Do you think Sega could make a "Dreamcast 2" and not go bankrupt?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Just asking :D

Avatar image for skanjos
skanjos

647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 skanjos
Member since 2006 • 647 Posts

all they need is a new sonic adventure/shenmue3/shining force 4/phantasy star 5/virtua striker 5/virtua tennis 2011 for starting exclusives . combine those with amazing online and crysis lvl graphics and not only they wont go bankrupt but they will eliminate the competition for the next gen from now....

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

no.

all there is to say.

Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

Sega lack the first party development clout to sustain a console.

And the funds to buy third party exclusivity.

So... no.

Avatar image for Renzokucant
Renzokucant

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 Renzokucant
Member since 2009 • 3157 Posts
probably, but it would be like a nintendo, not os3 or xbox
Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts

Sega lack the first party development clout to sustain a console.

And the funds to buy third party exclusivity.

So... no.

shinrabanshou

I agree completely. Lets see how this turns out.

Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#7 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

I don't think so but maybe if they team up with something like onlive and make that a sega "console" because honestly neither looks able to survive on it's own.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#8 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5593 Posts

Absolutely NOT. Just look at Microsoft they lost $4 billion dollars in their first Xbox. Their second gen had been losing money for it's first couple of years. Even though theirhave been many quarters including this year where their gaming division lost significant money, in other words Microsoft has yet to make an overall PROFIT from their console gaming division. The only reason they are able to sustain this is because they have other source of revenue from their PC software business. Similar story applies to Sony which had MAJOR losses in it's first couple of years but they were able to sustain that due to the profits from their other electronics division. How would Sega would be able to sustain the inevitable losses to their gaming division especially in it's early cycle of new console release given that they don't have any other alternate source of revenue?

So, getting out of the consoles market was the smartest decision they made.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

No. It wouldn't even make it past the planning stages. Sega is not the company it once was. More importantly they no longer have this man as a mascot:

Segata Sanshiro

Segata Sanshiro!

SEGATA SANSHIRO!!

Avatar image for johny300
johny300

12496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 johny300
Member since 2010 • 12496 Posts

Sega lack the first party development clout to sustain a console.

And the funds to buy third party exclusivity.

So... no.

shinrabanshou
Agreed with what you said.
Avatar image for ZIVX
ZIVX

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#11 ZIVX
Member since 2008 • 2981 Posts

Sega failed because of brand loyalty. After nearly a decade what do they have left?

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts

No, and why do people always say "Dreamcast 2?" Sega doesn't make "2's" like Nintendo.

Avatar image for 1PMrFister
1PMrFister

3134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#13 1PMrFister
Member since 2010 • 3134 Posts

No, and why do people always say "Dreamcast 2?" Sega doesn't make "2's" like Nintendo.

Renegade_Fury
When has Nintendo made a system with a "2" in its name? Anyways, Sega needs to fix the issues it has with being a third-party company first before it even thinks about becoming a first-party developer again.
Avatar image for Kane04
Kane04

2115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Kane04
Member since 2006 • 2115 Posts

No, and why do people always say "Dreamcast 2?" Sega doesn't make "2's" like Nintendo.

Renegade_Fury
Just because its easier than "Dreamcast successor" or something like that, its just for the easiness :P And about the topic i don't see Sega getting back at hardware, looking at a market now its like a pack of wild dogs, Sega would have a lot of trouble getting support, and honestly i haven't seen any great software with their stamp lately (IMO at least). I think Sega should roll up their sleeves and get working on Shenmue 3, i can imagine why they haven't yet, it really hard making it with the impact the original had, that game was so awesome, it was like a completely new level far above everything, more like a dream. IMO Sega just cant figure out how to do it again this time and while it saves it for later so they don't ruin it, years go by.
Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts
[QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

No, and why do people always say "Dreamcast 2?" Sega doesn't make "2's" like Nintendo.

1PMrFister
When has Nintendo made a system with a "2" in its name? Anyways, Sega needs to fix the issues it has with being a third-party company first before it even thinks about becoming a first-party developer again.

I wrote that sega is like nintendo. Neither do the "2" thing.
Avatar image for kobraka1
kobraka1

890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 kobraka1
Member since 2009 • 890 Posts

no. they do not make enough good games no more and most of their good development teams no longer exist. smilebit, amusement vision, wow, hitmaker are all gone. AM2 hasnt made a game in forever,and sonic team is norrible now.

Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts

I suppose they could release a console with decent to low end specs, price it at $70-$99

Put all their first party games on it.

Or a handheld, that'd probably be the most logical, if priced reasonably. But who wants any of this?

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#18 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

No...there's not enough room for a 4th console. There's no way Sega could get a foot back in the door unless Sony or Microsoft leaves the console business. This andSega is no where near the company it was during the Genesis / Saturn days. Now it's just a software company and not a very good one.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#19 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
Of course they could. So long as we aren't specific as to how powerful the system is, how much they intend to market it and how much they intend to sell.
Avatar image for erglesmergle
erglesmergle

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 erglesmergle
Member since 2009 • 1769 Posts

all they need is a new sonic adventure/shenmue3/shining force 4/phantasy star 5/virtua striker 5/virtua tennis 2011 for starting exclusives . combine those with amazing online and crysis lvl graphics and not only they wont go bankrupt but they will eliminate the competition for the next gen from now....

skanjos

All those titles you mentioned would be HORRIBLE launch titles and would not jumpstart the returning console.

Avatar image for reggy72
reggy72

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 reggy72
Member since 2008 • 145 Posts

The irony, It does make me laugh how cool it is to like the Dreamcast and dream the return of Sega to the home market, yet by the same token the key reason the Dreamcast failed was because you all brought Sony hardware and falled for the PR crap that Sony spouted before the launch of Playstation2 promising the world, reality synthesiser emotion engine blah blah. Sure Sega did play apart in there own demise with mis-management pretty much from day one, but the picture on here and any other gaming forum is that everyone brought Dreamcast, and lets be honest most of you didn't.

Avatar image for edinsftw
edinsftw

4243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 edinsftw
Member since 2009 • 4243 Posts

I wuld get it, the dreamcast was actually very good, plus if they went back to classic sonic...and crazy taxi 2 ;p

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#23 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

nope

3 is enough to begin with

nintendo is the main player which is why they aint gone bankrupt

sony keeps pushing for higher storage standards they should stay

microsoft hit or miss