During gameplay I don't notice the drop much, but during cut scenes those drops are very noticeable. this is on the PS4 version, can't speak for Xbox one though. In any case a very enjoyable game so far.
Frame rate drops on both consoles but higher resolution on PS4. Pick your poison.
@bunchanumbers said:
If I had to choose between the 2 I'd choose the X1 version. Games run better, less issues, and better overall online experience. Looks to me like the Xbox Won.
You would say that, shill.
He's a shill for wan
Worst damage control ever dudeting performance over Resolution?
i bet you accuse everyone that says the of being a lemming.
Nice spin by the way
;Frame rate drops on both consoles but higher resolution on PS4. Pick your poison.;
I notice you failed to point out that there are MORE framerate drops on the Ps4'
Watch the sad fuckers on here who choose resolution over performance,lol
I don't think it's a case of choosing anything. You buy the game for whatever console you want nobody knew before they bought it how it would perform. Either way it shouldn't bother anyone on either console the game is amazing a couple of frames dropped or slight drop in res shouldn't bother people ffs don't we even care about the fucking games anymore is it all about minute differences from one platform to the next.
i take cleam IQ in 1080p with -2 fps drop over a blurry looking game with +2 fps in sub-hd
LMAO cows immediate damage control
lol what there is to damage control the xbox one is inferior once again 28 vs 30 can't notice dude but better AA,cleaner picture and blurrier textures can..
2 fps drop will induce frame tearing which I hate and is very noticing .
There's absolutely no chance for 99.9999% of humans to detect the difference between 28 or 29fps to 30fps especially when it happens so infrequently. But for a constant 40% pixel diffidence it becomes rather obvious especially on large tvs, not to mention better tessellation and AF. The tradeoff is way better in the case of PS4, I'm just glad you filthy lems aren't making decisions for my multiplatforms. It's sad lems can't accept defeat even to this day.
'Unfortunately, the higher resolution on PS4 comes with a catch in the form of noticeable performance dips during strenuous sequences.'
You understand what the word 'NOTICEABLE means right'
i doubt they would count framerate drops of 1-2 frames as noticeable.
Noticeable framerate drops
Drops of 1-2 frames
Pick one, because you cant have both,lol
"Noticeable."
Then you watch the video and see these frame rate drops of 1-2 frames which do not justify knocking the res down to poverty 900p. Hilarious.
as another guy stated, framerate drops of 1-2 fps causing frame tearing which is very noticeable, also, Framerate drops= controller lag
Funny how when DF gives the nod to the PS4 you have nothing to say but because they give the nod to the Xbone for performance you are questioning what they are saying.
If DF says it's noticeable it probably is.
besides, it hits 25 FPS in the video so thats a 5+ framerate drop dude.
There's absolutely no chance for 99.9999% of humans to detect the difference between 28 or 29fps to 30fps
Stop talking Poop, you have to be blind to not notice screen tearing but if it´s only occasional I can live with it, I rather have a rock solid upscaled 900P version .
'Unfortunately, the higher resolution on PS4 comes with a catch in the form of noticeable performance dips during strenuous sequences.'
You understand what the word 'NOTICEABLE means right'
i doubt they would count framerate drops of 1-2 frames as noticeable.
Noticeable framerate drops
Drops of 1-2 frames
Pick one, because you cant have both,lol
You can't notice drops from 30 to 28 frames per second you just can't unless the frames drop to the low 20 or teen you will not notice.
This ins't 30 vs 60 which clearly can be seen,yet some lemming claim to not been able to tell the difference,2 frames is something you will not notice,hell i worry more for the screen tearing which can be seen.
Hell the PS4 version went over 30 FPS in several instances the xbox one didn't.
'Unfortunately, the higher resolution on PS4 comes with a catch in the form of noticeable performance dips during strenuous sequences.'
You understand what the word 'NOTICEABLE means right'
i doubt they would count framerate drops of 1-2 frames as noticeable.
Noticeable framerate drops
Drops of 1-2 frames
Pick one, because you cant have both,lol
You can't notice drops from 30 to 28 frames per second you just can't unless the frames drop to the low 20 or teen you will not notice.
This ins't 30 vs 60 which clearly can be seen,yet some lemming claim to not been able to tell the difference,2 frames is something you will not notice,hell i worry more for the screen tearing which can be seen.
Hell the PS4 version went over 30 FPS in several instances the xbox one didn't.
Firstly, the framrate drops to 25 several times in the video itself.
Secondly, don't be a hypocrite, DF stated it WAS noticeable.
Are you saying they are not credible now? because they sure are credible when they give the Ps4 the Nod as far as you are concerned.
they are either Credible or they are Not , Stop flip-flopping.
2 fps drop will induce frame tearing which I hate and is very noticing .
Still I already bought it as I only have a PS4 .
Screen tearing can be notice 2 frames can't and the screen tearing was measure it wasn't always there,the PS4 has cleaner AA and the textures are sharper to which can be notice as well.
Firstly, the framrate drops to 25 several times in the video itself.
Secondly, don't be a hypocrite, DF stated it WAS noticeable.
Are you saying they are not credible now? because they sure are credible when they give the Ps4 the Nod as far as you are concerned.
they are either Credible or they are Not , Stop flip-flopping.
Rarely and still is not low 20's,some people claim not been able to see 60 vs 30 dude here lemming so don't tell me you can see 5 or 2,hell many of the times it was 30 and some times even 31.
To them it was to you probably not they are using equipment to measure those 2 frames you are not using anything,not if you argue with me that the xbox one version has 10 20 or even 30 FPS yes than can be notice,but 2 to 5 in hell you can play a game in 28FPS lock and you will not notice period..
Stop spinning i didn't say they were not credible but every one with a freaking PC knows that 2 frames can't be fu**ing notice to them it was visible to you it will not be,now Textures it is something you can see clearly because they are all around you on the game,so are jaggies,and screen tearing is easy to notice,the PS4 version has it have you see me saying other wise.?
The PS4 version is some times slower the xbox one version is always inferior looking. Pick one..
@FastRobby said:
Not just 2 frames, it's 5 frames. He is trying to downplay it by saying it is only 2 frames, but those are just lies.
No is not 5 frames it is as much as 5 frames,stop your fanboysm.,the video is there moron it is not me..
What part of the number 20 in video games being unacceptable don't you guys understand?
"Games great man... love the shit out of it. If it wasn't in the 20-28 fps range it wouldn't be half the game."
Dude the game is not 20 stop your damage control the game drops as low as 25,not the 20's is mostly 28 and 30 even went over 30 which the xbox one version never did...
And was for a freaking second,and the PS4 version is always better looking period.
Performance-wise, both consoles do a good job of delivering a stable, consistent frame-rate but it is the Xbox One version that delivers the smoothest experience overall. Frame-rate drops are extremely rare, only appearing in the most extreme circumstances
Now stop your damage control you can't see a difference from 28 to 30 so stop your damage control the xbox one version is ALWAYS 900p,not sometimes.
Dragon Age runs at 900p on Xbox One and 1080p on PlayStation 4. The console versions both appear to use the same post-process anti-aliasing technique. As expected, this looks significantly cleaner when paired with the native 1080p image of the PS4 release, but still works well enough on Xbox One. Both versions also utilise HBAO and implement decent anisotropic filtering, though the lower resolution on Xbox One does leave textures looking a touch blurrier.
The PS4 is 1080p all the time,cleaner all the time and have sharper textures all the time,the xbox one version is some times faster the PS4 version always is better looking.
What part of the number 20 in video games being unacceptable don't you guys understand?
"Games great man... love the shit out of it. If it wasn't in the 20-28 fps range it wouldn't be half the game."
Dude the game is not 20 stop your damage control the game drops as low as 25,not the 20's is mostly 28 and 30 even went over 30 which the xbox one version never did...
And was for a freaking second,and the PS4 version is always better looking period.
Performance-wise, both consoles do a good job of delivering a stable, consistent frame-rate but it is the Xbox One version that delivers the smoothest experience overall. Frame-rate drops are extremely rare, only appearing in the most extreme circumstances
Now stop your damage control you can't see a difference from 28 to 30 so stop your damage control the xbox one version is ALWAYS 900p,not sometimes.
Dragon Age runs at 900p on Xbox One and 1080p on PlayStation 4. The console versions both appear to use the same post-process anti-aliasing technique. As expected, this looks significantly cleaner when paired with the native 1080p image of the PS4 release, but still works well enough on Xbox One. Both versions also utilise HBAO and implement decent anisotropic filtering, though the lower resolution on Xbox One does leave textures looking a touch blurrier.
The PS4 is 1080p all the time,cleaner all the time and have sharper textures all the time,the xbox one version is some times faster the PS4 version always is better looking.
funny how you wouldn't acknowledge that BF4 looked better back when that was a debate. Just because Digital Unfoundry and NeoGAF didn't point it out, you and the other cows refused to accept it. Now it is ok that Dragon Age gets the nod though, right? STFU.
What part of the number 20 in video games being unacceptable don't you guys understand?
"Games great man... love the shit out of it. If it wasn't in the 20-28 fps range it wouldn't be half the game."
Dude the game is not 20 stop your damage control the game drops as low as 25,not the 20's is mostly 28 and 30 even went over 30 which the xbox one version never did...
And was for a freaking second,and the PS4 version is always better looking period.
Performance-wise, both consoles do a good job of delivering a stable, consistent frame-rate but it is the Xbox One version that delivers the smoothest experience overall. Frame-rate drops are extremely rare, only appearing in the most extreme circumstances
Now stop your damage control you can't see a difference from 28 to 30 so stop your damage control the xbox one version is ALWAYS 900p,not sometimes.
Dragon Age runs at 900p on Xbox One and 1080p on PlayStation 4. The console versions both appear to use the same post-process anti-aliasing technique. As expected, this looks significantly cleaner when paired with the native 1080p image of the PS4 release, but still works well enough on Xbox One. Both versions also utilise HBAO and implement decent anisotropic filtering, though the lower resolution on Xbox One does leave textures looking a touch blurrier.
The PS4 is 1080p all the time,cleaner all the time and have sharper textures all the time,the xbox one version is some times faster the PS4 version always is better looking.
Please do explain to me how you damage control a fucking game in 2014 on new hardware running in the 20s......
It should only be ONE thing.... damaging for the creators... not damage control.
You are justifying fps in the 20s in a video game... think about that..... That's not only damage control... that's disgusting damage control.
What do the extra fps do for you in this kind of game? What advantage is it, really?
In a shooter, fighting game or fast paced action game, I'd definitely want more frames. An RPG, though? I mean, really? It's getting awfully easy to see who is looking for a reason to side with the XBone lately. Sad reasons are sad, though. Let's not deny this.
funny how you wouldn't acknowledge that BF4 looked better back when that was a debate. Just because Digital Unfoundry and NeoGAF didn't point it out, you and the other cows refused to accept it. Now it is ok that Dragon Age gets the nod though, right? STFU.
Are you stupid BF4 look better on PS4 runs better on PS4 and is higher res on PS4,stop your buffoonery dude.
In fact BF4 runs 10FPS faster on PS4 across the board BF4 was suppose to be a 60FPS game the xbox one version even at 720p doesn't come close.
@b4x said:
Please do explain to me how you damage control a fucking game in 2014 on new hardware running in the 20s......
It should only be ONE thing.... damaging for the creators... not damage control.
You are justifying fps in the 20s in a video game... think about that..... That's not only damage control... that's disgusting damage control.
GTFO with that bs.
Please Ryse is 900p and has drops into the teens so does DR3,and many xbox one games what have you forget about those.?
Have you forgot how the PS4 was up to 30FPS faster in Tomb Raider and Sniper Elite.? and faster in a barrage of other games.? Man the PS4 is doing freaking 1080p all the time with better textures and cleaner image all the time not just some times,trying to mean now that the PS4 is the only console that drop frames is a joke most games run at faster frames on PS4,is recently after the whole Ubisoft debacle that some games run faster on xbox one,you are a true hypocrite people like you were the ones downplaying sniper elite huge gap this past sprint...
And now you want to act like the xbox one is the king of frames and that is beating the PS4 when it barely does a few frames more while having 46% lower resolution...hahaha
But is funny because i just quoted DF talking about the frames and you ignore it and continue to talk shit and invent crap and pretend the game run at 20,i guess at this point for your sad lemmings any victory is a huge one..lol
funny how you wouldn't acknowledge that BF4 looked better back when that was a debate. Just because Digital Unfoundry and NeoGAF didn't point it out, you and the other cows refused to accept it. Now it is ok that Dragon Age gets the nod though, right? STFU.
Are you stupid BF4 look better on PS4 runs better on PS4 and is higher res on PS4,stop your buffoonery dude.
In fact BF4 runs 10FPS faster on PS4 across the board BF4 was suppose to be a 60FPS game the xbox one version even at 720p doesn't come close.
@b4x said:
Please do explain to me how you damage control a fucking game in 2014 on new hardware running in the 20s......
It should only be ONE thing.... damaging for the creators... not damage control.
You are justifying fps in the 20s in a video game... think about that..... That's not only damage control... that's disgusting damage control.
GTFO with that bs.
Please Ryse is 900p and has drops into the teens so does DR3,and many xbox one games what have you forget about those.?
Have you forgot how the PS4 was up to 30FPS faster in Tomb Raider and Sniper Elite.? and faster in a barrage of other games.? Man the PS4 is doing freaking 1080p all the time with better textures and cleaner image all the time not just some times,trying to mean now that the PS4 is the only console that drop frames is a joke most games run at faster frames on PS4,is recently after the whole Ubisoft debacle that some games run faster on xbox one,you are a true hypocrite people like you were the ones downplaying sniper elite huge gap this past sprint...
And now you want to act like the xbox one is the king of frames and that is beating the PS4 when it barely does a few frames more while having 46% lower resolution...hahaha
But is funny because i just quoted DF talking about the frames and you ignore it and continue to talk shit and invent crap and pretend the game run at 20,i guess at this point for your sad lemmings any victory is a huge one..lol
So even when i supply proof in a pic, you go full retard. Don't ever accuse someone about inventing crap or talking shit btw. It's your signature move.
The number 5 might be small but it's a 16% difference...
The problem is that the game is not running at 25FPS,it is running at 30 with drops into the 28 mostly and some times 25 during the most intense scenes,the PS4 has 46% higher resolution,cleaner picture and sharper textures ALL the time not just some times..
@Shewgenja said:
What do the extra fps do for you in this kind of game? What advantage is it, really?
In a shooter, fighting game or fast paced action game, I'd definitely want more frames. An RPG, though? I mean, really? It's getting awfully easy to see who is looking for a reason to side with the XBone lately. Sad reasons are sad, though. Let's not deny this.
This are lemmings they actually believe this is a shooter and that the xbox one is 60 and the PS4 is 30..hahahaaaaaaaaa
Now they care about frames,when the PS4 was scorching the XBO in sniper Elite they didn't care and you could barely tell the difference..
Remember the whole "bu, bu, but PS4 is 50% more powerful" ????????????? ahahahahhahahahahaaaaaaaa!!! Even Sony wouldn't confirm this claim.
According to DF the PS4 has 46% boost resolution wise... So yeah pretty close to 50%...
@FoxbatAlpha said:
So even when i supply proof in a pic, you go full retard. Don't ever accuse someone about inventing crap or talking shit btw. It's your signature move.
You chose a damn screen which doesn't represent how the whole game is i can do that to..
Is this how SE3 look all the time on XBO.?
ahhahaaaa
The xbox one version is SOMETIMES FASTER.The PS4 version is BETTER LOOKING all the time..
Log in to comment