do cows really think Uncharted will get a AAA here?

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
think about it Uncharted has got 8 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer wasent that the same reason HS flopped because it was a short game without any replay value?
Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts
No, that's why it's hyped AA.
Avatar image for Tnasty11
Tnasty11

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Tnasty11
Member since 2005 • 4497 Posts
think about it Uncharted has got 8 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer wasent that the same reason HS flopped because it was a short game without any replay value? ParadiddleFill
No cows do not think it will get AAA here
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
on that note i think believe every game this gen should have some kind of online function, or it has to be a very long epic game. I mean games are 60 dollars now why spend that much money when youre only gonna play it for a week?
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
oh my bad thought the hype was AAA
Avatar image for Arsenal325
Arsenal325

4899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Arsenal325
Member since 2005 • 4899 Posts
i dont care.,. its got 9 from the site i care about for reviews so im fine
Avatar image for black_awpN1
black_awpN1

7863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 black_awpN1
Member since 2004 • 7863 Posts
It got AAA on IGN, so why not?
Avatar image for elbow2k
elbow2k

1645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 elbow2k
Member since 2007 • 1645 Posts

think about it Uncharted has got 8 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer wasent that the same reason HS flopped because it was a short game without any replay value? ParadiddleFill

Metal Gear Solid 2 was no more than 12 hours gameplay and cinematics put together, and it's one of the highest rated games of all time.

The original God of War wasn't much longer than 8-10 hours, but it was an epic.

But I don't think it'll get an AAA rating.

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
It got AAA on IGN, so why not? black_awpN1
so did ratchet and clank.
Avatar image for Relys
Relys

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Relys
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts
A-AA
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
on that note i think believe every game this gen should have some kind of online function, or it has to be a very long epic game. I mean games are 60 dollars now why spend that much money when youre only gonna play it for a week?ParadiddleFill
i agree its ridiculous we're shelling out more for shorter games, especially games that have NO online they should easily be 15 hours ATLEAST.
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]think about it Uncharted has got 8 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer wasent that the same reason HS flopped because it was a short game without any replay value? elbow2k

Metal Gear Solid 2 was no more than 12 hours gameplay and cinematics put together, and it's one of the highest rated games of all time.

The original God of War wasn't much longer than 8-10 hours, but it was an epic.

But I don't think it'll get an AAA rating.

yeh but that was back then, those game if reviewed for these gen consoles would of never got the high of a score, why do you think metal gear solid 3 started to have multiplayer?

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]on that note i think believe every game this gen should have some kind of online function, or it has to be a very long epic game. I mean games are 60 dollars now why spend that much money when youre only gonna play it for a week?mmirza23
i agree its ridiculous we're shelling out more for shorter games, especially games that have NO online they should easily be 15 hours ATLEAST.

yeah i know what you mean thats why i didnt buy bioshock, i rented it and returned it when i beat it, when i buy games now i take into account the replay value of the game

Avatar image for pielover666
pielover666

531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#14 pielover666
Member since 2005 • 531 Posts
think about it Uncharted has got 8 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer wasent that the same reason HS flopped because it was a short game without any replay value? ParadiddleFill
"BUY THIS GAME!" -Reviewer who's name slips my mind.
Avatar image for deactivated-59603ff9b9423
deactivated-59603ff9b9423

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-59603ff9b9423
Member since 2007 • 2413 Posts

It's offcial system wars hype is AA. But it's averaging AAA critic reviews so far.

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts

[QUOTE="mmirza23"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]on that note i think believe every game this gen should have some kind of online function, or it has to be a very long epic game. I mean games are 60 dollars now why spend that much money when youre only gonna play it for a week?ParadiddleFill

i agree its ridiculous we're shelling out more for shorter games, especially games that have NO online they should easily be 15 hours ATLEAST.

yeah i know what you mean thats why i didnt buy bioshock, i rented it and returned it when i beat it, when i buy games now i take into account the replay value of the game

yeah and thats one reason i really like GS reviews, they really hit a game hard if the replay value is even average.
Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts
[QUOTE="elbow2k"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]think about it Uncharted has got 8 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer wasent that the same reason HS flopped because it was a short game without any replay value? ParadiddleFill

Metal Gear Solid 2 was no more than 12 hours gameplay and cinematics put together, and it's one of the highest rated games of all time.

The original God of War wasn't much longer than 8-10 hours, but it was an epic.

But I don't think it'll get an AAA rating.

yeh but that was back then, those game if reviewed for these gen consoles would of never got the high of a score, why do you think metal gear solid 3 started to have multiplayer?

Well you're somewhat right, since Konami will be releasing Metal Gear Online. But games with excellent narratives coupled withpimpin single-player gameplay (with no multiplayer whatsoever) can still achieve Triple A status this gen.
Avatar image for elbow2k
elbow2k

1645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 elbow2k
Member since 2007 • 1645 Posts
[QUOTE="elbow2k"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]think about it Uncharted has got 8 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer wasent that the same reason HS flopped because it was a short game without any replay value? ParadiddleFill

Metal Gear Solid 2 was no more than 12 hours gameplay and cinematics put together, and it's one of the highest rated games of all time.

The original God of War wasn't much longer than 8-10 hours, but it was an epic.

But I don't think it'll get an AAA rating.

yeh but that was back then, those game if reviewed for these gen consoles would of never got the high of a score, why do you think metal gear solid 3 started to have multiplayer?

God of War III wont have a multiplayer and will beno longer than 15 hours, but it will still be AAA becaue I doubt Sony is going to let one of its last remaining killer apps sink.

Multiplayers are an awsome thing, but there other games that don't need it to achive critically aclaimed status.

Avatar image for Out_Kast3000
Out_Kast3000

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Out_Kast3000
Member since 2007 • 358 Posts

failure

-The game is more like 10 hours.

-It definitely has replay value.

-It's not all about length. Shadow of the Colossus, God of War = 2 of the greatest games last year, and also could be beaten 10 hours or less(especiallly SotC).

Avatar image for DarkCloud79
DarkCloud79

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 DarkCloud79
Member since 2006 • 997 Posts

For a game to get AAA this gen it has to have multiplayer

... or 45 hour gameplay

... or aliens

..... or monsters

.......... or be on the 360

Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
Isnt AC only like 15 hours max with no replay value? That got a 9....and why does everyone keep saying no multiplayer, games like this do not work with multiplayer.
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="elbow2k"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]think about it Uncharted has got 8 hours of gameplay with no multiplayer wasent that the same reason HS flopped because it was a short game without any replay value? elbow2k

Metal Gear Solid 2 was no more than 12 hours gameplay and cinematics put together, and it's one of the highest rated games of all time.

The original God of War wasn't much longer than 8-10 hours, but it was an epic.

But I don't think it'll get an AAA rating.

yeh but that was back then, those game if reviewed for these gen consoles would of never got the high of a score, why do you think metal gear solid 3 started to have multiplayer?

God of War III wont have a multiplayer and will beno longer than 15 hours, but it will still be AAA becaue I doubt Sony is going to let one of its last remaining killer apps sink.

Multiplayers are an awsome thing, but there other games that don't need it to achive critically aclaimed status.

how do you know god of war3 isnt going to have muliplayer or some kind of online element? i mean the game is still being made and it was just announced, im sure there will be some kind multiplayer element

Avatar image for Arsenal325
Arsenal325

4899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Arsenal325
Member since 2005 • 4899 Posts

failure

-The game is more like 10 hours.

-It definitely has replay value.

-It's not all about length. Shadow of the Colossus, God of War = 2 of the greatest games last year, and also could be beat it 10 hours or less(especiallly SotC).

Out_Kast3000

yep

/thread

Avatar image for trizzle_a
trizzle_a

1186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 trizzle_a
Member since 2007 • 1186 Posts

Why do lemmings keep saying that it has no replay value? Didnt you read/watch IGN's review?

I guess the only thing you guys heard was "8 hours".

Avatar image for Jack_Bauer07
Jack_Bauer07

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Jack_Bauer07
Member since 2006 • 1141 Posts

Single player > Online.

I couldn't care less if GS doesn't give it an AAA score because I know I'll enjoy it. The game has lots of replay value and reason enough to play it again and again. Knowing GS, they'll probably give it to Aaron Thomas to review.

"The game's graphics are amazing but its gameplaysuffers from an identity crisis. I never know whether to fight or shoot enemies so I end up punching the air as I try to fight a pirate 10 feet away.7.0/10" - Aaron Thomas

Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts

For a game to get AAA this gen it has to have multiplayer

... or 45 hour gameplay

... or aliens

..... or monsters

.......... or be on the 360

DarkCloud79

.......... or guns.

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts

failure

-The game is more like 10 hours.

-It definitely has replay value.

-It's not all about length. Shadow of the Colossus, God of War = 2 of the greatest games last year, and also could be beat it 10 hours or less(especiallly SotC).

Out_Kast3000

"NATE'S Story took me alittle more than eight hours to complete"

taken from the IGN review so you fail

and stop bringing up last gen games we are talking about current gen games

if they were reviewed now they wouldent of gotten the same scores

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="Out_Kast3000"]

failure

-The game is more like 10 hours.

-It definitely has replay value.

-It's not all about length. Shadow of the Colossus, God of War = 2 of the greatest games last year, and also could be beat it 10 hours or less(especiallly SotC).

Arsenal325

yep

/thread

alright lets compare old games then look at mario 3 it wasent in 3d and it has no online but it still got AAA

same thing
Avatar image for Shaqneel
Shaqneel

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Shaqneel
Member since 2006 • 1413 Posts
Hmm well it does have a trophy/achievement system. Besides, most adventure games really don't have an online function, so hence if it gets graded on that standard, then i don't GS will care.
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts

Hmm well it does have a trophy/achievement system. Besides, most adventure games really don't have an online function, so hence if it gets graded on that standard, then i don't GS will care. Shaqneel

but im saying if its not going to have a multiplayer element at least make it long

Avatar image for DarkCloud79
DarkCloud79

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 DarkCloud79
Member since 2006 • 997 Posts
[QUOTE="Out_Kast3000"]

failure

-The game is more like 10 hours.

-It definitely has replay value.

-It's not all about length. Shadow of the Colossus, God of War = 2 of the greatest games last year, and also could be beat it 10 hours or less(especiallly SotC).

ParadiddleFill

"NATE'S Story took me alittle more than eight hours to complete"

taken from the IGN review so you fail

and stop bringing up last gen games we are talking about current gen games

if they were reviewed now they wouldent of gotten the same scores

Bioshock?

Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts
[QUOTE="Arsenal325"][QUOTE="Out_Kast3000"]

failure

-The game is more like 10 hours.

-It definitely has replay value.

-It's not all about length. Shadow of the Colossus, God of War = 2 of the greatest games last year, and also could be beat it 10 hours or less(especiallly SotC).

ParadiddleFill

yep

/thread

alright lets compare old games then look at mario 3 it wasent in 3d and it has no online but it still got AAA

same thing

Neither was Paper Mario last gen, but it got AAA. And that was when 3d games dominated the market.
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="Out_Kast3000"]

failure

-The game is more like 10 hours.

-It definitely has replay value.

-It's not all about length. Shadow of the Colossus, God of War = 2 of the greatest games last year, and also could be beat it 10 hours or less(especiallly SotC).

DarkCloud79

"NATE'S Story took me alittle more than eight hours to complete"

taken from the IGN review so you fail

and stop bringing up last gen games we are talking about current gen games

if they were reviewed now they wouldent of gotten the same scores

Bioshock?

bioshock was overrated big time

Avatar image for shadow32gamer
shadow32gamer

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 shadow32gamer
Member since 2006 • 139 Posts
I'm starting to hate on-line gameing, cuzit seems if agame dosn't have it then it's crap.
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts

I'm starting to hate on-line gameing, cuzit seems if agame dosn't have it then it's crap.shadow32gamer

its not crap unless it has a lenghty single player or else i wont buy it

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
oh my bad thought the hype was AAAParadiddleFill

For a game to get AAA this gen it has to have multiplayer

... or 45 hour gameplay

... or aliens

..... or monsters

.......... or be on the 360

DarkCloud79
You mean 6 hr long games with repetitive gameplay, thats been done before and no replay value or online won't get AAA me am cry :cry:
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]oh my bad thought the hype was AAAblue_hazy_basic

For a game to get AAA this gen it has to have multiplayer

... or 45 hour gameplay

... or aliens

..... or monsters

.......... or be on the 360

DarkCloud79
You mean 6 hr long games with repetitive gameplay, thats been done before and no replay value or online won't get AAA me am cry :cry:

i'm actually surprised it even got an 8, 6 hours is just ridiculously short and all you get out of playing it a 2nd time around is a harder difficulty? they should've atleast copied GOW with the unlockable stuff too, jeez...
Avatar image for shadow32gamer
shadow32gamer

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 shadow32gamer
Member since 2006 • 139 Posts

[QUOTE="shadow32gamer"]I'm starting to hate on-line gameing, cuzit seems if agame dosn't have it then it's crap.ParadiddleFill

its not crap unless it has a lenghty single player or else i wont buy it

well what do you count as a lenghy game?

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

Nothing I have seen orread would eliminate it from AAA contention. Shorter single player games without multiplayer can get AAA if they are good enough experiences. It has been said that you will want to play this over again , plus it has collectible items and rewards to unlock. Ithas a lot going for it.Whether it gets AAA or not here remains to be seen.

Avatar image for Out_Kast3000
Out_Kast3000

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Out_Kast3000
Member since 2007 • 358 Posts

taken from the IGN review so you fail

and stop bringing up last gen games we are talking about current gen games

if they were reviewed now they wouldent of gotten the same scores

ParadiddleFill

There was also a review that said the game would be about 10 hours, so you fail.

It's not their length that would have changed their scores, it's the fact that they would be technically outdated in a sense(graphics). In reality, both those games are still better than most next gen titles been released so far.

The standard for game length hasn't changed, so stop failing. The average RPG is still average 25 hours just like 10 years ago. ANd shorter games are fine, especially if they have replay value and extras(God of War).

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]

[QUOTE="shadow32gamer"]I'm starting to hate on-line gameing, cuzit seems if agame dosn't have it then it's crap.shadow32gamer

its not crap unless it has a lenghty single player or else i wont buy it

well what do you count as a lenghy game?

at the very least 12 hours

Avatar image for shadow32gamer
shadow32gamer

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 shadow32gamer
Member since 2006 • 139 Posts
[QUOTE="shadow32gamer"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]

[QUOTE="shadow32gamer"]I'm starting to hate on-line gameing, cuzit seems if agame dosn't have it then it's crap.ParadiddleFill

its not crap unless it has a lenghty single player or else i wont buy it

well what do you count as a lenghy game?

at the very least 12 hours

I can respect that, but for a game like this 8 ,or 10 (depends on the player of course) I find to be agoddsize leth.A nice fun experience without overdoing things, and lasting longer then it should. Pulse with all the extra stuff to unlock, and find in the game. Of course this is just my own opinion, and I can see why you would think this game would be shy of just AAA status.

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="shadow32gamer"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]

[QUOTE="shadow32gamer"]I'm starting to hate on-line gameing, cuzit seems if agame dosn't have it then it's crap.shadow32gamer

its not crap unless it has a lenghty single player or else i wont buy it

well what do you count as a lenghy game?

at the very least 12 hours

I can respect that, but for a game like this 8 ,or 10 (depends on the player of course) I find to be a nicelengh nice long experience without overdoing things. Pulse with all the stuff to unlock, and find in the game. Of course this is just my own opinion, and I can see why you would think this game would be shy of just AAA status.

yeah im not saying this game is bad or anything no it looks really good but for me games are to expensive to warrent a purchase or a AAA, the game needs to be either lenghty or have some kind of multiplayer element

Avatar image for shadow32gamer
shadow32gamer

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 shadow32gamer
Member since 2006 • 139 Posts
[QUOTE="shadow32gamer"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="shadow32gamer"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]

[QUOTE="shadow32gamer"]I'm starting to hate on-line gameing, cuzit seems if agame dosn't have it then it's crap.ParadiddleFill

its not crap unless it has a lenghty single player or else i wont buy it

well what do you count as a lenghy game?

at the very least 12 hours

I can respect that, but for a game like this 8 ,or 10 (depends on the player of course) I find to be a nicelengh nice long experience without overdoing things. Pulse with all the stuff to unlock, and find in the game. Of course this is just my own opinion, and I can see why you would think this game would be shy of just AAA status.

yeah im not saying this game is bad or anything no it looks really good but for me games are to expensive to warrent a purchase or a AAA, the game needs to be either lenghty or have some kind of multiplayer element

I understand, and sorry about my first post I just see so many people acting like On-line game is like the second comming or somthing.

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]

taken from the IGN review so you fail

and stop bringing up last gen games we are talking about current gen games

if they were reviewed now they wouldent of gotten the same scores

Out_Kast3000

There was also a review that said the game would be about 10 hours, so you fail.

It's not their length that would have changed their scores, it's the fact that they would be technically outdated in a sense(graphics). In reality, both those games are still better than most next gen titles been released so far.

The standard for game length hasn't changed, so stop failing. The average RPG is still average 25 hours just like 10 years ago. ANd shorter games are fine, especially if they have replay value and extras(God of War).

the fact that you are bringing up last gen games comparing them with games this gen makes me not take you seriously. standards of gaming evolves from gen to gen. Your point is saying oh look at halo ce it didnt have multiplayer and it got AAA that means that halo3 if it didnt have multiplayer would of still gotten AAA which is just not true

Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
Cows think that graphics = AAA, they hype games only for the graphics.
Avatar image for krunkfu2
krunkfu2

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 krunkfu2
Member since 2007 • 4218 Posts
we'll see
Avatar image for Setsa
Setsa

8431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 Setsa
Member since 2005 • 8431 Posts
It s hyped AA, and that s what it ll get. I m guessing an 8.5, hope for higher (like i do with all games) but i can t see it getting over AA status here.
Avatar image for osirisomeomi
osirisomeomi

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 osirisomeomi
Member since 2007 • 3100 Posts
I expect an 8.5-9.0, based on other reviews. Looks like a really fun game.
Avatar image for Out_Kast3000
Out_Kast3000

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Out_Kast3000
Member since 2007 • 358 Posts

the fact that you are bringing up last gen games comparing them with games this gen makes me not take you seriously. standards of gaming evolves from gen to gen. Your point is saying oh look at halo ce it didnt have multiplayer and it got AAA that means that halo3 if it didnt have multiplayer would of still gotten AAA which is just not true

ParadiddleFill

The fact that you think that length has dramatically evolved at all shows me you have no idea what you're talking about.

Standards in how long a game is suppose be haven't changed much. This is the point.

Nobody is comparing the standards of gameplay and game options. We're talking about the standards of length in a game. I brought up last gen titles becuase they're great games even though they're not extremely long.

you = lost.

kthxbi