Do Games Need Multiplayer??

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Sleepy_Doom
Sleepy_Doom

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Sleepy_Doom
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

I think they do. You can only play through a game so many times before you get bored with it. Online adds to a games replayability ALOT. PPl that say that games dont need multiplayer are stuck in the past. Wat do you think?

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
are you talking about ALL games or an certain type?
Avatar image for Sleepy_Doom
Sleepy_Doom

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Sleepy_Doom
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

are you talking about ALL games or an certain type?lawlessx

all games (besides rpgs)

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Not in the least. Singleplayer games with varied replay value are far better than multiplayer that is just the same monotonous gameplay over and over and over again. Multiplayer will always come second to a quality singleplayer.
Avatar image for -Jiggles-
-Jiggles-

4356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -Jiggles-
Member since 2008 • 4356 Posts

Matters what kind of game it is, and the sort of gameplay that is associates itself with.

First Person Shooters, Third Person Shooters, MMORPG's (obviously), Fighters, Racers, Sports and *some* WRPG's should have multiplayer. JRPG's, RTS's, Platformers, Action/Adventure, Survival Horror, Puzzle and Music games don't require multiplayer but it is openly-welcomed if it is implemented well.

Avatar image for Master-Thief-09
Master-Thief-09

2534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#7 Master-Thief-09
Member since 2009 • 2534 Posts
Not all games.
Avatar image for Innocentguy757
Innocentguy757

5410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 Innocentguy757
Member since 2004 • 5410 Posts
Games that can have it should have it
Avatar image for thriteenthmonke
thriteenthmonke

49823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 thriteenthmonke
Member since 2005 • 49823 Posts
No, they don't.
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
No. They don't need multiplayer. It adds longevity, sure, but no game NEEDS it.
Avatar image for W1ckedGo0se
W1ckedGo0se

1246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 W1ckedGo0se
Member since 2008 • 1246 Posts
Really depends on the type of game... Shooters = YES!!! But, games like Disgaea 3 with enough story and extras to hold you over for 100+ hours = no
Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts
RPGs, Platformers, Puzzle Games, Turn Based Strategy Games, Action Adventure Games, PnC Adventure Games, Non-Racing Simulators, etc. typically don't need multiplayer. Multiplayer works well in a lot of games, but there are also quite a few that don't need it, or where multiplayer just wouldn't fit.
Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#13 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

RPGs, Platformers, Puzzle Games, Turn Based Strategy Games, Action Adventure Games, PnC Adventure Games, Non-Racing Simulators, etc. typically don't need multiplayer. Multiplayer works well in a lot of games, but there are also quite a few that don't need it, or where multiplayer just wouldn't fit.MetroidPrimePwn

I agree, except for TBSes. Multiplayer is essential in any and all strategy games, IMO.

Avatar image for ganon546
ganon546

2942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ganon546
Member since 2007 • 2942 Posts
All depends on the genre. A FPS for example HAS to have multiplayer, but I don't mind my RPG's not having multiplayer.
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
All depends on the genre. A FPS for example HAS to have multiplayer, but I don't mind my RPG's not having multiplayer.ganon546
No it doesn't. I wouldn't want multiplayer in BioShock or Deus Ex..
Avatar image for web966
web966

11654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#17 web966
Member since 2005 • 11654 Posts
Depends on the game
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
All depends on the genre. A FPS for example HAS to have multiplayer, but I don't mind my RPG's not having multiplayer.ganon546

Plenty of shooters would be better off had the developers not wasted their time making a crappy multiplayer because the game "needs" it.

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl is one of the finest examples of why shooters don't "need" multiplayer.
Avatar image for GeoffZak
GeoffZak

3715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 GeoffZak
Member since 2007 • 3715 Posts
I think all games should have multiplayer. Sonic Unleashed should've at least had splitscreen and Uncharted should've had online multiplayer. Also, Assassins Creed could've been an awesome game to play online.
Avatar image for Bukowski81
Bukowski81

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Bukowski81
Member since 2005 • 242 Posts
I dont think so, I rather have a game with great single player and no multiplayer instead of a game with just good single player and good multiplayer.
Avatar image for nintendofreak_2
nintendofreak_2

25896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#21 nintendofreak_2
Member since 2005 • 25896 Posts
No, but I mostly play RPGs, which are long enough that they don't rely on multi-player to stay interesting, so I guess my inpute really doesn't mean much.
Avatar image for svetzenlether
svetzenlether

3082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 svetzenlether
Member since 2003 • 3082 Posts

Not in the least. Singleplayer games with varied replay value are far better than multiplayer that is just the same monotonous gameplay over and over and over again. Multiplayer will always come second to a quality singleplayer.foxhound_fox

I don't necessarily agree with you. A couple of my favorite games of all time are Battlefield 2 and Age of Empires 2; BF2 was pretty much MP-only and I never even touched the SP mode in AOE.

It depends on the genre more than anything, but I definitely wouldn't say that a good SP game trumps a good MP EVERY TIME.

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
games which are single player ... SHOULD stay single player... I hate when people say uncharted or bioshock "would have been better with multiplayer" no..just no.. Zomg Imagine Deadspace with multiplayer... NEcros vs Engineers..DEATHMATCH!! or co-op which is pathetic for a horror genre kinda game.
Avatar image for unknown37
unknown37

5135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#24 unknown37
Member since 2006 • 5135 Posts
no, in fact devs should stop with trying to put mp in every game and refocus on SP. Let the MP games be MP and the SP games SP
Avatar image for All_that_is_Man
All_that_is_Man

2044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 All_that_is_Man
Member since 2008 • 2044 Posts
if game ditched multi and were as long as old games I wouldn't mind, but Maybe add coop
Avatar image for iam2green
iam2green

13991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 iam2green
Member since 2007 • 13991 Posts
no, i just think a game need to be good story to keep a person interested to play it, the game also has to be long. halo and cod4 are some games that i mean by long. those games were only like 5 hours long. that is the only way to have a single player game good.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I don't necessarily agree with you. A couple of my favorite games of all time are Battlefield 2 and Age of Empires 2; BF2 was pretty much MP-only and I never even touched the SP mode in AOE.

It depends on the genre more than anything, but I definitely wouldn't say that a good SP game trumps a good MP EVERY TIME.

svetzenlether

Oh but it does. Not everyone will have access to either an internet connection or friends all the time, so having a quality singleplayer to fall back on in case of those circumstances, is always a good thing to have.

Multiplayer up until this current console generation has always taken a backseat to the singleplayer experiences. Only because of the fad of online play on consoles, has it become something that is "needed" in every game. There is no "need" for multiplayer, it is only added incentive and only when done well. A piss poor multiplayer can detract from the whole package.

As long as a game provides a quality singleplayer experience that is worth spending the time and money on, multiplayer is never "needed." Only if certain game mechanics lend themselves to an additional multiplayer mechanic, is it good to throw it in. But more often than not, especially with today's games, singleplayer experiences are suffering due to the focus on providing yet another multiplayer that just recycles everything that has already been done.
Avatar image for -Master_St3ve-
-Master_St3ve-

1421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 -Master_St3ve-
Member since 2007 • 1421 Posts
I do
Avatar image for Guyper
Guyper

3879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Guyper
Member since 2004 • 3879 Posts

First of all, are you asking if multiplayer is a must for gamers or game developers?

Well, multiplayer mode is only a plus for gamers, but it's a must have for game developers if they want the game to be more successful. Do you think RE5 would have still gain that enormous hype if it lacked the co-op? Hell no

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
they need left 4 dead type mp with awesome coop but, deathmatches are getting old and boring now, they need to focus more on coop and teamwork. your average mp game adds very little to the game replayability.