@tormentos said:
@clyde46 said:
@tormentos: Still believing I'm a lemming.... Wake up idiot.... Now to your point. Yes arguing 30v28 is stupid but we had people arguing yesterday over grass in GTA5. Stupid is SW and Stupid is what we do. Yes, we know that the PS4 produced better visuals. This has been proved time and time again, you don't need me to tell you something you already know. The fact of the matter is though, the consoles are proving that they can't produce the visual quality we demand at the resolution and performance levels we demand.
The differences between the two consoles are minimal to me as I play my games on PC.
WTF the grass in GTA is basically comparable to one setting on high vs mid,basically hell it has been this way since ever...
There is considerable more foliage on GTA PS4 than on XBO which is indicative of a stronger GPU,arguing 2 frames is a joke you will not notice the fu**ing difference,you can tell between 30 and 60,between 30 and 28 you can't period it is a fact and you know it,unless the game drops into the 20's or teens you would not notice those drops,much like you don't notice 60 vs 55 or even 58..
That you demand which is totally different i don't have a R290X i have a R270 the majority of PC gamers are not even abode my freaking PC let alone on something stronger,so that is what you demand,again beat the PS4 price wise the you have a point,hell now the xbox one became even harder to beat by PC at $350 price wise,you get what you pay for nothing more nothing less.
1. Considerable? Not even close.
However, the more locations we visited, the more it became clear that PlayStation 4 does possess the advantage in terms of detail level - it's just that the extent of the boost varies on a per-location level. In our first set of clips, we took the road north and explored the mountainside, finding no appreciable difference. However, spawning a chopper and flying onto the Vinewood hills, we discover plenty of areas where the results of the screenshot comparisons are borne out.
Moving on again into the Paleto Forest - an area where we would expect to see a rich array of greenery, our sample clips show that the compromise is limited to plants and grass. More imposing environmental detail, like tree density for example, seems to be untouched on Xbox One. The PS4 advantage here is much more subtle - a few bonus plants and small grassy areas. Overall, this is the kind of effect where the PS4's larger GPU and higher fill-rate come to the fore, and while it shouldn't impact any purchasing decision (Xbox One is hardly barren and featureless in the affected locations), it's nice to see that Rockstar has utilised the additional graphics power on tap in the Sony console.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-gta-5-next-gen-grass-compared
Stop lying. Yes there is more on the PS4 but it is not a considerable amount more.
As for arguing about frames, cows and lemmings were agruing over grass, crushed blacks, resolution or whatever. It doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. I.e. the consoles suck.
I don't care what setup you have. All that matters to me is that I get the best possible experience I can get. Fact of the matter is, the PS4 and the X1 can't do 1080p without having to make a lot of sacrifices along the way.
Log in to comment