dirt/ps3 >>>>>>>>>>>>dirt/360

lemmings always go on about how multiplats are always better on 360 because it can handle the game a lot better, But how is it Dirt one of the most impressive games visually so far runs a lot better on the ps3, ps3 can handle anything the 360 and then some, but just have needed more time why developers get a hang of the ps3, The End.

This is the first time I've heard "just wait for the devs to get the hang of ps3". I promise.

Dirt PS3, they downgraded the gfx (missing textures, roadside objects, and particle effects) to achieve a better framerate, because the biggest complaint on the 360 version was frame rate issues.evilross

Hmmm...that makes sense.

PS3 sucks

well, since dirt is a bit better on the ps3, i'm going to get a ps3 now that you put it this way

*goes to 360 *realizes 360 recently died * reads a book

Yeah, it's better on ps3. unfortunately that game now has zero hype.

As for looking worse, it looks just fine to me.

[QUOTE="evilross"]Dirt PS3, they downgraded the gfx (missing textures, roadside objects, and particle effects) to achieve a better framerate, because the biggest complaint on the 360 version was frame rate issues.-Ninja_Dog-

Hmmm...that makes sense.

PS3 sucks

To bad the PS3 version not only looks better but it runs better to as the IGN review clearly states. So stop the denial fanboys . And dont even think about linking me to the trash comparison shots done by the fanboy on his blog.

number 1 lemming excuse bu bu bu it was released latere20sm0k3

cough, xb360 nhl08>>>>>>>>>ps3 The other big selling point about last year's game, besides the skill stick, was its graphics. Hands-down, NHL 07 was the best-looking sports game on the market last year, and NHL 08 subtly improves on an already fantastic graphics engine. The improved skating is probably the biggest visual treat, though the still-amazing-looking player models and generally improved animations are a nice touch as well. On the Xbox 360, NHL 08 runs a great deal better than it did last year in terms of frame rate. You'll see occasional choppy bits here and there, but they're rare. The PlayStation 3 version runs about as well as the Xbox 360 game did last year. It mostly sticks to about 30 frames a second, though it occasionally chops up on the ice, and cutscenes seem to take a big hit. It doesn't affect gameplay, so it's not a gigantic deal. It's just disappointing that the PS3 version is inferior in this one regarddd2005nian

8.5 = 8.5

These Dirt threads are hilarious, I actually lol'd when I read the title. I'm not even going to bother reading what he has to say! :D-R3Volation

"lemmings always go on about how multiplats are always better on 360 because it can handle the game a lot better, But how is it Dirt one of the most impressive games visually so far runs a lot better on the ps3, ps3 can handle anything the 360 and then some, but just have needed more time why developers get a hang of the ps3, The End."

:)

[QUOTE="e20sm0k3"]number 1 lemming excuse bu bu bu it was released laterICollegeStudent

you cant say the ps3 has no games anymore

A mediocre racer is better on the PS3.

We must fallback to the other side of the river!

The PS3 version still has frame rate issues.

"The PS3 version's frame rate maintains a steady 30 fps with very few dips."

Plus it has less graphical assets on screen.

Which makes it the worse version because it has less detail and still has frame rate issues.

Almost3 months later... Sad.

Don't forget it used the new scoring system... Not the old one. ;)

Plus it has less graphical assets on screen.

Truth_Hurts_U

OMG. 1 less tree = baron wasteland FTL.

Dirt PS3, they downgraded the gfx (missing textures, roadside objects, and particle effects) to achieve a better framerate, because the biggest complaint on the 360 version was frame rate issues.evilross

number 1 lemming excuse bu bu bu it was released latere20sm0k3

So if it was released on the ps3 first, im sure u cows would say the same thing....

[QUOTE="ICollegeStudent"][QUOTE="e20sm0k3"]number 1 lemming excuse bu bu bu it was released latere20sm0k3

you cant say the ps3 has no games anymore

[QUOTE="-R3Volation"]These Dirt threads are hilarious, I actually lol'd when I read the title. I'm not even going to bother reading what he has to say! :Dball_of_air

"lemmings always go on about how multiplats are always better on 360 because it can handle the game a lot better, But how is it Dirt one of the most impressive games visually so far runs a lot better on the ps3, ps3 can handle anything the 360 and then some, but just have needed more time why developers get a hang of the ps3, The End."

:)

Wow wasted text. I wouldn't really consider myself a Lemming knowing the fact that the PS3's hardware is superior, as for the lemmings bragging about multiplats; okay? Is that even supposed to be directed to me as if I have done this before? The End.

[QUOTE="evilross"]Dirt PS3, they downgraded the gfx (missing textures, roadside objects, and particle effects) to achieve a better framerate, because the biggest complaint on the 360 version was frame rate issues.-Ninja_Dog-

Hmmm...that makes sense.

PS3 sucks

how when it can do anything the 360 can do?exept sound like a factory in your room

A mediocre racer is better on the PS3.

We must fallback to the other side of the river!

Shadow_op

yea a AA game is mediocre.....

Dirt sucked. Go hype GT5.Apathetic-Irony

You obviously have never played a racing game.

lolyou serious isaw the adverts the other day "OUT NOW FOR PS3"

by that time id finished the game on the 360 and got bored of it

the multiplats will get better for the ps3 its just youll have to wait a good 3 or 4 months after its released for the 360.therefore the devs have additional time to tweak it.

ok it got an 8.5 on ps3 and an 8.3 on 360. that's not a big difference. the graphics are the samejlh47

Yeah and with the new Ratings System, the 360 version would be an 8.5 as well.