Duke Nukem Forever PC AAAA?

Hey guys, do you think DNF on PC will get AAAA(10). I know it's been getting bad reviews on lesser review sites such as IGN but from what I've played on the demo, it's actually quite innovative. It has regeneration health and dual guns. I love it, it's fun and it has sexy females all over it. I think this game is perfect and could get an AAAA.

I think all the other versions reviewed so far has been the console (Xbox and PS3) versions, which lack the graphical power of the PC. As there are many lag claims, the PC will have no problem as it's the most powerful of all. I do not experience any lag....

Then there's the point of this game's development period, it's 10 years. I mean guys seriously, give these guys some credit for sustaining development for so long, you should go buy it just for that.

Just my two cents.

Cheeers

Quick answer no.

Some people need to turn on their sarcasm radars....

Health regen + Dual weapon + Sexy Females + Nice graphics = Perfection?

Sounds right to me

I watched an hours worth of gameply and unfortunately it's taken on so many of the bad design elements of modern games, like boring scriped levels with crappy set-pieces forcing you to do things they should have left open to the player to choose to do or not, very generic looking graphics with that shiny look to the enemies and that boring semi-realistic look to everthing, enemies that hit you almost every time, and so on, so to me it's only going to get AA-AAA at best, and to be fair that's all it deserves.

This new Duke Nukem is not a patch on the original Duke Nukem 3D and has lost a lot of stuff that made that original game so special in the first place.

This is no Duke Nukem game, its more like Duke Nukem: Theme Park Land. So many mini games to do yet they seem to have forgot what a Duke Nukem game is. So many annoying scripted events and only one path to follow. Hell it takes 30-40mins before you get to start shooting.

It's not hip enough

Nope

Even an AAAA score is much too low for the best game of the year.

I thought you hated the PC Olimar? I mean come on, at least have some semblance of consistency in your posts.

It's not hip enough

edidili

Hey guys, do you think DNF on PC will get AAAA(10). I know it's been getting bad reviews on lesser review sites such as IGN but from what I've played on the demo, it's actually quite innovative. It has regeneration health and dual guns. I love it, it's fun and it has sexy females all over it. I think this game is perfect and could get an AAAA.

I think all the other versions reviewed so far has been the console (Xbox and PS3) versions, which lack the graphical power of the PC. As there are many lag claims, the PC will have no problem as it's the most powerful of all. I do not experience any lag....

Then there's the point of this game's development period, it's 10 years. I mean guys seriously, give these guys some credit for sustaining development for so long, you should go buy it just for that.

Just my two cents.

Cheeers

Olimar_the_Min

Bad troll thread is bad.

I watched an hours worth of gameply and unfortunately it's taken on so many of the bad design elements of modern games, like boring scriped levels with crappy set-pieces forcing you to do things they should have left open to the player to choose to do or not, very generic looking graphics with that shiny look to the enemies and that boring semi-realistic look to everthing, enemies that hit you almost every time, and so on, so to me it's only going to get AA-AAA at best, and to be fair that's all it deserves.

This new Duke Nukem is not a patch on the original Duke Nukem 3D and has lost a lot of stuff that made that original game so special in the first place.

amaneuvering

[QUOTE="amaneuvering"]

I watched an hours worth of gameply and unfortunately it's taken on so many of the bad design elements of modern games, like boring scriped levels with crappy set-pieces forcing you to do things they should have left open to the player to choose to do or not, very generic looking graphics with that shiny look to the enemies and that boring semi-realistic look to everthing, enemies that hit you almost every time, and so on, so to me it's only going to get AA-AAA at best, and to be fair that's all it deserves.

This new Duke Nukem is not a patch on the original Duke Nukem 3D and has lost a lot of stuff that made that original game so special in the first place.

Olimar_the_Min

[QUOTE="Olimar_the_Min"][QUOTE="amaneuvering"]

I watched an hours worth of gameply and unfortunately it's taken on so many of the bad design elements of modern games, like boring scriped levels with crappy set-pieces forcing you to do things they should have left open to the player to choose to do or not, very generic looking graphics with that shiny look to the enemies and that boring semi-realistic look to everthing, enemies that hit you almost every time, and so on, so to me it's only going to get AA-AAA at best, and to be fair that's all it deserves.

This new Duke Nukem is not a patch on the original Duke Nukem 3D and has lost a lot of stuff that made that original game so special in the first place.

ocstew

Someone's expectations is too high.

No way it'll outscore Crysis 1.

Mods? I guess. Normal game? Probably not.