[QUOTE="tylergamereview"]Yes, it does. A lot. A whole lot of people here will tell you Ocarina of Time is the greatest game ever, but if it was released today, it would be awful. Standards rise with time, and time almost never treats games well. Ocarina of time, FF 7, Goldeneye, and others were all fantastic back in the day, but by todays standards, they are mediocre at best. I still enjoy a few classics, but never as much things released today.Mr_Nordquist
What if the same excitement and thrill you got when you first played a game like Ocarina of Time has never been met by any other game?
I still play Banjo Kazooie because it's my favorite game, and I like it just as much as I did when I first got it every playthrough. No other game has given me that much enjoyment, so I can easily compare it to new games.
There's no reason Ocarina of Time can't be the best game ever made if more people like that than any other game. Just shows how good of a game it is.
That's the point. By the standards of video games today, those games are awful, but by personal enjoyment, they are timeless. It just depends on how you look at it. For all intents and purposes, Mario is awful as hell. You can only move in one direction, the graphics are pixels, the sound is all beeps and boops, and the story consists of one line. But it is still ridiculously fun. And just about everyone who touched it loved it. I still love it, but I know that compared to a platformer like Uncharted, it is terrible. Everything by standards goes to Uncharted. But I enjoy Mario more than Uncharted. You can't compare games based on how much you enjoyed them and based on how good they actually are. Uncharted is better that Mario, but I enjoyed Mario more than Uncharted. How do I decide which one is better? It would look pretty strange to say "Mario is better than Uncharted because I enjoyed it more". This is how nostalgia effects us. Just because we enjoy the older game more does not mean it is better than newer things today.
Log in to comment