Did any other system before 360+PS3 have different versions?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for catlin_czirr
catlin_czirr

2545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 catlin_czirr
Member since 2007 • 2545 Posts

Xbox 360 - Premium 360. Core 360. Elite 360. Arcade 360. Halo 3 360.

PS3 - 60gb model. 40gb model. 80gb model. Mabey 120gb model.

Why are there so many versions of a single console? Why are they trying to confuse buyers? Was there ever any other system that had so many different versions?

Avatar image for kryloc
kryloc

2283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kryloc
Member since 2003 • 2283 Posts

Halo sku is really just a limited coloring, many systems have had that. (n64 had like 6 colors at one point I believe)

I think gaming is at a much more comfortable level, and a much more advanced and feature rich stage in the game that multiple skus are more relevant and successful.

Choices aren't bad, unless they get too confusing.

Edit: Core and Arcade are the same thing. And you forgot the 20GB ps3.

Avatar image for Nonam3gamer
Nonam3gamer

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 Nonam3gamer
Member since 2005 • 880 Posts
As you're counting the Halo3 edition X360 it is safe to assume you mean any different versions no matter how minor. There have been 11 different Ps2 SKU's.
Avatar image for laughingman42
laughingman42

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 laughingman42
Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts
Alot of consoles had new smaller sleeker SKUs towards the end of their life span but nothing like this that I know of.
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts
Nothing like this, but it's a evolving market where one choice was more than enough for consumers. Nowdays consumers seem to like to feel like they have more choice than just "What system"
Avatar image for JiveT
JiveT

8619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 JiveT
Member since 2005 • 8619 Posts
Yeah Sega Master System and NES system had different packages with various different peripherals. Not much different than what's going on now.
Avatar image for kryloc
kryloc

2283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kryloc
Member since 2003 • 2283 Posts

Yeah Sega Master System and NES system had different packages with various different peripherals. Not much different than what's going on now.JiveT

With different peripherals, not different hardware configurations. Different size harddrives and playback are a lot different than throwing in a running pad.

Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts
Ps2 had different versions as well. Launch Ps2 couldn't play some wrestling game and i believe a basketball game because thier version was too old.
Avatar image for laughingman42
laughingman42

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 laughingman42
Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts

Ps2 had different versions as well. Launch Ps2 couldn't play some wrestling game and i believe a basketball game because thier version was too old.jangojay

Those were minor hardware revisions (all 14 or so of them) the slim is the only different SKU

Avatar image for BlackendV
BlackendV

1929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 BlackendV
Member since 2007 • 1929 Posts

There was the Master system 1 and 2 and same with the MegaDrives plus the different add ons like Mega CD 1 and 2 and 32X

then there were different versions of the saturns in Japan. Sony had the PSX which had some changes the Video out port and cable. Then later on it had metal tracks that the laser run on. Then the PSone version. Then the PS2 PS3 360 versions you know about. Also The gameboy usually came in two styles and then the colour choices. So its nothing new.

Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts
Well the trends before was too make addons too the already existing consoles.. Like the famicom Disk System.. However there hasn't really been hardware changes too the core consoles as far as I know. (I guess the PS2 had a version that could fit in a HDD and one that couldn't.. but the HDD was really an addon..)
Avatar image for Stonin
Stonin

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Stonin
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts
Consoles have never been complicated enough to warrant extra SKU's. Now that they are more PC like and components can be upgraded without spoiling the core part of the system you can expect to see many more.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

The Sega Genesis had different version, a 32x add-on, a Sega CD add-on, and finally the "remodel" in the form of the Sega Nomad (adding in a color screen and portability).

The PS2 had multiple versions, the final "slim" version of which did not support the hard drive needed to play FF XI. The N64 had the memory cartridge expansion, the Gameboy Advance went through several iterations with different games support and features (GBA, SP, Micro)...

The NES, Jaguar, and well... yes? Upgrades and different SKUs were not quite the way we've seen recently, but there were different SKUs, especially with system with add-ons, in which features would be integrated. Take a look at the DVD-player Gamecube, for example.

Avatar image for Stonin
Stonin

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Stonin
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts

The Sega Genesis had different version, a 32x add-on, a Sega CD add-on, and finally the "remodel" in the form of the Sega Nomad (adding in a color screen and portability).

The PS2 had multiple versions, the final "slim" version of which did not support the hard drive needed to play FF XI. The N64 had the memory cartridge expansion, the Gameboy Advance went through several iterations with different games support and features (GBA, SP, Micro)...

subrosian

I don't really think add-ons count but the hardware revisions you mentioned are good examples. That's a scary knowledge of console hardware revisions you have there ;).

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#15 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

I don't really think add-ons count but the hardware revisions you mentioned are good examples. That's a scary knowledge of console hardware revisions you have there ;).

Stonin

Towards the end-of-life there would be SKUs that integrated add-ons into the system. Sometimes these would only be in Japan. In fact, to complicate matters, in the earlier days the appearance, names, and games of the same onsole in multiple countries were changed. Famicom / NES comes to mind. Gameboy has been the most guilty of minor revisions with improvements, be it to battery life, weight, color, or more recently screen brightness.

Thank you? I lived through it - gaming information was a radically different thing before the internet though.

Avatar image for skingus
skingus

2370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 skingus
Member since 2006 • 2370 Posts
While, i think more choices for the consumer is a good thing, the way the major companies have gone about it is a bad thing. They are trying to trick the consumer into buying the latest and greatest thing..... without showing them clearly WHY.