at launch last gen. Hell I remember buying a ps1 dual shock edition in 1997 for $100. You cant do that today. Thats why there aren't as many gamers from last gen. Couple that with the fact that many are still playing their ps2's with the 3000+ game library.. which you can get games for at $5-10 a pop. And many don't have hd tvs so they don't have a reason to upgrade.
Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#45 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts

If they are so concerned about lost revenue due to pre owned sales, than why not just lower the price of new games? If games were $40-50, people would probably buy more. younger kids who have either no job or a minimum wage job can't shell out $60 1-2 times a month and by the time they do have the moeny, the used games are much cheaper. When retailers like Gamestop have 8 month old games for full retail price, don't expect every consumer to willing fork over $60 for it.

BPoole96
Used game sales have been happening forever though. I remember going to a store similar to gamestop in 98' buying all the great ps1 rpgs and getting 3-4 games for the price of a new game today. I remember buying suikoden 1 and 2 and loving every second of those $20 games (that now retail for $300 new lol...wish i didn't sell my ps1 collection for pennies... :( )
Avatar image for Twin-Blade
Twin-Blade

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Twin-Blade
Member since 2005 • 6806 Posts

Not surprised this is being said by the man that created God of War, a series spanning five installments, all of which have practically the same mechanics. Someone creative & innovative, such as the gang over at Nintendo, can come up with things to keep consoles fresh & in demand. I don't think this is needed though, I can't see why people would move away from consoles. I don't see his argument for why consoles would disappear anyway.

I can understand developers moving away from retail though. Investing so much to develop a game only to be screwed over by the retail stores is a good reason to move away from physical copies. It's disappointing, but if it helps developers get what they deserve, then so be it (coming from an Australian, where we have relatively small download caps which include uploads).

Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#47 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

If they are so concerned about lost revenue due to pre owned sales, than why not just lower the price of new games? If games were $40-50, people would probably buy more. younger kids who have either no job or a minimum wage job can't shell out $60 1-2 times a month and by the time they do have the moeny, the used games are much cheaper. When retailers like Gamestop have 8 month old games for full retail price, don't expect every consumer to willing fork over $60 for it.

Mrmccormo
Games are cheaper than they used to be. Games have been $50 for a while, but if you take inflation into account, it ends up being a bit more than $60. Never mind that plenty of SNES games like FF3 (6) were $70 or more. The problem is that games aren't WORTH what they cost. People would happily fork over $60 if they knew the game would be worth keeping for more than a month, but most games are throwaways to the general public. There's a reason why there's a huge used gaming market.

Not many rpgs and turn based strategy games like there used to be. Those games take 100s of hours to beat and you don't mind forking over the loot. Games like civ5, tactics ogre and witcher 2 don't come out all that often.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#48 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

This guy has been in the business a long time. He was developing games on the PS1 before most of you were probably born so when this guy talks, it would be best to listen. Read the entire interview, this man knows EXACTLY what he is talking about.

djohnstonXCII

I was born in the 80s so that cancels me out.:P

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#49 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Sell them at $40.

Problem solved.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#50 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

Alternate headline: David Jaffe not getting enough attention between GOW III and Twisted Metal, says something mildly stupid as blog bait