DLC is hurting games!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Cujo31
Cujo31

2884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Cujo31
Member since 2002 • 2884 Posts

Think about it! When has the anouncment of DLC for a game once changed the way you go about making a purchase? If you ask me, I think the majority of most companies waste A LOT of money paying people to come up with stupid ideas. Sure it makes them money but I think it hurts the true final product of a game. I think DLC in general is over rated and it will eventually hit its tipping point and lose it's flare, if it even has as much as it seems to have....I've bought DLC, don't get me wrong, but its getting pretty silly the way DLC is being pushed in the market. DLC seems to get more focus then the actual game itself these days with anouncments of DLC even before a game hits store shelves!

The last DLC I think I bought was the lost and damned GTAIV. I've bought a couple map packs in the past for Halo3 and CoD4 and I think I bought almost everything downloadable for Oblivion (the only DLC well worth every penny in my books). I don't play the FPS's as much anymore since the days of CoD4 and the MW2 map pack well not see a cent from me. Don't even get me started on payed unlock for content already on a disc. What ever happened to finely crafting a game. DLC should be a thought after the fact, something a dev just couldn't leave out forever, or a huge pack of content that just didn't make the final cut when the game was being completed. It should be special, something wanted by the fans and created for them.

What are your thoughts on the DLC craze and where do you see it going?

This topic was inspired by this recent post here in the forums....if your wondering!

Avatar image for dog_dirt
dog_dirt

2813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 dog_dirt
Member since 2009 • 2813 Posts

Overrated?? all i ever see are threads with people moaning about it.

Avatar image for forza420
forza420

1225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 forza420
Member since 2010 • 1225 Posts

Overrated?? all i ever see are threads with people moaning about it.

dog_dirt
true but they r doing it for a good reason
Avatar image for Cujo31
Cujo31

2884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Cujo31
Member since 2002 • 2884 Posts

Overrated?? all i ever see are threads with people moaning about it.

dog_dirt

Way to not read my whole post :)

Avatar image for MizFitAwesome
MizFitAwesome

2745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 MizFitAwesome
Member since 2009 • 2745 Posts

I think the idea behind DLC was intended to create replayability of older gamesduring long development cycles of new games. I do agree that some companies (EA and Activision) get carried away and overcharge.

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
(1) What ever happened to finely crafting a game. (2) DLC should be a thought after the fact, something a dev just couldn't leave out forever, (3) or a huge pack of content that just didn't make the final cut when the game was being completed. (4) It should be special, something wanted by the fans and created for them.Cujo31
(1) Games are still finely crafted (2) I don't really mind when a company first thinks about DLC (3) This isn't a requirement for me as long as the price makes sense for the size of the content (4) I think the whole point of making DLC is to make something that for consumers that they want to buy I don't have any problem with DLC and if I did, which I never have for any game that I've bought DLC for, I just wouldn't buy it.
Avatar image for bobbleheadrogue
bobbleheadrogue

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 bobbleheadrogue
Member since 2009 • 2203 Posts
I personally never ever bought any DLC...personally, I find expansion packs (like Episodes of Liberty City or Dragon Age Awakening) to be of much better value. However, I have picked up several Game of the Year Editions (like Little Big Planet) which included downloadable content. The quality was okay in my opinion, the quantity sold to us for the price tag isn't :P I guess there will be loads more of dlc in the future? (as it is so popular now) :?
Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts

yes the dlcs hurt games like fallout 3 and borderlands , not

but capcomish already on disk dlc $ucks i have to agree , although it doesnt hurt the game (vs in RE5)as much as it pisses off when you buy a full price game and they lock out stuff from you and wanting cash for that

Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts
im personally that a huge fan of DLC...but developers simply need the extra dough with the cost of making games today though i wish they'd find alternative ways of bringing in more revenue
Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts
The main idea of DLC was to decrease the significance of second-hand market. Anyway, TC, are you from Brazil or a fan of Amon Tobin by any chance? or is it just Stephen King?
Avatar image for SpinoRaptor24
SpinoRaptor24

10316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#11 SpinoRaptor24
Member since 2008 • 10316 Posts

There is good DLC and bad DLC, just like games. Good is when you have expansions that add more hours of replay value at a reasonable price, such as the GTAIV/Fallout 3 expansions.

Bad are the evident cash ins to nickel and dime consumers, such as paying money for costumes and game modes (RE5, Street Fighter 4)

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#12 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts
im personally that a huge fan of DLC...but developers simply need the extra dough with the cost of making games today though i wish they'd find alternative ways of bringing in more revenuekidcool189
what do you think bout already on disk dlcs or launch date dlcs , such content should be included in the full game already as its finished on time , theyre removing stuff on purpose here and not creating additional content later , pure greed imo i think they should at least wait for them to be released and NEVER Include dlcs on disk to avoid pissing of their customers who know that (especially capcom)
Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts
[QUOTE="kidcool189"]im personally that a huge fan of DLC...but developers simply need the extra dough with the cost of making games today though i wish they'd find alternative ways of bringing in more revenueAmnesiaHaze
what do you think bout already on disk dlcs or launch date dlcs , such content should be included in the full game already as its finished on time , theyre removing stuff on purpose here and not creating additional content later , pure greed imo i think they should at least wait for them to be released and NEVER Include dlcs on disk to avoid pissing of their customers who know that (especially capcom)

that particular aspect of DLC does come off a little shady, but thats also a blatant sign for needing more money the best way for them to make extra money i think is to take down the used game market...but the only way i see them doing that is going 100% DD, which obviously causing a lot of mixed feelings for consumers
Avatar image for chaotzu
chaotzu

773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 chaotzu
Member since 2005 • 773 Posts
DLC map packs have to stop. When companies charge to play online maps the devs are splitting the community. Some have it, some don't. Games like Halo and Call of Duty are fine, since they're population is so big splitting their community won't matter. However, games like MGO, Killzone 2, etc. suffer much more for this. Plus, it's a rip off. Alot of this stuff is already on the disc, like Yoda in Soulcalibur 4, or Street Fighter 4 alternate costumes. Since gamers are idiots that will pay $15 for Modern Warfare's map pack (You can by Warhawk for that price off PSN), it's not going to stop any time soon.
Avatar image for sam_nintendo
sam_nintendo

2066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 sam_nintendo
Member since 2005 • 2066 Posts
[QUOTE="kidcool189"]im personally that a huge fan of DLC...but developers simply need the extra dough with the cost of making games today though i wish they'd find alternative ways of bringing in more revenueAmnesiaHaze
what do you think bout already on disk dlcs or launch date dlcs , such content should be included in the full game already as its finished on time , theyre removing stuff on purpose here and not creating additional content later , pure greed imo i think they should at least wait for them to be released and NEVER Include dlcs on disk to avoid pissing of their customers who know that (especially capcom)

Release day DLC is often developed after the game has gone gold, I'm just fine with it.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

No consumers are hurting games, its all ways been the consumer that hurts the game never the company.

the company does what the consumer wants or seems to want, buyin useless dlc makes them make useless dlc, buying dlc that was obviously part of the game any ways makes them make dlc out of content they could have added to the game.

If the consumer would simply do research to find out what content is worthwhile high quality then we'd all be better off...But as allways the consumer ruins their own area of the culture.

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"][QUOTE="kidcool189"]im personally that a huge fan of DLC...but developers simply need the extra dough with the cost of making games today though i wish they'd find alternative ways of bringing in more revenuekidcool189
what do you think bout already on disk dlcs or launch date dlcs , such content should be included in the full game already as its finished on time , theyre removing stuff on purpose here and not creating additional content later , pure greed imo i think they should at least wait for them to be released and NEVER Include dlcs on disk to avoid pissing of their customers who know that (especially capcom)

that particular aspect of DLC does come off a little shady, but thats also a blatant sign for needing more money the best way for them to make extra money i think is to take down the used game market...but the only way i see them doing that is going 100% DD, which obviously causing a lot of mixed feelings for consumers

everybody needs money but pissing off customers who already bought your game isnt a good strategy imo for the future , however dlc support like gearbox offers has my respect and i keep supporting them , that's the differnce , you can do DLC the "capcom" way or the "gearbox" way ,

concerning the DD , i think it is similar to pirating here where : no pirating possibility =/= automatically a sale , some people just don't have the money to buy games (@ full price) so removing the possibility to get it cheaper or free doesnt result into sales automatically only in a small percentage , also 100% DD wouldnt be good considering not everybody has internet or only a slow connection priced on data transfer etc. ... maybe the sales would be even worse compared to now ,

i dont like digital games as much as my physical copies , i just have the feeling i buy something "real" as odd it may sound it's just how i'm used to buy games and if ps3 would go 100% DD like psp-go i wouldnt even be able to buy games (no psn store support in my country)

Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts
I have no problem with DLC. Get more gameplay out of the game for a small fee. One of the reason though DLC is loved by software companies is the chance to still make money when a game is bought used. There was a point when Cliff B stated some companies were thinking about charging to beat the final boss in a game. Companies are trying to come up with ways to make money when so much of their sales are lost to the Used game market. So no I don't think DLC hurts gaming, I think it helps companies which in turn make more games.
Avatar image for kidcool189
kidcool189

4307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 kidcool189
Member since 2008 • 4307 Posts

[QUOTE="kidcool189"][QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"] what do you think bout already on disk dlcs or launch date dlcs , such content should be included in the full game already as its finished on time , theyre removing stuff on purpose here and not creating additional content later , pure greed imo i think they should at least wait for them to be released and NEVER Include dlcs on disk to avoid pissing of their customers who know that (especially capcom)AmnesiaHaze

that particular aspect of DLC does come off a little shady, but thats also a blatant sign for needing more money the best way for them to make extra money i think is to take down the used game market...but the only way i see them doing that is going 100% DD, which obviously causing a lot of mixed feelings for consumers

everybody needs money but pissing off customers who already bought your game isnt a good strategy imo for the future , however dlc support like gearbox offers has my respect and i keep supporting them , that's the differnce , you can do DLC the "capcom" way or the "gearbox" way ,

concerning the DD , i think it is similar to pirating here where : no pirating possibility =/= automatically a sale , some people just don't have the money to buy games (@ full price) so removing the possibility to get it cheaper or free doesnt result into sales automatically only in a small percentage , also 100% DD wouldnt be good considering not everybody has internet or only a slow connection priced on data transfer etc. ... maybe the sales would be even worse compared to now ,

i dont like digital games as much as my physical copies , i just have the feeling i buy something "real" as odd it may sound it's just how i'm used to buy games and if ps3 would go 100% DD like psp-go i wouldnt even be able to buy games (no psn store support in my country)

While there are plenty of unsatisfied consumers with the overall dlc trend, at the same time they people are buying dlc like crazy as williamrlbaker mentioned...im sure dlc has caught on with sales a lot better than developers had originally had anticipated when it all first started

as for DD...the comparison of initial sales(first few months) of DD vs retail, really wont be all that much hugher with only DD. But over the long run is when devs can see plenty of steady revenue to keep them going strong financially. Probably nearly all those people who dont have the money to afford initial releases of new games are going to end up buying a used copy for cheap down the road, a sale the devs wont see. The only true way to be successful with DD only would be on a fresh new console of the next generation with the plans of everything of that consle being DD(i think atleast one of the big 3 well be like this next gen). Interenet connections and speeds will be the main hinge preventing the most success with it, but it will eventually catch on enough and/or one of the big three we figure out something or make have some form of their own network system...lol i dunno

but it will happen eventually




Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62051 Posts

DLC as a whole is not hurting gaming. They are optional, and provide longevity to people's games.

Oft times, it is something that could not make it to final retail of the game, due to time constraints and/or lack of budget.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62051 Posts

This explains more than i can....rartatatat

See ya' later... Hopefully someone picks up on your regular acct so that can get banned aswell.

Avatar image for rartatatat
rartatatat

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 rartatatat
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="rartatatat"] This explains more than i can....lundy86_4

See ya' later... Hopefully someone picks up on your regular acct so that can get banned aswell.

My regular account is Dakan45. Be sure to ban me.
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
Mass Effect 2 is basically an unfinished game without Cerberus Network. Everyone that got the game new shouldn't have to pay another penny for its DLC.
Avatar image for Cujo31
Cujo31

2884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Cujo31
Member since 2002 • 2884 Posts
@Senor_Kami, good break down. It great to see others opinion :) @WilliamRLBaker, Great way of thinking about it. I agree that on some respects that it the consumer is hurting the market also. @Salt_The_Fries, Why do you ask those questions that you do? I'm actually from Canada. :)
Avatar image for Cujo31
Cujo31

2884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Cujo31
Member since 2002 • 2884 Posts

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"][QUOTE="kidcool189"]im personally that a huge fan of DLC...but developers simply need the extra dough with the cost of making games today though i wish they'd find alternative ways of bringing in more revenuekidcool189
what do you think bout already on disk dlcs or launch date dlcs , such content should be included in the full game already as its finished on time , theyre removing stuff on purpose here and not creating additional content later , pure greed imo i think they should at least wait for them to be released and NEVER Include dlcs on disk to avoid pissing of their customers who know that (especially capcom)

that particular aspect of DLC does come off a little shady, but thats also a blatant sign for needing more money the best way for them to make extra money i think is to take down the used game market...but the only way i see them doing that is going 100% DD, which obviously causing a lot of mixed feelings for consumers

I'm sure it would have been done already if it could have been, but it sucks how the gaming industry can't get some sort of royalty from the sale of used games....have they tried this route?

Avatar image for WardCleaver02
WardCleaver02

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 WardCleaver02
Member since 2007 • 1559 Posts

[QUOTE="Cujo31"](1) What ever happened to finely crafting a game. (2) DLC should be a thought after the fact, something a dev just couldn't leave out forever, (3) or a huge pack of content that just didn't make the final cut when the game was being completed. (4) It should be special, something wanted by the fans and created for them.Senor_Kami
(1) Games are still finely crafted (2) I don't really mind when a company first thinks about DLC (3) This isn't a requirement for me as long as the price makes sense for the size of the content (4) I think the whole point of making DLC is to make something that for consumers that they want to buy I don't have any problem with DLC and if I did, which I never have for any game that I've bought DLC for, I just wouldn't buy it.

This logical approach to considering the merits of DLC has no place in SW! :P

Avatar image for Darkmoone1
Darkmoone1

2845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#28 Darkmoone1
Member since 2008 • 2845 Posts
No one if forcing you to buy DLC, though it makes you feel like you're not getting the "Full experience." ME2 DLC is perfect. As long as you make a new purchase you wouldn't need to bother with the price.
Avatar image for CZVA
CZVA

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 CZVA
Member since 2009 • 1166 Posts

TC I couldnt agree more. DLC should be the very last thing developers think about. They should put all their efforts into making the game the way it was envisioned. Right now, they allocate ideas and time in the development process just for DLC. Theres no denying that. I personally dont want DLC at all. I want the retail product to be the final product just like how a movie or a book cant be added to. You cant add content to a book or a movie so everyone gets the same experience. Thats the way games should be.

I think there are just more dumb people than there are smart people in this world so most gamers end up buying into the DLC scam. The rest of us smarter guys who see the problems DLC bring have to suffer because these other guys dont. And explaining to them is pointless. DLC is doing more harm than good. The idea of DLC is like giving a gun to everyone to protect themselves when everything would be better without one.

Im still partially open to the idea of expansion discs. If the content is truly worth your money and can extend the life of your game, it should be large enough to fill up a disc.

Avatar image for CZVA
CZVA

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 CZVA
Member since 2009 • 1166 Posts

Oh yeah, do you guys remember the days of unlocking extra skins after beating the game? Or entering a cheat code to change skins or enable low gravity? Welcome to the age of DLC where you have to pay for all that. Skins, DLC, maps, chreat codes and on disc content.

Most of the DLC sold today at $1.99 is "content" that we would have gotten for free back in the PS1 days. Extra weapon slots, horse armor, Versus mode, skins, etc. Its just a simple code devs have to write or edit. Back then they were rewards given to us for playing the game and support the developer. Do you guys like paying for things that should be free? I wish this new generation of gullible gamers never came along. Things would be so much better for us. Its so pathetic the way things turned out.

Reminds me of the Holocaust. It only happened because people let it.

Avatar image for Cujo31
Cujo31

2884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 Cujo31
Member since 2002 • 2884 Posts
@CZVA - I was thinking about this thread today and if I would get anyone that would say those words "TC I couldnt agree more....". It's nice to know I'm not alone. Even if it's just you and I that feel the same about DLC. lol. Like I said though, I've bought DLC that I thought was totally worth it. Also, I totally remember the days of cool unlocks like the skins and all. Great posts! Thanks.
Avatar image for Parasomniac
Parasomniac

2723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Parasomniac
Member since 2007 • 2723 Posts
Mass Effect 2 is basically an unfinished game without Cerberus Network. Everyone that got the game new shouldn't have to pay another penny for its DLC.tomarlyn
Majority of the DLC for ME2 is junk. Bunch of fancy armors that you can't even remove the helmets of, cheapy characters with no dialog wheels, boring hammerhead missions etc.
Avatar image for DethSkematik
DethSkematik

3900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 0

#33 DethSkematik
Member since 2008 • 3900 Posts
I agree. The last time I was actually wowed by DLC was DA: Awakening and the Fallout 3 expansions (to an extent, though...only Point Lookout, Broken Steel and the Pitt impressed me). Most of the time they're scant map packs or a handful of missions that barely last an hour. I'm not saying anything is wrong with those, but back then, I actually looked foward to DLC because they added to an already awesome experience...nowdays, it's like they're not even trying anymore :?.
Avatar image for angryfodder
angryfodder

20490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#34 angryfodder
Member since 2007 • 20490 Posts
I have issues with the way DLC is going. DLC for games like oblivion was a great idea. It came out way after the game and added life to it with decent content. Now it seems they just hold back content that could be on the disc just to make money as DLC. I also think map packs are a con. I refuse to pay for map packs when alot of games give them away for free.