Do Not Want : PS2 games

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MetalContra
MetalContra

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 MetalContra
Member since 2006 • 1131 Posts

Right now I have a handful of games to finish before I even think about playing Crysis, Ratchet and Clank, Uncharted, or CoD 4.

I have no interest in PS2 games whatsever, that generation has passed me by.

Stop trying to use the backwards compatability thing against Sony. If people want it that bad they can spend 100 dollars more and get 40 gigs more hd space.

Avatar image for Zulgaines
Zulgaines

9750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Zulgaines
Member since 2003 • 9750 Posts
 .
Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts
*burps twice* speak for urself...not others
Avatar image for Dark_Knight6
Dark_Knight6

16619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Dark_Knight6
Member since 2006 • 16619 Posts
Even though I have a PS2, I would have liked the 40 gig to be BC because I always replace consoles the next console of that company but I don't mind lugging it out to play some of my favorite games. I'm just glade I don't need to run a 40 foot cord through my house for online.
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it the BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Just because the gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#6 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
No BC in the PS3 = no buy for me.
Avatar image for Magical_Guy
Magical_Guy

1673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Magical_Guy
Member since 2003 • 1673 Posts

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Eltroz

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

Avatar image for Magical_Guy
Magical_Guy

1673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Magical_Guy
Member since 2003 • 1673 Posts

No BC in the PS3 = no buy for me.musicalmac

poor guy, can't afford a PS2 :(

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Magical_Guy

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

There is no reason at all the user has to have two consoles from the same maker to be hooked up to the same TV. If these were games from different makers like Sony AND MS then that would be different. But the user has to have a PS2 and a PS3 hooked up to same TV to play both gens. That is just a dumb move on Sony's part.
Avatar image for Dark_Knight6
Dark_Knight6

16619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Dark_Knight6
Member since 2006 • 16619 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]No BC in the PS3 = no buy for me.Magical_Guy

poor guy, can't afford a PS2 :(

Or maybe he doesn't want to pay another $100 for something that should have been included with PS3.

Avatar image for a_chalz
a_chalz

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 a_chalz
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts

Right now I have a handful of games to finish before I even think about playing Crysis, Ratchet and Clank, Uncharted, or CoD 4.

I have no interest in PS2 games whatsever, that generation has passed me by.

Stop trying to use the backwards compatability thing against Sony. If people want it that bad they can spend 100 dollars more and get 40 gigs more hd space.

MetalContra
why do you care? looks like you have one already anyway
Avatar image for Magical_Guy
Magical_Guy

1673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Magical_Guy
Member since 2003 • 1673 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Eltroz

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

There is no reason at all the user has to have two consoles from the same maker to be hooked up to the same TV. If these were games from different makers like Sony AND MS then that would be different. But the user has to have a PS2 and a PS3 hooked up to same TV to play both gens. That is just a dumb move on Sony's part.

since when do you have to have both consoles hooked up at once or on the same tv. last time I checked you could unplug a console from the tv and hook another one up. not hard to do.

Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts
BC is important tbh its ok if you dont own any older gen games but if you do then its important, its been months since i have had both god of wars totaly untouchedfor like 3 months, havent played em once and Resident Evil 4 with only 1 mission completed in like 2 months...now i just cant get to play ps2 coz of xbox 360, now if i had ps3 instead of xbox 360 or if those 3 games were on xbox and i have xbox 360, i would have probably beaten those games by now easily on my next gen console.....its just hard going back to playing older gen systems after next gen lol
Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#14 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts
but the thing is that if you get the new cheaper ps3, it doesn't matter if you dont want to play ps2 games or not. You dont have the option, so it doesn't matter what you want
Avatar image for Dark_Knight6
Dark_Knight6

16619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Dark_Knight6
Member since 2006 • 16619 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Magical_Guy

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

There is no reason at all the user has to have two consoles from the same maker to be hooked up to the same TV. If these were games from different makers like Sony AND MS then that would be different. But the user has to have a PS2 and a PS3 hooked up to same TV to play both gens. That is just a dumb move on Sony's part.

since when do you have to have both consoles hooked up at once or on the same tv. last time I checked you could unplug a console from the tv and hook another one up. not hard to do.

Wow, the whole point of his post went completely over your head. :roll:

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Magical_Guy

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

There is no reason at all the user has to have two consoles from the same maker to be hooked up to the same TV. If these were games from different makers like Sony AND MS then that would be different. But the user has to have a PS2 and a PS3 hooked up to same TV to play both gens. That is just a dumb move on Sony's part.

since when do you have to have both consoles hooked up at once or on the same tv. last time I checked you could unplug a console from the tv and hook another one up. not hard to do.

Fine every time you want to play a PS2 game you have to unhook your PS3 console and then hook up your PS2 console. Next day want to play a PS3 game and then have to unhook your PS2 and then hook up your PS3. That is one way OR sony could have done something smart and just keep the BC. This is going to hurt 40gb sales. You take the console with the largest amount of games, most diverse libary, most AAA. Then you make it not able to run on the next gen console. Heck 80gb only has about 50% BC. The 60gb and 20gb models were good with BC but they discontinued those.
Avatar image for -JayWong-
-JayWong-

1703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 -JayWong-
Member since 2006 • 1703 Posts
Fanboys are truly a spectacle:

Nintendo announces no H
Sheeps: HD SUCKS!

MS announces no next gen format:
Lems:You see, you see..we dont NEED a next gen format! DO YOU SEE?!

MS announces no HDMI and no 1080p:
Lems: HDMI is DVI with audio, and no better than VGA. And the human eye cant even tell teh difference between 1080p! We're paying a premium, but please, MS, ONLY GIVES US WHAT WE NEED, nothing more!

Sony announces rumble in 1990s:
Cows: Wow, truly revolutionary! When the heart beats in the rumble Im ottally immersed!

Sony Announces no rumble for PS3:
Cows: Rumble? Never cared for it. Never told the difference.

Sony announces FULL BC in PS3:
Cows: HAHA Lems, and your last gen software BC! LOL!

Sony announces Software BC:
Cows: Ignore posts insulting them.

Sony announces NO BC at ALL in 40GB:
Cows: Do not want PS2 games anyway, SOOOO many PS3 games. clas.sics and genre defiuning games of last gen dont matter this gen, this is NEXT GEN!!!

I hate you all.
Avatar image for Insane00
Insane00

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 Insane00
Member since 2003 • 1267 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Eltroz

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

There is no reason at all the user has to have two consoles from the same maker to be hooked up to the same TV. If these were games from different makers like Sony AND MS then that would be different. But the user has to have a PS2 and a PS3 hooked up to same TV to play both gens. That is just a dumb move on Sony's part.

Uh, I have a 60 Gb ps3 and I have a ps2 hooked into one of my TVs. As it is I'm gonna take both with me soon so I can play GH2 as well as HS. And, I like to be able to save my ps2 finish games without having to buy a ps2 HD.

Avatar image for Insane00
Insane00

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Insane00
Member since 2003 • 1267 Posts

Fanboys are truly a spectacle:

Nintendo announces no H
Sheeps: HD SUCKS!

MS announces no next gen format:
Lems:You see, you see..we dont NEED a next gen format! DO YOU SEE?!

MS announces no HDMI and no 1080p:
Lems: HDMI is DVI with audio, and no better than VGA. And the human eye cant even tell teh difference between 1080p! We're paying a premium, but please, MS, ONLY GIVES US WHAT WE NEED, nothing more!

Sony announces rumble in 1990s:
Cows: Wow, truly revolutionary! When the heart beats in the rumble Im ottally immersed!

Sony Announces no rumble for PS3:
Cows: Rumble? Never cared for it. Never told the difference.

Sony announces FULL BC in PS3:
Cows: HAHA Lems, and your last gen software BC! LOL!

Sony announces Software BC:
Cows: Ignore posts insulting them.

Sony announces NO BC at ALL in 40GB:
Cows: Do not want PS2 games anyway, SOOOO many PS3 games. clas.sics and genre defiuning games of last gen dont matter this gen, this is NEXT GEN!!!

I hate you all.-JayWong-

Excellent, I love the way you point outthe generalhipocracy. No one group is better than anyone else, ain't that the truth.

Avatar image for Magical_Guy
Magical_Guy

1673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Magical_Guy
Member since 2003 • 1673 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Eltroz

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

There is no reason at all the user has to have two consoles from the same maker to be hooked up to the same TV. If these were games from different makers like Sony AND MS then that would be different. But the user has to have a PS2 and a PS3 hooked up to same TV to play both gens. That is just a dumb move on Sony's part.

since when do you have to have both consoles hooked up at once or on the same tv. last time I checked you could unplug a console from the tv and hook another one up. not hard to do.

Fine every time you want to play a PS2 game you have to unhook your PS3 console and then hook up your PS2 console. Next day want to play a PS3 game and then have to unhook your PS2 and then hook up your PS3. That is one way OR sony could have done something smart and just keep the BC. This is going to hurt 40gb sales. You take the console with the largest amount of games, most diverse libary, most AAA. Then you make it not able to run on the next gen console. Heck 80gb only has about 50% BC. The 60gb and 20gb models were good with BC but they discontinued those.

wow it takes a whole minute to unhook a system and hook up another. If BC was so important to you you should've bought a 60GB/20GB. People wanted a cheaper version they got one. Buy a system with BC, or play the PS2 games on the PS2.

Avatar image for youngtongue
youngtongue

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 youngtongue
Member since 2006 • 990 Posts

Fanboys are truly a spectacle:

Nintendo announces no H
Sheeps: HD SUCKS!

MS announces no next gen format:
Lems:You see, you see..we dont NEED a next gen format! DO YOU SEE?!

MS announces no HDMI and no 1080p:
Lems: HDMI is DVI with audio, and no better than VGA. And the human eye cant even tell teh difference between 1080p! We're paying a premium, but please, MS, ONLY GIVES US WHAT WE NEED, nothing more!

Sony announces rumble in 1990s:
Cows: Wow, truly revolutionary! When the heart beats in the rumble Im ottally immersed!

Sony Announces no rumble for PS3:
Cows: Rumble? Never cared for it. Never told the difference.

Sony announces FULL BC in PS3:
Cows: HAHA Lems, and your last gen software BC! LOL!

Sony announces Software BC:
Cows: Ignore posts insulting them.

Sony announces NO BC at ALL in 40GB:
Cows: Do not want PS2 games anyway, SOOOO many PS3 games. clas.sics and genre defiuning games of last gen dont matter this gen, this is NEXT GEN!!!

I hate you all.-JayWong-

you win this thread *gives medal* *waits for fanboys to say "nuh uh we never said that!"*

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Insane00

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

There is no reason at all the user has to have two consoles from the same maker to be hooked up to the same TV. If these were games from different makers like Sony AND MS then that would be different. But the user has to have a PS2 and a PS3 hooked up to same TV to play both gens. That is just a dumb move on Sony's part.

Uh, I have a 60 Gb ps3 and I have a ps2 hooked into one of my TVs. As it is I'm gonna take both with me soon so I can play GH2 as well as HS. And, I like to be able to save my ps2 finish games without having to buy a ps2 HD.

Fine that is you. The average gamer at least in my opinion will not want multiple consoles hooked up to their Tv or have multiple consoles through out the house. For me I general have one console and PC for gaming. If I buy another console it will be from a different maker for example 360 and PS3. I would not have 360 and Xbox hooked to same TV.
Avatar image for Insane00
Insane00

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 Insane00
Member since 2003 • 1267 Posts
[QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Magical_Guy"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

If BC is not important then why are all the most hyped PS3 games sequels to PS2 games. MGS 4, FF13, GT5, RnC, and all the others. Cows seemed to love those games so much on PS2 that they consider the sequels to be the best upcomming games on PS3. So why would the general fans not want to be able to play them anymore?

face it then BC is not needed is just damage control. I still enjoy last gen games on the 360. Justbecause then gen changed did not make those last gen games any less great.

Eltroz

they can still play them on the PS2. PS2's didn't vanish into thin air when the PS3 was released

There is no reason at all the user has to have two consoles from the same maker to be hooked up to the same TV. If these were games from different makers like Sony AND MS then that would be different. But the user has to have a PS2 and a PS3 hooked up to same TV to play both gens. That is just a dumb move on Sony's part.

since when do you have to have both consoles hooked up at once or on the same tv. last time I checked you could unplug a console from the tv and hook another one up. not hard to do.

Fine every time you want to play a PS2 game you have to unhook your PS3 console and then hook up your PS2 console. Next day want to play a PS3 game and then have to unhook your PS2 and then hook up your PS3. That is one way OR sony could have done something smart and just keep the BC. This is going to hurt 40gb sales. You take the console with the largest amount of games, most diverse libary, most AAA. Then you make it not able to run on the next gen console. Heck 80gb only has about 50% BC. The 60gb and 20gb models were good with BC but they discontinued those.

Dude, I have a Dreamcast, GC, Stereo, ps2, and a ps3 in my TV at the same time. The other one has a Direct TV reciever, a DVD player, a GC, and a ps2 hooked into it. The other one, (the 15 incher) has a Direct TV reciever and a DVD player in it. They're called multiple video inputs, welcome to the 21st cenury.

Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts

PS2 games have been constantly outselling PS3 games every month.

Charts don't lie

shakira shakira

Avatar image for MetalContra
MetalContra

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 MetalContra
Member since 2006 • 1131 Posts
While some people will not buy the 40 gig model because of no bc, a substantail percentage of potentail PS3 buyers are not interested in PS2 software.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#26 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
While some people will not buy the 40 gig model because of no bc, a substantail percentage of potentail PS3 buyers are not interested in PS2 software.MetalContra
Whereas a substantial percentage of potential PS3 buyers are interested in PS2 software. Such as myself.
Avatar image for Hoffgod
Hoffgod

12229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#27 Hoffgod
Member since 2006 • 12229 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]No BC in the PS3 = no buy for me.Magical_Guy

poor guy, can't afford a PS2 :(

Or he could be like me and not have the space for another system hooked up to the TV. Or it could be something else entirely. Either way, stop being so belittling and assumptive. It makes you look silly.
Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16740 Posts

No BC in the PS3 = no buy for me.musicalmac

Buy an 600$ 80gb Ps3 then...

Avatar image for MetalContra
MetalContra

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 MetalContra
Member since 2006 • 1131 Posts

[QUOTE="MetalContra"]While some people will not buy the 40 gig model because of no bc, a substantail percentage of potentail PS3 buyers are not interested in PS2 software.musicalmac
Whereas a substantial percentage of potential PS3 buyers are interested in PS2 software. Such as myself.

I said that in the first part of my statement

Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts
Yeah there's plenty of people that could care less about it. Most hardcore gamers probably do. But since it either costs Sony money to put PS2 hardware inside it or wastes resources to make full emulation then why are you hypocrits complaining about the low end model losing an extra feature. The only reason it exists at all is because they stripped out as much as possible. Either get the high end one or shut up. 360 Core doesn't have BC either, you need the HDD - both sides are equal now.... and the Wii prettymuch IS a gamecube so sheep prettymuch sacrificed next-gen graphics all together for BC lol.
Avatar image for shadowcat2576
shadowcat2576

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#31 shadowcat2576
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts

I think the primary issue is that each new version of the PS3 is getting worse than the ones before it. Yes, we all expect and hope for hardware to come down in price as the generation goes on, but the hardware we buy later is usually identical of slightly better than what was available at launch.

It's silly that the best versions are going to be the refurbished GameStop or ebay ones.

Avatar image for Hoffgod
Hoffgod

12229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 Hoffgod
Member since 2006 • 12229 Posts
But since it either costs Sony money to put PS2 hardware inside it or wastes resources to make full emulation then why are you hypocrits complaining about the low end model losing an extra feature. The only reason it exists at all is because they stripped out as much as possible. Either get the high end one or shut up. 360 Core doesn't have BC either, you need the HDD - both sides are equal now.Lazy_Boy88
Two things: 1. According to the spin masters at Sony, they didn't cut out BC to cut costs, they did it to make people focus on the PS3's expansive library. ...right. 2. The 360 Core can have BC if you attach a HDD. The 40 gig PS3 will never, ever have BC for PS2 games. Ever. One can have it, the other can't. That's not exactly even.