Does it make sense to build a gaming Pc now?

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for aia89
aia89

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By aia89
Member since 2009 • 2828 Posts

My motherboard recently died, moreover I also need to upgrade my gpu. Rest of the specs are fine. My question is whether it's worth upgrading now or holding off until the next console iterations to choose adequate hardware to upgrade my Pc with - comparable or superior to the console counterparts - and from the time being buy either an xbox one or a ps4.

Thanks for your advice!

Avatar image for X_CAPCOM_X
X_CAPCOM_X

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 X_CAPCOM_X
Member since 2004 • 9625 Posts

I would upgrade, as you can adopt next gen consoles at any time during their lifespan. I wait for exclusive games to release on the platform that are worth the price of the platform.

There's my change on the matter.

Avatar image for neutrinoworks
NeutrinoWorks

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By NeutrinoWorks
Member since 2018 • 75 Posts

If your PC is old and your motherboard died you'll need to get a similar motherboard and they're likely discontinued and over priced brand new. You'll need to look for used motherboards on eBay.

For GPU, just get the best bang for your buck you can get. Which is probably an RX 580 8GB for $170, or an RX570 for $130, both come with 2 free games which you can sell or keep

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48885 Posts

Always beats getting a console.

Avatar image for zeggelaar
Zeggelaar

181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Zeggelaar
Member since 2017 • 181 Posts

Gaming PC can mean anything, I just refurbished a Dell Inspiron running XP, it is a duel core at 2.00 ghz with 1 gb of ram, with capacity to go up to four. I'm putting in an Radeon HD 4850. It allows me to play a lot of great games. I picked up Command and Conquer The first decade, Starwars Repulic Commando, Beyond Good vs Evil, Morrowind, Oblivion, Diablo 1/2 + Expansions, Starcraft + Expansion, Warcraft 1/2/3 + expansion, Half-Life 1/2, Baulder's Gate 2, Roller Coaster Tycoon, Sim City, Sin, No One Lives Forever plus a ton of old PC games you could pick up used at max $5 and this is all physical copies. This could be considered PC gaming. I know what you mean but there are tons of great games that aren't graphic pushing but still very fun. In my opinion this is one of the huge pluses of PC gaming, our backwards compatibility blows everything else out of the water. PC gaming is pretty much what you want to make it and that is the big edge it has over consoles besides better graphics and specs (of course at a higher cost), and we actually have more exclusives, and before people rush in and say that our exclusives suck, it is literally a matter of preference, I enjoyed a lot of the Sony exclusives but I would hardly call them my personal favorite games.

I went off on a ramble, but over all I think it makes more sense to just invest into a better PC over consoles

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

I assemble a PC to play games I want to play, not compare it to console specs. I don't care if the console specs are better.

I don't even care about PC dick-measuring contests such as benchmarks. I'm perfectly happy if the game runs well enough. It's always about the games.

Avatar image for robert_sparkes
robert_sparkes

7785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 robert_sparkes
Member since 2018 • 7785 Posts

The thing which has intrigued me with pc gaming is not needing to upgrade as often. I've already gone through the base Xbox one and now own the S possibly upgrading to the x at some point. With pc you can be good at decent settings for a while.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

@aia89 said:

My motherboard recently died, moreover I also need to upgrade my gpu. Rest of the specs are fine. My question is whether it's worth upgrading now or holding off until the next console iterations to choose adequate hardware to upgrade my Pc with - comparable or superior to the console counterparts - and from the time being buy either an xbox one or a ps4.

Thanks for your advice!

If you go the AMD route you have the ability to upgrade that AM4 to newer cpu models. I would grab a Ryzen 2600/ 2600x or 2700x with B450 board and you will be set . As for gpu, depending on what you had before, RX 580 or RX 590 will hold you over for awhile yet.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f4e2292197f1
deactivated-5f4e2292197f1

1374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By deactivated-5f4e2292197f1
Member since 2015 • 1374 Posts

Now as good as anytime in last 2 years, so the way things are, get it while the getting is good.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

16563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 5

#10 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 16563 Posts

The RTX 2060 seems like a worth it purchase especially with reviews of how amazing it held up in 2K gaming. 60fps, ultra or very high settings in recent games. A good entry card for budget 4k too.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#11 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58537 Posts

The answer is always gonna be yes! Never wait for next-gen consoles to give you an idea on what to have for your PC build. You build a PC the way you build it to do, play games as you see fit. I build my PC to game in 1440p resolution max settings only, no more, no less.

As of right now, GPU & Ram have drop in prices so low, you can now build a PC for $600 which is the sweet spot for those who just want to play games on a much better hardware then what consoles can provide and the PC benefits of free online & open-platform is still going to be the huge advantage over consoles, that is a straight up fact! Like what @sakaixx said, the newest RTX 2060 is a good GPU purchase for only $350 and more of a future-proof GPU at that. I was really impress from the benchmarks showed.

And finally, if you have a PC, it makes zero sense to go buy an Xbox One now that you can play just about all of MS games on PC unless you really like Halo, then buy Xbox One to play Halo. PS4 however should be treated to play exclusive games only & watching Blu-Ray movies. When it comes to PC & consoles, PC always and should be the main priority before consoles but that's my opinion.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

16563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 5

#12 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 16563 Posts

@davillain-: watch out, lems gonna have a go at you for telling not to buy xbox one lol

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#13 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58537 Posts

@sakaixx said:

@davillain-: watch out, lems gonna have a go at you for telling not to buy xbox one lol

Oh let them. Lems can't handle the truth when I say it like it is. Owning a PC makes zero sense buying an Xbox One now.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts

It's worth it. With how cheap processors are, you can build a partially 4k machine for less than 1000 bucks if you live in the states. Not sure about other country pricing.

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/jwXfgw

Above is a 2070 build with an i3 8100.

It will run many games at 4k, but you will need to turn down settings for some of the more intensive ones.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

47418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 47418 Posts

If you're a PC person, then get it whenever you want. If you're not that crazy about PC, wait until next gen consoles come out.

Avatar image for boxrekt
BoxRekt

2425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#16  Edited By BoxRekt
Member since 2019 • 2425 Posts

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck.

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC.

Avatar image for kali-b1rd
Kali-B1rd

2241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#17 Kali-B1rd
Member since 2018 • 2241 Posts
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Avatar image for drvikasgupta12
drvikasgupta12

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#18 drvikasgupta12
Member since 2019 • 3 Posts

yes sometimes it does..

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#19 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

If you dont have a capable one already, and youre planning to build a good one then yes, it always makes sense.

Avatar image for Gatygun
Gatygun

2709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Gatygun
Member since 2010 • 2709 Posts

If you can wait i would personally wait and sit it out if you don't need more then a console with a console until next generation arrives. So you can buy something more future proof.

However PC has so ridicilious amount of content that even a budget gaming setup at this day will be enough to run mostly everything.

Avatar image for jasonofa36
JasonOfA36

3725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 JasonOfA36
Member since 2016 • 3725 Posts

While prices are stable, I say yes. RAM prices might be going down later this year, but no one knows when. But RAM prices are okay right now.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61974 Posts

It's a pretty solid time to buy... Though prices were just jacked on 1080ti's on Newegg. No doubt to try to push the 2080ti, but the 2070 is still a reasonable(ish) price.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

To replace a broken one? Any time is a good time for that, imo...

If you already have a decent CPU and a 1070+ gpu I doubt that there will be much reason to upgrade the next 2-3 years unless you want to use a fancy 2k/4k display without gsync/freesync, or NEED 100+ fps performance on all games.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#24 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60619 Posts

fam', it's always a good time to build a new PC

Just be sure to spend like 10,000 dollars. Because apparently that's how much it cost. Which shouldn't be a problem; like me, you are probably saving tons of money not paying rent since you live in your parent's basement.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#25 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60619 Posts

@kali-b1rd said:
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Well done.

That original post was like reading a really long Trump tweet. Full of nonsense and lies.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:

Always beats getting a console.

Highly subjective. If you want certain exclusives and dont care much about having "da best performance" then getting a console beats building a gaming PC

Avatar image for boxrekt
BoxRekt

2425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#27 BoxRekt
Member since 2019 • 2425 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Well done.

That original post was like reading a really long Trump tweet. Full of nonsense and lies.

There are 0 stand out games on PC this generation and the best looking games on PC games are console ports so my post is pretty much spot on.

The best games of every generation are Console exclusives or console multiplats.

Sorry if the truth hurts.

In 2018 5 years after PS4 launched on 2013 hardware Sony released God of War and stopped every PC game this generation. The year before Horizon Zero Dawn did the same. Even console exclusive shared between PS4 and Xbox One takes dumps on any PC game.

When next gen systems launch they will carry over this generation's library which has higher quality games than the shovelware steam library PC fans are forced to deal with. I have a gaming PC and the best games are console multiplats and console remasters. Consoles will have better games from the start with high quality AAA exclusives something PC fans can only dream about.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48885 Posts

@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:

Always beats getting a console.

Highly subjective. If you want certain exclusives and dont care much about having "da best performance" then getting a console beats building a gaming PC

Nope, always.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@boxrekt said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Well done.

That original post was like reading a really long Trump tweet. Full of nonsense and lies.

There are 0 stand out games on PC this generation and the best looking games on PC games are console ports so my post is pretty much spot on.

The best games of every generation are Console exclusives or console multiplats.

Sorry if the truth hurts.

In 2018 5 years after PS4 launched on 2013 hardware Sony released God of War and stopped every PC game this generation. The year before Horizon Zero Dawn did the same. Even console exclusive shared between PS4 and Xbox One takes dumps on any PC game.

When next gen systems launch they will carry over this generation's library which has higher quality games than the shovelware steam library PC fans are forced to deal with. I have a gaming PC and the best games are console multiplats and console remasters. Consoles will have better games from the start with high quality AAA exclusives something PC fans can only dream about.

Classic Recloud post

Avatar image for kali-b1rd
Kali-B1rd

2241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#30 Kali-B1rd
Member since 2018 • 2241 Posts
@MonsieurX said:
@boxrekt said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Well done.

That original post was like reading a really long Trump tweet. Full of nonsense and lies.

There are 0 stand out games on PC this generation and the best looking games on PC games are console ports so my post is pretty much spot on.

The best games of every generation are Console exclusives or console multiplats.

Sorry if the truth hurts.

In 2018 5 years after PS4 launched on 2013 hardware Sony released God of War and stopped every PC game this generation. The year before Horizon Zero Dawn did the same. Even console exclusive shared between PS4 and Xbox One takes dumps on any PC game.

When next gen systems launch they will carry over this generation's library which has higher quality games than the shovelware steam library PC fans are forced to deal with. I have a gaming PC and the best games are console multiplats and console remasters. Consoles will have better games from the start with high quality AAA exclusives something PC fans can only dream about.

Classic Recloud post

That's what I was thinking.

ReCloud or Geo? not enough Atmos or HDR to be Geo.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@kali-b1rd said:
@MonsieurX said:

Classic Recloud post

That's what I was thinking.

ReCloud or Geo? not enough Atmos or HDR to be Geo.

Geo didn't really give a shit about the exclusives part nor the PS4

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

11617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#32  Edited By with_teeth26
Member since 2007 • 11617 Posts
@boxrekt said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Well done.

That original post was like reading a really long Trump tweet. Full of nonsense and lies.

There are 0 stand out games on PC this generation and the best looking games on PC games are console ports so my post is pretty much spot on.

The best games of every generation are Console exclusives or console multiplats.

Sorry if the truth hurts.

In 2018 5 years after PS4 launched on 2013 hardware Sony released God of War and stopped every PC game this generation. The year before Horizon Zero Dawn did the same. Even console exclusive shared between PS4 and Xbox One takes dumps on any PC game.

When next gen systems launch they will carry over this generation's library which has higher quality games than the shovelware steam library PC fans are forced to deal with. I have a gaming PC and the best games are console multiplats and console remasters. Consoles will have better games from the start with high quality AAA exclusives something PC fans can only dream about.

I think you are trying to say "0 stand out exclusives" but even that isn't correct

high MC score, huge marketing and even GOTY awards isn't what determines a 'standout exclusive.'

If you are into strategy games, PC is still the only real option. Total War: Warhammer II, Homeworld: Deserts of Kharak, They Are Billions (still in early access but already fantastic) are all standout exclusives. I could name more, these are just the ones i've personally hugely enjoyed, probably moreso than any PS4 exclusive this gen. There are plenty of other niche genres that only really exist on PC, and just because a game in one of these niches doesn't get rave-reviews on MC like some game made to appeal to as wide an audience as possible, doesn't mean they aren't stand-out exclusives/games to those who are into that niche.

I do agree that when it comes to graphics, that gap isn't really there anymore - the best looking games on consoles and the best looking games on PC are at a point where excessive nitpicking is required to find any real differences and most people won't notice. That is just a byproduct of how far visuals have advanced on all platforms. For now, PC still has a critical advantage when it comes to performance, something console gamers claim isn't that important but I strongly disagree. I will get a lot more enjoyment out of the same game running at at steady 60+fps compared to 30 (or less than 30 in some cases).

Yes more PC games are coming to consoles, but the reverse is also true. PC gets the entire Xbox first-party lineup now, plus quite a few Sony and Nintendo first party games that come to PC but not other consoles. there are just way less exclusives in general.

Consoles definitely offer the best bang for your buck, but PC still offers the best overall. plus, I'm confident that if you can afford a nice gaming PC, you can afford to spend a few hundred on a console or two for those handful of worthwhile exclusives that come out every year.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#33  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62534 Posts

Wait until next-gen.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts
@mrbojangles25 said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Well done.

That original post was like reading a really long Trump tweet. Full of nonsense and lies.

He thinks Star Citizen will be on console? Wow, the delusions. Lol

Avatar image for pyro1245
pyro1245

9525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#35 pyro1245
Member since 2003 • 9525 Posts

It is a good time to build a system.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#36 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60619 Posts

@boxrekt said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Well done.

That original post was like reading a really long Trump tweet. Full of nonsense and lies.

There are 0 stand out games on PC this generation and the best looking games on PC games are console ports so my post is pretty much spot on.

The best games of every generation are Console exclusives or console multiplats.

Sorry if the truth hurts.

In 2018 5 years after PS4 launched on 2013 hardware Sony released God of War and stopped every PC game this generation. The year before Horizon Zero Dawn did the same. Even console exclusive shared between PS4 and Xbox One takes dumps on any PC game.

A bunch of nonsense interspersed with words the non-gaming suits that forced consoles down your throat tell you to say. Needs more "4K" and "60 fps" though.

Can you give me some examples, maybe some of your own opinions? How did GoW "stop" PC gaming? How do they take "dumps" on PC?

You seem to think that PC and console are in some sort of competition. They're not. PC is a shark out in the big ocean, doing it's own thing; if consoles wanted to be less petty about shit, they could come out into the ocean too. There's plenty of room.

But no, consoles are a big fish in a small pond, concerned with the limited space. Console-supporting sycophants keep being like "CONSOLE DID THIS!!! Nyah nyah nyah" and I feel like my only response is "Gee, that's cool, buddy, good for you" because I don't really care, but it quickly gets to the point of "Dude, you're annoying the shit out of me, come up with some original thoughts or leave"

@boxrekt said:

...

When next gen systems launch they will carry over this generation's library which has higher quality games than the shovelware steam library PC fans are forced to deal with.

That's an awful lot of speculation for something that is not coming to market soon, especially in the context that these console makers treat backwards compatibility like a really huge inconvenience.

And if the masterpieces I've been enjoying on PC are shovelware, then pile it on.

@boxrekt said:

...

I have a gaming PC and the best games are console multiplats and console remasters. Consoles will have better games from the start with high quality AAA exclusives something PC fans can only dream about.

The best games are the ones you enjoy. Come up with your own opinions and just play what you want, on whatever platform you enjoy.

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11895 Posts

I'd say depending on what your GPU is if isn't something to old/weak for your needs I'd keep it around for at least another year/till the next line of GPUs come out and just replace the motherboard.

@with_teeth26 said:
@boxrekt said:
@mrbojangles25 said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@boxrekt said:

Just depends on how much bang you want for you buck. Which on this forum is a narrow minded view of "mah games are pretty" as apposed to the bigger picture (range of games, performance etc)

Next gen consoles will 100% give you more bang for you buck with $500 all in one system compared to upgrading to any high end PC build. Next gen systems are aiming for 4k 60fps and consoles will last an entire generation 5 to 8 years without needing to upgrade or invest in parts. "aiming for 4k 60 FPS" yea, just like the PS3 was aiming for 1080p 120 FPS super computing... stop the bull. They will choose graphics over 4k 60fps as usual.

If you care about the best graphics, you can be sure they're going to be on consoles no matter what PC build you have because PC and multiplat devs aren't going to max out games they development just like this gen. console exclusive devs on the other hand are going to code to the metal and produce the most amazing games you've ever seen with full system capability. But if you care about games in general the PC would be the better choice, more genres, more high quality exclusives overall, best backwards compatibility, more features, mods etc.

Furthermore, PC games are more and more frequent on consoles. With how powerful next gen systems with be and them using X86 architecture games being made specifically for PC, other than low quality basement developed titles, will be virtually non existent. Star Citizen will most likely be seen on consoles shortly after it launches on PC. Some of those "basement" titles are worth more than a 20 hour action TPS... no matter how pretty it looks.

bringing some balance back in here.

Well done.

That original post was like reading a really long Trump tweet. Full of nonsense and lies.

There are 0 stand out games on PC this generation and the best looking games on PC games are console ports so my post is pretty much spot on.

The best games of every generation are Console exclusives or console multiplats.

Sorry if the truth hurts.

In 2018 5 years after PS4 launched on 2013 hardware Sony released God of War and stopped every PC game this generation. The year before Horizon Zero Dawn did the same. Even console exclusive shared between PS4 and Xbox One takes dumps on any PC game.

When next gen systems launch they will carry over this generation's library which has higher quality games than the shovelware steam library PC fans are forced to deal with. I have a gaming PC and the best games are console multiplats and console remasters. Consoles will have better games from the start with high quality AAA exclusives something PC fans can only dream about.

I think you are trying to say "0 stand out exclusives" but even that isn't correct

high MC score, huge marketing and even GOTY awards isn't what determines a 'standout exclusive.'

If you are into strategy games, PC is still the only real option. Total War: Warhammer II, Homeworld: Deserts of Kharak, They Are Billions (still in early access but already fantastic) are all standout exclusives. I could name more, these are just the ones i've personally hugely enjoyed, probably moreso than any PS4 exclusive this gen. There are plenty of other niche genres that only really exist on PC, and just because a game in one of these niches doesn't get rave-reviews on MC like some game made to appeal to as wide an audience as possible, doesn't mean they aren't stand-out exclusives/games to those who are into that niche.

I do agree that when it comes to graphics, that gap isn't really there anymore - the best looking games on consoles and the best looking games on PC are at a point where excessive nitpicking is required to find any real differences and most people won't notice. That is just a byproduct of how far visuals have advanced on all platforms. For now, PC still has a critical advantage when it comes to performance, something console gamers claim isn't that important but I strongly disagree. I will get a lot more enjoyment out of the same game running at at steady 60+fps compared to 30 (or less than 30 in some cases).

Yes more PC games are coming to consoles, but the reverse is also true. PC gets the entire Xbox first-party lineup now, plus quite a few Sony and Nintendo first party games that come to PC but not other consoles. there are just way less exclusives in general.

Consoles definitely offer the best bang for your buck, but PC still offers the best overall. plus, I'm confident that if you can afford a nice gaming PC, you can afford to spend a few hundred on a console or two for those handful of worthwhile exclusives that come out every year.

Nevermind how most of the biggest and trendiest games and genres this past decade are only on PC or originated there first such as PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, DayZ, Undertale, League Of Legends and DOTA 2. But since some of these games came to consoles or in genres console gamers don't find as appealing (anything not a third person action game or FPS) they don't count and are considered irrelevant. These games coming to consoles sure didn't significantly damage the amount of people wanting to transition over to PC. There so many games on PC and still coming to it that even when some of them still come to consoles there is still a lot exclusively to chose from and some of the games that do come to consoles may end up taking more than a year to come over.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#38 deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:

Always beats getting a console.

Highly subjective. If you want certain exclusives and dont care much about having "da best performance" then getting a console beats building a gaming PC

Nope, always.

You're wrong. Fact

Avatar image for kali-b1rd
Kali-B1rd

2241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#39 Kali-B1rd
Member since 2018 • 2241 Posts
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:

Always beats getting a console.

Highly subjective. If you want certain exclusives and dont care much about having "da best performance" then getting a console beats building a gaming PC

Nope, always.

You're wrong. Fact

Any argument is made redundant when personal "I dont care" comes into it.

FACTUALLY, PC is best performance.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#40 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58537 Posts

@kali-b1rd said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:

Always beats getting a console.

Highly subjective. If you want certain exclusives and dont care much about having "da best performance" then getting a console beats building a gaming PC

Nope, always.

You're wrong. Fact

Any argument is made redundant when personal "I dont care" comes into it.

FACTUALLY, PC is best performance.

These console gamers here tend to forget that PC has an advantage over consoles. Console gamers are still and don't have a choice but to pay online, PC gamers don't. Sorry but I'll take PC gaming online free over a greedy locked online console. Nintendo used to be friendly online but not anymore :(

Avatar image for kali-b1rd
Kali-B1rd

2241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#41  Edited By Kali-B1rd
Member since 2018 • 2241 Posts
@davillain- said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:

Nope, always.

You're wrong. Fact

Any argument is made redundant when personal "I dont care" comes into it.

FACTUALLY, PC is best performance.

These console gamers here tend to forget that PC has an advantage over consoles. Console gamers are still and don't have a choice but to pay online, PC gamers don't. Sorry but I'll take PC gaming online free over a greedy locked online console. Nintendo used to be friendly online but not anymore :(

Indeed.

Competitive Game Pricing.

Option of Graphics vs Performance (or both if the wallet is willing)

Biggest range of genres and games.

Why would a Strategy fan worry about a metacritic score of 9.5 of God of War? All that tells me is God of War is a PRIME adventure game. buy Cows logic I should ignore God of War and go play Ocarina of Time instead.... (which to be fair, I'm more likely to replay Ocarina of Time than God of War.... ever.)

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

48885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 48885 Posts

@davillain- said:

These console gamers here tend to forget that PC has an advantage over consoles. Console gamers are still and don't have a choice but to pay online, PC gamers don't. Sorry but I'll take PC gaming online free over a greedy locked online console. Nintendo used to be friendly online but not anymore :(

Even more insult to injury: you're not even paying for servers or for games to stay online, you are just paying the platform holder because he holds half your game ransom.

Switch online is still as bad as Wii U's was, but now it comes with a price.

Most PS4 and Xbone games offer peer to peer connections, so there aren't even servers that have to be paid for ...

Avatar image for the_old_gods
The_Old_Gods

9

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#43 The_Old_Gods
Member since 2019 • 9 Posts

It's very expensive to build right now, I would personally wait for AMD cards to release later this year and see if that drives down the Nvidia (Ray Tracing) Premium.

Avatar image for SchnabbleTab
SchnabbleTab

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 SchnabbleTab
Member since 2013 • 1488 Posts

@aia89 said:
Does it make sense to build a gaming Pc now?

Yes.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#45 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

actually now is a great time to upgrade. Prices for CPUs/Motherboards and GPUs are the lowest they have been for quite some time. You can get a 6 core 12 thread ryzen 2600 for 160-170 or even the slightly slower 1600 for about 130-140. Decent b350-b450 mobos are as low as 70-80 and GPUs with the same or slightly better performance compared to xbox1x start from as little as 140 ( rx 570/rx 580 and gtx 1060 ). Even RAM prices almost drop to normal levels ( still a bit expensive but prices are the lowest we have seen in a couple of years )

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@kali-b1rd said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:

Always beats getting a console.

Highly subjective. If you want certain exclusives and dont care much about having "da best performance" then getting a console beats building a gaming PC

Nope, always.

You're wrong. Fact

Any argument is made redundant when personal "I dont care" comes into it.

FACTUALLY, PC is best performance.

Ugh, you PC fanboys are pathetic... The fact I debated wasnt about the performance but the fact bulding a gaming PC isnt "always" the best option if you dont care about having the best performance but actually playing certain exclusives. So yeah, thats subjective and that was the fact I was talking about. Learn to read before making a fool out of yourself

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@davillain- said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:
@Vatusus said:

Highly subjective. If you want certain exclusives and dont care much about having "da best performance" then getting a console beats building a gaming PC

Nope, always.

You're wrong. Fact

Any argument is made redundant when personal "I dont care" comes into it.

FACTUALLY, PC is best performance.

These console gamers here tend to forget that PC has an advantage over consoles. Console gamers are still and don't have a choice but to pay online, PC gamers don't. Sorry but I'll take PC gaming online free over a greedy locked online console. Nintendo used to be friendly online but not anymore :(

Again, read the context of the conversation before replying. I swear, is like people only read the last sentence or something...

Avatar image for kali-b1rd
Kali-B1rd

2241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#48 Kali-B1rd
Member since 2018 • 2241 Posts
@Vatusus said:
@kali-b1rd said:
@Vatusus said:
@R4gn4r0k said:
@Vatusus said:

Highly subjective. If you want certain exclusives and dont care much about having "da best performance" then getting a console beats building a gaming PC

Nope, always.

You're wrong. Fact

Any argument is made redundant when personal "I dont care" comes into it.

FACTUALLY, PC is best performance.

Ugh, you PC fanboys are pathetic... The fact I debated wasnt about the performance but the fact bulding a gaming PC isnt "always" the best option if you dont care about having the best performance but actually playing certain exclusives. So yeah, thats subjective and that was the fact I was talking about. Learn to read before making a fool out of yourself

Which again is a "I don't care about the 150+ AA+ exclusives and much better performance on 99% of games" personal preference.... which again, is not grounded in anything other than personal opinion.

Besides, the exclusives debate is dying. Xbox exclusives are on PC, PS Now is leaking more games, only a matter of time before games like God of War are on there. In console world outside of Nintendo, the only exclusives will be timed exclusives.

inb4 "Buh buh PS Now is low rez" ... well yea, we said 99% of games, not 100%.

Avatar image for that_old_guy
That_Old_Guy

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#49  Edited By That_Old_Guy
Member since 2018 • 1233 Posts

Depends on if you’re gonna play the 90% of exclusives that can run on a toaster and are half baked.

If so then yes.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#50  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@kali-b1rd said:

which again, is not grounded in anything other than personal opinion.

Yes, wich was the f*vkin point. Ragnarok was saying building a PC was "always" the best option, wich it isnt if it comes to personal preference. Again, or you're just missing the context of my reply on purpose or it really bothers you some people dont actually care about PC's higher performance. 90 million of people seem to not care since they bought a PS4. Cry moar

Also, any PSNow games that might or might not release is just conjecture on your part so, atm, its irrelevant for the conversation at hand